Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders
The DSM-5-TR is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the DSM-5-TR, and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder.
In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders.
Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media
To Prepare
· Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.
· Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.
The Assignment (2–3 pages)
· Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
· Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.
By Day 7 of Week 9
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
· Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
· Click the Week 9 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
· Click the Week 9 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
· Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
· If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
Redistricting in Texas has been an issue of significant controversy since 2000 ( and even before but not as dramatic and consequential). First read some of the issues involved in 2000 and then read the issues involved in 2010 redistricting controversies including court cases responding to all questions concerning both separate but in many ways very connected cases, incidents and processes.
Redistricting is a highly partisan activity mandated indirectly by the required reapportionment of the constitution every decade. The House of Representatives state member allocations is dependent on an accurate population count and subsequent redistricting. “The primary reason for taking the census is to comply with the U.S. Constitutional mandate for data needed to reapportion the 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. With the census data tapes in hand, states swiftly began to draw a seemingly infinite number of state legislative and congressional district plans to use in the elections.
In 2001-2004 following the 2000 mandated census redistricting in Texas adopted and then re adopted redistricting plans in an unusual manner. Eventually, state legislators adopted plans that were carefully crafted to satisfy a wide range of criteria including compliance with one-person one-vote, the federal Voting Rights Act and traditional redistricting principles such as compact and contiguous districts. In addition, legislators meticulously designed plans to further political goals without violating federal and state statutes. A couple of states, New Jersey and Virginia, had to draw plans for 2001 elections and almost all states had plans in place for the 2002 elections with the exception of Maine and Montana where redistricting is done prior to the 2004 election.” (NCLR) However, Texas re drew its districts at least twice. The first redistricting effort was under the direction of the courts and the other instance and latest with a new republican majority in the legislature.
This action of redistricting has been litigated in the Supreme Court (as often Texas legislation and policies are—with many found unconstitutional). The Supreme Court has ruled that much if not most of what Texas enacted during the 2000 decade was in fact constitutional but with one exception also a violation of minority voting rights.
The process with a little less drama repeated itself in 2010 but with different relevant Supreme Court rulings and a new interpretation of the voting rights act. 2010 again was the beginning of a decade in which Texas attempt to redistrict was again found incongruous with minority voting rights.
Discuss, after conducting your own research on the issues involved, that decision and the process in the U.S. Supreme Court. REMEMBER that the decisions and opinions of the Supreme Court change . Should the last ( following the 2010 census) redistricting of Texas congressional seats by the Texas legislature have been found in violation of the constitution and civil rights laws?
The most recent 2010-2012 process did in fact result in the plan being rejected over and over and over again. Outline the current (2010-2012 rejection of Texas redistricting efforts) and determine the fatal flaws and underlying values which undermine that process. What could be done to prevent this from occurring again?
The process is again heating with disputes still over data and boundaries and maps regarding current congressional ( and state legislative) districts. The basic argument again focuses on denial of minorities ( particularly in these cases Latino) voting rights.
You must show depth in your arguments and demonstrate your research so very long and many paragraphs with numerous academic citations are expected.
You do not have to discuss the concept/practice of redistricting or reapportionment but focus on the Texas process and the aftermaths of recent census on that process both in terms of legislative/political actions and court decisons
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals Redistricting in Texas has been an issue of significant controversy since 2000 ( and even before but not as dramatic and consequential). First read some of the issues involved in 2000 and then read the issues involved in 2010 redistricting controversies including court cases responding to all questions concerning both separate but in many ways very connected cases, incidents and processes.
