Assignment;
Take a moment and reflect on the different people and experiences, both good and bad, that shape who you are today. This week you focus on social psychology and ethics in social psychology research by exploring some of Pat’s relationships in the case study.
Below you hear from Pat’s boss, best friend, medical doctor and her mother. As you read how each person describes Pat, begin to hypothesize how you think Pat interacts socially. Also, consider how you can study someone like Pat in an ethical manner.
Pat’s boss: Pat is somewhat of a laidback worker. She does not seem to take her work seriously. She is late getting to work sometimes, and she takes long breaks to smoke and to be alone.
Pat’s best friend: Pat has had a rough life. She suffers from a lot of emotional stuff. She is a good person, though. She just has it tough. I have had a rough life, so I know a little of what she’s going through.
Pat’s medical doctor: Pat has always done better in groups. When she was in the hospital, she seemed to be able to complete tasks better, and she seemed to be able to make better decisions for herself. I think this was, in part, because she had other people around her who could encourage her.
Pat’s mom: I wish she would stop smoking. She used to tell me she wanted to stop smoking. She must have tried a million times. She just never could do it. After a while, she started saying that she did not want to stop smoking because “I’m going to die anyway. I like smoking. It calms me down, and we are all going to die someday.”
As you read through this week’s resources, reflect on Pat’s different relationships. Consider how the different social psychology concepts and research apply to the Pat case study.
Week 3 Learning Resources
This page contains the Learning Resources for this week. Be sure to scroll down the page to see all of this week’s assigned Learning Resources.
Required Resources
| Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus. |
Readings
- Myers, D. G. (2014). Exploring psychology, in modules (9th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
- Module 36, “Social Thinking and Social Influence” (pp. 490–509)
- Module 37, “Antisocial Relations” (pp. 510–523)
- Blass, T. (2002). The man who shocked the world. Psychology Today, 35(2), 68–74.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
This article reviews the Milgram study and highlights why the results changed how psychologists understood social influences. - Walden Univerisity. (2013). Social change. Retrieved from http://www.waldenu.edu/about/social-change
Media
- Ludwig, T. E. (n.d.). Everybody’s doing it! Retrieved December 14, 2012, from http://bcs.worthpublishers.com/WebPub\Psychology\psychsim5\PsychSim5 Tutorials\Everybodys Doing It/EverybodysDoingIt.htm
This web link tutorial explores social influence by reviewing a number of experiments focusing on conformity and ambiguous situations.
Optional Resources
- Festinger, L. &Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Festinger/index.htm
Week 3 Assignment
Application: Understanding Pat Using Social Psychology Research
Through social media and technology, people are more connected now than any other time is history. Human connections are powerful and results of these interactions can range from the heroes on Flight 93 to terrible atrocities like the Holocaust or Rwanda. Understanding cultural and social influence builds a foundation for understanding what makes people do what they do or do not do.
There are several theories that support social psychology. For example, attribution theory suggests that you tend to attribute the behavior of others to either disposition or external situation (Heider, 1958). Just as circumstances and disposition impact behavior, attitudes are also predictors of behaviors. Peripheral route persuasion argues that attitude changes are influenced by things, such as attractiveness or celebrity. Alternatively, central route persuasion argues that attitudes change based on scientific evidence and arguments. Central route persuasion is much more thoughtful and more likely to influence behavior. Additionally, external influences and personal attitudes influence your behavior.
For this assignment, you will choose one social psychology theory and apply it to Pat’s behavior.
To prepare for this Assignment:
- Review Module 36, “Social Thinking and Social Influence,” in the course text. Focus on attribution, social facilitation, and cognitive dissonance research.
- Select one of the following research areas:
- Social facilitation research
- Attribution research
- Cognitive dissonance research
Submit by Day 7 a paper of 2–3 pages in which you apply the research area you selected to Pat’s case study. Be specific and use examples from the case study to support your answer.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com
MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER
Psychology: Understanding Pat Using Social Psychology Research
(Course Instructor)
(University Affiliation)
(Student’s Name)
Application of Cognitive Dissonance Research to Pat’s Case
Human beings are social beings and they live by interacting with their friends, relatives and workmates. However, the individuals in the social group can easily influence an individual behavior, beliefs and attitudes (Myers, 2014) . The idea of social influence can result in conformity or reactance. The cognitive dissonance, explains the situation where an individual attitudes, behaviors and beliefs are in conflict. When an individual experiences such a situation, one is motivated to reduce the effects of dissonance, by changing his/her cognitions. Pat’s case provides a unique situation, in which her interaction with the environment has played in shaping her behaviour, which can be explained using the cognitive dissonance.
Cognitive Dissonance and Pat’s Case
Firstly, Pat beliefs that by taking her time to smoke and arriving when she deems right are the best ways for her. Her inner cognitions are that she can smoke anytime she wants and arrive whenever she feels to because after all she has a right of doing so. Her personal beliefs are so strong that she responds by developing ways that contradict the set rules and thus ensuring that her behavior matches the inner cognitions. That is why she does get to work early and smokes without worrying about times, since they represent behaviors that conform to her inner cognitions. Her behavior is a display of high cognitive dissonance. In contrast, in the case of her performance in a group and when alone, the source of conflict arises from her inner belief that productivity arises from group work, contrary to the individual job performance. Therefore, she reacts in order to conform to her inner cognitions, by adjusting and giving all her efforts in a group and thus performing better. However, in the situations in which she works on her own, her inner cognitions are clear that productivity can be achieved through group work. For her to achieve………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com
MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER
