Imagine that you are a legislative consultant hired to assess the influence of stakeholders and interest groups on a health policy issue. Your supervisor has asked that you present your assessment findings to the senior leadership of your organization to inform their decisions on how best to approach their intended organization-wide position statement regarding this issue.
As a first step, you will select one of three health policy issues from the Project Two Health Policy Issue Scenarios document. As part of the background study, you will conduct preliminary research about the selected issue and analyze the impact of the selected issue on various stakeholders. This background study and assessment of the selected issue will serve as a foundation for your Project Two final presentation. In this Project Two Preparation assignment, you will essentially analyze the selected health policy issue and describe how it influences the decision-making process in healthcare.
Your research in this Project Preparation will be specific to the nonfinancial impact of the selected policy on various stakeholders. In your second Project Preparation for Project Two, which is due in Module Seven, you will explore the financial implications of the selected issues. Together, both of these Project Preparation assignments will prepare you for the Project Two submission due in Module Nine.
Prompt
Create a research report summarizing your assessment findings on your chosen health policy issue. This research report will serve as a support document in the Project Two final submission.
You must cite at least three sources to support your claims. You may cite no more than one source from the module resources; all other resources must come from your own research. In other words, you may cite no more than one resource from the Resources section of this module. For additional help completing this assignment, refer to the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing – Graduate item in the Start Here module. You may also use the Online Writing Center, located in the Academic Support module.
Use this resource to help you complete this assignment: IHP 610 Project Two Health Policy Issue Scenarios
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Introduction
Health Policy Issue: Describe your chosen health policy issue in a clear, concise manner. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
Why did you choose this health policy issue for your Project Two work?
How might this health policy issue be explained to someone who has never heard of it before?
Key Stakeholders and Interest Groups: Identify three key stakeholders and/or interest groups impacted by your chosen issue. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
Who are the stakeholders and/or interest groups that will be primarily affected by this issue, either positively or negatively?
How might vulnerable populations and underserved areas be affected by this issue?
Influence on Decision Making
Stakeholder Needs: Describe the nonfinancial needs of the identified three key stakeholders and/or interest groups with respect to your chosen issue. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
How are the nonfinancial needs of the identified stakeholders and/or interest groups affected by the selected issue?
How does this issue impact vulnerable populations or underserved areas?
Health Policy Influence: Describe the kinds of nonfinancial influence that the three identified key stakeholders and/or interest groups can have on health policies. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
Which three stakeholders and/or interest groups can have significant nonfinancial influence on the selected issue?
Which three stakeholders and/or interest groups have subtle or covert nonfinancial influence on the selected issue?
Benefits and Disadvantages: Describe how the identified three stakeholders and/or interest groups might benefit or be disadvantaged by your chosen issue. Do not include any financially related benefits and disadvantages. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
Which of the identified stakeholders and/or interest groups benefit from this issue?
Which of the identified stakeholders and/or interest groups are disadvantaged by this issue?
How might those in vulnerable populations or underserved areas be benefited or disadvantaged by this issue, not including financial benefits or disadvantages?
Value Conflict Analysis: Describe the potential value conflicts between identified stakeholders and/or interest groups relating to your chosen issue. Consider the following guiding question in your response:
What nonfinancial value conflicts might the identified stakeholders have concerning this issue, and why?
What to Submit
Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and 1-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
Imagine that you are a legislative consultant hired to assess the influence of stakeholders and interest groups on a health policy issue. Your supervisor has asked that you present your assessment findings to the senior leadership of your organization to inform their decisions on how best to approach their intended organization-wide position statement regarding this issue.
As a first step, you will select one of three health policy issues from the Project Two Health Policy Issue Scenarios document. As part of the background study, you will conduct preliminary research about the selected issue and analyze the impact of the selected issue on various stakeholders. This background study and assessment of the selected issue will serve as a foundation for your Project Two final presentation. In this Project Two Preparation assignment, you will essentially analyze the selected health policy issue and describe how it influences the decision-making process in healthcare.
Your research in this Project Preparation will be specific to the nonfinancial impact of the selected policy on various stakeholders. In your second Project Preparation for Project Two, which is due in Module Seven, you will explore the financial implications of the selected issues. Together, both of these Project Preparation assignments will prepare you for the Project Two submission due in Module Nine.
Prompt
Create a research report summarizing your assessment findings on your chosen health policy issue. This research report will serve as a support document in the Project Two final submission.
You must cite at least three sources to support your claims. You may cite no more than one source from the module resources; all other resources must come from your own research. In other words, you may cite no more than one resource from the Resources section of this module. For additional help completing this assignment, refer to the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing – Graduate item in the Start Here module. You may also use the Online Writing Center, located in the Academic Support module.
Use this resource to help you complete this assignment: IHP 610 Project Two Health Policy Issue Scenarios
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Introduction
Health Policy Issue: Describe your chosen health policy issue in a clear, concise manner. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
Why did you choose this health policy issue for your Project Two work?
How might this health policy issue be explained to someone who has never heard of it before?
Key Stakeholders and Interest Groups: Identify three key stakeholders and/or interest groups impacted by your chosen issue. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
Who are the stakeholders and/or interest groups that will be primarily affected by this issue, either positively or negatively?
How might vulnerable populations and underserved areas be affected by this issue?
Influence on Decision Making
Stakeholder Needs: Describe the nonfinancial needs of the identified three key stakeholders and/or interest groups with respect to your chosen issue. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
How are the nonfinancial needs of the identified stakeholders and/or interest groups affected by the selected issue?
How does this issue impact vulnerable populations or underserved areas?
Health Policy Influence: Describe the kinds of nonfinancial influence that the three identified key stakeholders and/or interest groups can have on health policies. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
Which three stakeholders and/or interest groups can have significant nonfinancial influence on the selected issue?
Which three stakeholders and/or interest groups have subtle or covert nonfinancial influence on the selected issue?
Benefits and Disadvantages: Describe how the identified three stakeholders and/or interest groups might benefit or be disadvantaged by your chosen issue. Do not include any financially related benefits and disadvantages. Consider the following guiding questions in your response:
Which of the identified stakeholders and/or interest groups benefit from this issue?
Which of the identified stakeholders and/or interest groups are disadvantaged by this issue?
How might those in vulnerable populations or underserved areas be benefited or disadvantaged by this issue, not including financial benefits or disadvantages?
Value Conflict Analysis: Describe the potential value conflicts between identified stakeholders and/or interest groups relating to your chosen issue. Consider the following guiding question in your response:
What nonfinancial value conflicts might the identified stakeholders have concerning this issue, and why?
What to Submit
Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and 1-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
Go to the website of your allocated company. Then, go to the Investor Relations section of the website. This section may be called: “””Investors”””, “”Shareholder Information”,” or similar titles. In this section, find the ‘company’s annual report and other related reports. Download the ‘firm’s latest annual report and other related information and reports and save it to your computer. For example, these reports may be dated 30 June 2021 or 30 June 2022.
Questions
Assume that you have been appointed as the external auditor for your allocated company for the financial year ending June 2021 or 2022. Prepare a report to adequately address the following:
Examine and assess the Revised ASA315 with a focus on identifying risks, including risks associated with information technology and the auditor’s obligation to utilize automated tools and techniques to perform the audit in a professional, effective and efficient manner
After you have determined what sources to include in your literature review to assess employee contributions in the workplace, you must now compile your review and reflect on the implications of all that you have read in the extant literature and how that applies to your research. To what extent might the strengths, weakness, limitations, and delimitations of existing studies indicate strengths, weakness, limitations, and delimitations of your study? Explain.
Note: Rather than providing insights into the topics of employee rewards/compensation or employee retention, focus your discussion post on the research methodology and design to resolve this applied research example
Individual Report: PMBoK versus PRINCE2 or Agile in contemporary projects Individual/Group Individual Length 1,200 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle. Weighting 35% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary Following group discussions, individually write a 1,200-word report that discusses the strengths, weaknesses, similarities, and contrasts of PMBoK and PRINCE2 or Agile in contemporary projects. Context There are several project management methodologies and approaches that are used in contemporary project management. Among these are PMBoK, PRINCE2, Waterfall, Agile, Extreme Programming (XP), and Adaptive Project Framework (APF). Each of them has certain specific elements that proponents say make it easier to use, more applicable, more robust, or otherwise more appropriate for particular environments or circumstances. Whilst these methodologies are all valid and reliable tools for a project manager to use, it is important to be able to contrast them and to form a view of how they may best be used in a project. This analysis includes their usefulness, application in various types of projects, and how they view project risk. Such context can help project managers identify which methodologies/approaches may be best for specific projects. Instructions In this Assessment, you will write a 1,200-word (+/- 10%) report that considers the application of a project management methodology to a project as described in an assigned case study. In particular, you will review the assigned case study, then compare and contrast the application of the PMBoK project management approach to the highlighted project with your choice of one of the following methodologies/approaches: a) PRINCE2, or b) Agile The report must use the following headings:
INTRODUCTION: Develop an introduction to PMBoK and the other methodology/approach you have selected (PRINCE2 or Agile) that includes their background and historical context (approximately 200 words)
SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES: List 2–3 similarities and 2–3 differences between them and why these similarities and differences are relevant to the assigned case study (approximately 200 words combined)
RISK: How each method treats project risk and how these approaches to risk are relevant to the assigned case study (approximately 200 words)
PROJECT CONTEXT: The types of projects in which each is used (approximately 200 words)
LIFECYCLE IMPLICATIONS: How each differs across different phases of a project’s lifecycle (approximately 200 words)
APPLICATION: Explain which methodology you would choose to apply for the project in the assigned case study, and why (approximately 200 words) Be sure to cite any source material, including learning resources or other academic or industry literature you research, used to inform your analysis. You will need to consult the literature and use at least 6 references (and not more than 12 references) from academic and industry sources. The word count does not include the reference list. Each reference must be cited in-text in your report. The assessment requires that you submit your report via Blackboard. You do not need to upload anything relating to your group discussions in Weeks 4 and 5. Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool Submission Instructions Submit this task via the Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6000 – Principles of Project Management. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that, except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at: http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Knowledge and understanding of project management methodologies and approaches Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of PMBoK and either PRINCE2, and/or Agile methodologies/approac hes Percentage for this criterion = 30% Demonstrates a limited understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Demonstrates a functional understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a thorough knowledge or understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Demonstrates a highly developed knowledge or understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Demonstrates a capacity to explain in significant detail and thoughtfully apply relevant concepts. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Demonstrates an exceptional capacity to explain in substantial and relevant detail critical concepts and apply these concepts in a manner that makes strong connections. Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Compares and evaluates two project management methodologies/approac hes Percentage for this criterion = 30% Limited or no comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approache s. Limited application/recommendat ions based upon analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Demonstrated basic comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches. Demonstrated basic application/recommendation s based upon analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Well-developed comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches. Well-developed application/recommendatio ns based upon proficient analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Thoroughly developed and creative comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches. Thoroughly developed application/recommendatio ns based upon to analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Highly sophisticated and creative comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches . Highly developed application/recommendati ons based upon to analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Effective communication (written) Effectively presents two selected project management methodologies/approac hes and their distinguishing/differing elements Limited ability to present information related to two selected project management methodologies/approache s and their distinguishing elements. Specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approache s is rarely or inaccurately employed. Presents in a basic manner information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Occasionally employs specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches with accuracy, with some inaccuracies. Presents in a coherent and readable manner information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Accurately employs some specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches. Presents coherently and concisely information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Accurately employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches. Communicates eloquently, coherently, concisely, and creatively information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches . Percentage for this criterion = 30% Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or the acknowledgment of sources. Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow. Information; arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical. Some errors are evident in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. Meaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical. Occasional minor errors present in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. Engages audience interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and persuasive. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are mostly free from errors. Engages and sustains audience’s interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are insightful, persuasive, and expertly presented. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are free from errors. Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion = 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Less than six references employed. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Referencing resembles APA with frequent or repeated errors. Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing resembles APA with occasional errors. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. APA referencing is free from errors. Demonstrates use of highquality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. APA referencing is free from errors. The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment SLO a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. SLO b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. SLO c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle
Write a 4-6 page paper in which you address the following:
Assess how globalization and technology changes have impacted the corporation you researched.
Apply the industrial organization model and the resource-based model to determine how your corporation could earn above-average returns.
Assess how the vision statement and mission statement of the corporation influence its overall success.
Evaluate how each category of stakeholder impacts the overall success of this corporation.
Use the Strayer University Online Library or the Internet to locate and include at least three quality references. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as academic resources
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6000: Principles of Project Management Assessment Assessment 1 – Project Management Lifecycle (PML): Opinion Post and Peer Response Individual/Group Individual Length 800 words: 600 words (+/- 10%) initial discussion forum post and 200 words (+/- 10%) response post Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 2.2 Weighting 25% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary Critically read and interpret both the Project Management Lifecycle and the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK). Engage with other students by posting an initial 600-word discussion forum post and a 200-word critique that details your response to the question below (or the set question). Context The Project Management Lifecycle (PML) is an important component of project management methodology. It incorporates several areas of knowledge from the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK), and it affects and interacts with the application of PMBoK in a project. Different stages of the PML may require focusing on different areas of the PMBoK, and project managers need to assess the PML for their project in order to identify possible risks, plans for resourcing, and to commence communicating with stakeholders. This assessment requires that you answer the following question: “During which project management lifecycle stage(s) do you believe a project management methodology is most impactful, and how do we ensure alignment between the lifecycle of the project and the implementation of a project management methodology?” PROJ6000_Assessment_1_Brief_Opinion Post_Module 2.2 Page 1 of 6 To answer this question, you will need to: (a) Post a 600-word (+/- 10%) response to this question, based on your informed opinion and demonstrated knowledge of project management concepts, project lifecycles, and PMBoK, to the Discussion Forum on the Learning Portal. (b) Respond to another student’s post by critiquing their opinion and comparing it with yours in 200 words (+/-10%). Instructions
Read about the PMBoK and the Project Management Lifecycle to familiarise yourself with their fundamental concepts. Critically reflect on your readings to form an opinion of both and how they interact together. Write a 600-word opinion piece responding to the set question. Be sure to cite any source material, including learning resources or other academic or industry literature you research, used to inform your opinion. The word count does not include the reference list.
Read another student’s post. Think about their opinion and try to compare and contrast it with your own. This approach will allow you to “critique” their view. You can do this by highlighting the aspects you agree with and those you disagree within their post. You need to justify and explain your critique of their opinion. In your response, you will need to refer to industry and academic literature. Your response will need to be 200 words. The word count does not include the reference list. Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool Submission Instructions Submit this task via the Assessment 1 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6000 – Principles of Project Management. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that, except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at: http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. PROJ6000_Assessment_1_Brief_Opinion Post_Module 2.2 Page 2 of 6 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Knowledge and understanding of PMBoK and Project Management Lifecycles Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of Project Management Lifecycles and the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK) Percentage for this criterion = 25% Limited or no understanding demonstrated of required concepts and knowledge. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Demonstrates basic knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s demonstrated. Personal opinion and information are substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates the capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s demonstrated. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well-demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s demonstrated. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Limited or no synthesis of project management knowledge and analysis/alignment of project lifecycles and Demonstrated basic synthesis of project management knowledge and analysis/alignment of project Well-developed synthesis of project management knowledge and analysis/alignment of Thoroughly developed and creative synthesis of project management knowledge and analysis/alignment of Highly sophisticated and creative synthesis of project management knowledge and analysis/alignment of Synthesises project management knowledge and analysis/alignment of project lifecycles and PMBoK areas of knowledge Percentage for this criterion = 25% PMBoK areas of knowledge. Limited application/recommendat ions based upon analysis. lifecycles and PMBoK areas of knowledge. Shows the basic ability to interpret relevant information and literature. project lifecycles and PMBoK areas of knowledge. Shows thorough ability to interpret relevant information and literature. project lifecycles and PMBoK areas of knowledge. Shows highly-developed ability to interpret relevant information and literature. project lifecycles and PMBoK areas of knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and/or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on analysis/synthesis. Excellent ability to apply knowledge to new situations/other cases. Effective communication (written) Percentage for this criterion = 10% Post and/or reply lack clarity. Post and/or reply contains numerous spelling/grammatical errors. Post and/or reply demonstrate minimal clarity. Post and/or reply contains several spelling/grammatical errors. Post and reply are communicated in a clear manner. Post and reply contains few spelling/grammatical errors Post and reply are communicated in a clear and thoughtful manner. Post and reply contain no major spelling/grammatical errors. Well-demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Post and reply are communicated in a clear, thoughtful, and professional manner that makes use of advanced concepts and examples. Post and reply contain no major spelling/grammatical errors. Inclusion of and correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion = 15% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Referencing resembles APA with frequent or repeated errors. Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing resembles APA with occasional errors. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors. Demonstrates use of highquality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors. Provides constructive feedback to peers that strengthens their position or offers solutions to challenges Percentage for this criterion = 25% Feedback to peers is missing or lacks any value in support or solution development. Demonstrated feedback to peers that moderately strengthens their position or offers solutions to challenges. Thorough feedback to peers that strengthens their position or offers solutions to challenges. Highly developed feedback to peers that meaningfully strengthens their position or offers solutions to challenges. Sophisticated feedback to peers that significantly strengthens their position or offers solutions to challenges. The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment SLO a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. SLO b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. SLO c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle
You should complete any one of the questions below.
1. Assess the extent to which crime figures and trends are influenced by social class, and in particular by common assumptions made about the ‘underclass’.
2. Labelling and subcultural theories see crime and deviance as the outcome of social processes. What are these processes and how convincing are the theoretical accounts of them?
3. Some social groups appear to experience secondary victimisation in which police actions amplify rather than decrease the experience of victimisation. Who is most likely to experience this? Why? What can be done to prevent it?
As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit a Crime and Society assessment. Please refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general information on preparing and submitting assignments. Learning Outcomes: After completing the module, you should be able to:
1. Demonstrate a basic understanding of patterns of crime and the significance of crime in society.
2. Demonstrate a basic understanding of the respective institutional roles in the criminal justice system and their relationships with each other, and with society.
3. Demonstrate a basic understanding of criminological theories and their relationships to each other.
4. Demonstrate a basic ability to analyse social, philosophical and legal issues relating to crime, criminal justice and social policies.
5. Demonstrate an understanding of the ethical issues embedded in analyses of problems, existing policies and options for policy change.
The critical assessment involves a few steps. First, translating a written argument into a form that can be analyzed using tools you have learned in class. The next step is to use these tools to critically explore the argument being made. The analysis involves doing more than merely paraphrasing the textbook, class notes, or using jargon. It involves things like identifying which model/tool is appropriate for this context, checking to see if the assumptions required are satisfied, identifying any changes in circumstances, and working through the predictions, etc. You need to be able to compare your analysis with the author’s arguments and be able to articulate any differences or similarities in a precise manner. The final step in this leadership assignment help is translating all of this back into clear language that readers can easily understand. Task There will be two writing assignments in this course to give you practice and opportunities to get feedback on your writing. This is an individual writing assignment. For this writing assignment, you will be given an economic podcast and will be asked to critically evaluate it. You will be graded on the quality and thoroughness of your analysis. Therefore, you will also be graded on the clarity, flow and overall cohesiveness of the writing in your work Podcast: How Spotify Saved the Music Industry Work Outline Introduction (5 points): The introduction (first paragraph) briefly summarizes what you consider to be the main point(s) of the article. If there are many, focus on the one(s) that you will analyze in the assignment. Summary (5 points) : A short summary of the podcast should be included. This summary should capture the key points presented in the podcast and any important facts or elements. Do not spend the whole assignment summarizing the entire article. Summaries should be succinct and to the point and be approximately one paragraph.