An issue is defined by Webster as “a matter that is in dispute between two or more parties: A point of debate of controversy.” This assignment provides the opportunity for you to think critically about an issue that is currently affecting the professional and to present your position in writing. II. OBJECTIVES This assignment provides the opportunity to: Demonstrate research abilities by locating pertinent and timely resources that present more than one side of the issue. Critically analyze various viewpoints. Formulate personal position that can be defended. III. PROCEDURE A. Topics: Students will select a topic from the following list: Should Nurses Join a Union? Should Nurses Join the American Nurses Association? Should the Entry level for Registered Nurses be the BSN? Should Families be Allowed to Attend a Code? Should the Terminally Ill be Admitted to ICU? Do some Advanced Directives Limit Patients’ Rights? Or, you can submit another ethical issue for approval. Students are expected to read broadly about the assigned topic. The primary resources should be nursing journals. B. Paper: 1. This is a formal paper and must follow APA format. To avoid plagiarism use correct APA format to cite references, especially direct quotes. 2. The order of the paper is: Title page (separate page) Abstract (separate page, approximately 100 words) Introduction to the topic. (i.e. Why is it important for nurses? What are the implications for nurses? 3-4 paragraphs) Discussion of the pro side of issue. (3-4 points, 3-4 pages). Include references. Discussion of the con side of issue. (3-4 points, 3-4 pages). Include references. Personal opinion section (3-4 paragraphs) Reference list (separate page). 3. Important APA Guidelines (6th ed) Margins: left margin — right, top and bottom – 1 inch. Page numbers should appear in the upper right corner of page, 1 inch from top and side. Use double spacing for entire paper. Use headings.
Due to the rise in popularity of nursing unionization, this paper looks at the phenomena and its implications on the nursing profession. The issue has been debated since the 1940s, through to the American Nurse Association’s (ANA) collective bargaining for better working conditions and the association’s consequent formation of United American Nurses (UAN) that was a precursor to National Nurses United (NNU), the biggest nursing union in the country. The paper lists down various advantages of unionization that include higher wages, job security and collective bargaining. It also lists down various disadvantages that include union dues, stifling working environment and deprofessionalization of nursing. Finally, the author offers an opinion on whether nurses should join unions or not.
Should Nurses Join A Union?
Unions are increasingly becoming relevant in the nursing profession, impacting on the financial, professional and personal welfare of nurses. Yet whilst some people view them as important to the profession, others view them as unnecessary impediments to the development of the profession (Dube, Kaplan and Thompson, 2016). Indeed since discussions about unionizing nursing emerged in the 1940s, there has been no agreement as to their importance.
Nursing union membership in the United States is estimated to be at 21% (Spetz, Ash, Konstatinidis and Herrera, 2011) with the largest union being the National Nurses United (NNU) that has 185,000 members. Other nursing unions are the National Federation of Nurses, Washington Nurses Association and Oregon Nurses Association. Some nurses are represented by non-nursing unions including the American Federation of Teachers, United Steelworkers and the Service Employees International Union (Koys, Martin, LaVan and Katz, 2015). There are also professional organizations that represent nurses, such as the American Nurse Association (ANA).
Often, the roles of nursing professional associations and those of unions overlap. ANA has in the past successfully lobbied for better working conditions for nurses (Staiger, Spetz and Phibbs, 2010) while present-day unions are advocating for more professionalism in the industry through funded training programs for nurses. Overall, nursing unionization should lead to better working conditions, more job satisfaction and better patient outcomes for unionized nurses. Whether A point of debate of controversy these goals are achieved is debatable.
Advantages of joining a union
The right to unionized membership is enshrined in the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935 that grants private sector workers the right to organize and form unions whilst reviewing and prosecuting unfair labor practices such as threat, unfair disciplining and refusal to bargain. NLRA further requires unions to represent employees and to bargain in good faith (Kany, 2007). Amendment to the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 allowed nurses in not-for-profit hospitals to unionize. Moreover unions are working towards laws that regulate hospitals and other healthcare institutions, especially with a view to requiring employers to protect nurses from harassment and violence in the nosocomial environments and creating government-funded programs for nursing education (Cherry, 2014).
Unions give workers a voice in collective bargaining with employers for better pay. They enable negotiation for fair wages for all unionized nurses, usually with a minimum wage and different rates for different shifts being agreed upon. It is noteworthy that nurses in unionized facilities generally earn 18.8% higher than…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. A point of debate of controversy
Times have certainly changed since Michele Dickey wrote “Girl Gamers: The controversy of Girl Gamers and the Relevance of Female-Oriented Game Design for Instruction Design”. Not only has the gaming industry pivoted from a male-dominated console-based world to a world in which mobile games with wide audiences reign supreme, but we now have games like Pokemon Go, which lets you assign your character a “style” instead of a gender.
For this assignment, I would like you to discuss how games have changed from the time “Girl Gamers” was written and today. Please focus on representations of race and gender in games, and elements in games that have become more mass appeal and less white-male-specific. Please use examples from our reading and from modern media to support your thoughts and ideas.