Categories
Writers Solution

what are the requirements for compliance and conformance? 1.4. What guidance is included in Australian Standards 1684?

Rectangle  Description automatically generated with low confidence

Student Pack

Rectangle  Description automatically generated with low confidence

Student Pack

1. Student and trainer details Comment by Trinity Institute Australia: Please remove any/all sections that are a double-up of information on Moodle or things they have to sign in Moodle. This includes the last few pages, too.

Student details
Full name:
Student ID:
Contact number:
Email address:
Trainer details
Full name:

2. Unit of competency

Unit of competency
Code:CPCCCA3007
Name:Construct pitched roofs

3. Assessment Submission Method

☐ By hand to trainer/assessor ☐ By email to trainer/assessor ☒ Online submission via Learning Management System (LMS) ☐ Any other method _________________________________________________ (Please describe here)

4. Student declaration

1. I have read and understood the information in the Unit Requirements prior to commencing this Student Pack

2. I certify that the work submitted for this assessment pack is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in my submission. I understand that a false declaration is a form of malpractice;

3. I have kept a copy of this Student Pack and all relevant notes, attachments, and reference material that I used in the production of this Student Pack;

4. For the purposes of assessment, I give the trainer/assessor permission to:

a. Reproduce this assessment and provide a copy to another member of staff; and

b. Take steps to authenticate the assessment, including communicating a copy of this assessment to a plagiarism checking service (which may retain a copy of the assessment on its database for future plagiarism checking).

Student signature: ________________________________

Date: ____/_____/______________

5. Assessment Plan

The student must be assessed as satisfactory in each of the following assessment methods in order to demonstrate competence in a variety of ways.
Evidence number/ Task numberAssessment method/ Type of evidence/ Task nameSufficient evidence recorded/Outcome
Assessment task 1Knowledge Test (KT)S / NS (First Attempt) S / NS (Second Attempt)
Assessment task 2Skills Test (ST)S / NS (First Attempt) S / NS (Second Attempt)

6. Unit Requirements

You, the student, must read and understand all of the information in the Unit Requirements before completing the Student Pack. If you have any questions regarding the information, see your trainer/assessor for further information and clarification.

Assessment method-based instructions and guidelines: Knowledge Test

Instructions provided to the student:
Assessment task description:     
· This is the first (1) assessment task you must successfully complete to be deemed competent in this unit of competency. · The Knowledge Test is comprised of seventeen (17) written questions · You must respond to all questions and submit them to your Trainer/Assessor. · You must answer all questions to the required level, e.g. provide an answer within the required word limit, to be deemed satisfactory in this task
Applicable conditions:        
· All knowledge tests are untimed and are conducted as open book assessment (this means you can refer to your textbook during the test). · You must read and respond to all questions. · You may handwrite/use a computer to answer the questions. · You must complete the task independently. · No marks or grades are allocated for this assessment task. The outcome of the task will be Satisfactory or Not Satisfactory. · As you complete this assessment task, you are predominately demonstrating your written skills and knowledge to your trainer/assessor.
Task instructions
· This is an individual assessment. · To ensure your responses are satisfactory, consult a range of learning resources and other information such as handouts, textbooks, learner resources etc. · To be assessed as Satisfactory in this assessment task, all questions must be answered correctly.

Assessment Task 1: Knowledge Test

Provide your response to each question in the box below.

Q1:Answer the following questions:  1.1. Name the Australian Standard that provides the specifications regarding framing members’ section sizes and stress grades. 1.2. What are the fundamental criteria for adhering to the National Construction Code (NCC)? 1.3. According to the National Construction Code (NCC), what are the requirements for compliance and conformance? 1.4. What guidance is included in Australian Standards 1684? 1.5. What are the four (4) sections of AS 1684? 1.6. List any five (5) pieces of information you need to know in order to design a residential timber frame in line with the Australian building standard AS1684.Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q2:Answer the following questions: 2.1. Prepare a list of five (5) quality checks you would conduct on the pitched roofs to ensure that they meet the quality requirements. 2.2. List any three (3) documents that specify the quality requirements to be met during the construction of pitched roofs.Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q3:Answer the following questions: 3.1. Prepare a list of any five (5) Australian standards applicable working at heights during the construction of pitched roofs. 3.2. List the five (5) necessary safety requirements everyone must be aware of while working at heights while constructing pitched roofs.Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q4:Answer the following questions: 4.1. What are creeper rafters? 4.2. What are the two (2) basic pitched roof construction techniques?Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q5:Answer the following questions: 5.1. List any five (5) drawings that make up a set of building plans. 5.2. Explain the purpose of these two (2) types of drawings: Roof plan Section drawings 5.3. What are construction specifications? 5.4. Identify the symbols given in the table below that are used in roof construction. Symbol Description 5.5. Briefly describe the following technical terms used in the roof construction plan. Barge Board Flaunching Barge Board Collar ValleySatisfactory response
YesNo
Q6:Answer the following questions: 6.1. Document the correct name and two (2) uses of the pictured tools and equipment used to construct ceiling frames given in column 1 of the table. Tool Tool Name Uses (Any Two) 6.2. Briefly describe the types, characteristics and uses of the following plant and equipment: Pneumatic compressor Portable Electric Circular Saw 6.3. Briefly describe the purpose and uses of the following types of nail guns: Framing nail gun Finish nail guns 6.4. What is the limitation of nail guns? Write your answer in a single sentence.Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q7:Answer the following questions: 7.1. List and describe the steps to set out and construct a ceiling frame for the hip roof. 7.2. Briefly describe the processes for calculating roof area. 7.3. What steps should you take to determine the amount of material needed to build a roof frame? 7.4. Based on the dimensions and material specifications of the hip roof given below, calculate the quantities of the following: Sheets Tiles Dimensions: Length: 1800mm Width: 1200mm Material specifications: Metal sheets Sheet size: 760 mm (plus overlap) x 3,600 mm (standard sheet) Tiles per square metre: 12 7.5. What are the formulas to calculate: Length of the rafter? Roof pitch? 7.6. Assume that the run length (horizontal distance between the roof ridge and the wall of the building) is 6m, and the rise of your roof is 1.5m. Based on these assumptions, calculate the following: Rafter length Roof pitch as the proportion of rise and run Roof pitch in the form of x:12Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q8:Answer the following questions: 8.1. List four (4) basic types of material required to construct the roof frames. 8.2. Describe the steps you would follow to calculate the following materials: Rafters Collar tiesSatisfactory response
YesNo
Q9:Answer the following questions: 9.1. What three aspects of the roof must be considered when setting out a roof? 9.2. How can you set out and determine roof bevels? 9.3. How can you set out the roof section and determine the length of the common rafter? 9.4. Briefly describe the steps to set out roof frames.Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q10:Answer the following questions: 10.1. Briefly describe the structural properties and uses of the following types of timber: Cedar Pine Walnut 10.2. Discuss the structural features of different types of engineered timbers given in column 1 of the table. Timber type Structural properties Glulam (Glued Laminated Timber) Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) 10.3. What are the eight (8) properties of structural steel?Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q11:Name the characteristics and briefly list the construction techniques of pitched roof types given in column 1 of the table. Roof type Characteristics (15-40 words each) Construction techniques (20-60 words) Hip and Valley Broken Hip And Valley Gable roof Skillion StrutsSatisfactory response
YesNo
Q12:What are the five (5) bevels needed for all roof members?Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q13:How should timber be stored and what needs to be considered?Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q14:Answer the following: 14.1. What are the NCC fire performance requirements for wall and ceiling linings? Write your answer in a single sentence. 14.2. What are the different types of non-combustible materials as per the housing provisions? Prepare a list of any five (5).Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q15:Answer the following questions: 15.1 What is the purpose of ridge boards? 15.2. How should you cut the rafters? Write your answer in 30-50 words. 15.3. How should you fix the valley gutters to the valley boards?Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q16:Answer the following questions: 16.1. Where are collar ties installed? 16.2. What are under purlins? How are they spaced? 16.3. Explain the purpose of roof struts in a single sentence.Satisfactory response
YesNo
Q17:What are creeper rafters?Satisfactory response
YesNo
Assessment Results Sheet Outcome First attempt: Outcome (make sure to tick the correct checkbox): Satisfactory (S) ☐ or Not Satisfactory (NS) ☐ Date: _______(day)/ _______(month)/ _______(year) Feedback: Second attempt: Outcome (please make sure to tick the correct checkbox): Satisfactory (S) ☐ or Not Satisfactory (NS) ☐ Date: _______(day)/ _______(month)/ _______(year) Feedback: Student Declaration I declare that the answers I have provided are my own work. Where I have accessed information from other sources, I have provided references and/or links to my sources. I have kept a copy of all relevant notes and reference material that I used as part of my submission. I have provided references for all sources where the information is not my own. I understand the consequences of falsifying documentation and plagiarism. I understand how the assessment is structured. I accept that the work I submit may be subject to verification to establish that it is my own. I understand that if I disagree with the assessment outcome, I can appeal the assessment process, and either re-submit additional evidence undertake gap training and or have my submission re-assessed. All appeal options have been explained to me. Student Signature Date Trainer/Assessor Name Trainer/Assessor Declaration I hold: ☐ Vocational competencies at least to the level being delivered ☐ Current relevant industry skills ☐ Current knowledge and skills in VET, and undertake ☐ Ongoing professional development in VET I declare that I have conducted an assessment of this student’s submission. The assessment tasks were deemed current, sufficient, valid and reliable. I declare that I have conducted a fair, valid, reliable, and flexible assessment. I have provided feedback to the student. Trainer/Assessor Signature Date Office Use Only The outcome of this assessment has been entered into the Student Management System on _________________ (insert date) by (insert Name) __________________________________

Unit Code CPCCCA3007 Page 2 of 11

Unit CodeCPCCCA3007 Page 2 of 11

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com on What guidance is included in Australian Standards 1684?

NO PLAGIARISM, Get impressive Grades in Your Academic Work

Categories
Writers Solution

upholding and pro- moting compliance with the current American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) position on Procedural Interventions Exclu- sively Performed by Physical Therapists

Physical Therapists and Direction Of Mobilization/Manipulation: An Educational Resource Paper

PRODUCED BY THE APTA PUBLIC POLICY, PRACTICE, AND PROFESSIONAL AFFAIRS UNIT

SPETEMBER 2013

2

PHYSICAL THERAPISTS AND DIRECTION OF MOBILIZATION/MANIPULATION

INTRODUCTION This white paper outlines the importance of upholding and pro- moting compliance with the current American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) position on Procedural Interventions Exclu- sively Performed by Physical Therapists. This position impacts all aspects of the physical therapy profession, including clinical practice, regulation, licensure, and education. Historical and sup- porting information related to Procedural Interventions Exclusively Performed by Physical Therapists address the patient safety, practice, education, and legislative/regulatory implications of this position on the physical therapy profession.

BACKGROUND Since 1998, APTA’s Guide to Physical Therapist Practice1 has defined mobilization/manipulation as “a manual therapy technique comprised of a continuum of skilled passive movements that are applied at varying speeds and amplitudes, including a small ampli- tude/high velocity therapeutic movement.” To achieve a common language for describing this area of the physical therapist’s scope of practice, the terms “thrust” and “nonthrust” manipulation were established to replace the previous terms “manipulation” and “mo- bilization,” respectively. The APTA Manipulation Education Manual for Physical Therapist Professional Degree Programs further defines thrust manipulation as a “high velocity, low amplitude therapeutic movement within or at the end range of motion” and nonthrust as manipulations that do not involve thrust.2 These defini- tions emphasize that these procedures are applied on a continuum, which requires ongoing examination and evaluation to determine how to proceed along the continuum with modification of speed, amplitude, and direction of forces for optimal clinical outcomes.

In response to longstanding concerns expressed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists (AAOMPT) that physical therapist assistants (PTAs) were receiving instruction in and administering mobilization/manipulation, a skill set requiring ongoing examination and evaluation, AAOMPT adopted the follow- ing positions at the 1998 AAOMPT membership business meeting:

1. Any joint manipulation/mobilization techniques into a restricted or painful range should be performed by the physical therapist and not delegated to supportive personnel including physical therapist assistants.

2. The AAOMPT is opposed to the teaching of joint manipulation/ mobilization to all supportive personnel including physical therapist assistants.

The AAOMPT leadership collaborated with the Orthopaedic

Section and APTA Board of Directors in bringing similar motions to the APTA House of Delegates. As a result, the APTA House of Delegates (House) heard discussion in 1999 and in 2000 passed the position statement: Procedural Interventions Exclusively Per- formed by Physical Therapists (HOD P06-00-30-36),3 which states the following (emphasis added):

The physical therapist’s scope of practice as defined by the Ameri- can Physical Therapy Association Guide to Physical Therapist Practice includes interventions performed by physical therapists. These interventions include procedures performed exclusively by physical therapists and selected interventions that can be performed by the physical therapist assistant under the direction and supervision of the physical therapist.

Interventions that require immediate and continuous examination and evaluation throughout the intervention are performed exclusively by the physical therapist. Such procedural interventions within the scope of physical therapist practice that are performed exclusively by the physical therapist include, but are not limited to,

• spinal and peripheral joint mobilization/manipulation, which are components of manual therapy, and

• sharp selective debridement, which is a component of wound management.

The support statement for this position presented to the House stated: “the Association should delineate those interventions which, due to their clinical complexity and the sophistication of judgment required to perform them, precludes delegation to paraprofessionals or others. This position is consistent with the House of Delegate’s endorsed Guide to Physical Therapist Practice and A Normative Model of Physical Therapist Education.”

This position statement did not represent a change in philosophy for the association.4 APTA policies and positions have long maintained that the physical therapist assistant’s scope of work did not include examination, evaluation, diagnosis, and prognosis. Those elements of practice are to be performed exclusively by the physical therapist.4,5,6,7 The purpose of the position was to more clearly specify which interventions should never be directed to the physical therapist assistant due to their inherent requirements for skill and ongoing clinical decision making.

3

In 2002, in collaboration between AAOMPT, the Orthopaedic Section, and the APTA Board of Directors, the House adopted a position statement addressing clinical continuing education, Clinical Continuing Education for Individuals Other Than Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants.8

Physical therapist assistants may participate in continuing education that includes and teaches subject matter and interventions that differ from the description of entry-level skills as described in A Normative Model of Physical Therapist Assistant Education. Physical therapist assistants may use the interventions taught in continuing education only as consistent with the American Physical Therapy Association [policies, positions, guidelines, standards, and the Code of Ethics] and under the direction and supervision of the physical therapist.

During the 2005 AAOMPT Business meeting, AAOMPT member- ship voted to adopt the APTA House positions on delegation and continuing education. These positions have remained in place within AAOMPT and APTA for over 10 years to enhance patient safety and treatment effectiveness.

There are also legislative and regulatory reasons for these positions that cannot be underestimated. For example, health professions such as chiropractic that would like to limit physical therapists’ scope of practice in mobilization/manipulation can bolster their argument by pointing out that physical therapists may potentially instruct and direct skilled procedures to supportive personnel. APTA has been able to argue successfully in legislative and regulatory battles with chiropractic that physical therapists have the education and training in professional physical therapist education to effectively and safely provide mobilization/manipula- tion. It is easy to demonstrate that the master of physical therapy (MPT) and doctor of physical therapy (DPT) degrees compare favorably to the doctor of chiropractic (DC) degree in time, scope, and content to effectively train manual therapy practitioners. Conversely, PTA education results in a technical degree and is not comparable to MPT, DPT, or DC education. Acting outside this posi- tion not only magnifies liability for the physical therapist but also places the physical therapist profession at risk of being challenged or of losing manipulation as part of the physical therapist scope of practice when physical therapy is criticized in legislative hearings for delegating mobilization/manipulation.

In summary, these consensus-based positions provide important clarity relevant to best clinical practice including patient safety, education, and regulatory and legislative arenas. These positions clarify the practice competency and latitude within the scope of practice for the physical therapist and constraints within the scope of work that can be directed to the PTA.

RATIONALE FOR THE CURRENT POSITION Immediate and Continuous Examination and Evaluation Procedural Interventions Exclusively Performed by Physical Therapists is based on the principle that “immediate and continu- ous examination and evaluation,” critical components of clinical reasoning, are inherent to the effective and safe provision of joint mobilization/manipulation. It is understood that the implementation of these procedures may produce new findings that must be evalu- ated simultaneously as the interventions are implemented. Hence, examination, evaluation, clinical reasoning, and intervention are continuous and immediate.

Although many physical therapy tests and measures as well as interventions are performed at the body systems and functions, activity, and participation levels, there are elements of selected physical therapy procedures that require careful evaluation of tissue/organ and patient response. For these interventions, body systems and functions response usually are qualitatively measured by observation or palpation, applied clinical cues clinicians use as decision points to continue or adjust the treatment. The data gathered through the observations or palpations often are supple- mented with the patient’s subjective reports.

In some physical therapy interventions, the treatment can be divided into distinct phases, gathering data on new findings produced during provision of the intervention, evaluating the data, and using clinical decision making to determine the appropriate action of continuing, reducing, or progressing further intervention. PTAs, working under the direction and supervision of a physical therapist, are generally expected to respond to any negative patient responses immediately to ensure patient safety. In contrast, PTAs generally are expected to continue or modify treatment in the presence of a non-negative response to treatment only within the boundaries established in advance by the physical therapist.

However, joint mobilization/manipulation is an example of an intervention that does not easily lend itself to being segmented into distinct sequential phases of evaluation and implementa- tion. Clinical judgments about the amount of force to apply to create or progress an arthrokinematic change cannot be made on a “stop-evaluate-decide-proceed” linear time sequence. The implementation of the procedure, by its very nature, produces new findings that must be evaluated simultaneously as the intervention is implemented. Examination, evaluation, intervention, and clinical decision making are inseparable in the performance of mobiliza- tion/manipulation.

The essential arthrokinematic motion applied to the joint in mobilization/manipulation is not under voluntary control of the patient, and the practitioner must produce this motion through skilled manual techniques.9,10 This skill requires a detailed under- standing of joint surface anatomy and kinesiology and a continu- ous use of examination with clinical decision making to modulate

4

the technique throughout the treatment session.9,11 The negative responses to application of mobilization/manipulation techniques may include but are not be limited to worsening and/or peripher- alization of symptoms, tissue damage, promotion of inflammation leading to chronic pain and/or proliferation of scar tissue, spinal or joint instability, and neurovascular compromise. Failure to properly evaluate responses during the course of examination or intervention could result in adverse responses from the intervention, ranging from increased pain and deformity, to loss of function, to death.12-19

Since the safe application of mobilization/manipulation requires the practitioner to apply an advanced understanding of arthrokinema- tic principles simultaneously with ongoing examination, evaluation, and clinical decision making during the intervention, the PTA would not be an appropriate provider. In 2007, the APTA’s Departments of Education, Accreditation, and Practice produced a “Problem Solving Algorithm Utilized by PTAs in Patient/Client Intervention.” The application of mobilization (nonthrust manipulation) requires dedicated consistent monitoring and evaluation of the patient/ client response. The algorithm clearly indicates that evaluation is not among the controlling assumptions of PTA practice.20 This is in contrast to osteokinematic range-of-motion interventions in which patients have more voluntary control and are within the PTAs’ scope of work.

Efficacy and Effectiveness of Mobilization/Manipulation Published peer-reviewed research on the efficacy and effective- ness of mobilization/manipulation interventions provided by physical therapists has repeatedly demonstrated the effectiveness of such interventions for a variety of conditions and regions of the body.21-30 However, there are no research studies available that address the efficacy of the practice of mobilization/manipulation provided by PTAs. Therefore, it cannot be assumed that a similar level of effectiveness of manual therapy interventions can be produced when the mobilization/manipulation is directed to PTAs.

Legal and Safety Implications of the Current Position At least 35 state practice acts are silent on the issue of direction of mobilization/manipulation to the PTA. Even so, there is a liability risk when physical therapists choose to practice contrary to the current APTA position on delegation of mobilization/manipulation procedures to PTAs. According to Welk, “A clinically inappropriate decision to direct physical therapy services increases the PT’s risk of professional liability claim. It is important to realize that while APTA policies may in fact require more than the absolute legal requirements of state or federal law, a court still may look to APTA policy in a professional liability action to determine if a physical therapist acted within an acceptable standard of care in delegat- ing physical therapy services.”31

If injury occurs at the hands of a PTA performing mobilization/ma- nipulation procedures in these states, the standard of care may be determined by APTA policy. The current policy will make it difficult

to defend the practice of a PT who directed a PTA to perform these procedures. According to Welk, “In the unfortunate event that a professional liability claim arises that includes issues of delega- tion, the supervising PT will be required to support the delegation decision. This can put the PT in a difficult if not impossible position if the delegation decision was not in compliance with the state practice act and/or APTA policies, or was inconsistent with what a reasonable PT would have done under similar circumstances”31

The analysis also indicates risk for injury when a PTA performs mobilization/manipulation techniques. It reports that the top 3 severities by allegation claims related to PTAs 2001–2010 were:

1. Improper use of equipment

2. Improper management over the course of treatment

3. Improper performance of manual therapy 32

In addition, CNA found that failure to monitor the patient during treatment accounted for the highest percentage of PTA claim.32 To protect the public, state physical therapy licensing boards should consider adopting regulations consistent with the APTA position on Procedural Interventions Exclusively Performed by Physical Therapists.

CHALLENGES TO THE CURRENT POSITION At the 2006 APTA House, the Texas Chapter delegation proposed RC-12, which would have rescinded Procedural Interventions Ex- clusively Performed by Physical Therapists. At the motion’s presen- tation to the 2006 House, the parliamentary procedure “object to consideration” was made and sustained by more than the 2/3 votes required to sustain the motion. This was a strong endorsement by the 2006 APTA House in support of the current position.

In spring 2012, the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy (FSBPT) published the results of its recent PT and PTA practice analyses.33 FSBPT conducts surveys every 5 years to develop the blueprints for both the PT and PTA national examinations. Of note were 2 items in the manual therapy intervention category that had previously not been included on the PTA exam but did meet the threshold in this survey administration:

• Item 62, Perform peripheral mobilization/manipulation (non-thrust) • Item 64, Perform spinal mobilization/manipulation (non-thrust)

An item equivalent to item 62 reached threshold in the 2006 survey, but the FSBPT exam policy committee decided against recom- mending that this content be added to the exam, a determination the FSBPT Board accepted. In the 2011 survey process, the policy committee recommended that these items appear on the exam, resulting in a decision by the FSBPT Board to include them on the content outline.

5

The item numbers related to peripheral and spinal mobilization/ma- nipulation reached the critical threshold of 25% of the respondents indicating they performed the activity, and so these items are now eligible to appear on the exam. Of additional note is the frequency with which these respondents reported performing these items. The frequency reported for Item 62 (peripheral) is 1.26 (1 = “a few times a year” and 2 = “once a month”). The frequency reported for Item 64 (spine) is 0.78 (0 = “never” and 1 = “a few times a year”).33

On September 6, 2012, the Commission on Accreditation of Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE), the national accreditation organization for physical therapist and physical therapist assistant education programs, released a statement regarding the inclusion of mobilization in PTA curricula, which was amended on November 7, 2012, to read (emphasis added):

PTA Education and Peripheral Joint Mobilization

As the preferred extender of physical therapy services, physi- cal therapist assistants (PTAs) are educated and licensed to deliver physical therapy interventions within the plan of care designed by the physical therapist (PT). To safely and effectively fulfill this role, the PTA must possess knowledge of the rationale for all components of the treatment plan as directed by the physical therapist. The Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE) believes that the knowledge of the entry-level PTA should include the rationale for manual therapy procedures such as soft tissue and non-thrust joint mobilization techniques. Furthermore, the Commission believes that it is not inappropriate to train PTAs to perform soft tissue mobilization or to manually assist the PT in the delivery of peripheral joint mobilization procedures (ie, assist with patient positioning, stabilization, or grade 1-2 movements). CAPTE does not support the inclusion of educa- tional objectives or learning experiences in the entry-level PTA curriculum that are intended to prepare the PTA to perform grades 3-5 (thrust) procedures.

CAPTE is responsible for ensuring that all accredited programs meet a minimum set of educational standards in physical therapy. CAPTE’s recognition agencies (the US Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation) require that all accrediting agencies have independent authority, free from in- terference by sponsoring organizations, for their decisions related to standards and to the accreditation status of programs. As such, APTA did not have a role in the decision by CAPTE on this issue. CAPTE’s statement is about curricular content only; it does not address the appropriateness of the PT in directing and supervis- ing the PTA in the application of such techniques. Further, it does not require that physical therapist assistant education programs include this content; it does, however, open programs that include the content to increased scrutiny by CAPTE regarding the quality of relevant student outcomes.

Prior to the September 2012 statement, CAPTE documents were quite clear and consistent with APTA policy in that only physical therapist training included didactic, psychomotor, and clinical training in thrust and nonthrust mobilization/manipulation for the spine and extremities. The design and implementation of physical therapist professional education curriculum are supported by both A Normative Model for Physical Therapist Professional Education and the CAPTE Evaluative Criteria for Accreditation of Education Programs for the Preparation of Physical Therapists. Both the normative model and CAPTE evaluative criteria are specific that both thrust and nonthrust manipulation techniques are taught exclusively in physical therapist professional education programs 34,35 A Normative Model for Physical Therapist Assistant Education and the CAPTE evaluative criteria for PTA education exclude the exami- nation and evaluation skills and the interventional skills required for safe and effective implementation of mobilization/manipulation.

In response to the above FSBPT and CAPTE actions, APTA Presi- dent Paul Rockar provided the following statement in a September 18, 2012, letter to APTA component leaders: “As the organization that represents physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, and students, APTA creates and communicates professional standards to which members should aspire. The current standard for the intervention of manual therapy is in part expressed in the APTA House of Delegates position on the issue of delegation of joint mobilization/manipulation to PTAs, which remains in place and unaffected … .” As noted in Rockar’s letter, APTA holds firm to its support of the Position on Procedural Interventions Exclusively Performed by Physical Therapists.

At its April 2013 meeting, CAPTE rescinded its statement PTA Education and Peripheral Joint Mobilization. At the same meeting CAPTE adopted a new position paper titled Expectations for the Education of Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants Regarding Direction and Supervision,36 which states the following (emphasis added):

CAPTE expects educational programs to prepare PT students to determine those components of interventions that may be directed to the physical therapist assistant. These consider- ations should include the level of skill and training required to perform the procedure, the level of experience/advanced competency of the individual PTA, the practice setting in which the procedure is performed, and the type of monitoring needed to accurately assess the patient’s response to the intervention. In addition, acuity and complexity of the patient’s condition and other clinical factors should be considered when directing PTAs to safely and competently perform any intervention. CAPTE also expects PTA educational programs to prepare PTA students to recognize components of interven- tions that are beyond their scope of work. (see PTA Criteria 3.3.2.10 through 3.3.2.12)

6

Likewise, CAPTE expects education programs for the PTA to select the appropriate depth and breadth of knowledge and skill needed to perform interventions that are consistent with the PTA’s responsibilities. These skills not only include specific intervention procedures but also the data collection skills needed to monitor and assess a patient’s response to an intervention. These data collection skills are outlined in the evaluative criteria. Regardless of the relative simplicity or complexity of the procedure itself, CAPTE also believes that those interventions which require more extensive founda- tional knowledge, manual skill, and/or complex monitoring than a PTA is educated to provide should only be performed by the physical therapist.

SUMMARY This white paper provides an historical overview and clear ratio- nale for upholding and promoting the APTA position on Procedural Interventions Exclusively Performed by Physical Therapists (HOD P06-00-30-36). This issue has an impact on all aspects of the physical therapy profession including clinical practice, educa- tion, patient safety, and regulatory and legislative arenas. APTA has concluded that, based on education, efficacy, and safety, it is inappropriate for a physical therapist to direct the manual therapy procedures of mobilization/manipulation to the PTA under any circumstances. Further, beyond the specific interventions of mobilization/manipulation, any procedure within physical therapist practice that requires immediate and continuous examination and evaluation throughout the intervention should not be directed to the PTA.

As the principal membership organization representing and promoting the profession of physical therapy,37 APTA encourages state licensing boards to establish rules, regulations , or position statements congruent with the position on Procedural Interven- tions Exclusively Performed by Physical Therapists.

REFERENCES 1. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. Revised 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: American Physical

Therapy Association; 2003. 2. APTA Manipulation Education Manual for Physical Therapist Professional Degree

Programs. Alexandria, VA: APTA Manipulation Task Force; 2004. 3. APTA House of Delegates. Procedural Interventions Exclusively Performed by Physical

Therapists. (HOD P06-00-30-36.) Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2000. 4. APTA House of Delegates. Briefing Paper RC 12-06-1. Alexandria, VA: American Physical

Therapy Association; 2006. 5. APTA House of Delegates. Direction and Supervision of the Physical Therapist Assistant.

HOD P06-05-18-26. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2005. 6. APTA House of Delegates. Continuing Education for the Physical Therapist Assistant. HOD

P06-01-22-23. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2001. 7. APTA Board of Directors. Minimum Required Skills of Physical Therapist Assistant

Graduates at Entry-level. BOD G11-05-09-18. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2005.

8. APTA House of Delegates. Clinical Continuing Education for Individuals Other Than Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants. HOD P06-02-26-49. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2002.

9. Maitland GD. Peripheral Manipulation. London: Butterworth; 1984. 10. Kaltenborn FM. The Spine Basic Evaluation and Mobilization Techniques. Oslo, Norway:

Olaf Norlis Bokhandel; 1964.

11. Olson KA. Manual Physical Therapy of the Spine. St Louis, MO: Saunders, Elsevier; 2009. 12. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Vassilaki M, Lu-May C. Frequency and clinical predictors of adverse

reactions to chiropractic care in the UCLA neck pain study. Spine. 2005;30(13):1477-1484. 13. Rivett DA. The vertebral artery and vertebrobasilar insufficiency. In: Bouling JD, Jull

GA. Greive’s Modern Manual Therapy, The Vertebral Column. Third ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2004:257-273.

14. DiFabio RP. Manipulation of the cervical spine: risks and benefits. Phys Ther. 1999;79(1):50-65. 15. Rivett DA, Milburn P. A prospective study of complications of cervical spine manipulation. J

Manual Manip Ther. 1996;4:166-170. 16. Haldeman S, Kohlbeck FJ, McGregor M. Risk factors and precipitating neck movements

causing vertebrobasilar artery dissection after cervical trauma and spinal manipulation. Spine. 1999;24:785-94.

17. Hurwitz EL, Aker PD, Adams AH, Meeker WC, Shekelle PG. Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine: a systematic review of the literature. Spine. 1996;21:1746-1760.

18. Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R L, Bouter LM. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J. 2004; 4(3):335-356.

19. Danish Institute for Health Technology Assessment. Low Back Pain: Frequency, Management and Prevention From a Health Technology Perspective. Copenhagen: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database; 1999.

20. A Normative Model of Physical Therapist Assistant Education: Version 2007. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2007.

21. Bang MD, Deyle GD. Comparison of supervised exercise with and without manual physical therapy for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. JOSPT. 2000;30(3):126-137.

22. Bergman GJ, Winters J, Croesier KH, Pool JM, Jong B, et al. Manipulative therapy in addi- tion to usual medical care for patients with shoulder dysfunction and pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 141(6):432-9; 2004.

23. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Kulig K, Davenport TE, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2009;34(25):2720–2729.

24. Deyle GD, Henderson NE, Matelkel RL, et al. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy and exercise in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(3):173-181.

25. Deyle GD, Allison SC, Matekel RL, et al. Physical therapy treatment effectiveness for osteo- arthritis of the knee: a randomized comparison of supervised clinical exercise and manual therapy procedures versus a home exercise program. Phys Ther. 2005;85(12):1310-1317.

26. Hoeksma HL, Dekkar J, Ronday HK, et al. Comparison of manual therapy and exercise in osteoarthritis of the hip: a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2004;51(5):722-729.

27. Hoving JL, Koes BW, de Vet HCW, et al. Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:713-722.

28. Walker MJ, Boyles RE, Young BA, et al. The effectiveness of manual physical therapy and exercise for mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2008;33(22):2371-2378.

29. Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Childs JD, et al. A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2006;31(22):2541-2549.

30. Vermeulen HM, Rozing PM, Obermann WR, Cessie SL, Vlieland TPMV. Comparison of high- grade and low-grade mobilization techniques in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2006;86(3):355-68.

31. Welk P. Considerations for physical therapy service delegation. PT: Magazine of Physical Therapy. 2008;16(11):18-21.

32. CNA HealthPro Physical Therapy Closed Claims Analysis, Part One, 2001–2010. www.cna.com/vcm_content/CNA/internet/Static%20File%20for%20Download/Risk%20 Control/Medical%20Services/PhysicalTherapyLiability2001-2010-01-2012.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2013.

33. Analysis of Practice for the Physical Therapy Profession: Entry-Level Physical Therapist Assistants. Alexandria, VA: Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy; 2011.

34. A Normative Model of Physical Therapist Professional Education: Version 2004. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2004.

35. Evaluative Criteria for Accreditation of Education Programs for the Preparation of Physical Therapists. Alexandria, VA: Commission on Accreditation of Physical Therapy Education; 2013.

36. Expectations for the Education of Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants Regarding Direction and Supervision. Alexandria, VA: Commission on Accreditation of Physical Therapy Education; 2013.

37. APTA House of Delegates. Mission Statement of APTA. HOD P06-93-05-05. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 1993

WE HAVE DONE THIS ASSIGNMENT BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on upholding and pro- moting compliance with the current American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) position on Procedural Interventions Exclu- sively Performed by Physical Therapists

Are You looking for Assignment and Homework Writing help? We Provide High-Quality Academic Papers at Affordable Rates. No Plagiarism.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Categories
Writers Solution

Compliance coordinator for a biomedical company

You’re the compliance coordinator for a biomedical company, Hadley Services, which provides field service technicians to local hospitals and medical offices. Hadley’s specialty is radiological equipment, particularly open MRIs. Your primary job is to coordinate the schedules for repair, calibration and preventive maintenance for all of your clients. You are also responsible for writing the reports that keep the company in compliance with local and federal guidelines. Since many medical facilities are starting to replace their outdated MRI machines with the new open MRIs, Hadley has grown considerably in the last 2 years. Hadley has a long standing relationship with the folks at Hitachi Medical, who manufacture the AIRIS Elite, the most commonly used machine in your market.

In the early afternoon, you get an email from one of Hadley’s newest clients, St. Francis Clinic, which is a brand new clinic of the Alliance Medical Group. When St. Francis opened two months ago, they signed on with Hadley. The St. Francis account meant a lot to Hadley since they had been wooing the Alliance Medical Group for years.

The email is from St. Francis’s clinic administrator, Pat Williams. The technician, Allen Franks, just left after completing a safety check, and now the machine is no longer recording data. You immediately dispatch another, more experienced technician (Marcus Ramirez) to address the problem, and call Ms. Williams. While you’re on the phone with her, Marcus texts you to tell you that problem is solved. You relay the information to Ms. Williams and hang up. After chatting with both technicians, the problem was a simple. Allen Franks had failed to connect the data port snuggly, which is a rookie technician mistake. Now that everything has settled down, you know you have some additional work to do.

DELIVERABLES

Based on the scenario above, your deliverables will be the following:

• Document to Pat Williams, the client (written as a letter)

• Document to Hadley’s client rep, Ronni Simms, who is responsible for the St. Francis account letting her know of the developments with her clinic (written as an email)

• Document to Allen Franks (written as a memo for the staff without using the name directly)

Assignment Instructions

This scenario asks you to prepare a range of documents. Students are responsible for determining the appropriate genre (email, memo, business letter, etc.) as well as the content of those documents

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com ON Compliance coordinator for a biomedical company

NO PLAGIARISM, Get impressive Grades in Your Academic Work

Categories
Writers Solution

Compliance of a patient is one key to successful medication by therapists

Discussion Questions

Compliance of a patient is one key to successful medication by therapists. Therefore, in a case like that of Alma, a healthcare professional has first to find a way to overcome the non-compliant nature of Alma so that the pelvic procedure will be carried out successfully. In helping to provide a solution to the non-compliant nature of Alma, the health care professional has first to focus on finding out the root cause of the behavior. In this case, the cause of the non-compliance might be illiteracy, or maybe economic hardships, or an array of other issues which are personal to the patient. Therefore, after getting causes of the root cause of the non-compliance, the real solution will be looking at patterns of care and utilization. By taking a care route, the health care professional will be able to solve the non-compliance problem of Alma. Some of the strategies to adopt for the health care professional for successful solvation of non-compliance will be maintaining their rationality, placing responsibility where it belongs, setting reasonable limits in addressing the problem, and not focusing more on the negative aspects.

In the case of Alma, patient education will have to come in. Patient education encompasses three aspects, which determine the approach one can take: the educator, the non-compliant patient, and the healthcare setting. For the educator, a high degree of familiarity with the case of the patient is needed. Familiarity, in this case, means that whatever might be meaningful to the patient regarding the diagnosis should be made known to them through appropriate methodologies. For the patient, for complete compliance, they should be convinced enough that the procedure of treatment that is set to them will help avoid the adverse condition they are facing. Regarding the healthcare setting, the educator should look for an appropriate environment that will enhance communication between the healthcare professional and the non-compliance professional.

Alma Faulkenberger is an 85-year-old female outpatient sitting in the waiting room awaiting an invasive pelvic procedure. The health care professional who will assist in her procedure enters the room and calls “Alma.” There is no reply so the professional retreats to the work area. Fifteen minutes later the professional returns and calls “Alma Frankenberg.” Still no reply, so he leaves again. Another 15 minutes pass and the professional approaches Alma and shouts in her ear, “Are you Alma Frankenberg?” She replies, “No I am not, and I am not deaf either, and when you get my name correct I will answer you.”

Using the topic 1 materials, develop a plan to help Alma be compliant with the procedure and post-treatment medication. Also, describe the approach you would take to patient education in this case.

Using 200-300 words APA format with at least two references. Sources must be published within the last 5 years

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals Compliance of a patient is one key to successful medication by therapists

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG
Categories
Writers Solution

How database monitoring and auditing fit within the SOX compliance framework.

How database monitoring and auditing fit within the SOX compliance framework.

Monitoring and auditing are the more essential compliances set to motivate or encourage various associations to meet various businesses following the capacity and information to be used. In such a case, records and database authority are involved. This means that the stored information or data in the database should be well monitored and reviewed for the SOX compliance framework. However, there are some steps that one needs to follow when monitoring and auditing the database that will fit in the system of SOX. The first step is that the information technology director should fully support the demonstrations parts that contain complexity to reporting, security, and information management.

SOX compliance framework contains two areas that are SOX section 302 and SOX section 404. However, the monetary reporting of a firm is essential since it ensures the continuous flow of the business because there is the availability of adequate finances to run it. Therefore, SOX section 302 is viewed and considered as the monetary reporting of a firm. It is the manager’s responsibility or the CEO of a firm to ensure that all the firms’ data and information are well recorded for easy retrieval when needed. The information recorded should be complete and accurate. This will improve the management of a firm because the essential thing in an organization is good record keeping.

Additionally, both sections are identified with the financials and the act of bookkeeping in a firm. Every organization should be keen on bookkeeping and ensure that the financial records are done accurately and in the correct order. When the firm fails to do so, that ne can lead to the dissolution of the company. Therefore, before recording the information, a survey should be made about the information to ensure all the essential details are recorded. This becomes beneficial to the organization since it will be able to manage its finances. (Hasan, 2018). 

The auditing of the SOX compliance is the ability of how large firms deal with their internal controls. This can also be known structure of management. Large firms employ experts to safeguard the information that is kept in bookkeeping concerning various transactions. The public company accounting oversight board is one of the necessities of the SOX compliance on companies. This board is after preparing the auditors for auditing the firm’s information and data used to run the organization. This ensures a continuous flow of information in a firm from the top management to other employees.

Additionally, there should be adequate security to protect the firm’s data, ensuring that the ones do not access the organization’s confidential information without the owner’s permission.   This is very vital because security gives workers employed there a sense of confidentiality. The organization committee plays a role in delegating the organizational work to various workers to perform on time and in an effective manner. The process of delegation should be equally done according to the skills of the workers. The information system team should ensure that it updates the firm on the emerging issues on about the technology and be in a position to advise the organization on how to apply it.

References.

Hasan, M. U. (2018). A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF INFORMATION SECURITY DATABASE AUDIT AND ASSESSMENT IN UNIVERSITY BASED ORGANIZATION (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia). https://libguides.nec.edu/az.php

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. How database monitoring and auditing fit within the SOX compliance framework.

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

organization will track compliance with the policies and what must be disclosed to employees for this to be acceptable practice.

Assignment 2: Final Project—Privacy Guidelines

Continuing with the scenario from Week 4, you now need to develop guidelines relating to privacy in the workplace and workplace monitoring. Consider how the organization will track compliance with the policies and what must be disclosed to employees for this to be acceptable practice.

Develop guidelines for professional responsibilities in the organization related to identifying and resolving ethical issues in IT.  This should include consequences of violation of the established policies, an appeals process, and a contact person within the organization for any questions regarding this.  You should identify that there will be no discrimination based upon reporting ethical violations and where employees can report these anonymously.

As you complete this final deliverable, remember to incorporate the feedback provided by your classmates in Week 3 and facilitator for your deliverable.

Summarize (in either the submission text box or a separate document) what you have learned since starting this assignment and provide an outline of changes you have made to your document since your first topical outline 

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. organization will track compliance with the policies and what must be disclosed to employees for this to be acceptable practice.

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

Falstaff’s Chief Compliance Officer

How much for this paper? I only want 6 pages including references.  

Please consider the fact pattern below on a fictional company, Falstaff Corporation. You are Falstaff’s Chief Compliance Officer. Based upon the facts and items to address at the end of the fact pattern, you are to prepare a memorandum to the Falstaff Corporation Board of Directors. Your memorandum should be a maximum of seven pages, single-spaced, in 12 point font, and with one inch margins. In preparing your memorandum, you can use all lecture and reading materials from class, as well as any additional outside research you would like to include with proper citations.

Your final memorandum will have a possible total of 100 points, with the following factors to be considered:

Content = 70 points

Style/Coherence = 10 points

Organization = 10 points

Research/Citations = 10 points