to ROBERT  |
You are a judge who believes that individuals should be allowed to choose when to die.
You personally had to watch both your parents die long and agonizing deaths because your state does not have a right-to-die statute. Before you is a doctor who is being prosecuted for giving a lethal dose of morphine to a patient dying of terminal cancer. The family of the patient did not want the prosecution, the majority of the public is not in favor of the prosecution, but the prosecutor believes that if there is a law in place, it should be enforced. The doctor has opted for a bench trial.
Write a 2-3 page, APA style paper addressing where you examine your options and defend your position. Please include 2-3 references. (not Wikipedia) Only the body of the paper will count toward the page requirement
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com
MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER
Ethics: Judging Oneself
(Course Instructor)
(University Affiliation)
(Student’s Name)
January 22nd 2016.
Judging Oneself
There are many debates in United States and many countries regarding the rights for one to take his/her live with the aid of a physician, when such an individual approaches the end of live under terminal illness. According to (Reinke et al., 2010), a terminal illness is defined as a medical condition where there is no expectation of recovery. The debate has attracted the opposition of the traditional conservatives of sanctity of life and proponents who argue that such patients have a right to choose when to die. The opponents of euthanasia (taking one’s life with aid of medical prescription) argue that it is a homicide, pointing that everyone has a right to life. However, the idea that life is important is relative given that when a patient is suffering from a terminal illness, the choices that arise is to accord such a patient with a decent death or leave them to content with life full of suffering.
Although life is sacred and people have human dignity, maintaining life cannot be the ultimate way of maintaining human dignity. For patients and their loved ones, there is no important care than that one that can be offered towards the end of life (Knott, 2004). When patients have terminal illnesses, they near the end of life and most of their lives are devolved into hospital stays, medical research as well as doctor consultations. Such a state can be a source of huge agony for the patients and families whom they love. Such a life can be demeaning, miserable and has no dignity. For example and individual suffering from a rare case of locked-in syndrome, a severe stroke, cannot communicate but can use the movement of his/her to communicate. Such people suffer a lot of psychological torture and would wish to end their life in order to regain the dignity that they since had when they led a healthy life. Restricting such people from taking their lives is just like restricting them from their right to a dignified and descent death. According to (Zhang, Nilsson, & Prigerson,…………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com
MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER
