Assignment : It May Not Work in Politics
Worth 225 points
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which the student addresses the following three (3) items using headers to separate each response:
Congressional Ethics. Identify one (1) member of Congress who has been charged with ethics violations. Briefly discuss the reason for the charges and provide two (2) reasons why you agree or disagree with the verdict and any penalties. Provide examples to support your answer. Note: Consider how the verdict and penalties impacts your trust of the members of Congress.
Third Party Candidates. Discuss two (2) political reasons why a third party candidate has never been successful in winning a presidential election. Provide examples to support the answer. Note: Consider the political impact of the Republican and Democratic Party if a third party was successful.
Federal and State Authority. Identify one (1) current issue facing the United States today. Analyze the respective roles of Federal and state authorities in addressing the issue. Determine whether the U. S. Constitution constrains the Federal and state responses to the issue. Explain.
In your research, you cannot use Wikipedia, online dictionaries, Sparknotes, Cliffnotes, or any other Website do that do not qualify as an academic resource.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are to:
Identify informed opinions on issues and questions involving the U.S. government, national political processes, policy making, and the notion of democracy.
Employ terminology used to study political science and American government.
Develop reasoned written and spoken presentations on issues and questions involving the U.S. government and national political processes using information in the course.
Describe the basic values of American political culture.
Explain how the federal system of government works.
Explore different perspectives on issues and questions about the U.S. government and national political processes.
Describe the importance of an informed, effective citizenship for the national government and political processes.
Use concepts from our study of U.S. national government and politics (such as models of democracy) to discuss government and politics in state, local, and international contexts.
Examine the evolution of presidential power in military affairs.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in the field of U.S. government and politics.
Write clearly and concisely about U.S. government and politics using proper writing mechanics
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com
MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER
Political Science: It May Not Work In Politics
(Course Instructor)
(University Affiliation)
(Student’s Name)
(Date)
Political Science: It May Not Work In Politics
Congressional Ethics
One member of the congress who has been charged with violation of ethics is Charles B. Rangel. According to (House of Representatives, 2010) Charles B. Rangel was one of the powerful members of the house committee until he was found guilty on numerous accounts of violation of ethics of conduct. The 8th lawmaker subcommittee found Charles B. Rangel guilty of violation of 10 of the 13 charges of violations of ethics related to his fundraising activities and personal finances.
Charles B. Rangel was accused of collection of infractions that were related to four important components of the case. He was accused of raising four-figure money from chief executives and corporate charities to fund a college wing named in his honor, through illegal use of congressional official letterhead and staff. Moreover, Rangel was accused of violation of New York City rules by housing the house committee in a house that he controls rent in Harlem. The other ethics violations were failure to pay taxes on Dominican villa and improper discloser of hundreds of thousands on USD in properties that he owned. The charges against Charles B. Rangel included reprimand, expulsion, censure and suspension. The house committee verdict was good since it would in
- ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com
MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER
CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com
Political Science: It May Not Work In Politics
(Course Instructor)
(University Affiliation)
(Student’s Name)
(Date)
Political Science: It May Not Work In Politics
Congressional Ethics
One member of the congress who has been charged with violation of ethics is Charles B. Rangel. According to (House of Representatives, 2010) Charles B. Rangel was one of the powerful members of the house committee until he was found guilty on numerous accounts of violation of ethics of conduct. The 8th lawmaker subcommittee found Charles B. Rangel guilty of violation of 10 of the 13 charges of violations of ethics related to his fundraising activities and personal finances.
Charles B. Rangel was accused of collection of infractions that were related to four important components of the case. He was accused of raising four-figure money from chief executives and corporate charities to fund a college wing named in his honor, through illegal use of congressional official letterhead and staff. Moreover, Rangel was accused of violation of New York City rules by housing the house committee in a house that he controls rent in Harlem. The other ethics violations were failure to pay taxes on Dominican villa and improper discloser of hundreds of thousands on USD in properties that he owned. The charges against Charles B. Rangel included reprimand, expulsion, censure and suspension. The house committee verdict was good since it would in
- ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com
MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER