NO GPT CHAT OR ANY AI

The Ottoman Empire in the Great War/WWI

Post author By admin
Post date December 24, 2019
No Comments on The Ottoman Empire in the Great War/WWI

For this paper, I want you to choose two scholarly papers of between 10 and 25 pages apiece which examine some aspect of the First World War from different perspectives. The two essays do not need to be entirely in opposition to each other, nor do they have to be on exactly the same specific subject. However, they should treat the same general subject from different perspectives.

Please cite these papers as sources when first mentioned in the body of your paper, and also in a Bibliography at the end. See the Purdue Owl Writing Center handout on Chicago citation method. (Links to an external site.)

Here is a link to a sample student paper

Actions that, while not 100% perfect, does a great job of performing a side-by-side comparison of the two papers the student chooses. Note that the paper is about the Montgomery bus boycott, and thus is not about “World War I,” so this topic would not work for this particular assignment.

For example, if you were to choose as your World War I subtopic, “The Ottoman Empire in the Great War/WWI” you should find two essays which have as their main subject the Ottoman Empire which in some way relate to the First World War.

One paper (and I’m just imagining imaginary papers here) may examine the political intrigue surrounding the rise of the Young Turks to power, while another might examine the experience of Ottoman soldiers on the front. As long as you choose two academic papers about the same broad subtopic, read them, summarize them, and compare their approaches, you have fulfilled the goal of the paper.

All I am asking is for you to locate two reputable academic papers about a single subject, and then write a unified three to four page essay on what the different perspectives are. It need not be an assessment of the articles, but instead a comparison of their topics and the approach of their authors to the subject. The different perspectives must be chosen wisely, however. You cannot choose just any two papers. You must not write a three to four page paper that treats each reading separately and distinctly and doesn’t unify them. You must choose them so that you can write a unified paper that sheds light on the subject as a whole, by using the two essays. Usually the best way to do this is to have a strong introduction and thesis, and a strong conclusion. You may discuss the papers separately inside the essay, but your justification for looking at the two essays together must be clear.

That said, you are not writing a research paper based on two articles — you are comparing two academic articles. You should mention in the body of your paper the author, title, and typically, the journal where they appeared, and will generally refer to the article in your paper by the last name of the primary author (e.g. “While McMillen discusses the Ottomans prior to 1914, Gandalf is mostly concerned with the collapse of the empire in the 1918-1920 period.”

Here are some potential topics:

The Schlieffen Plan

Kaiser Wilhelm’s instability

Serbian nationalism

Bulgarian nationalism

The War in Africa

Japan in WWI

The Battle of the Marne (or Somme, or etc.)

Shell Shock (PTSD)

Nurses at the Front

The Flu Pandemic in Europe

Trench Life

The Sinking of the Lusitania

U-Boat Warfare

Women’s Suffrage Movements During the War

German and Austro-Hungarian Military Cooperation

The Versailles Conference

Dogfighting

I mean, there are millions of possible topics. Just find two academic articles about one of them, read both, take notes, and then compare their approaches to the topic.

NOTE: The assignment perhaps sounds more difficult than it actually is. It really is just a compare and contrast piece concerning two different academic papers. It’s not a review of the two articles, although you will have to summarize them; instead, you should discuss how each of the papers examines a different aspect of the subject you have chosen. That’s it.

One good way to think about your thesis statement is create one that reads “Whereas Paper A says this about the topic, Paper B says this.” You should try to talk about the two papers together though, and not as two separate summaries or reviews.

Tags empire, great, ottoman

Writers Solution

Hate Crime against Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgender, Queer, (LGBT)

Post author By admin
Post date December 24, 2019
No Comments on Hate Crime against Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgender, Queer, (LGBT)

Topic: Hate Crime against Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgender, Queer, (LGBT)

Individuals

Write 1–2 paragraphs about what you found most surprising, challenging, or interesting about the material you explored this week. What did you learn? How do you feel about the content?

Tags against, crime, lesbian, queer, sexual, transgender

Writers Solution

Violence and Aggression

Research Proposal Paper: Each student will be asked to design a social psychologicalstudy. (The study should not be carried out.) The paper describing the study should be written inAPA style and should contain: 1) a title page; 2) an abstract; 3) an introduction, or literature review (with at least three references),ending with an original hypothesis; 4) a method section (in which the design is explained); and 4) a reference section. The report should be at least six pages long. Do not use websites as citations. ***Please do NOT put any type of results.This is a proposal of what study you would do if you were allowed, not what you have done.Thus, the abstract and method section should be written in future tense. a. Students are strongly encouraged to take drafts of their reports to the Writing Tutors at Academic Services (see http://www.nova.edu/tutoring-testing/index.html). Because this is a college course, grammatically correct writing is expected. b. This paper needs to be an EXPERIMENT or CORRELATIONAL STUDY with a testable hypothesis. The paper should not be written about an observationalstudy. c. This paper needs to be inAPA style.You should have the American PsychologicalAssociation Publication Manualas your guide. You can also use some of the information on the APA style website at www.apastyle.org. d. Of course, students must not plagiarize in this paper. It is your responsibility to know what plagiarism is and avoid doing it; however, one quick tip is that whenever you read information from somewhere else, you need to give that author(s) credit, right at that point in the paper, so that the reader knows exactly where you got your information. Note: Papers are to be submitted prior to or on the DUE date. Papers submitted late will be subject to a penalty of one-third of a letter grade per day. No paper will be accepted after the last day of the semester. For papers, websites are NOT acceptable as sources. If you have websites as sources, you will be marked off. If your paper is not in APA style, you will be marked off.

the topic will be about Violence and Aggression

the resource should be books not websitesResearch Proposal Paper: Each student will be asked to design a social psychologicalstudy. (The study should not be carried out.) The paper describing the study should be written inAPA style and should contain: 1) a title page; 2) an abstract; 3) an introduction, or literature review (with at least three references),ending with an original hypothesis; 4) a method section (in which the design is explained); and 4) a reference section. The report should be at least six pages long. Do not use websites as citations. ***Please do NOT put any type of results.This is a proposal of what study you would do if you were allowed, not what you have done.Thus, the abstract and method section should be written in future tense. a. Students are strongly encouraged to take drafts of their reports to the Writing Tutors at Academic Services (see http://www.nova.edu/tutoring-testing/index.html). Because this is a college course, grammatically correct writing is expected. b. This paper needs to be an EXPERIMENT or CORRELATIONAL STUDY with a testable hypothesis. The paper should not be written about an observationalstudy. c. This paper needs to be inAPA style.You should have the American PsychologicalAssociation Publication Manualas your guide. You can also use some of the information on the APA style website at www.apastyle.org. d. Of course, students must not plagiarize in this paper. It is your responsibility to know what plagiarism is and avoid doing it; however, one quick tip is that whenever you read information from somewhere else, you need to give that author(s) credit, right at that point in the paper, so that the reader knows exactly where you got your information. Note: Papers are to be submitted prior to or on the DUE date. Papers submitted late will be subject to a penalty of one-third of a letter grade per day. No paper will be accepted after the last day of the semester. For papers, websites are NOT acceptable as sources. If you have websites as sources, you will be marked off. If your paper is not in APA style, you will be marked off.

the topic will be about Violence and Aggression

the resource should be books not websites

Tags aggression, violence

Writers Solution

Reubenheimer’s Protein Leverage & Protein Leverage Hypothesis.

Post author By admin
Post date December 23, 2019
No Comments on Reubenheimer’s Protein Leverage & Protein Leverage Hypothesis.

Requirement:
2500 words
Literature review on Reubenheimer’s Protein Leverage & Protein Leverage Hypothesis.
Essay 1 is an intro to the Hypothesis (that you guys fixed for the Praphrase)
Essay 2 will be the application of Protein leverage Hypothesis to understand the Socio-Economic Variation of Obesity, then argue how Nutrition in the modern day was not equivalent to health in Poor/developing Country and Protein Leverage Hypothesis only works with Rich People worlds (Please, academic term)
Abstract, Intro, Body, Conclusion.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajhb.22953
One of the paper I really like for my Essay.

Tags hypothesis, leverage, protein, reubenheimer

Writers Solution

Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes.

Post author By admin
Post date December 23, 2019
No Comments on Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes.

BIOL399 marking rubric for essays:
This page outlines the University grading policy. The following pages provide the marking rubric. Macquarie University’s grading policy:
HD High Distinction 85-100
D Distinction 75-84
Cr Credit 65-74
P Pass 50-64
F Fail 0-49
High Distinction
Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes. Demonstrates substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critical evaluation of problems, their solutions and their implications; creativity in application as appropriate to the discipline.
Distinction
Provides evidence of integration and evaluation of critical ideas, principles and theories, distinctive insight and ability in applying relevant skills and concepts in relation to learning outcomes. Demonstrates frequent originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and providing solutions; and the use of means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience.
Credit
Provides evidence of learning that goes beyond replication of content knowledge or skills relevant to the learning outcomes. Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts in the field of study and the ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; convincing argumentation with appropriate coherent justification; communication of ideas fluently and clearly in terms of the conventions of the discipline.
Pass
Provides sufficient evidence of the achievement of learning outcomes. Demonstrates understanding and application of fundamental concepts of the field of study; routine argumentation with acceptable justification; communication of information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline. The learning attainment is considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the specified outcomes.
Fail
Does not provide evidence of attainment of learning outcomes. There is missing or partial or superficial or faulty understanding and application of the fundamental concepts in the field of study; missing, undeveloped, inappropriate or confusing argumentation; incomplete, confusing or lacking communication of ideas in ways that give little attention to the conventions of the discipline.

Title and Abstract

Criteria
Title/Abstract
HD (8.5 to 10)
Concise, clear title. Abstract summarises issue, states what the review covers, findings, future directions.

D (7.5 to 8.5)
Title is good indication of content. Abstract provides a good summary but could be stronger.

Cr (6.5 to 7.5)
Title verbose or missing key elements. Abstract summarises report with inappropriate detail (e.g.merely states that issues will be discussed rather than what the issues are).

P (5 to 6.5)
Title is vague. Abstract is basic.

F ( 5)
Absent.

Introduction

Criteria
Structure
HD (17 to 20)
Clearly explains issue and its importance. Provides broad overview of the topic. Gives a specific and strong aim.

D (15 to 17)
Provides strong background information, states the issue, is reasonably structured and gives a broad aim, although this could be more specific.

Cr (13 to 15)
Provides good information, but not always relevant or too much detail for an introduction. States a basic aim, but could be more strongly structured.

P (10 to 13)
Introduces topic, but does not have clear structure. Too much/little information given for introduction. Aim is unclear or very broad.

F ( 10)
Little introduction, little structure, no aim.

Scientific content

Criteria
Engagement with text and Development of arguments

HD (34 to 40)
Demonstrates advanced understanding of topic, excellent coverage of literature.
Develops specific ideas in depth with strong supporting examples.
Critically analyses rather than just presents arguments. Clearly demonstrates original thinking.

D (30 to 34)
Demonstrates firm understanding of topic, good coverage of literature. Develops specific ideas with supporting examples. Can critically analyse different arguments and demonstrates original thinking.

Cr (26 to 30)
Demonstrates sound understanding of topic. Incorporates many important sources. Discusses some key points or issues, develops specific ideas usually backed up with examples. While there is evidence of critical analysis this skill is still developing.

P (20 to 26)
Demonstrates basic understanding of topic. Mainly summarizes source material with few specific ideas. Key points or issues missed, little critical analysis.

F ( 20)
Does not demonstrate understanding of topic. Numerous key points or issues missed, no critical analysis.
Criteria
Conclusion
HD (17 to 20)
Extends into broader context of topic, avoids merely summarizing review. Clearly identifies knowledge gaps, provides firm direction for future research or decision making.

D (15 to 17)
Extends into broader context of theme, identifies knowledge gaps, future research, but could provide more detail.

Cr (13 to 15)
Some extension of theme, identifies some research gaps, future research direction.

P (10 to 13)
Primarily summarizes paper, little extension of theme, little information on research gaps or future directions.

F ( 10)
Mainly summarizes paper and does not extend beyond.

Tags consistent, critical, evidence, learning, provides, relation, understanding

Writers Solution

Using Social Media in the workplace to communicate with staff.

Post author By admin
Post date December 23, 2019
No Comments on Using Social Media in the workplace to communicate with staff.

ASSESSMENT 2A BRIEF
Subject Code and Title BIZ101: Business Communications
Assessment Source Analysis
Individual/Group Individual
Length 1000 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes:
a) Demonstrate information literacy and critical analysis appropriate to the level of study.
b) Understand and demonstrate academic integrity and authentic engagement with information.
d) Identify and apply effective communication skills within a variety of business environments, including the use of technology.
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 3.2 (Week 6)
Weighting 25%
Total Marks 100 marks
Task Summary
Identify, summarise and evaluate four (4) sources that will be useful for completing the Assessment 2B Written Report.
Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this assessment.
Context
In business, you need to be able to research sources of information, read and evaluate their credibility to ensure they are appropriate when building and communicating an argument or a line of reasoning. Beyond this context, these skills will assist you for academic purposes in writing summaries and critically reviewing sources of information for your current and future studies.
Task Instructions
To complete this assessment task you must:
1. Select one (1) of the following topics (You will use this topic for both this assessment task (2A Source Analysis) and Assessment 2B Written Report):
a. Using Social Media in the workplace to communicate with staff.
b. Communicating a companywide employee recognition program using digital technology.
c. Boosting workplace motivation through innovative communication tools.
d. Implementing instant messaging/group messaging, discussion forums and workplace chatrooms.
e. Podcasts, internal blogs/vlogs as a means to communicate to employees.
f. Using an internal intranet/social intranet for employee interactions.
2. Conduct research on your chosen topic.
3. Identify four (4) sources that will be useful for completing Assessment 2B Written Report (read Assessment 2B Brief to inform your choice of sources).
a. Two (2) of the sources must be from reliable academic sources, such as academic journals and books. The other two (2) sources can come from YouTube or TEDtalks or other non-academic sources.
4. Provide the following for each source:
a. Name of the source in full according to the APA 6th ed. style.
b. A brief summary of each source (100-150 words each), justifying why it is relevant to the topic of your written report.
c. Evaluate the reliability of each source by applying the Five Tests for Reliability, covered in Module 3. You must cover:
1. Authority
2. Audience
3. Transparency
4. Objectivity
5. Currency
d. Include a final reference list for all four (4) sources in APA 6th ed. style.
Please note the following additional information:
• You should adhere to the correct use of academic writing, presentation and grammar.
• You are advised to include a minimum of two (2) academic references and two (2) mediabased references as described above.
• You must check the Similarity Report for your assessment task in Turnitin before submitting it in Blackboard. All highlighted sentences must be either paraphrased in your own words or put in as direct quotes and referenced accordingly.
• For additional support on academic skills, please visit: https://laureateau.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&am p;content_id=_2498849_1
Referencing
• It is essential that you use appropriate APA 6th edition style for citing and referencing your research.
• Please comply with all academic standards of legibility and referencing details (including a reference list). Please see more information on referencing here: http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Submission Instructions
Upload your Source Analysis to Turnitin and check your Turnitin Similarity Report.
When the Turnitin Similarity Report is less than 20%, submit your Source Analysis via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in BIZ101 Business Communications.
Your learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in Blackboard. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
The below assessment rubric guides the marker when awarding marks for your assessment. You should use this rubric to review your assessment task prior to submission, ensuring there is nothing you have missed.
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Number of sources
10%
Identifies less than 4 sources useful to complete the Assessment 2B Written
Report on the chosen topic. Identifies 4 sources, however there are less than 2 reliable academic sources identified.
The usefulness and/or suitability of the sources identified to complete the Assessment 2B Written Report on the chosen topic is debatable. Identifies 4 sources, from which at least 2 are from reliable academic sources. The sources identified are generally useful and
appropriate to complete the Assessment 2B Written
Report on the chosen topic. Identifies 4 sources, from which at least 2 are from reliable academic sources. All sources identified are useful and pertinent to complete the Assessment 2B Written Report on the chosen topic. Identifies 4 sources, from which at least 2 are from reliable academic sources.
The academic sources identified are critical in the discipline to the discussion of the chosen topic. All sources identified are highly pertinent to complete the Assessment 2B Written Report on the chosen topic.
Referencing
25%
Does not include correct references or in-text citations; does not use APA 6th ed. style.
Attempts to include references or in-text citations; however, these are sometimes insufficient or incorrect; uses APA 6th ed. style, however may contain some citation or referencing errors. Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th ed. style, however may contain minor citation or referencing errors. Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th ed. style, containing minimal and or no errors. Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th ed. style, containing no errors.
Summary
30%
Sources have not been summarised (i.e. more than one summary missing for one of the sources).
There is no/ a limited attempt at justifying relevance of selected sources. Most sources have been summarised (i.e. all sources have partial summaries or there is one summary missing for one of the sources).
The summaries are inconsistently appropriate
to the task, as demonstrated by an interrupted flow of ideas and at times lack of clarity.
All sources have been summarised appropriately, however this still needs some work to achieve a clear and coherent flow of ideas.
There is a generally adequate attempt at justifying the relevance of all selected sources, however this still needs some work (i.e. relevance to topic and task inconsistently clear). All sources have been summarised appropriately, coherently and clearly.
All sources are justified in relation to their relevance to the topic of the written report clearly and consistently. All summaries are consistently clear and coherent; in the summaries, the main ideas are synthetised as they are needed to justify the source selection in relation to the topic of the written report (i.e. main ideas from sources are used to justify selection and relevance to chosen topic).
BIZ101 Assessment 2A Brief Page 4 of 5
There is a basic attempt at justifying the relevance of all selected sources, however this needs substantial work (i.e. relevance to topic and task
not entirely clear, appropriate).
Reliability evaluation
35%
The reliability evaluation shows no understanding of source authority, audience, transparency, objectivity and currency, with omissions in all of the tests. The reliability evaluation shows superficial understanding of source authority, audience, transparency, objectivity and currency, with weaknesses in all of the tests and some omissions. The reliability evaluation shows a generally competent understanding of source authority, audience, transparency, objectivity and currency, with only weaknesses in some of the tests and no omissions. The reliability evaluation shows a clearly competent understanding of source authority, audience, transparency, objectivity and currency, with no more than one or two weaknesses and no omissions in all of the tests. The reliability evaluation is comprehensive, thorough and
appropriate in all tests, demonstrating a highly competent understanding of source authority, audience, transparency, objectivity and currency, with no weaknesses and no omissions in all of the tests.
BIZ101 Assessment 2A Brief Page 5 of 5

Tags communicate, media, social, staff, using, workplace

Writers Solution

How brands are capitalising on the ‘Markle Sparkle’ and consumer trends to push sustainable fashion.

Post author By admin
Post date December 23, 2019
No Comments on How brands are capitalising on the ‘Markle Sparkle’ and consumer trends to push sustainable fashion.

MRKT20052 Assessment 1B:
Portfolio Articles Analysis
Weight: 10%
Word limit: Maximum of 1,000 words for your selected article
Due: Monday Week 6
Due date and time: 23rd December, 5 PM AEST. Note: please adjust this time if you have daylight savings or are not in Queensland.
For this assessment, each student will choose any ONE of the two articles provided below and write a reflective analysis. This is an individual assessment with a maximum word count of 1,000 words for the article analysis excluding references.
In analysing the chosen article, the emphasis is on identifying the marketing implications of the events or issues described in the selected article. For the selected article, students are to prepare a write-up (in a .doc or .docx format) answering the following question:
What are the implications of the events/incidents/issues in the article from a marketing perspective and how will these impact (positively or negatively) relevant stakeholders?
The write-up for each article should be presented in the following format using headings as per the three points below:
1. Concise summary of the key issues illustrated in the article.
2. Explanation of why the issues illustrated in the article is important.
3. Discussion of implications of these issues from a marketing perspective.
Article Reference
#1 Rigby, B. (2019). How brands are capitalising on the ‘Markle Sparkle’ and consumer trends to push sustainable fashion. Retrieved from: https://mumbrella.com.au/how-brands-are-capitalising-on-the-markle-sparkleand-consumer-trends-to-push-sustainable-fashion-575396
#2 Singer, M. (2019). Smaller stores and free booze: Myer’s plan to lure shoppers after dark. Retrieved from: https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/fashion/smaller-stores-and-freebooze-myer-s-plan-to-lure-shoppers-after-dark-20190830-p52mik.html
Provide a list of at least 4 references for your reflective analysis. The references should consist of published academic and research papers and textbooks in the write-up to support key points. Ensure that your references are relevant to the issues discussed. You should also reference the chosen articles in the submission document with the correct URL in the reference list section (this is additional to your academic references). Referencing should follow the APA style, which can be found at
https://www.cqu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/58413/APA_referencing_guide.pdf
All assessments may be checked by the marker and Unit Coordinator for potential plagiarism issues. Therefore, write in your own words, do NOT use Google Translate or Spin, do NOT copy a part or all of a friend’s assessment or pay someone else to do your assessment. It is not just your Turnitin score that counts but whether a staff member feels that this is not your own work that may make us take a long look at your assessment.
If your assessment is suspected to be plagiarised, it will be forwarded to an appropriate authority and severe penalties will be applied if you are found guilty of Academic Misconduct.
1
Assessment Criteria:
• Summary of key issues (10%)
• Explanations of issues’ importance (30%)
• Reflective analysis (30%)
• Writing style (10%)
• Evidence of research (20%)
Detailed marking rubric that will be used to mark your assessment can be found in the
Assessments folder in Moodle. Penalties apply for late submission (1 mark will be deducted from the total mark for every day late in submission, unless an extension has been granted by the Unit Coordinator).
Submission checklist for Assessment 1:
• Cover page with student name, student ID, campus, tutor, tutorial class, word count from introduction to reference list (template is provided in Moodle)
• 1.5 line spacing and 12 size font in Times New Roman;
• Maximum of 1,000 words for the article excluding references;
• Submitted in .doc or .docx format
2