Assessment 1: Individual Written Report (20%) – Between 1500 – 1800 words
Written Report Due Date Week 6
Explain and examine the four functions of the Kadushin Model from both the perspective of the supervisor in their role and also the benefits for the supervisee: Address the four elements of supervision, Administration Function; Education Function; Support; and Mediation Function.
You are required to submit a written evaluation report on a topic area identified by your lecturer during classes.
Your written report should include at least 10 (scholarly) journal articles read, in addition to any textbook references. The format of your report will be discussed in greater detail during tutorials.
Do NOT utilize sources such as www.tutor2u.com and other such web materials as these in no way constitute academic references for the purpose of your assignments. If you rely on such sources for theoretical support, you will be deemed NOT to have met the requirements of the assessment
WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU
GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class
CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on Johnny and Francesca rented an apartment together.
TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH
Assessment Criteria
Written report
| Criteria | Weighting 100% | HD | D | C | P | F |
| Analysis of literature on topic | 35% | |||||
| Conclusions derived from analysis and assessment of the topic and application | 30% | |||||
| Use and depth of research | 20% | |||||
| Presentation and referencing effective and organised essay structure with correct referencing of up-to-date resources | 15% | |||||
| TOTAL | /20% |
| Criteria for report | High Distinction 80% – | Distinction 70%- 79% | Credit 60-69% | Pass 50-59% | Fail 0-49% |
| Analysis of literature on topic | Provides accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on most recent scholarly literature | Provides accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on relevant literature | Explanations of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on provision of supervision and often cites the relevant literature. | Explanations of how potential issues can be identified and are not always accurate and sometimes incomplete, sometimes cites the relevant literature. | Explanations of how potential issues can be identified, and research are inaccurate or incomplete, does not cite the relevant literature. |
| Conclusions derived from analysis and assessment of the topic | Shows a deep understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population | Shows an excellent understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population | Shows a good understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population | Shows a basic understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population | Shows poor, insufficient understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population |
| Use and depth of reflection | A comprehensive analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows insightful synthesis of the literature information, including analysis of gaps and/or limitations of the research | A strong analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows insightful synthesis of the literature information, including analysis of gaps and/or limitations of the research | A good analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows some insightful synthesis of the literature information, identifies some limitations of the research | Analysis is fairly well developed. It summarizes the overall information obtained from the literature reviews and synthesizes adequately the knowledge gained | Analysis is not well developed. It lacks summary and/or any synthesis of the relevant literature |
| Presentation of summary and correct references used | All levels of content are covered in depth. Wide range of contemporary references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made | High level of content is covered in depth. Wide range of good references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made | Appropriate content is covered in reasonable depth. Sources are generally well cited when specific statements are made | Most major sections of the relevant content included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected References were basic and some errors of citation | Major sections of relevant content have been omitted or missed Inadequate references and poor citation |
| TOTAL |
