Categories
Writers Solution

Monitoring and Evaluation

Task 1 – Monitoring and Evaluation

Instructions to Learners:

  • This summative assessment can be completed in class or at any other convenient location.
  • Students are required to complete this task using digital tools and ensure to submit in an acceptable format, e.g. .docx, .pdf, .pptx, or as advised by your assessor.
  • Please use the following formatting guidelines to complete this assessment task:
    • Font Size: 12; Line Spacing: Double; Font Style: Times New Roman
  • Assessment activities can be completed either in real workplace environment or in a simulated environment such as your classroom. In both cases, appropriate evidence of the assessment activities must be provided.

Instruction to Assessors:

  • You must assess student’s assessment according to the provided Marking Criteria.
  • You must complete and record any evidence related to assessment activities including role-plays and presentations using appropriate forms which must be attached with student assessment submission.
  • You must provide students with detailed feedback within 10 working days from submission.

For a project nominated by your Assessor, you are required to implement a monitoring, evaluation and reporting program.

In order to do so, complete the attached Evaluation Worksheet then complete the following questions:

Purpose

– What is the purpose of the evaluation?

– Who is it serving?

– Does the design of the evaluation support the initiative taking place on the ground?

– Does the research generate new knowledge?

– Is the evaluation being used as a tool to help empower the individuals and communities it serves?

Realistic

– Are adequate resources available for the evaluation?

– Are the evaluators fully trained and competent in the techniques they are being asked to carry out? (This may be particularly important with internal evaluations – i.e. when project staff are being asked to carry out much of the evaluation themselves.)

– Do stakeholders agree that the resources earmarked for the evaluation are proportional to the overall size of the project? i.e. +/- 10% of the total budget for the project.

– Do all stakeholders share similar views of what the evaluation aims to achieve?

– What has been done to ensure that funders and practitioners have a realistic view of the communities they are working with and their capacity to absorb and engage with different kinds of evaluation activities?

– What has been done to ensure that the proposed project outcomes, and the timescale within which changes might be expected, are compatible?

– Is the project goal/vision compatible with the anticipated outcomes?

– Has the evaluation considered the historical, political and social (local and national) context in which the program is taking place?

– Does the evaluation address the theoretical assumptions on which the project is based? – What are the political forces at play? How much political power is being wielded?

Ethics

– Has an appropriate ethical framework been developed? This may include considerations of protecting the confidentiality and anonymity of responses.

– Who considered the ethical dimensions of the project and how ethical policies would be implemented?

Methods

– Is the evaluation participatory?

– Are the objectives and monitoring indicators SMART (Specific, Measurable, Appropriate, Realistic, Time-Bound)?

– Has the planning of the evaluation been treated as equally important as the data collection? – Is the evaluation integrated into all stages of development and implementation?

– Is the chosen methodology the most appropriate in light of the project interventions? Be clear why!

– How is the quality of practice/application of methods ensured (different questions need to be asked if the research is commissioned or carried out internally)?

– Is the timeframe of the evaluation sufficient to measure the potential outcomes (some of which may be very long-term)?

– Are the methods used flexible enough to monitor unintended outcomes?

Dissemination

– How can evaluators be encouraged to report more fully on their evaluation activities?

– Will the findings be conveyed to all participants and stakeholders in meaningful, timely and appropriate ways?

– Will the results show the failings as well as the achievements of the project?

Attach copies of all produced documents including the evaluation plan, surveys, survey outcomes and reports.

Need help with this assignment 1
Need help with this assignment 2
Need help with this assignment 3
Need help with this assignment 4
Need help with this assignment 5
Need help with this assignment 6
Need help with this assignment 7
Need help with this assignment 8
Need help with this assignment 9
Need help with this assignment 10
Need help with this assignment 11
Need help with this assignment 12
Need help with this assignment 13

By admin

Academic tutoring services from the best essay writing company

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *