NO GPT CHAT OR ANY AI

functions of the Kadushin Model from both the perspective of the supervisor in their role and also the benefits for the supervisee

Post author By admin
Post date March 5, 2022
No Comments on functions of the Kadushin Model from both the perspective of the supervisor in their role and also the benefits for the supervisee

Assessment 1: Individual Written Report (20%) – Between 1500 – 1800 words

Written Report Due Date Week 6

Explain and examine the four functions of the Kadushin Model from both the perspective of the supervisor in their role and also the benefits for the supervisee: Address the four elements of supervision, Administration Function; Education Function; Support; and Mediation Function.

You are required to submit a written evaluation report on a topic area identified by your lecturer during classes.

Your written report should include at least 10 (scholarly) journal articles read, in addition to any textbook references. The format of your report will be discussed in greater detail during tutorials.

Do NOT utilize sources such as www.tutor2u.com and other such web materials as these in no way constitute academic references for the purpose of your assignments. If you rely on such sources for theoretical support, you will be deemed NOT to have met the requirements of the assessment

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on Johnny and Francesca rented an apartment together.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Assessment Criteria

Written report

Criteria	Weighting 100%	HD	D	C	P	F
Analysis of literature on topic	35%
Conclusions derived from analysis and assessment of the topic and application	30%
Use and depth of research	20%
Presentation and referencing effective and organised essay structure with correct referencing of up-to-date resources	15%
TOTAL	/20%

Criteria for report	High Distinction 80% –	Distinction 70%- 79%	Credit 60-69%	Pass 50-59%	Fail 0-49%
Analysis of literature on topic	Provides accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on most recent scholarly literature	Provides accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on relevant literature	Explanations of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on provision of supervision and often cites the relevant literature.	Explanations of how potential issues can be identified and are not always accurate and sometimes incomplete, sometimes cites the relevant literature.	Explanations of how potential issues can be identified, and research are inaccurate or incomplete, does not cite the relevant literature.
Conclusions derived from analysis and assessment of the topic	Shows a deep understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population	Shows an excellent understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population	Shows a good understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population	Shows a basic understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population	Shows poor, insufficient understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population
Use and depth of reflection	A comprehensive analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows insightful synthesis of the literature information, including analysis of gaps and/or limitations of the research	A strong analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows insightful synthesis of the literature information, including analysis of gaps and/or limitations of the research	A good analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows some insightful synthesis of the literature information, identifies some limitations of the research	Analysis is fairly well developed. It summarizes the overall information obtained from the literature reviews and synthesizes adequately the knowledge gained	Analysis is not well developed. It lacks summary and/or any synthesis of the relevant literature
Presentation of summary and correct references used	All levels of content are covered in depth. Wide range of contemporary references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made	High level of content is covered in depth. Wide range of good references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made	Appropriate content is covered in reasonable depth. Sources are generally well cited when specific statements are made	Most major sections of the relevant content included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected References were basic and some errors of citation	Major sections of relevant content have been omitted or missed Inadequate references and poor citation
TOTAL

Tags benefits, functions, kadushin, model, perspective, supervisor, their

Writers Solution

Johnny and Francesca rented an apartment together.

Post author By admin
Post date March 2, 2022
No Comments on Johnny and Francesca rented an apartment together.

the use of websites such as Chegg or Course Hero are prohibited. Questions that are submitted to, or answers that are obtained from, online sources will result in a failing grade. Your notes should be the only resources needed to complete assignments.
Homework assignments will remain open for 24 hours after the deadline listed and you may upload your homework up until that time. Assignments submitted later than 24 hours will receive no credit.

Please read the Consideration Notes prior to completing the assigned questions. Please complete all homework below using the IRAC Method (review the example posted in the Week One Module for IRAC format).

In order to submit homework please create a Microsoft Word only and save it (Google docs, odt files, pages files, and text box entries are not compatible for submitting/grading the assignment). When you have completed your homework, log into the course page and go to the assignment link in order to upload your file for submission (please note that you may have to scroll down to the bottom of the page to find the “upload” button). To minimize problems with uploading homework, use the latest Google Chrome browser only.

Your notes should be the only resources needed to complete assignments. Answers that are obtained from online sources will receive no credit.

Submit the answer only; do not include the homework questions.

Complete the following questions using the notes on Consideration:

Johnny and Francesca rented an apartment together. Before moving in both agreed to split the cost of the rent, utilities, and cable bill equally. Four months after moving in, Johnny borrowed Francesca’s SUV to pick up his parents at the airport. On the way back, Johnny was involved in an accident. The damage to Francesca’s car was $3,500. Johnny told Francesca that he would pay to have the car fixed if she promised not to report the accident to the insurance company. Francesca agreed. However, Johnny never paid Francesca because he claimed the agreement was not enforceable. What is the outcome?
Adele entered into a contract with Caesars Palace in Las Vegas to perform a concert on the night before Valentine’s Day. The agreement indicated that she would perform for from 8:00pm to 12:00pm for $2 million. Greg was attending the show with his girlfriend Marie and intended to propose to her at the concert. Marie loved Adele so Greg offered Adele $25,000 if she would sing Marie’s favorite songs during the first hour and at the end of the hour he would propose. Between 8:00 and 9:00pm Adele sang Marie’s favorite songs and at the end of the concert, Adele went to meet Greg for payment. However, he refused to pay. Adele told Greg she was filing a lawsuit. What is the outcome?
Sara Franklin recently purchased a new home in Whitman. The home had been recently renovated but Sara felt that it still required some modifications in order for her to be happy with it. Sara contacted Susan, who was an interior designer, and discussed the changes she wanted. Sara said she was familiar with Susan’s work and wanted her to design her kitchen and living room. They agreed on a price of $25,000. Susan started the process of ordering materials and hiring subcontractors. A month into the renovations, Susan contacts Sara to let her know that when they were removing the cabinets in the kitchen the found a water leak. Susan indicated that it would cost an additional $3,000 into fix the issue. Sara agrees to pay. However, when the job is complete, Sara writes a check for $25,000 but refuses to pay the additional $3,000. Susan plans to sue Sara. What is the outcome?

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on

Johnny and Francesca rented an apartment together.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Tags apartment, francesca, johnny, rented, together

Writers Solution

challenging elements of the marketing mix is pricing

Post author By admin
Post date March 2, 2022
No Comments on challenging elements of the marketing mix is pricing

Marketing Strategy and Price

One of the most important and challenging elements of the marketing mix is pricing. Price is the value that must be exchanged for a customer to receive a product or service. It is usually monetary and has a direct impact on sales. Many entrepreneurs are intimidated by financials and the prospect of using statements and other information to make projections. Correctly pricing your product enables your company to be competitive while maximizing your product’s profit potential.

Here are several methods that entrepreneurs can use to effectively price products:

Cost-Based Pricing

Cost-based pricing is the easiest way to price a product. It involves taking the cost of making the product and creating a profit margin, which is how much profit your business stands to make after costs have been deducted. For example, if you add the direct costs for materials and labor to the indirect costs of salaries, marketing, rent, and utilities, you determine that your product costs $5 to make. Adding, say, a 30 percent profit margin would give you a sales price of $6.50. The percentage added depends on the business’s goals. This type of pricing is helpful when start-ups do not have much information about their target market and need more time to define their value proposition and business identity.

Competition-Based Pricing

Another option to set prices is for the entrepreneur to consider what the competition is doing—what they are charging customers. And remember, it is the competition that establishes the price range for given product/service categories. If you perform your competitive analysis properly, you will know the prices charged by your competitors. In other words, you will be able to establish the current “going rates.”

What you must decide as an entrepreneur is how you will price your products/services given this range. For example, do you wish to be at the high end of the range? Do you wish to be at the low end of the range? Or, do you wish to be at the middle of the range? Now, of course, the key question is how do you know whether to price at the high end, low end, or middle of the range? Well, here is some guidance. For example, if you have a high-quality and highly differentiated product/service, you should probably charge a price at the high end of the price range. If, on the other hand, you are marketing a product/service designed to appeal to the price-sensitive customer, then you will price it at the low end of the price range. If your product/service is similar to your key direct competitors, you will charge basically the same price.

Customer-Based Pricing

Unlike cost-based pricing that emphasizes the cost side of the business, customer-based pricing focuses on the demand side of the business. The price ceiling is the maximum amount that customers are willing to pay for a product. This ceiling is contingent on the elasticity of demand. And elasticity of demand is generally driven by availability of substitutes and the urgency of need for the product (or strong desire for it). So, one thing you need to determine is whether there will be elastic demand (demand that increases as price decreases or demand that decreases as price increases) or inelastic demand (demand does not change if prices increase or decrease) for your product.

One customer-based pricing method, skimming pricing, leverages the newness of a product to justify the highest price possible in order to “skim” the most profits off the top, meaning in the first phase of sales. As time passes, the price is lowered to accommodate for more price-sensitive customers. Apple often introduces its products with this particular method, charging the highest price for them until it has exhausted the market willing to buy at that price and when newer and more technologically advanced products are introduced. Then, Apple slowly lowers its pricing.

On the other hand, penetration pricing (charging a low initial price) is appropriate if you have a market with price-sensitive customers; you want to use the low initial price to discourage competitors from entering the market and when production and marketing costs fall dramatically as demand (volume) increases. However, it may also lead to “price wars” in which competitors keep dropping prices in an attempt to beat each other. Obviously, the disadvantage is diminished profits for all.

If you start with a skimming price strategy, you can, over time, lower your price to attract more price-sensitive customers. However, if you enter the market with a penetration price strategy, it is often very difficult to raise your prices. In other words, while you can move down the going price range with a skimming price strategy, you may not be able to move up the going price range if you initially used a penetration price strategy.

Prestige pricing involves setting high prices on products to convey a message of uniqueness or premium quality. However, you need a clear reason why customers would want to spend more on your product. When Duracell launched its high-performance Ultra brand AA alkaline battery with a 25 percent price premium over standard Duracell batteries, Energizer quickly countered with its own high-performance battery—Energizer Advanced Formula. Believing that consumers would not pay the premium price, Energizer priced its Advanced Formula brand at the same price as its standard AA alkaline battery, expecting to gain market share from Duracell. It did not happen. Why? Consumers associated Energizer’s low price with inferior quality in the high-performance segment. Energizer lost market share.

Some customers are demanding better value (increased benefits at the same price). Therefore, many new ventures appeal to this type of customer using value-based pricing. For example, they might offer customers “better value” by offering a greater quantity of product at the same price as competitors. A startup yogurt company, for example, offers 20 percent more product per package at the same price as a competitor that offers the standard amount. Another value-based pricing strategy is bundling two or more products in a single package deal, thus lowering the total cost compared to if the customer purchased each item separately. An example of this strategy is used by DirectTV, which bundles its phone, Internet, and satellite services for a monthly fee. If a customer were to purchase these services separately, they would be more expensive. The benefits of bundling include gaining more revenue per customer, as they would not have paid for some services separately, and making the order-taking task simpler. Take fast-food chains, for example. Instead of asking the customer to list everything separately from the menu, they give you the name or number of the bundle. They make more profit by including the drink and sides to the main entrée, and the customer saves money and time ordering.

One of the good things about using a customer-based pricing approach is that you should be able to determine the “target price” based on the customer’s perspective. Knowing this target price, you can then “back into that price.” In other words, you can “design to price.” For example, an upstart commercial furniture manufacturer used customer input to establish the optimal price point that customers were willing to pay for particular furniture pieces. The company then went back and pulled costs out of its production system, stripped away costly features the customers do not value, and designed and produced the product to meet the customers’ target price.

Another advantage of using a customer-based pricing approach is the possibility of uncovering the opportunity to “price by segment” and to offer “good, better, best” product options. In other words, you might be able to develop a line of products with specific price points designed to appeal to very specific segments. For example, consider a casual clothing store for women that sells three different lines of casual dresses priced at $39, $59, and $79. This practice is known as price lining.

* * * * *

Ultimately, you need to consider cost, competitors, and customers when setting prices. You must know your price floor (your cost), know what your competitors are charging (the price range), and know your customers’ willingness and ability to pay (the price ceiling). While pricing must be established when starting a new business, pricing strategies should be reviewed on an ongoing basis. These occasions in particular merit consideration:

When adding a new product or service to your offerings
When demand shifts (due to market, consumer, or other factors)
When entering a new market
When competitors are making changes
When your costs are changing
When adjusting products/services or strategies

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on challenging elements of the marketing mix is pricing

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Tags challenging, elements, marketing, pricing

Writers Solution

Quantitative and Qualitative research is just numbers or words on a page until they are brought to life

Post author By admin
Post date March 2, 2022
No Comments on Quantitative and Qualitative research is just numbers or words on a page until they are brought to life

Please find below assignment as discussed.
3000 word Essay on the title:

‘Quantitative and Qualitative research is just numbers or words on a page until they are brought to life’ How can story telling integrate data into strategic plans?

Prepare a document that explains the differentiation between quantitative and qualitative research with respect to how research is used in today’s business environment. Give examples of when each could be conducted, on which topics and with what audiences to provide an evidential platform to inform a client’s decision making. Include a section or table on the limitations as well as the benefits of both. Use academic references (15 minimum) to support your key points (1500 words).

Create an argument for the methodology (either quantitative or qualitative) which you believe to be the most relevant for today’s business environment where insight has a premium. Provide examples to support your argument and use academic references (15 minimum) to support your key points (1500 words).

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on Quantitative and Qualitative research is just numbers or words on a page until they are brought to life

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Tags brought, numbers, qualitative, quantitative, research, until, words

Writers Solution

How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?

Post author By admin
Post date March 2, 2022
No Comments on How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?

For advanced health assessment, To prepare:
With the information presented in Chapter 1 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following:
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment.
How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?
How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health?
What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks?
Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration.
Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidels Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.
Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history.

DISCUSSION CASE PATIENT: 21-year-old Filipino college student living in a dorm wanting to know what birth control is:
For advanced pharmacology,Post a description of the patient case from your experiences, observations, and/or clinical practice from the last 5 years. Then, describe factors that might have influenced pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes of the patient you identified. Finally, explain details of the personalized plan of care that you would develop based on influencing factors and patient history in your case. Be specific and provide examples

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Tags building, communication, health, history, interview, techniques, would

Writers Solution

Explain the concepts and basic features of integrated marketing communications

Post author By admin
Post date March 2, 2022
No Comments on Explain the concepts and basic features of integrated marketing communications

Subject Title Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC)
Subject Code MKT201A
Assessment Title Assessment 1. Case Study.
Graduate Capabilities
• Innovative Problem Solving
• Global Citizenship
Learning Outcome/s (found in the
Subject Outline) a) Explain the concepts and basic features of integrated marketing communications
b) Link the aims of integrated marketing communications with basic marketing principles to analyse given communication problems
Assessment type (group or individual) Individual
Weighting % 25%
Word count 1000 words (+/- 10%) excluding cover and references
Due day Sunday by 11.55pm week 4
Submission type Turnitin ?
Format / Layout of Assessment
Report:
ICMS Cover Page
Table of Contents
Introduction
Analysis
Market
Competition
Consumer
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Page 1 of 5
Conclusion
Reference List
Appendices if required
?
?
Assessment instructions Choose one case study from either the selection provided by your lecturer or propose another which will need to be approved by your lecturer, then conduct further research and analyse an integrated marketing communications campaign applying the theories and concepts from the unit. Each case study includes a detailed profile of a client such as business context,
business model, marketing communication channels, and a plan to develop a new product targeting a new type of consumers, etc.
Based on the learning contents from the first 4 weeks, students are required to present a brief market analysis (approximately 1000 words +/- 10%, 1-2 pages) including the following points:

analyse the market that your ‘client’ is facing (e.g. current market situation and evolution, growth opportunities and threats, distribution channels, etc.)
identify the competition (e.g. main competitors, their positioning and target markets, etc.)
understand the consumers (e.g. who are current key consumers, what are their preferences, are they satisfied with the products of the client, are there any new consumer trends, what are the main trends for this type of consumer, etc.)
The Case Study analysis needs to match the following:
• 1000 words +/- 10% excluding cover sheet and references
• Follow short report formatting • Minimum of 6 resources, 3 from academic resources at minimum.
NOTE: The chosen case study will be used in Assessment 2.
Readings for the assessment
To assist you with writing this report, use the materials found on your
• Moodle page (lecture slides, recommended and additional readings or other documents).
• Review the class content.
• Review the useful links posted on Moodle.
Complete the Module activities which are designed to support the critical tasks of this Assessment. If you have any further questions, make sure you speak to your lecturer.
Grading Criteria / Rubric See detailed marking rubric below
Page 2 of 5
Assessment 1 – Marking Rubric
Criteria HD (85-100) D (75-84) CR (65-74) PASS (50-64) FAIL (0-49)
Criteria 1.
Introduction. Brief Case Study Background.
(10 %)? Highly effective introduction including a brief company/case overview. Mostly effective introduction including a brief company/case overview. Moderately effective introduction including a brief company/case overview. Introduction included but need more elaboration / background on the case/company or the overview is too long. There is no clear introduction and does not adequately provide an overview of the chosen case/company.
Criteria 2.
Market analysis, application of theories, concepts and methods. (25%)? The analysis is coherently presented. Shows a full understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are accurately applied and used to justify rationale throughout. Shows a depth of knowledge. Includes insightful commentary and highlights high significance. Links the different theories to analyse and solve the challenges face by the firm in the market in a throughout way The analysis is coherently presented. Shows a significant understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are accurately applied and used to justify rationale in most instances. Shows a depth of knowledge in all but 1 area. Includes insightful commentary and highlights above average significance. The analysis is present, but hard to follow at times. Shows a good understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are accurately applied and used to justify the rationale, but further elaboration was needed in 2 areas. Shows a depth of knowledge in all but 2 areas. Includes multiple instances of insightful commentary and highlights average significance. The analysis is present, but hard to follow at times. Shows a basic understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are sometimes inaccurately applied when used to justify the rationale. Or, greater depth is needed in the analysis and application of the unit content. Includes somewhat insightful commentary and highlights average significance. Analysis is confused or missing. Lacks depth or shows superficial understanding. Theories, concepts and methods are inaccurately applied when used to justify the rationale. Or, greater depth is needed in the analysis and application of unit content. Does not include insightful commentary and highlights little or no significance.
Criteria 3. Competitor analysis, application of theories, concepts and
methods. (25%)
? The analysis is coherently presented. Shows a full understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are accurately applied and used to justify rationale throughout. Shows a depth of knowledge. Includes insightful commentary and highlights high significance.
The analysis is coherently presented. Shows a significant understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are accurately applied and used to justify rationale in most instances. Shows a depth of knowledge in all but 1 area. Includes insightful commentary and highlights above average significance. The analysis is present, but hard to follow at times. Shows a good understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are accurately applied and used to justify the rationale, but further elaboration was needed in 2 areas. Shows a depth of knowledge in all but 2 areas. Includes multiple instances of insightful The analysis is present, but hard to follow at times. Shows a basic understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are sometimes inaccurately applied when used to justify the rationale. Or, greater depth is needed in the analysis and application of the unit content. Includes somewhat insightful Analysis is confused or missing. Lacks depth or shows superficial understanding. Theories, concepts and methods are inaccurately applied when used to justify the rationale. Or, greater depth is needed in the analysis and application of unit content. Does not include insightful commentary and highlights little or no significance.
commentary and highlights average significance. commentary and highlights average significance.
Criteria 4.
Consumer
analysis, application of theories, concepts and
methods. (25%)?
The analysis is coherently presented. Shows a full understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are accurately applied and used to justify rationale throughout. Shows a depth of knowledge. Includes insightful commentary and highlights high significance.
The analysis is coherently presented. Shows a significant understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are accurately applied and used to justify rationale in most instances. Shows a depth of knowledge in all but 1 area. Includes insightful commentary and highlights above average significance.
The analysis is present, but hard to follow at times. Shows a good understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are accurately applied and used to justify the rationale, but further elaboration was needed in 2 areas. Shows a depth of knowledge in all but 2 area. Includes multiple instances of insightful commentary and highlights average significance.
The analysis is present, but hard to follow at times. Shows a basic understanding of the topic. Theories, concepts and methods are sometimes inaccurately applied when used to justify the rationale. Or, greater depth is needed in the analysis and application of the unit content. Includes somewhat insightful commentary and highlights average significance.
Analysis is confused or missing. Lacks depth or shows superficial understanding. Theories, concepts and methods are inaccurately applied when used to justify the rationale. Or, greater depth is needed in the analysis and application of unit content. Does not include insightful commentary and highlights little or no significance.
Criteria 4.
Conclusion. (5%)? Thorough conclusion that summarises effectively. Mostly thorough conclusion that summarises effectively. Somewhat thorough conclusion that summarises adequately. Minimal conclusion that summarises averagely but lacks depth in some areas. Conclusion present but does not summarise and is not effective. Or conclusion missing.
Criteria 5.
Presentation, referencing and structure (10%)? Professional presentation and effective communication of analysis and evaluation, fully supported with evidence. Outstanding report structure and communication of ideas enhances readability. Free of errors and logical flow, appropriate sections. At least 6 resources from reliable sources, with at least 3 being from academic sources… e.g., journals, company websites, trustworthy articles. Well-structured presentation and communication of analysis and evaluation, supported with evidence that closely correspond to the elements of the report. Very good report structure, free of errors and has a logical flow, appropriate sections. 5 resources from reliable
sources, e.g., journals, company websites, trustworthy articles.
OR
1 source not reliable.
Appropriate presentation and communication of analysis and evaluation, supported with some evidence. Good report structure, free of errors and has a logical flow with appropriate sections. 4 resources from reliable
sources, e.g., journals, company websites, trustworthy articles.
OR
2 sources not reliable.
Presentation that shows some evidence of report structure, but errors may detract from the communication of the analysis and evaluation.
There is some evidence used but it may not correspond to the elements and sometimes detract from the readability. Basic report structure, some errors and is hard to follow, some sections are missing. 3 resources from reliable
sources, e.g., journals, company websites, trustworthy articles.
OR
2 sources not reliable Lacks evidence of a structured presentation with limited analysis and evaluations. The few pieces of evidence used do not correspond to the key elements. Missing appropriate report structure, contains errors and hard to follow, appropriate sections are missing. 2 resources, OR less than 3 from reliable sources e.g., journals, company websites, trustworthy articles.
OR
4 or more not from reliable sources

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on Explain the concepts and basic features of integrated marketing communications

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Tags basic, communications, concepts, explain, features, integrated, marketing

Writers Solution

The Law and Health Care Practice

Post author By admin
Post date March 2, 2022
No Comments on The Law and Health Care Practice

Assessment 1: Essay (E-tivities) & Annotated Bibliography
Task Overview
Course NUR8340: The Law and Health Care Practice
Assessment name Essay (E-tivities) & Annotated Bibliography
Brief task description The first part of this assessment requires you to participate in a minimum of four (4) Etivities. These will form Part A – essay. You will then locate four (4) recent journal articles on one of your chosen E-tivity topics, relevant to your workplace, and provide an annotated bibliography of these articles.
Rationale for assessment task This assessment will enable you to link a relevant legal and/or ethical issue in your workplace to the literature and make sense of how current research can be put into practice. Evidence based practice at work.
Due Date Tuesday 19th April 2022 by 2355 AEST.
Length 1500 words for the Essay (E-tivities).
1500-1800 words for the Annotated Bibliography. The reference for each chosen article is not included in the word count.
Marks out of: Weighting: Total marks /100
50% of final grade.
Course
Objectives

Critically review contemporary law and health literatures to inform legal, ethical, and professional health care practice.
Employ a realistic application of theories and principles of law and ethics to the design of reasoned responses to critical incidents in health care practice.
Task Details For this assessment you will apply and contextualise advanced knowledge and understanding of Australian healthcare law and/or ethics that impacts on your workplace, through contributing to E-tivities and an annotated bibliography.
PART A – Essay – E-tivities:
Format: You will submit evidence of participation in the E-tivities by copying and pasting your chosen contributions from the Study Desk E-tivity Forums onto a Word document file for submission. Please use a heading for each E-tivity indicating the week it came from.
Guidelines for E-tivities
• Each week, an E-tivity will be assigned as part of your weekly activities. Read what the activity is asking you to do and post your response on that week’s Etivity Forum.
• Complete a minimum of four (4) E-tivities on four (4) different weeks (there is no maximum to the number of contributions you can make),
• You are to support at least two (2) of your E-tivity contributions with a minimum of one (1) contemporary literature source and provide a reference for
that source using APA 7th edition referencing style at the end of your E-tivity post.
• Choose a minimum of four (4) of your E-tivity responses and copy and paste them onto a word document. These form Part A of this assessment.
NOTE: The four (4) E-tivities chosen must equal 1500 words (+/-10%). If you choose to use more than four (4) contributions, please do not exceed 1500 words (+/-10%).
Intext referencing is included in the word count, but the reference source at the end is not.
Part B – Annotated Bibliography:
Choose one of the topics from Part A, your E-tivity participation, and locate four (4) contemporary journal articles relevant to your chosen topic (one article can be the one you used in your discussion). For example: each week’s E-tivity matches the content of that week. If you submit the Week 5 E-tivity in Part A, then you may choose Negligence as your topic for Part B and you will locate four (4) journal articles on Negligence.
Write an annotated bibliography on each article using the following format:
• One introduction for the whole annotated bibliography section – introduce your chosen topic and the articles you will discuss. (100-150 words)
• Full citation for each article directly above its annotated bibliography – APA
7th referencing must be used. (not included in the word count)
• Annotation Bibliography (one for each article):
o a summary of the article in your own words (one paragraph).
(100-150 words) o a critique of the article, which is a brief statement about the article’s calibre ie:
? is the article easy to understand and current?
? is the article easy to set out well – headings/subheadings?
? Is the author(s) credible?
? Are the interpretation of findings correct?
? what type of audience would benefit from reading this article?
(100-150 words)
o a reflection on the articles value ie:
? how relevant is the information in the article to your own practice as a health care professional? (100-150 words)
NB: the word count in red beside each section is a guide only.
Resources available to assist with task The StudyDesk Assessment Tab contains the following resources to help you with this assessment:

Information on how to write an Annotated Bibliography.
Information on how to do APA 7th edition referencing style.
Link to the library APA 7th edition referencing guide.
Support for academic writing (and referencing) is available from the Learning Advisor and Liaison Librarian, you can find information and contact them via their site: Study and Research Support for Health & Community students
Writing & formatting requirements Case study and discussion on the legal and ethical issues will be in academic writing style ie third person.
Reflection, section (4), may be in first person.
Assignments should be presented using:
• Double-line spacing
• Times New Roman, 12 point font
• APA formatting (7th Edition as per APA guide)
• Footer with name, student number & page number
Referencing/ citations • For this assessment you will use APA 7th referencing style.
• Sources: your reference list must include at least 8 scholarly sources with the majority no older than 6 years old (four of them will be your chosen articles for the Annotated Bibliography).
In text citations: You must include intext citations in the body of your work. Each new point or piece of evidence must be attributed (via in-text citation) to the source.
Submission What you need to submit:
One Microsoft Word document to the submission link on the course StudyDesk that contains the following items:
• The Essay and Annotated Bibliography as one document,
• No coversheet but footer must include: course code, semester and year, student name, student number, page number
• Do NOT include the marking criteria sheet
• Save your document with the following naming convention:
surname_initial_NUR8340_A1.doc
E.g: Jones_J_NUR8340_A1.doc
Please upload the four journal articles, or a clear link to them (eg. URL), on a separate page to the second submission link – Save your document with the following naming convention: surname_initial_NUR8340_A1articles.doc
E.g: Jones_J_NUR8340_A1articles.doc
Marking and moderating • This task will be marked against a marking rubric available on StudyDesk.
• All staff who are assessing your work meet to discuss and compare their judgements before marks or grades are finalised.
Academic integrity & Misconduct Students should be familiar with, and abide by, USQ’s policy on Academic Integrity and the definition of Academic Misconduct . Penalties apply to student’s found to have breached these policies & procedures.
Assessment policy &
procedure
Information and links regarding USQ’s assessment policy/ procedure; extensions and late submissions; academic integrity & misconduct and marking are found on your course StudyDesk Assessment page.
Note on Late submission & extensions: Applications for an extension of time will only be considered if received in accordance with the USQ Assessment procedure and the Assessment of Compassionate and Compelling Circumstances Procedure. Refer to the links on StudyDesk for copies of these procedures.
NUR8340: The Law and Health Care Practice. Semester 1, 2022
Assessment 1: Annotated Bibliography and Essay – Marking Rubric
E-tivity 20 – 17 16.9 – 15 14.9 – 13 12.9 – 10 9.9 – 0
Contributions to E-tivities
(20 marks) Evidence of 4 or more Etivity contributions to 4 different weeks, which are highly articulate and relevant to the week’s topic.
Evidence of 4 E-tivity contributions to 3-4 different weeks, which are relevant to the week’s topic. Evidence of 3-4 E-tivity contributions to 3-4 different weeks, which are mostly relevant to the week’s topic. Evidence of 2-3 E-tivity contributions to 2-3 different weeks which attempt to be relevant to the week’s topic. Evidence of one (1) or more contributions to E-tivities which are not relevant to the week’s topic.
No evidence of contributing to an E-tivity.
6 – 5.1 4.6 – 5 4.5 – 4
3.9 – 3 2.9 – 0
Referencing
in E-tivities
APA7th ed referencing
style used
(6 marks) A minimum of two (2) reference sources have been used to support a minimum of two (2) E-tivity discussions.
APA7 is used correctly to cited sources both within text and at the end of the Etivity with no errors.
Two (2) reference sources have been used to support two (2) E-tivity discussions.
APA7 is used correctly to cite sources both within text and at the end of the E-tivity with some minor errors. Two (2) reference sources have been used to support one (1) E-tivity discussion.
APA7 is mostly used correctly to cite source(s) within text and at the end of the E-tivity with numerous minor errors.
One (1) reference source has been used to support one (1) E-tivity discussion.
APA7 is mostly used correctly to cite the source within text and/or at the end of the E-tivity with major errors.
An attempt to provide one (1) reference source has been made intext only/no reference sources have been used to support the E-tivity discussion.
APA7 has not been correctly used intext/no referencing.
Annotated Bibliography
4
3
2
1
0.9 – 0
Bibliographic (reference) details APA
7th ed
(4 marks) All four (4) annotated bibliography journal articles are cited in correct APA7 referencing format with no errors. All four (4) annotated bibliography journal articles are cited in correct APA7 referencing format with one error. All four (4) annotated bibliography journal articles are cited in correct APA7 referencing format with twothree errors. All four (4) annotated bibliography journal articles are cited with an attempt at APA7 referencing format with more than four errors. There are omitted or no citations for the annotated bibliography journal articles/
APA7 referencing format has not been used.
5
4
3
2
1 – 0
Introduction to Annotated Bibliography
(5 marks) Highly relevant comprehensive introduction. Defines topic at an advanced level and includes a comprehensive introduction to the annotated bibliography articles. Well-developed introduction. Defines the topic and includes an introduction to the annotated bibliography articles.
Effective attempt at writing an introduction. Defines the topic and attempts to introduce the annotated bibliography articles. An attempt made to provide an introduction,
The topic chosen is not clear. Some/vague evidence of introducing the annotated bibliography articles. Inadequate and/or poor introduction.
Minimal/no evidence of an overview of the annotated bibliography.
20 – 17 16.9 – 15 14.9 – 13 12.9 – 10 9.9 – 0
Summary of
article
(20 marks – 5 marks for each article) A sophisticated choice of all articles which are relevant to the topic.
A comprehensive summary, demonstrating a thorough understanding of each article has been provided.
There is no repetitiveness in the summaries. All articles have been well chosen and are relevant to the topic.
A comprehensive summary, demonstrating a considerable understanding of each article has been provided.
There is no repetitiveness in the summaries. All articles chosen are relevant to the topic. A clear summary, demonstrating a broad understanding of each article has been provided. There is some repetitiveness in the summaries. All articles chosen are somewhat relevant to the topic.
A summary, demonstrating a beginning understanding of each article has been provided but is unclear at times.
There are a number of repetitive statements in the summaries. Articles chosen are not relevant to the topic/ there are
less than five articles chosen/ no summary has been provided.
20 – 17 16.9 – 15 14.9 – 13 12.9 – 10 9.9 – 0
Critique of each article (20 marks – 5 marks for each article) A comprehensive critique of each article is provided which is highly articulate and clearly describes how the article is set out and who would benefit from reading it.
Highly relevant rationales are used to support the critique. There is a high level of synthesis of the material. A substantial critique of each article is provided which is articulate and clearly describes how the article is set out and who would benefit from reading it.
Relevant rationales are used to support the critique. Material is well synthesised. A sound critique of each article is provided which describes how the article is set out and who would benefit from reading it.
Sound rationales are used to support the critique however greater synthesis is needed. A broad critique of each article is provided which attempts to describes how the article is set out and who would benefit from reading it.
An attempt has been made to provide rationales to support the critique, however more detail and relevance is required. A limited/no critique of each article is provided. It is not clear how the article is set out and who would benefit from reading it, or there is no information provided.
Limited/no attempt to provide rationales to support the critique.
20 – 17 16.9 – 15 14.9 – 13 12.9 – 10 9.9 – 0
Reflection for each article (20 marks – 5 marks for each article) A highly articulated and comprehensive reflection on each article is presented.
A highly articulated reflection
on relevance to own professional practice is presented.
A relevant and concise reflection on each article is presented.
A well-articulated reflection on relevance to own professional practice is presented. A sound reflection on each
article is presented however some generalisations used rather than personal reflection.
Relevance to own professional practice is presented. A generic reflection is provided with an attempt at a personal reflection.
It is unclear what the relevance is to own professional practice.
The reflection is vague and generic with no attempt at personal reflection/ No reflection is provided.
No attempt at providing information on relevance to own professional practice.
5 4 3 2 1 – 0
Academic
writing/ expression/ grammar (5 marks) Word limit has been adhered to.
High standard of academic presentation with formatting style adhered to.
Good standard of academic presentation with formatting style mostly adhered to.
Sound standard of academic presentation with some errors in formatting style.
Basic/beginner standard of academic presentation with a number of errors in formatting style.
Word limit has not been adhered to.
Assessment is poorly presented demonstrating poor understanding of academic presentation. Numerous errors in formatting style.
Writing is clear, concise & fluent with few/no spelling or
grammatical errors
Structure:
Well-constructed with excellent paragraph and sentence structure. Writing style conforming to assessment instructions. Writing is clear & fluent with some spelling and/or
grammatical errors
Structure:
Well-constructed with good paragraph and sentence structure. Writing style mostly conforming to assessment instructions. Writing is mostly clear but lacks fluency in places with a number of spelling and/or grammatical errors
Structure:
Some paragraph and/or sentence structure errors. Writing style mostly conforming to assessment instructions. Writing is unclear and lacks fluency in places with many spelling and/or grammatical
errors
Structure:
There are paragraph and/or sentence structure errors. Writing style partially conforms to assessment instructions. Writing is difficult to follow with
major spelling and grammatical errors.
Structure:
Poor paragraph and sentence structure. Writing style does not conform to assessment instructions.
All marking is completed in Turnitin. You will find your feedback and marks there. This rubric is for your reference only.
Please note that a LATE PENALTY of 5% of the total marks available for the assessment will be deducted for each day the assessment is late

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on The Law and Health Care Practice

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Tags health, practice

Writers Solution

Culture and Empowerment

Individual In Class Activity #1 –
Individual In Class Activity #1 –
Before you complete this activity you must complete the readings for chapters 3 and 10, and watch the videos and read the articles in the folder on Leadership, Management, Culture and Empowerment.
This is an individual report (no group work permitted). Please use APA citation for your research.
Choose three companies in the hospitality (service) industry.
a) Examine their Web sites, look for mission statements, press releases, annual reports (if any) articles, new service delivery strategies, updates, new announcements (anything you can find on how they handle their service delivery, leadership and employee empowerment during Covid19).
b) How do they communicate their new service strategy during Covid19?
c) Can you find any indication of how much they empower their employees?
d) Write a 500 word report comparing these three companies’ service messages for Covid19

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on Culture and Empowerment

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Tags culture, empowerment

Writers Solution

Developing Global Leadership: A review of barriers and adjustments for international expansion

Post author By admin
Post date March 2, 2022
No Comments on Developing Global Leadership: A review of barriers and adjustments for international expansion

Choose 1 country that the organization you’ve been working on in this course could consider expanding into.

(Caterpillar)

Read the selected article from the University Library.

Read

Burkus, D. (2012). Essay: Developing Global Leadership: A review of barriers and adjustments for international expansion. International Management Review, 8(2), 83–84.

Analyze that potential international market by considering the 4 aspects of the Diamond of National Advantage: industry rivalry, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, and factor endowments

Analyze the forces (in the home market and international market) that will help the organization succeed with its expansion, and the forces that may act as barriers to that expansion. Refer to your analysis of strengths and weaknesses completed in Week 1, the Porter’s Five Forces worksheet from Week 3, and your analysis of the Diamond of National Advantage.

Evaluate the 4 adjustments leaders must make when expanding internationally (Burkus, 2012). Recommend 1 specific leadership action for each adjustment, such as developing a global mindset, developing sensitivity to cultural differences, decentralizing, deciding on the level of involvement, etc.

Recommend whether the organization should expand into the chosen country and explain your rationale.

Create a PowerPoint presentation to present your analysis and recommendation. Include the following sections in your presentation:

A cover slide
An agenda
Identification of the country you have chosen (1 slide, with brief speaker’s notes)
1 slide for analysis of each of the elements of the Diamond of National Advantage (4 slides, with speaker’s notes)
A summary of analysis of the forces that will help the organization succeed in the new country (1 slide, with speaker’s notes)
A summary of analysis of the forces that will hinder the organization’s success in the new country (1 slide, with speaker’s notes)
Leadership actions required to make the 4 adjustments identified by Burkus (2012)
A recommendation and rationale (1 slide, with speaker’s notes)
A conclusion
References

Support your Statements: Include citations in the speakers notes.

Format your citations and references according to APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment.

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on

Developing Global Leadership: A review of barriers and adjustments for international expansion

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Tags adjustments, barriers, developing, global, international, leadership, review