—- Powerpoint Scenario Reflection: 1. Introduce the Business 2. Identified Revenue Optimisation Opportunity 3. Suggested Recommendations for Implementation 4. Conclusion —- Assessment Instructions: 1. Students to reflect on what they have learnt in class and apply to a real life scenario 2. Ideally they should approach where they currently work or contact a previous employer or personal contact 3. Assessment format is a Powerpoint presentation, with voice commentary 4. Introduce the business, identify three (3) revenue optimisation opportunities then present your suggested recommendations for implementation and conclusion 5. No limit to the number of slides, however presentation should be around 5 minutes 6. Last slide to include all references 7. Students should include at least 3 external references to back up their suggested action. —- Video example link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upB_2vQEGCE
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Identified Revenue Optimisation Opportunity
1. Choose one of the following scenarios (1-5) to develop a PICO question, search string and a summary table and complete the template provided in page 2. 2. Please note that there is no word limit for this assessment, and It does not require introduction and conclusion. Scenario 1 Patient satisfaction is a key metric that influences both hospital ratings and reimbursement. Studies have suggested that purposeful nursing rounds can improve patient satisfaction. Gemma wants to know the impact of hourly rounding by nursing staff on patient satisfaction and safety. Scenario 2 Pressure, from lying or sitting on a particular part of the body results in reduced oxygen and nutrient supply, impaired drainage of waste products and damage to cells. Kiana works in a medical ward where number of patients cannot reposition themselves and require assistance. Kiana is worried that the number of pressure ulcers may increase and wants to clarify the role of repositioning in the management of patients with pressure ulcers. Scenario 3 Leg ulcers arising from venous problems are called venous (or varicose or stasis) ulcers. The main treatment is the application of a firm compression garment (bandage or stocking) in order to aid venous return. There is a large number of compression garments available and it was unclear whether they are effective in treating venous ulcers and, if so, which method of compression is the most effective. RN Mia wants to know whether compression bandages or stockings aid venous ulcer healing. Scenario 4 Dementia is a chronic condition which progressively affects memory and other cognitive functions, social behaviour, and ability to carry out daily activities. To date, no treatment is clearly effective in preventing progression of the disease. RN Koby wants to evaluate the efficacy and safety of animal-assisted therapy for people with dementia. Scenario 5 Falls in care facilities and hospitals are common events that cause considerable morbidity and mortality for older people. There are several interventions designs to reduce falls in older people in hospitals. Emma wants to confirm whether implementing an exercise programmes can reduce the rate of falls
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Patient satisfaction is a key metric that influences both hospital ratings and reimbursement
Assessment Information Assessment Task 2: Portfolio Unit Weighting 90%, but with individual components that make up that (read on below) Task description The final assessment comprises a portfolio of work comprised of three (3) pieces of work. There are two options for what is included in the portfolio. OPTION ONE: Your portfolio includes: A revised version of your essay from Assessment Task 1, which incorporates feedback you have received and demonstrates your skills’ development. 500 words: (20% of total unit grade) AND An additional 500-word essay that has not been previously submitted for assessment. 500 words: (30% of total unit grade) AND Present an essay attempted or completed by you during the semester for another unit, annotated in Microsoft Word Review mode (you will be instructed on this in class). The annotations should consist of comment bubbles that clearly label key features of an academic essay, including: relevant introductory background information an indication of the value or importance of the subject under discussion a clear thesis that responds to the essay question clear topics that link to the thesis key evidence that supports each topic at least two correctly formatted quotations or paraphrases concluding summarisation The essay used for your commentary should be a minimum of 1000 words. You are welcome and encouraged to revise it so that it better demonstrates the features (such those in the list above) of academic writing discussed in this unit. There is no set word limit on the annotations, however they should fulfil the function described above. This piece is worth 40% of total unit grade. OPTION TWO: Your portfolio includes: A revised version of your essay from Assessment Task 1, which incorporates feedback you have received and demonstrates your skills’ development. 500 words. This component counts for 20% of your total unit grade) AND An additional 500-word essay that has not be previously submitted for assessment. 500 words. This component counts for 30% of your total unit grade) AND A longer essay on a topic selected from the options that will be provided to you. This essay should incorporate and demonstrate your learning in areas of academic writing including style, structure, argument, and evidence. 1500 words. This component counts for 40% of your total unit grade. Detailed instructions will be made available in the Assessment Information folder in the Contents section of MyLO, including essay question options. Links to unit’s intended learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4 Task length See ‘Task Description’ above.
Submission method All assessments for this unit are submitted through MyLO and must be either in Word Document or PDF form. Assessment criteria 1. Write a complete and coherent introduction. 2. Write in complete, focused and coherent body paragraphs. 3. Write a complete and coherent conclusion. 4. Write in clear and appropriately formal academic English. 5. Deploy evidence from appropriate sources to support your points. 6. Reference sources according to academic standards. Portfolio Assessment Rubric (MS Word document version) Please note: If you are repeating this unit, you must not write on any topic that you have previously written for assessment. Assessments will be processed by the Turnitin software, which detects text matching. ETHICS AND HEALTH 1) If people refuse to be vaccinated against contagious illnesses, should the government be entitled to have them vaccinated against their will? POLITICS / SOCIOLOGY 1) Young people are often interested in and vocal about political matters, yet they have no formal say in them. Should the voting age in Australia be lowered to sixteen? HEALTH / HEALTH SCIENCE; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIETY 1) Given the harms, yet widespread nature, of binge-drinking, should the drinking age in Australia be raised to twenty-one? 2) Depression is common in older adults. Major depression manifests in 2% of those aged over 55, and its prevalence rises as age increases (Kok & Reynolds, 2017). What are the most effective ways of managing depression in older adults? 3) The rise in sedentary lifestyles in both developed and developing countries presents potential public health challenges as the danger of inactivity and too much sitting become more apparent. What can institutions such as schools and employers do to contribute to bettering this situation. 4) Should the public be concerned by the influence of violent video games on those who play them? 5) Are we justified in recommending ‘vaporisers’ or e-cigarettes to habitual smokers as a harm-minimisation strategy? 6) There is increasing interest in the link between exercise and cognitive health into older age. Is there convincing evidence that exercise benefits not only the body but also the ageing brain? 7) Pressure injuries are among the most common problems to arise in intensive care units, placing an addition burden on care and recovery. What are the most common factors associated with pressure injuries, and what can be done to minimise their occurrence? 8) What strategies should be implemented to prevent violence against healthcare workers in emergency departments? SOCIOLOGY / EDUCATION 1) School uniforms are often criticised for stifling individuality. Are there any positives to school policies that require uniforms? On balance, would such schools be wise to retain or discontinue their uniform policies 2) Is diet quality important to educational/academic performance in school children? If so, in what ways? 3) Mobile phones are often considered by teachers and many parents to be a menace in the classroom, and often banned outright. However, are there any ways in which the use of mobile phones in class can enhance student learning? If so, in what contexts? INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS / MEDIA & TECHNOLOGY 1) Consider the effects and interactions arising from Indigenous Australians’ use of social media sites. Identify at least two key trends and discuss the implications of those (either beneficial or detrimental) for Indigenous individuals and/or communities. Some of the topics you might choose to focus on are health, connectedness, identity, protest or advocacy, cyberbullying, dating, or business. INDIGENOUS STUDIES / SOCIOLOGY 1) Sport plays a significant role in many Australian Indigenous communities, “with rates of participation . . . even higher than those of non-Indigenous Australians” (Hallinan & Judd, 2016). While Australia has a long history of premier Indigenous athletes, what interest and opportunities does sport hold for Indigenous communities at the local and non-professional level? SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT 1) Antarctica remains relatively unaffected by pollutants stemming from human habitation and industry, yet it is not totally unaffected. Identify the major factors contributing to pollution in Antarctica and comment on their effect on the ecosystem. ENGLISH / COMMUNICATIONS 1) Identify and discuss at least two key ways that feminism has been reflected in, or influenced, crime fiction. Your answer may consider literature and/or film, and may focus on any era of crime fiction. 2) Lethal infectious diseases, whether caused by viruses, bacteria or parasites, have been a fascination of popular cinema at least since The Plague of Florence (1919), but increased in popularity after The Andromeda Strain (1971). They have encompassed multiple genres, from drama (e.g. Philadelphia [1993], The Cure [1995]), to thrillers (e.g. Outbreak [1995]), to numerous horror films in which virally reanimated corpses prey upon the living. Focusing on any of these genres, and drawing on the research literature, identify at least two key themes common to ‘infection cinema’. The topics your essay might consider include the representation of scientific endeavours (and the scientists behind them), government authority, bioterrorism, human nature, STIs including HIV/AIDS, and capitalism/resource allocation (as in several of George Romero’s zombie films).
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. If people refuse to be vaccinated against contagious illnesses, should the government be entitled to have them vaccinated against their will?
Part B: Essay Length: 1200 Words (10% +/- applies) Worth: 30% Task: Choose ONE of the following topics to address: TOPIC 1: Social class, crime and theory in Australia The overarching theme in this essay should be around social class, class inequality, and intersections with crime in Australian context. In addition, you need to apply either structural theory OR conflict theory to help you argue your points and to demonstrate an understanding of the topic. You have an option to select between a specific question to answer OR a quote to interpret in a critical manner. a) How can theory illuminate your understanding of the links between social class and crime in Australian context? OR b) “Rich get richer, poor get prison” (Reiman, 1979). TOPIC 2: Gender, crime and theory in Australia The overarching theme in this essay should be around gender, gender inequality, and intersections with crime in Australian context. In addition, you need to apply feminist theory OR queer theory to help you argue your points and to demonstrate an understanding of the topic. You have an option to select between a specific question to answer or a quote to interpret in a critical manner. a) How can theory illuminate your understanding of the links between gender and crime in Australian context? OR b) “…men and women can be criminals, and criminality structures opportunities for the expression of varieties of masculinity and femininity” (Britton 2011, p. 26). TOPIC 3: Race, ethnicity, crime and theory in Australia The overarching theme in this essay should be around race/ethnicity, racial inequality, and intersections with crime in Australian context. In addition, you need to apply postcolonial theory to help you argue your points and to demonstrate an understanding of the topic. You have an option to select between a specific question to answer or a quote to interpret in a critical manner. a) How can theory illuminate your understanding of the links between race/ethnicity and crime in Australian context? OR b) “Higher rates of offending in Indigenous communities can also be understood as a consequence of colonial processes…” (Pereira & Scott 2016 p. 333) References: You are required to explicitly use at least 8 different academic/scholarly sources in your essay. These must include: • At least 3 scholarly readings drawn from the LST1UNC reading list. These can be listed as either required or further reading, may be from any part of the subject and can include books, journal articles and published reports generated by reputable bodies (including those published on the internet). • At least 2 reports from Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) and/or Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) or reports generated by reputable bodies. You should locate these sources yourself, not use any of the ones available from the LST1UNC reading list. • At least 3 additional scholarly materials that you have found yourself. Please note that newspaper reports and other media items can be used but will not be counted towards meeting the above requirements. In addition, you need to avoid using just any ‘open web sources’ (e.g. Wikipedia) or quoting from lecture slides. *** Reference list is NOT counted toward the overall word count!!! You need to use Harvard Referencing style. If you require help with referencing, try accessing La Trobe Library’s Referencing Tool: https://latrobe.libguides.com/referencing-tool. Please note that referencing is very important in your University work. Every time you refer to ideas you have learned through reading a book, a journal article, or a report, you need to refer to this source in your writing. You need to also be mindful of Academic Misconduct policy (for more information see: http://latrobe.libguides.com/academic-integrity/ethical_use). Direct quotes must be acknowledged using quotation marks (‘like this’) and should be followed by an in-text reference that contains the author’s name, year of publication and page number where applicable. A reference list should be included at the end of your essay. It will contain the full details of the sources you have referred to in your text. The items should be in alphabetical order according to the author’s surname and formatted appropriately. Submission: • Your essay must be submitted electronically as a word file via the ‘Part B: Research Essay’ submission link in the Assessment block on the LST1UNC LMS site. No hardcopy submission is required. • You will only be allowed to submit your essay once. • Your essay will be subject to Turnitin which is a web-based text-matching software system, which can be used to assist in the detection of plagiarism. • You do not need to submit a confirmation of submission or originality report. • Please do not send late submissions via email to subject coordinator or tutor, you need to submit your essay via the appropriate process. • Please note that your essay will not be marked until it is submitted electronically Preparation, Presentation and Referencing: • Your essay should be prepared and submitted using either: o MS Word (.doc and .docx) o You are not allowed to submit a pdf document • Use A4 size pages and a clear, simple and legible black font – either 11 or 12 point. • Double-space the text. • Do not use margins smaller than 2.54cm. • You need to use Harvard Referencing style. • You need a title page (first page), which should include: o your name, o student number, o tutorial group (day, time), o your tutor’s name, o essay topic (be specific – for example: Topic 1, Option b), and o word count (not including reference list). Essay Structure: Suggested essay structure (according to the marks allocated to each section) – Introduction and conclusion (5% of the overall mark): approximately 100 words each – Crime issue (10-15% of the overall mark): approximately 300-350 words – Theory description (20-25% of the overall mark): approximately 300-400words – Theory application (25-30% of the overall mark): approximately 500-600 words Please note that these dot points are suggestions and they do not indicate the number of paragraphs you need to have in your essay. Content (see the marking rubric) Start with three key steps: – First, you need to select one of the three suggested topics in Australian context. You will then search for the appropriate sources (authoritative sources) which will help you describe and frame the selected topic. The more information you have, the easier it will be to apply the theory. – Second, you need to select one of the theories specified in your chosen topic (these are covered in Weeks 3, 4 and 5), which you will need to properly explain before applying it. Here you need to focus on theoretical concepts – provide a proper explanation of these in order to demonstrate your understanding. Do not write about the theorists, write about the ideas. – Third, you need to now link the theory and topic. The links need to be properly supported with empirical evidence, which means here you need to use research in order to demonstrate how theory helps you understand the topic you selected. This will help you construct your main argument(s) which you need to point out at the very start of your essay. In addition, you need to continuously relate the information you present back to this argument throughout the rest of your essay. In this instance your argument needs to be grounded in the application of the theory – how does your selected theory help you understand selected topic. This is a persuasive essay, which means that you need to properly persuade the reader of your argument. In this instance you need to first persuade the reader about your knowledge on the selected topic; second, you need to persuade the reader of your theoretical understanding by properly explaining selected theory; finally through your application you need to persuade the reader of your argument. For selected topic, you need to make sure you follow the tips: – Briefly outline and explain key concepts relevant to the selected topic; – Properly frame the topic in Australian context – here you need to provide statistical information on the extent, impact, etc. Before applying the theory, you need to first explain the theory. Here you need to use academic and authoritative sources to define key theoretical concepts and demonstrate the understanding of theory. It does not matter which theoretical perspective you choose to apply. What does matter is how well you argue your case. Do not simply describe your selected theoretical position. You need to make arguments (maybe come up with three or four main points) that support your discussion and back these up with appropriate research (empirical) evidence. You need to keep in mind that when using empirical evidence to support your claims you need (i) a brief study description (e.g. number of participants, measures used), (ii) the key study findings (relevant to your argument) and (iii) the link back to the essay argument. Throughout your essay you need to use at least 8 authoritative sources. This means you have to research widely, and you can begin your search with the set readings provided. These were selected because they are directly relevant to the subject content, so do not neglect them. Structure (see the marking rubric) Often the difference between a good and a poor essay is not what is said, but how well it is said. Essay structure is an important part of the essay. The following are some simple tips and rules that can greatly improve your essay. Introduction A good introduction is crucial. To navigate through an unfamiliar essay, the reader needs a map or instructions that highlight the points of interest and guides them safely to the end. Your introduction is a brief summary of your essay. It must do the following: – Set out the problem to be addressed; – Highlight the main arguments to be made; – Provide an explicit plan of the essay (the order in which you will present information); – Provide a direct answer to the question (or instructions). Discussion You must give serious thought to the order in which you present your information. There needs to be logic to it – you cannot just present information in a random order. A discussion needs to be well structured and the structure should be obvious to the reader. Keep telling your reader what you are up to. Make sure you set out a clear plan in your introduction and then follow that structure in your discussion. Use ‘signposts’ to emphasis that you are following the plan (e.g. The second argument is…). Do not write too short or too long paragraphs (longer than two sentences, no longer than half a page). Each paragraph should have a topic sentence and should only discuss one idea – make sure your paragraphs are not too long. Avoid over-use of quotes; remember, every time you present a quote, you need to explain what it means. You should only use 2 quotes per whole essay. You should also avoid asking rhetoric questions. You just need to paraphrase these questions into sentences. Conclusion Your conclusion is a brief summary of the essay. Do not introduce any new information, and certainly do not leave your answer to the question (or instructions) until the conclusion. You need to avoid the use of quotes here. *** Please note that in academic essay you should not use subheadings. Writing: The way the information is presented is one of the most significant aspects. In your assessment you need to keep in mind to write clearly, identify and justify your choices. There are a few easy steps you should follow in your writing: • You essay needs to be grammatically sound, so make sure to check the spelling and punctuation before submitting. • To avoid grammatical mistakes, avoid the use of overcomplicated sentences (sentences that are more than a couple of lines in length). • Do not write your essay in first person. Make sure you adapt a more formal language (third person) for the purpose of this essay. This includes avoiding the use of abbreviations. • As this is an academic essay, avoid the use of dot points or lists. Instead incorporate these points into sentences. • You need to use a proper essay style-structure throughout. This also means, do not include tables, figures, and appendices unless you are asked to. Instead incorporate the information from these into sentences. • Avoid over-use of quotes – remember, every time you present a lengthy quote, you need to explain what it means. You should only use 2-3 lengthy quotes per whole essay. • You should also avoid asking rhetoric questions. You just need to paraphrase these questions into sentences. • Avoid long (longer than approximately half a page) or short paragraphs (one or two sentences is not a paragraph). • Avoid the use of subheadings. Extensions: If you are having difficulties with the assessment and/or have grounds to request an extension, submit your request online (Online Extension Form) to your tutor or subject coordinator at least 3 days before the due date. Do not email your tutor or subject coordinator, you will be asked to submit your request online – we do not grant extension request for this task via email. Please note that unless there are exceptional circumstances, requests after this timeframe will be rejected. You should also keep in mind that unless you have LAP, you will be required to submit documentation with your request. Please also remember that unless there are exceptional circumstances (e.g. emergency), retrospective extensions are not approved, and you should consider applying for Special Consideration. If you are struggling to achieve the set due date, please make sure you reach out to us ASAP! It is important to contact us before the due date. Late submissions: Please keep in mind that the penalty for lateness is severe. “The standard penalty for late submission of assessment tasks is 5% of the marks for that task for each delay in submission of a day or partial day up to a maximum of five (5) working days after the due date. Assessment tasks will not be accepted after the fifth (5th) working day after the due date.” Marking Rubric: This might be the most important document for you to refer to when you prepare for your assessment. This rubric provides you with a clear marking expectation and you should be guided by this rubric. Markers use this rubric to assess your work, so you need to ensure that you address the key aspect of this rubric. Only include information that is being evaluated. Above Expectations Meets Expectations Approaches Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations Topic Student’s comprehension of the selected topic in AU context is exemplar in terms of scholarship. Student briefly examines selected topic in appropriate AU context; demonstrates an awareness of key terminology. Student uses appropriate referencing and authoritative sources. Student attempts to examine selected topic in appropriate AU context, but there are issues. Student attempts to use appropriate referencing and authoritative sources. There might be minor factual errors. There is a lack of clarity around the topic understanding and contextualising. Limited knowledge of appropriate referencing and sources. There might be some factual errors. Theory Student’s comprehension of the theory is exemplar in terms of scholarship. Student demonstrates great understanding of key topical ideas. Student provides a concise overview of the key theoretical terms and concepts relevant to the topic; and clearly demonstrates an understanding of the topical ideas by accurately interpreting these. Student uses appropriate referencing and authoritative sources. Student also critically engages with the literature. Student provides some overview of the key theoretical terms and concepts relevant to the topic; and attempts to demonstrates an understanding of the topical ideas. Student attempts to use appropriate referencing and authoritative sources. The response does not demonstrate reasoning and understanding of the theory and/or source(s). Lack of clarity around sources or the sources presented are not relevant. Application, Critical Engagement and Argument Student demonstrates exemplary skills in their critical thinking and reflection. Student mounts a coherent and logical application of theory; and does not just rely on description. Student clearly identifies key concepts and arguments relevant to the debate. Student integrates information from various sources; and where appropriate, supports application with empirical research findings. Student properly supports all claims made with appropriate references. Student attempts to provide a coherent and logical application of theory, but there are minor issues. Student attempts to identify key concepts and arguments relevant to the debate, but there might be some problems. Student attempts to use sources properly, but there might be issues (for example using empirical research). Student attempts to support all claims made with appropriate references. The response does not demonstrate relationship between theory and topic. There seems to be a vague understanding of theoretical application process. While there is an attempt, there are too many issues throughout the paper. Independent Research Skills Student goes beyond the required 8 sources and researches widely. Student grounds their analysis in 8 appropriate sources (as specified in instructions). Student attempts to ground their analysis in 8 appropriate sources, but there are errors. Student did not select/draw from the 8 appropriate scholarly sources. Structure Essay is organised extremely efficiently with sophisticated arrangement of content with evident and/or subtle transitions. Essay is effectively organised to enhance reader’s understanding of the information. The relationships between ideas are made clear with effective transitional phases. The ideas presented flow and structure is well thought out. Essay organisational structure is evident but may not be fully developed or appropriate. Transitional phrases may be used but the relationships between ideas are somewhat unclear. There might be some issues with essay structure. Essay organisational structure is largely absent and the relationships between ideas are unclear. There are issues with paragraphs and/or overall essay structure. Expression and Grammar Expression and grammar are exceptional and of a high academic standard. Ideas are presented clearly and in a formal language. The writing is grammatically sound and is free of punctuation errors. Ideas are mostly clear. There are minor grammatical and spelling errors. Ideas are not clear. There are several grammatical and/or spelling errors. Format and Referencing The formatting and Harvard referencing contains no flaws and is within the specified word count. The assessment adheres to presentation guidelines, and specified referencing style (Harvard). Essay is written within the 10% of the suggested word count. The assessment mainly adheres to presentation guidelines and/or specified referencing style (Harvard). There might be issues with word count. There are several issues with presentation guidelines and/or specified referencing style (Harvard). There might be issues with word count.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. How can theory illuminate your understanding of the links between social class and crime in Australian context?
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS607 Cybersecurity Assessment Mitigation Plan for Threat Report Individual/Group Individual Length 2500 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: b) Explore and articulate cyber trends, threats and staying safe in cyberspace, plus protecting personal and company data. c) Analyse issues associated with organisational data networks and security to recommend practical solutions towards their resolution. d) Evaluate and communicate relevant technical and ethical considerations related to the design, deployment and/or the uses of secure technologies within various organisational contexts. Weighting 45% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary For this assessment, you are required to write a 2500 words mitigation plan for threat report based on knowledge you gained about threat types and key factors in Assessment 2. You are required to use the Assessment 2 case as context to write a report to address or alleviate problems faced by the business and to protect the customers. In doing so, you are required to demonstrate your ability to mitigate threat/risks identified in Assessment 2 through the strategy you recommend (STRIDE). Context Cybersecurity help organizations to mitigate threats/risks, reduce financial loss and safety violations, decrease unethical behaviour, improve customer satisfaction, and increase efficiency, as well as to maintain these improved results. Threats can be resolved by Risk Acceptance (doing nothing), Risk Transference (pass risk to an externality), Risk Avoidance (removing the feature/component that causes the risk) and Risk Mitigation (decrease the risk). This assessment gives you an opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of cybersecurity and your capability to explain Risk Mitigation strategies for such threats. Mitigations should be chosen according to the appropriate technology and resolution should be decided according to the risk level and cost of mitigation. Task Instructions 1. Read the Assessment 2 Case Scenario again to understand the concepts discussed in the case. 2. Review your subject notes to establish the relevant area of investigation that applies to the case. Reread any relevant readings that have been recommended in the case area in modules. Plan how you will structure your ideas for the mitigation plan for threat report. 3. The mitigation plan for threat report should address the following: • Setting priorities for risks/threats MIS607_Assessment_3_Brief_Mitigation plan for threat report_ Module 6.1 Page 1 of 4 • Analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios • Apply standard mitigations • Discuss specific resolutions for improvement, and justify their significance • Provide recommendations for mitigating risk based on an assessment of risk appetite, risk tolerance and current risk levels (Choose techniques to mitigate the threats) • Make recommendations to the CEO on how to conduct risk management, key issues involving your process improvement model, including a road map, the identification of appropriate technologies for the identified techniques, communicating the strategy, and a suggested timeline. 4. The report should consist of the following structure: A title page with subject code and name, assignment title, student’s name, student number, and lecturer’s name. The introduction that will also serve as your statement of purpose for the report. This means that you will tell the reader what you are going to cover in mitigation plan report. You will need to inform the reader of: a) Your area of research and its context (how to mitigate or manage threats) b) The key concepts you will be addressing c) What the reader can expect to find in the body of the report The body of the report will need to respond to the specific requirements of the case study. It is advised that you use the case study to assist you in structuring the report. Set priorities for identified threats from assessment 2, analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and discuss specific resolutions and recommendations for improvements in the body of the report. The conclusion (will summarise any findings or recommendations that the report puts forward regarding the concepts covered in the report. 5. Format of the report The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading, and have page numbers on the bottom of each page. If diagrams or tables are used, due attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate captioning. 6. Referencing There are requirements for referencing this report using APA referencing style for citing and referencing research. It is expected that you used 10 external references in the relevant subject area based on readings and further research. Please see more information on referencing here: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool 7. You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the assignment—this will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like. Submission Instructions Submit Assessment 3 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS607 Cybersecurity. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that, except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms. I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. MIS607_Assessment_3_Brief_Mitigation plan for threat report_ Module 6.1 Page 2 of 4 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Visual appeal and presentation of content Title page included. Adheres to the font, spacing, format, word count requirement. Appropriate use of paragraphs, sentence construction, spelling, and grammar. 20% No title page. Incorrect font and size with poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination, tables, or diagrams. Report is written as a block of text with no breaks in between ideas. Separate ideas cannot be clearly discerned. Many errors in spelling or grammar. Does not adhere to the word count requirement. Title page is included. Missing most information. Incorrect font and size is used or poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination. Paragraphs are used but large blocks of text with long sentences make it difficult to understand the ideas being conveyed. Spelling or grammar has errors but meaning remains clear. Does not adhere to the word count requirement. Title page is included but is missing key information. Some errors in font use and line spacing. Some pagination problems. One idea or concept per paragraph. Some paragraphs could be more succinctly written. Minor spelling or grammar errors. Adheres to the word count requirement. Title page is included with most required information. Minor errors in font, spacing and format. One idea or concept per paragraph with 3–4 wellconstructed sentences per paragraph. No errors in spelling or grammar. Adheres to the word count requirement. Title page is included with all required information. Font, spacing, and format are in accordance with the requirements of the assignment brief. Expert use of paragraphs with 3–4 well-constructed sentences per paragraph that follow logically from each other. No errors in spelling or grammar. Adheres to the word count requirement. Knowledge and understanding Understanding of the key concepts, principles of cybersecurity, Analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios and apply standard mitigations. 30% Lack of understanding of the required concepts and knowledge. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Lack of analysis of the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios and no application of standard mitigations. Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge. Some of the key components of the assignment are not addressed. Limited analysis of the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios. Limited application of standard mitigations. Adequate understanding of the required concepts. A reasonable capacity to explain and apply relevant key concepts. Supports opinion and information substantiated by evidence from research to analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios. Adequate application of standard mitigations. Thorough understanding of the key concepts. Welldemonstrated capacity to apply and analyse relevant information to analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios and application of standard mitigations. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s and key concepts. Expert analysis of case in terms of identified risk categories and application of standard mitigation. MIS607_Assessment_3_Brief_Mitigation plan for threat report_ Module 6.1 Page 3 of 4 Evaluation and recommendations Discuss specific resolutions for improvement. Evaluation and justification of resolutions to provide recommendations for mitigating risks 30% Lack of discussion on specific resolution for improvement. No evaluation of resolutions for improvement to provide recommendations for mitigating risk. Limited discussion on specific resolutions for improvement. Lack of evaluation of resolutions for improvement to provide recommendations for mitigating risk. Adequate discussion of specific resolutions for improvement. Provide resolutions for improvement and recommendations for mitigating risk. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and discuss specific resolutions for improvement. A comprehensive evaluation and justification of resolutions to provide recommendations for mitigating risk. Expert discussion of specific resolutions for improvement. Comprehensive and high level of evaluation and justification of the significance of resolutions to provide recommendations for mitigating risks. Use of academic and discipline conventions Formal tone. No use of first-party perspective. Meets the assignment brief regarding introduction, body, and conclusion. Appropriate use of credible resources. Correct citation of key resources using APA style of referencing. 20% Does not adhere to the assignment brief requirements. Poorly written with informal tone using first person pronouns. No introduction attempted. Conclusion not attempted. Inconsistent and inadequate use of goodquality, credible resources. No use of intext references, or no reference list at the close of the report. Many mistakes in using the APA style. Written according to academic genre. Minor errors in the use of first-person pronouns. Introduction attempted but very generic. Does not clearly state the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the report. Conclusion attempted but does not include summation of key concepts and/or recommendations. Consistent use of credible sources but these are not always explicit or welldeveloped. Little use of intext referencing. Mistakes in using APA style. Written according to academic genre. Sound use of the introduction but does not clearly state either the purpose of the report or what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report. Sound use of the conclusion and succeeds in either the summation of key concepts discussed or recommendations, but not both. Consistent use of credible sources. Good use of in-text referencing. Minor errors in using the APA style. Well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Good use of the introduction, which clearly states the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report. Good use of the conclusion and succeeds in summation of key concepts discussed and key conclusions or recommendations. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible sources. Very good use of in-text referencing. No mistakes in using the APA style. Expertly written. Adheres to the academic genre. Excellent use of introduction. Secures the attention of the reader, clearly states the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the report. Excellent use of the conclusion. Succeeds in confident summation of key concepts and recommendations. Expert use of credible and relevant sources. Excellent use of in-text referencing. No mistakes in using the APA style. MIS607_Assessment_3_Brief_Mitigation plan for threat report_ Module 6.1 Page 4 of 4
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Cybersecurity help organizations to mitigate threats/risks, reduce financial loss and safety violations
Oral presentation instructions Make sure the presentation can last 20 minutes 1. Background Information What are some of the arguments presented in the literature? Are there any ethical issues involved here? What issues, gaps do you think requires further investigation? (This is what they found in previous research – what issues and additional questions should you examine?) 2. Your research Your questions MUST be linked to the evidence – and which issues require further exploration / gaps Your research questions MUST NOT be yes/ no unless testing knowledge. You must convey the following: Survey: (QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH) it must contain: Likert scales; Rank opinions/ offer space for comment; content analysis, identifying objects. Further. I would like you to create these research questions that can be used in a survey that comply with the aspects above eg, likert scales, rank opinions etc. 3. Discuss – Explain how your key findings are the same or different to previous findings. Consider the limitations of your research. 4. Conclude: What is your stance now (supported by evidence)? You don’t have to agree/disagree just support what you are thinking now with evidence. What makes a successful coach? Coaches at any age group can have a profound impact on athletes / players. Conduct a study with coaches and players of different sports and age groups. For example, junior sport, amateur adult level, elite level, individual or team sports. What makes a successful coach? Are there common characteristics and traits they think describe a successful coach and their behaviours? What factors do they consider important when working with teams/individuals? For the coaches: Do they have a coaching philosophy? What psychological objectives do they have for those with which they work? How do they motivate their charges?
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. What are some of the arguments presented in the literature?
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T2 2021 Unit Code HC3131 Unit Title Business Research Project Assessment Type 1, Topic Approval, Presentation Assessment Title Topic Approval Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) 1.Clearly identify your chosen topic, having carried out some basic review of available secondary data to secure your interest (at least 3 academic articles, plus a business report, or a relevant current news item). Indicate the Research Problem, as you see it so far, and at least ONE research question at this stage (additional questions may be defined as you progress with this unit). 10%. Matches outcomes 1,2,3 2.A brief presentation in-class in week 5. 4 PPTS 10% Plus 3 minute voice-over/video Matches to Unit Learning Outcomes 4 and 5 Weight 20 % of the total assessments Total Marks 20 Word limit Not more than 1200 words for the Topic Approval and 4 PPTS for presentation Due Date Friday of Week 4 and Week 5 Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by 12 midnight of the due date, along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. [If no cover page your mark will be reduced -20%]. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings, paragraphing, and page numbers. Slides in standard PPT format with video/voice over. • Reference sources must be correctly cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list, all in Harvard referencing style.
Assignment 1 Specifications Purpose: This unit aims to give you an opportunity to combine many facets of your acquired MBA skills into the production of a high-quality research project. Assignment 1 – the Topic Approval – is to ensure you have given sufficient thought to the topic you are choosing to base your research project on. Your tutor will LEAD and FACILITATE you through the process, week by week. The learning will be progressive, so for best results you will need to be reading the weekly lectures as well as in contact with your tutor during the interactive tutorials. Assignment Structure should be as the following: 1. Say why this topic interests you. Submit a draft topic for approval. 2. Discuss your initial search for relevant literature and show that it has provided you with a good contextual understanding 3. Define the Research Problem that you intend to address (as you see it, so far) 4. Propose at least ONE research question that you will be seeking to answer through your research project (additional questions may be defined as you progress with this unit) 5. Develop a detailed table of contents and your initial reference list.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. having carried out some basic review of available secondary data to secure your interest
Intent: To explore historical nursing leaders’ values, attributes and their contribution to the nursing profession. This assessment will enable students to explore important leadership abilities and to incorporate this knowledge into their emerging professional identity. Task: Students can either write a paper OR compose a narrated PowerPoint presentation about a specific nursing leader selected from the list below, addressing the following: 1. In your own words provide a brief biographical outline of the life of the nursing leader you have selected. 2. Identify and describe two (2) attributes/values of an effective leader that were evident in the leader you have chosen. Provide an example of how the leader demonstrated the attributes/values. 3. Describe two (2) significant contributions/achievements of this person to the nursing profession? 4. Reflect on what have you learned from your research on this leader and describe how this knowledge will inform your own professional identify? Note: All questions must be supported by high quality, relevant nursing literature. Nursing leaders: • Mary Seacole; • Ellen (Nell) Savage; • Walt Whitman; • Helene Donnelly; • Sally Goold; • Fatu Kekula; • Vivien Bullwinkle; • Florence Nightingale; • Irena Sendler. Length:10 minute video + transcript to be supplied OR 1500 word paper Rubric Nurse Leader Assessment Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBiography A brief biographical outline of the life of the nursing leader is written in the student’s own words 15 to 14.0 pts Well Developed 14-15 marks A succinct, historically accurate biographical outline is written in the student’s own words. AND The standard of writing/presentation is excellent and use of high quality, relevant nursing literature is effective and appropriate to support the answer. 14 to 12.0 pts Developed 12-13 marks A succinct biographical outline is written in the student’s own words. AND The standard of writing/presentation is very good and high quality, relevant nursing literature is used appropriately to support the answer 12 to 10.0 pts Satisfactory 10-11 marks A clear biographical outline is written in the student’s own words. AND The standard of writing/presentation is good and there is reference to appropriate nursing literature to support the answer. 10 to 8.0 pts Developing 8-9 marks A biographical outline is written in the student’s own words. AND The standard of writing/presentation is satisfactory and there is reference to some nursing literature to support the answer. 8 to 0 pts Not yet developed 0-7 marks. A biographical outline is not provided OR the outline DOES NOT refer to an appropriate nursing leader OR The outline IS NOT written/presented in the student’s own words. OR there is no reference to appropriate nursing literature to support the answer. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAttributes and Values One attribute and one value of an effective nursing leader demonstrated by the selected leader is described An example of how the leader demonstrated the attribute and value is described 25 to 22.0 pts Well Developed 23-25 marks A highly relevant nursing attribute and value demonstrated by the leader is clearly and accurately described. AND An example of how the leader demonstrated the attribute and value is clearly and accurately described. AND The standard of writing/presentation is excellent and use of high quality, relevant nursing literature is effective and appropriate to support the answer. 22 to 19.0 pts Developed 20-22 marks An appropriate nursing attribute and value demonstrated by the leader is clearly described. AND An example of how the leader demonstrated the attribute and value is accurately described. AND The standard of writing/presentation is very good and high quality, relevant nursing literature is used appropriately to support the answer. 19 to 16.0 pts Satisfactory 17 – 19 marks One nursing attribute and one value demonstrated by the leader is described. AND An example of how the leader demonstrated the attribute and value is described. AND The standard of writing/presentation is good and there is reference to appropriate nursing literature to support the answer. 16 to 12.0 pts Developing 13-16 marks One attribute and one value demonstrated by the leader is identified. AND An example of how the leader demonstrated the attribute OR value is provided. AND The standard of writing/presentation is satisfactory and there is reference to some nursing literature to support the answer. 12 to 0 pts Not yet developed 0-12 marks Neither an attribute or a value demonstrated by the leader is identified or they are not appropriate. OR There is no example of how the leader demonstrated the attribute or the example is not appropriate. OR There is no reference to appropriate nursing literature to support the answer. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContributions and Achievements Two significant contributions / achievements of the nursing leader to the nursing profession are described 25 to 22.0 pts Well Developed 23-25 marks Two contributions / achievements are clearly and accurately described. AND The standard of writing/presentation is excellent and use of high quality, relevant nursing literature is effective and appropriate to support the answer 22 to 19.0 pts Developed 20-22 marks Two contributions / achievements are accurately described. AND The standard of writing/presentation is very good and high quality, relevant nursing literature is used appropriately to support the answer. 19 to 16.0 pts Satisfactory 17-19 marks Two contributions / achievements are correctly described. AND The standard of writing/presentation is good and there is reference to appropriate nursing literature to support the answer. 16 to 13.0 pts Developing 13-16 marks Two contributions / achievements are correctly identified. AND The standard of writing/presentation is satisfactory and there is reference to some nursing literature to support the answer. 13 to 0 pts Not yet developed 0-12 marks Two contributions / achievements are not correctly identified. AND There is no reference to appropriate nursing literature to support the answer. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Reflection on what has been learned from the research on the leader and how this will inform student’s own professional identity. 25 to 22.0 pts Well Developed 23-25 marks A well-written/presented, in-depth and insightful reflection provided and supported by a clear and meaningful description of how knowledge gained will inform the student’s professional identity. 22 to 19.0 pts Developed 20-22 marks A clear and insightful reflection provided and supported by a meaningful description of how knowledge gained will inform the student’s professional identity. 19 to 16.0 pts Satisfactory 17-19 marks A sound and thoughtful reflection provided and supported by a description of how knowledge gained will inform the student’s professional identity. 16 to 12.0 pts Developing 13-16 marks A refection provided along with reference to how knowledge gained will inform the student’s professional identity. 12 to 0 pts Not yet developed 0-12 marks A refection is not provided OR there is no or minimal description of how knowledge gained will inform the student’s professional identity 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Referencing (written paper AND PPT presentation) Writing and presentation is consistent with UTS academic referencing standards 10 to 9.0 pts Well Developed 10 marks. In-text citations and reference list is error free, and referencing is consistent with APA – 7 standards. 9 to 8.0 pts Developed 9 marks In-text citations and reference list is mostly error free and referencing is consistent with APA – 7 standards. 8 to 5.0 pts Satisfactory 6 – 8 marks In-text citations and/or reference list has less than 3 errors and referencing is consistent with APA – 7 standards. 5 to 3.0 pts Developing 4-5 marks In-text citations and reference list has 3-5 errors and referencing is consistent with APA – 7 standards. 3 to 0 pts Not yet developed 0-3 marks Major errors (more than 5) evident in either/both in-text citations and reference list; or referencing is not consistent with APA – 7 standards. 10 pts Total Points: 100
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. In your own words provide a brief biographical outline of the life of the nursing leader you have selected.
Assessment Information/brief 2020/21 Module title Operations and Information Management CRN 33150, 33216 Level 7 Assessment title Consultancy Report (Assessment 2) Weighting within module This report is worth 50% of the overall module mark. Submission deadline date and time See OnlineCampus Assessment set by: Dr Suzanne Kane How to submit You should submit your assessment through OnlineCampus by the due date. Assessment Criteria: Assessment task details and instructions Your Task You are a consultant who has been employed to advise on the effective implementation of strategic changes. You are required to produce the following for the case study provided below: Part A: Analysis – Business Process Models and strategy analysis In this section you should develop 1. A series of at least two Business Process Models, which capture the existing and your proposed business processes. The models should follow the BPMN notation shown in the lecture slides. You can utilise Microsoft Visio, Word, PowerPoint or appropriate alternatives to create the models. 2. Strategic analysis: You should use at least one recognised analysis technique such as SWOT, PESTLE etc Part B: Open Source Software Comparison Table In this section, you should conduct research into a suitable software solution. You should decide on the set of characteristics which you will use to evaluate the software and your research should consider 4-5 alternatives in detail. This section should be presented as a table. Part C: Report In this section, you should write a report which provides an overview of the current situation together with a roadmap outlining how the proposed changes to the business can be achieved to the benefit of the business. This should draw on your analysis in Part A, include your recommendation for software in Part B, and provide recommendations for ensuring that the strategy is effectively implemented, including consideration of the challenges ahead. This section should follow standard report structure: Title Page – Contents – Introduction – Main Section – Conclusions and Recommendations – References. You should use appropriate theories, frameworks, models, that we have covered in the module, to inform and justify your recommendations. Part D: Reflection on your contribution to the online discussion In this section you should submit a 250-word reflective summary, accompanied by your own self-assessment of your contribution to the online elements throughout the module, using the table labelled ‘Reflection Self-Assessment Pro forma’ in Appendix A (copy and paste it into your assignment document). The reflective report should include your detailed reflection on your learning process of theories, frameworks, models that we covered in the module, supported with evidence (pasted URLs) from the online discussion forum. Using the Discussion Forum The module syllabus will feature discussion forums for you to explore the assignment/share your ideas and findings of group activities. It is recommended that you use these to: ? Share papers and articles that you have found on relevant topics (remember to include links / reference / pdfs if you do this!) ? Discuss the changes to the ways of working – i.e. discuss what processes will change and explore how these might work in practice. You might also consider the changing information needs of the business ? Discuss and share examples of Open Source software that could be of use. ? Present the practice/outcomes/discussion of group activities outside class. Please don’t be shy of using the discussion forums – the purpose is to give you experience of using collaborative technologies. This is the marking table which will be used to guide the marking of assessment components: Section Content Word Count Marks Part A Analysis – Business Process Models and strategy analysis 1000 (equivalent to) 30 Part B Open Source Software Comparison Table 500 (equivalent to) 20 Part C Report 1250 40 Part D Reflection on your contribution to the online discussion 250 10 Total 3000 100 The case study: Music Mates Music Mates is a group of three musicians who have been performing together for approximately two years. The group have regular repeat gigs around the North West of England, which provides enough funds for them to be paid as part-time professional musicians. In addition to their musical talents, Alexander, Sergei, and Vassily, are experienced sound engineers, who provide a PA service for the Music Mates gigs and for a number of other bands in the North-West area. They share a wide network of friends who are also musicians and they often promote other bands. But recently these other bands have asked them to be agents for an agree fee. If they decide to take this professional route, it would mean that they could work full-time as musicians/agents. However, they are aware that starting the agency would require a business approach. They would be responsible for advertising events, social media marketing, keeping business accounts, providing an updated calendar of events, and keeping track of the communications between themselves, the clients who want to book bands, and the bands who are signed to the Music Mates agency. At the moment, they use a website, a Facebook page, and the SoundCloud audio platform. Alexander, Sergei, and Vassily all have iphone’s and macbook pro laptop computers. They realise that starting the agency requires a business approach, which includes software that will support their business. They have read about Customer Relationship Management software and Enterprise Resource Management software, which appears to offer the type of information technology support that they will need. However, they need professional help before they can make any final decisions about investing funds in business software. They are also interested in the possibility of utilising Open Source Software, but require information on the advantages and disadvantages. Growing Music Mates into a full-time small to medium enterprise business that supports three members of staff will mean significant changes and there are some concerns that using business technology might change the close working relationships which exist between Alexander, Sergei, Vassily and the bands with which they have personal connections. They are keen to run the business in a democratic style and as such, everyone will have an equal vote on any business decisions. Therefore, they require a report that can be read and understood by each of them. You are the OIM consultant who is responsible for researching this business and providing a consultancy report. Module Aims 1. Allow students to develop an in-depth understanding of the increasingly important field of operations and information management. 2. Provide students with an overview of the role and contribution of operations and information systems to a company’s strategic position. 3. To provide concepts, techniques and models used for planning, managing and improving operations and information systems in contemporary organisations across a range of business sectors 4. To equip students with the capability to apply their knowledge of operations and information management within their business and management practice or further study.
Appendix A: Reflection Self-Assessment Pro forma 80+ 70-79 60-69 50-59 40-49 0-40 Quality of contributions Made several good contributions and one or more outstanding contribution. Made several good contributions. Made a few good contributions Made a few valid contributions Made 1 or 2 postings, of poor quality Did not contribute. Attribution of references Clear referencing of well-chosen and highly relevant sources Clear referencing of all sources, some relevant. Clear referencing of all sources. Sources generally referenced. Used ideas/ words of others without attribution. Cut and paste or absent contributions. Evidence of collaboration/ facilitation skills Skill shown in weaving contributions into the discussions and wiki and following up on contributions of others. Skill shown in weaving contributions into discussion and / or wiki, or following up on contributions of others Some evidence of links to contributions of others. Basic recognition of contributions of others. Little or no recognition of contributions of others. None Reflection on online contributions (in reflective summary) Deep reflection shown, with clear and substantial evidence from online discussion and wiki Good reflection, with clear evidence from online discussion and / or wiki Reflection and evidence offered, limitations in one of these Reflection and evidence offered, limitations in both of these Superficial reflection, very limited evidence Very little or no reflection/evidence. Level 7– Generic Descriptors
Extremely poor Very poor Poor Inadequate Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Outstanding 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100 Knowledge Totally inadequate demonstration of required knowledge. Not able to link theory to practice. No appropriate themes identified. Virtually no relevant knowledge demonstrated. Fails to adequately demonstrate links between theory and practice. Very poor identification of key themes. Inconsistent or inaccurate knowledge. Limited and inappropriate or inaccurate links between theory and practice. Poor identification of key themes. Limited evidence of knowledge. Inappropriate links between theory and practice. Inadequate identification of key themes. Basic knowledge with occasional inaccuracies appropriate yet basic integration of theory and practice. Superficial depth or limited breadth with unsatisfactory identification of key themes. Mostly accurate knowledge with satisfactory depth and breadth of knowledge. Sound integration of theory and practice with satisfactory identification of key themes. Consistently relevant accurate knowledge with good depth and breadth. Clear and relevant application of theory to practice. Good identification of key themes. Comprehensive knowledge demonstrating very good depth and breadth. Clear insight into links between theory and practice. Demonstrates ability to transfer knowledge between different contexts appropriately. Integrates the complexity of a range of knowledge and excellent understanding of its relevance. Excellent depth of knowledge in a variety of contexts. Coherent and systematic application of theory to practice. Outstanding knowledge. Theory is linked to practice to an exceptional level and may be used to formulate new questions, ideas or challenges. Extremely poor Very poor Poor Inadequate Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Outstanding 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100 Cognitive processes Cognitive Processes No demonstration of analysis, evaluation or synthesis. No evidence of reflection. Unsatisfactory professional judgement No meaningful analysis or evaluation. Unable to identify appropriate issues for reflection. Arguments presented are inappropriate and very poorly linked. Very poor professional judgement. Descriptive occasionally attempts to analyse or evaluate material but lacks critical approach. Confusion and/ or weakness in academic argument. Identifies issues for reflection but lacks evidence of reflective processes. Poor professional judgement. Mainly descriptive evidence of analysis, inconsistent critical approach, little evaluation or synthesis. Follows processes of reflection but fails to demonstrate insight. Inconsistent and/ or inaccurate professional judgement. Critical analysis evident, with some evaluation and synthesis, although limited. Limited evidence of reflection. Some appropriate academic argument although not well applied and lacking in clarity. Unsatisfactory professional judgement. Sound critical analysis and evaluation. Relevant academic argument. Demonstrates basic ability of synthesise information in order to formulate appropriate questions and conclusions. Reflective process is utilised, with insight demonstrating planning for future practice. Integrates relevant information in order to make sound professional judgements. Clear, in depth critical analysis, evaluation and academic argument with synthesis of different ideas and perspectives. Utilises reflection to develop self and practice. Aware of the influence of varied perspectives and time frames. Uses a wide range of sources to inform clinical decision making and prioritises plans. Very good analysis and synthesis of material with evidence of critique and independent thought. Balanced and mature approach to reflection used to enhance practice and performance in a range of contexts. Demonstrates ability to make sound decisions in complex and unpredictable contexts. Excellent critical analysis and synthesis. Arguments handled skilfully with imaginative interpretation of material. Willingness to challenge self and practice. Outstanding critical analysis and synthesis. Incorporates evidence of original thinking.
Extremely poor Very poor
Poor Inadequate
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Outstanding 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100 Communication
Presentation is extremely poor. Work has no structure or clarity. Extremely poor use of language.
Presentation is very poor. Work has little discernible structure or clarity. Very poor use of language. Presentation is poor. Work is disorganised and lacks clarity. Poor use of language. Presentation is unsatisfactory. Work is limited in terms of structure, coherence and clarity. Limitations in academic style. Presentation of work is unsatisfactory in terms of structure, coherence, clarity and academic style. Some inconsistencies. Some grammar and syntax errors which detract from the content Presentation of work is satisfactory in terms of structure coherence, clarity and academic style. But some inconsistencies in grammar and syntax. Presentation of work is well organised with good use of language to express ideas/argument. Very few inconsistencies; grammar and syntax good. Presentation is of a very good standard, demonstrating a scholarly style. Very good grammar and syntax Presentation is excellent, well-structured and logical. Demonstrates a scholarly style. Excellent grammar and syntax. Presentation is outstanding demonstrating a fluent academic style.
Extremely poor Very poor
Poor Inadequate Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Outstanding 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100 Referencing and using evidence No references. No attempt to provide evidence of sources used. Lack of ability to source adequate material. Very poor referencing Poor use of reference material. Inappropriate or outdated sources with numerous referencing errors. Unsatisfactory referencing with frequent error. Limited ability to support content with relevant sources. Narrow range of sources. Referencing in presented work is unsatisfactory with some inconsistencies or inaccuracies. Over utilises secondary sources. References used are inappropriate in terms of currency. Satisfactory range of sources identified with appropriate referencing and few inaccuracies. Appropriate use of primary and secondary sources. Good range of sources. Well referenced, very few inaccuracies. Good use of primary and secondary sources. Clear evidence of referencing to a wide range of primary and secondary sources which are used effectively in supporting the work. Detailed use of predominantly primary sources which are well referenced and are used creatively to develop the work. Synthesis of reference material from a wide range of sources both within and across professions
Feedback arrangements You can expect to receive summative feedback 10 working days after the due date. Typed feedback on your work will be available via OnlineCampus. Support arrangements You can obtain support for this assessment by attending the required classes, participating in the class discussions and asking questions in the dedicated forum thread. Engagement is vital for your success in the module. askUS The University offers a range of support services for students through askUS. Good Academic Conduct and Academic Misconduct Students are expected to learn and demonstrate skills associated with good academic conduct (academic integrity). Good academic conduct includes the use of clear and correct referencing of source materials. Here is a link to where you can find out more about the skills which students require http://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning. Academic Misconduct is an action which may give you an unfair advantage in your academic work. This includes plagiarism, asking someone else to write your assessment for you or taking notes into an exam. The University takes all forms of academic misconduct seriously. You can find out how to avoid academic misconduct here https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning. Assessment Information If you have any questions about assessment rules, you can find out more here. Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2019/20 is available at: https://www.salford.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/1912507/AcademicRegulationsTaught201920.pdf In regard to late submissions, you can submit your work up to 21 consecutive days. But all late submissions will be capped at the pass mark. Accepted personal mitigating circumstances will remove the capped mark. PMCs – self certification is permitted. There is no limitation to the number of PMCs you are applying. Personal Mitigating Circumstances If personal mitigating circumstances may have affected your ability to complete this assessment, you can find more information about personal mitigating circumstances procedure here. Student Progression Administrator If you have any concerns about your studies, contact StudentCare at studentcare@rkc.edu Assessment Criteria You should look at the assessment criteria to find out what we are specifically considering during the assessment marking. Marks for your assessment will be allocated based on the marking table (see marking table above). Reassessment If you fail your assessment, and are eligible for reassessment, you need to take resit in due time (details to be followed). For students with accepted personal mitigating circumstances, this will be your replacement assessment attempt. The reassessment is based on an improvement of your failed submission.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. You are a consultant who has been employed to advise on the effective implementation of strategic changes.
Company choosed: Bahrain Duty free shop complex B.S.C. Assignment report parts with explanation of each part content: Part 1: Background of the company (1 page) overview of the company: stating what is the company all about, when was it established, what is the core ability of the company, what are the key achievements and milestones for the past 10 years that makes this company unique from other organizations, the nature of the company, what is the nature of its operation, what it’s specialized in. also focus on key achievements and milestones of the organization. Part 2: Board of directors and key management officials (1 page): discuss who are the board of directors and chairman of the board of the company, who are the key officers, and also try to identify the members of the board, try to find on a research who are those individuals and brief experiences and stuff like that, also highlight who is their CEO (chief executive officer), key officials such as chief financial officer and operations manager or head of operations, and for human resource any major official that you can look in to in the company that you feel the core stones of the organization. Also provide an analysis of their BOD and management composition. Part 3: Industry analysis (2 pages): conduct industry analysis of where the company is part of. Use PEST analysis for example, depending on your convenience you can choose any framework so that you can analyse the nature of the industry (what are it’s potentials, what are the challenges, what are the threats). In the industry where the company belongs who are the major players? so try to provide a very good overview of the industry (where the company currently analysing). Part 4: Analysis of the financial performance of the firm (7 pages): conduct financial analysis of the company using vertical analysis ratio. Focus on the key strengths? you can use a vertical analysis of course you use ratio analysis to the sect relevant financial information about the firm or the organization and after that to focus on the key strengths of organization what will be possible areas for improvements of their weaknesses. Put graphs also in case there’s a need to put, put also the financial statements or condense version of the financial statements. So how to do financial analysis using financial ratio? Get the 2 year financial statement from for example income statement of Bahrain duty free company and do vertical analysis, if it’s financial statement look at the percentage at each of the values to net income (for example see the composition of net sales relative to net income, so you have the base of net sales and the rest will be the percentage of net sales for example net sales will be 100% in 2009 then you derive operating cost excluding depreciation and amortization…etc and mention the implications also. If you make vertical analysis for balance sheet, your base should be total assets for the assets, and total liabilities and equity for liability and equity so divide each value with total value and you will see the changes in the compositions of your assets relative to the overall total assets. So try to extract relevant information and try to draw conclusions from your analysis using vertical analysis. The other thing you should use to complement the vertical analysis is to do the ratio analysis. Financial ratio allows you to analyse the company in terms of it’s financial performance? there are different types of financial ratio such as liquidity ratio, activity ratio, debt ratio, profit ratio. The ratios are group according to what you can draw conclusions once you drive the values from them. Also use Dupoint system of analysis in the financial statement of the company. To get the financial statements of the company from Bahrain bourse: go to Bahrain bourse website ( www.bahrainbourse.com/dailysummary ). In the list you will see Bahrain duty free shop complex B.S.C. and click on it and you’ll see all their financial statements, corporate actions and overview also. Also you can go to Bahrain duty free complex website itself from google and you will have all the information of the company in the website available. Part 5: Analysis of company value (3 pages): Once you are done with your financial analysis in the previous section, now you can use the evaluation tool in order to assess the company’s fair value, you can use different models (you can use free cash flow evaluation model, you can use also the dividend discount model or you can use the two stage discount model or the PE models) whatever you think is necessary and whatever you think is the most appropriate use it as a way to value the company and compare them with the current market price so with base and current market price share? is the company over valued or ir is it undervalued? You have to provide an analysis on why such difference in the price and the fair value that you have computed, there’s always a mismatch and it will not always be the same and if you think your computation for fair value is correct will the price go down undervalue? If it’s overvalued will the price go up? And try to see what could be possible things that could happen if the future that will lead to price adjustment (for example if you find a company that is undervalued and you say that the fair market value is the same for example price is 15, it’s current price is 10 I believe it will go up, so try to provide reasons why you think the price of 15 has not been materialized? for example, you would say that based on their research they have ongoing project, they have an ongoing construction; they have ongoing partnership and it’s not yet materialized so once it’s materialized the market will adjust it’s evaluation and it will go up from 10 to 15. So provide necessary explanations of why the fair market value is not the same with the market price. You can do them by looking on the information in Bahrain bourse of the duty free company projects. Part6: Conclusion and overall observation (2 pages): identify possible growth potentials of the company that you’re assessing (you can provide recommendations that you think the company has to do to improve also you can use your evaluation section and you can use the financial analysis section to comment in this area. Make sure that your recommendations have base, you can’t just provide recommendations that are not packed up by the findings of the previous sections so try to be evidence-based in terms of your recommendations do not just get recommendations from the internet and putting it
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Bahrain Duty free shop complex B.S.C.