In your own words, you need to explain how Spotify saved the music industry. This is not a summary of the podcast. That was the previous paragraph. Remember, you are looking at this writing assignment through the lens of an economist. You will need to research the short-run and long-run effects that Spotify had on the music industry, going beyond what has been explained in the podcast. Do not copy and past graphs or charts from outside sources. Are there others like Spotify that have changed their own respective industries? What are they? How was the industry affected? Was it good or bad? Your analysis should use the economic concepts you have learned in class. In other words, the analysis should focus on how topics covered in class are applicable/relevant to the real world. Be sure to demonstrate your analysis using graphs and/or models learned in class. Be careful to address the appropriate audience. Remember; to narrow your focus so that your analysis can be more in-depth. That is much more important than hitting every point made in the article. You are required to do in-depth research into this issue going beyond the podcast and text. Assume your reader has taken this course and only understands microeconomic theories in the context of the theories covered in this class. You are expected to use at least one of the concepts covered in class. Policy Recommendation (20 points): This is the most important aspect of this assignment. Students are expected to clearly and in detail provide a policy recommendation. In this section, you need to think of an industry that needs improvement. How would you go about making a change such that it brings about a revolutionary change? Think of the impacts companies like Facebook, Uber, Spotify has had on their respective industries. Again, I expect you to use multiple models in this section. The analysis portion has the potential to be varied in nature. However, I recommend sticking to my guidelines below: Provide a summary of your policy recommendation and explain how it works. Then, critically evaluate your policy recommendation.
Essentially you should take apart the various steps in the recommendation and see if they make sense separately and as a whole. Can you use the tools learned in class to think about the policy in another way? Check to see if you are missing anything in your argument or have used some tool or method incorrectly or inappropriately. That is, think on the other side of the aisle and find counter-arguments. Is there evidence that contradicts your policy? If so, how would you address them? I expect you to use at least 1 economic model we have learned in class. However, using one model does not guarantee full credit. Your models should also be detailed. Make sure you explain what the models mean and clearly demonstrate the economic implications. All models must be drawn by hand. Any models “grabbed” from the text or internet will not count and will adversely affect your grade. Your hand-drawn models should be scanned and of high quality. Conclusion (5 points): It is important to have a strong conclusion since this is the last chance you have to make an impression on your reader. The goal of your conclusion isn’t to introduce any new ideas, but to sum up, everything you’ve written. Specifically, your conclusion should accomplish three major goals: Restate the main idea of your work, or your thesis statement. Summarize the main sub-points of your work. Leave the reader with an interesting final impression. Works Cited: Works cited completed using MLA format. Must cite at least 3 sources. Class notes/lectures can account for one source. The textbook can account for one source. How to format your assignment Your assignment should be typed, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, and have a font size 12. Minimum of 3 pages (not including models, works cited page). Your models must be hand-drawn, scanned as an image, and pasted to your word document. Grammatical mistakes Students are required to proofread their assignments prior to submitting them. Students are recommended to utilize the campus-writing center to ensure any grammatical/writing errors are corrected. I generally do not give lower grades for grammatical mistakes. However, if the writing is too incomprehensible/unclear, there will be a reflection in the overall grade. You are encouraged to take advantage of Glendale Community College’s Writing Center. https://www.glendale.edu/students/student-services/learning-center-tutoring/writing-center (Links to an external site.)
Podcast: How Spotify Saved the Music Industry (Links to an external site.) Work Outline Introduction (5 points): The introduction (first paragraph) briefly summarizes what you consider to be the main point(s) of the article. If there are many, focus on the one(s) that you will analyze in the assignment. Summary (5 points) : A short summary of the podcast should be included. This summary should capture the key points presented in the podcast and any important facts or elements. Do not spend the whole assignment summarizing the entire article. Summaries should be succinct and to the point and be approximately one paragraph. Analysis (15 points): In your own words, you need to explain how Spotify saved the music industry. This is not a summary of the podcast. That was the previous paragraph. Remember, you are looking at this writing assignment through the lens of an economist. You will need to research the short-run and long-run effects that Spotify had on the music industry, going beyond what has been explained in the podcast. Do not copy and past graphs or charts from outside sources. Are there others like Spotify that have changed their own respective industries? What are they? How was the industry affected? Was it good or bad? Your analysis should use the economic concepts you have learned in class. In other words, the analysis should focus on how topics covered in class are applicable/relevant to the real world. Be sure to demonstrate your analysis using graphs and/or models learned in class. Be careful to address the appropriate audience. Remember; to narrow your focus so that your analysis can be more in-depth. That is much more important than hitting every point made in the article. You are required to do in-depth research into this issue going beyond the podcast and text. Assume your reader has taken this course and only understands microeconomic theories in the context of the theories covered in this class. You are expected to use at least one of the concepts covered in class. Policy Recommendation (20 points): This is the most important aspect of this assignment. Students are expected to clearly and in detail provide a policy recommendation. In this section, you need to think of an industry that needs improvement. How would you go about making a change such that it brings about a revolutionary change? Think of the impacts companies like Facebook, Uber, Spotify has had on their respective industries. Again, I expect you to use multiple models in this section. The analysis portion has the potential to be varied in nature. However, I recommend sticking to my guidelines below: Provide a summary of your policy recommendation and explain how it works. Then, critically evaluate your policy recommendation. Essentially you should take apart the various steps in the recommendation and see if they make sense separately and as a whole. Can you use the tools learned in class to think about the policy in another way? Check to see if you are missing anything in your argument or have used some tool or method incorrectly or inappropriately. That is, think on the other side of the aisle and find counter-arguments. Is there evidence that contradicts your policy? If so, how would you address them? I expect you to use at least 1 economic model we have learned in class. However, using one model does not guarantee full credit. Your models should also be detailed. Make sure you explain what the models mean and clearly demonstrate the economic implications. All models must be drawn by hand. Any models “grabbed” from the text or internet will not count and will adversely affect your grade. Your hand-drawn models should be scanned and of high quality. Conclusion (5 points): It is important to have a strong conclusion since this is the last chance you have to make an impression on your reader. The goal of your conclusion isn’t to introduce any new ideas, but to sum up, everything you’ve written. Specifically, your conclusion should accomplish three major goals: profsonly.com/assignment-help
This week we will start the process of compiling your edited and polished work for the assessment portion of your portfolio, demonstrating your mastery of a selected learning outcome from your program. Instructions Select one learning outcome from your program of study. Then, select two graded artifacts (i.e., written assignments, projects, works, discussion posts, or responses) that you feel best demonstrate your mastery of the selected program outcome. When selecting a previous work sample, you can review and retrieve your Waypoint assignments from previous courses from within Waypoint itself. Utilizing the feedback you received on these artifacts from your instructor as well as the things you have learned since submitting this work, revise and expand on these artifacts to create polished and corrected examples that you can add to your portfolio. Utilize track changes to make additions, corrections, and changes to your work in order for the instructor to review the changes that were made. Add two additional professional and current resources to support and improve your artifacts. Submit Combine the two updated artifacts (include track changes) into one document and submit via Waypoint. Then remove the tracked changes from the artifacts and add the polished and corrected artifacts to your portfolio with the correct heading and description of the selected program learning outcome. Insert a link to your portfolio in a Word document and submit via Waypoint. If needed, review the Week 1 python assignment help.
Create and add to your portfolio some of the important career-portfolio elements as described below. Personal Introduction: Who are you? Describe in one paragraph your strengths, interests, and experiences that make you a unique and valuable employee. This might look much like the introduction used on LinkedIn. This would be an appropriate place to use pictures to create a more interesting portfolio in this history assignment help. Professional Curriculum Vitae (CV) or Resume: Be sure that you have updated your resume or CV to reflect your status as a doctoral student. Note: It is never appropriate to add the degree to your name until AFTER you have graduated. While you may see people list PhD, ABD, this is not appropriate and should not be used. You may, however, add your expected date of completion or year of graduation. Highlight specific field-related experience, philosophy, or other information. If you are in education or are interested in teaching in the future, you might list your teaching philosophy here. For psychology, you may list your areas of specialization. You may also choose to highlight any specialized training or certification you possess. Carefully consider the design elements of your portfolio, including the use of a professional font, pictures, reference materials, and access for future employees and others. Submit Insert a link to your portfolio in a Word document and submit via Waypoint
CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDERon Assess the extent to which crime figures and trends are influenced by social class, and in particular by common assumptions made about the ‘underclass
The priority nursing interventions for Roslyn are to assess and monitor her vital signs, especially her respiratory rate, and perform a pain assessment. The nurse should also administer medication to relieve pain, and considering she is pale and weak; a blood transfusion may be needed. The nurse should prepare Roslyn for that. As the nurse, it is vital to inform Roslyn and her family that her condition can cause pain and avoid students who may be sick when attending school. She should also inform them to let the school know about her condition and need to take medication to treat her symptoms while in school. The nurse can encourage them to keep Roslyn updated with her immunizations to help prevent infections. “Support groups for children with sickle cell anemia can help learn ways to cope with these conditions. These support groups can also be helpful for sharing their worries with peers who have similar concerns and feelings.” (Stanford Children’s Health, 2022, para.10) The nurse can support the family and Roslyn by providing information about support groups. The nurse needs to educate them about Sickle Cell Anemia and crisis. The nurse should instruct the family and Roslyn about the importance of handwashing. The nurse can educate them about different ways to manage pain and symptoms. Instruct them to avoid different foods and monitor things that can trigger Roslyn’s symptoms. It is vital to instruct Roslyn to avoid strenuous exercises because they can cause a crisis
1. Review these three mission statements and assess whether they meet the “person on a bus” test.
• To provide book lovers and those they care about with the most inspiring retail and online environments in the world for books and life-enriching products and services.
• X is dedicated to building a world-class national resource enabling Canadians to know their country and themselves through their published heritage, and to providing an effective gateway to national and international sources of information.
• X is an independent campaigning organization that uses nonviolent, creative confrontation to expose global environmental problems and to force the solutions essential to a green and peaceful future.
2. “Employees are our biggest asset.” “Yes, but they can walk out the door any time and all your investment in them will be lost.” Explain why investments in human capital are important. Using the example of a great coach, explain why all is not lost if some of the team members quit.
3. You and your friend decide to open a high-end restaurant specializing in cuisine from your home country. This type of food may appeal to people in the neighbourhood, but you will need to differentiate this restaurant from others, and offer great service, with explanations, customization, etc. Describe the ways in which you would use HRM programs to train the waiters.
4. Some HR professionals are suggesting that employers not “stereotype” generations and treat them differently. Argue the pros and cons of establishing different HR Policies for different generations.
5. Using your school as an example, find one trend in each of the areas (economics, globalization, political/legislative, technology, demographic and social/cultural) that will impact enrollment in your school.
6. Employees spend an average of 43 minutes a day at work on personal mobile devices. A company in the United States implanted a micro chip in employees (who had volunteered to have this done) to prove the identity of the user and increase security and privacy. What policies should the HR department develop in anticipation of the continuing use of technology?
instructions:
There is total 6 questions in assignment and each question should be written in 100 words.
