Tag: corrections

Categories
Writers Solution

Death-row inmate from the Arizona Department of corrections website.

Style : Write an essay (750-1,000 words) explaining factors that are normally considered aggravating and mitigating circumstances.

Step one: Select a death-row inmate from the Arizona Department of corrections website.
Step two: Research your selected inmate and identify aggravating and mitigating circumstances that placed him/her on death row.
Step three: Describe exactly why your case facts are mitigating and aggravating based on the explanation given in your assigned readings. Be sure to cite all of your sources. Evaluate why the factors of this case merited the sentence of death.
Use the GCU Library to locate three to five relevant, scholarly sources in support of your content.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.


GET SOLUTION BELOW

Assignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at CapitalEssayWriting.com 

ORDER YOUR COPY AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances among the Death-Row Inmates

Name of Student

University Affiliation

Course Number

Name of Professor

Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances among the Death-Row Inmates

            The end of a criminal trial often involves the determination of the maximum sentence that an offender must serve. Once the trial process is complete, the jury or the judge employs the state and federal criminal statutes to determine the maximum sentence. For a jury or a judge to arrive at specific sentence duration, important considerations based on modern laws must be made. One such consideration is the aggravating and mitigating factors (Hoge & Andrews, 2013). The aggravating factors are those that can increase the duration of the sentence, whereas mitigating factors helps in reducing the gravity of the criminal sentence.

A Death-Row Inmate from Arizona Department of Corrections

            The Arizona Department of Corrections website has over 100 inmates on death-row sentence. The inmates are from different ethnic backgrounds and were given the maximum penalty of death through various means. For example, some of the inmates were sentenced through lethal injection. However, the aggravating and mitigating factors that informed their sentences vary among all the inmates.

Jose Acuna-Valenzuela

            Jose Acuna-Valenzuela is was convicted of murder and sentenced to the maximum sentence of the death penalty. Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry (2020) has listed Acuna as a Mexican-American aged 21 and was convicted of a criminal offence in 2011. According to the Arizona statement department of corrections, Acuna was convicted of the first-degree murder of a victim who had previously testified against him in a court. He was also convicted for the attempted murder of the victim’s girlfriend, where he was found to have discharged a firearm at a structure and misconduct that involved a weapon.

            In August 2011, Perla M. and his boyfriend Edgar S. went to a nearby Baskins-Robbins to buy some icecream. While in the shop, Acuna who had been a friend to Edgar pulled over and saw him and her girlfriend. Edgar has previously testified against Acuna in a criminal trial and this had got him a prison sentence. This led to the deterioration of their friendship and once Acuna saw them, he yelled at Edgar telling him that he did not want to see him. Once Edgar and his girlfriend left the shopping centre, Acuna trailed them. He fired a gun on their vehicle several times breaking their car window and seriously injuring Edgar and his girlfriend. Although Perla later survived after undergoing several surgeries, Edgar succumbed to his gun wounds and died some days later.             After a trial in the court, Acuna was convicted for first-degree murder, attempted murder, and misconduct involving a firearm. Acuna was found to lack substantial mitigating factors in the abuse of discretion review that his defence had filed before the court. In his request filed before the court, the Arizona Supreme Court affirmed his conviction and death sentence (Arizona Supreme Court, 2020). In determining the maximum sentence, the jury found two aggravating factors. First, the jury found that Acuna was an ex-convict of a serious crime. In the first criminal offence, Acuna had been convicted of attempted first-degree murder of Pearla. The other aggravating factor that was considered by the jury was………………………………………………………………………………………………

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

NO PLAGIARISM

Categories
Writers Solution

corrections system can take in order to ensure that their officers adhere to the principals of professional conduct as stated by the correctional officers’ organization

 Write a 3-to 5-page paper in which you:

  1. Suggest two actions that the corrections system can take in order to ensure that their officers adhere to the principals of professional conduct as stated by the correctional officers’ organization at http://www.correctionalofficer.org/professional-conduct. Provide a rationale for your response.
  2. Take a position as to whether or not conditions of correctional facilities circumvent the “cruel and unusual punishment standard” of the Eighth Amendment. Provide a rationale for your response.
  3. Support or refute the removal of capital punishment from the U.S. corrections system. Provide a rationale for your response.
  4. Create an argument for or against intermediate sanctions as a deterrent of crime. Support your viewpoint with one example of intermediate sanctions from within the last three years that reflects your opinion.
  5. Debate whether or not correctional officers are adequately equipped to deal with mentally ill inmates. Provide a rationale for your response.
  6. Use at least two quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
  • This course requires that citations and references follow the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than others Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Determine the U.S. Constitutional amendments that apply to correctional management and operations.
  • Recommend improvements to selected areas of corrections.
  • Defend the purposes of corrections.
  • Examine the reform of American criminal justice beginning with 15th century Europe.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in correctional facility policies.
  • Write clearly and concisely about correctional facility policies using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric found here. 
Assignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at CapitalEssayWriting.comCLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

Categories
Writers Solution

Select a death-row inmate from the Arizona Department of corrections website.

Write an essay (750-1,000 words) explaining factors that are normally considered aggravating and mitigating circumstances.

Step one: Select a death-row inmate from the Arizona Department of corrections website.

Step two: Research your selected inmate and identify aggravating and mitigating circumstances that placed him/her on death row.

Step three: Describe exactly why your case facts are mitigating and aggravating based on the explanation given in your assigned readings. Be sure to cite all of your sources. Evaluate why the factors of this case merited the sentence of death.

Use the GCU Library to locate three to five relevant, scholarly sources in support of your content.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.Assignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at EssayCabinet.comCLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT EssayCabinet.com

Categories
Writers Solution

Your research topic has come from an issue, problem, or policy of law enforcement, corrections, or the court system

Key Assignment

In the previous assignment, you developed a position paper for the research topic that you have identified and explored. You have recommendations for change, revocation, modification, and addition to the research topic. Your research topic has come from an issue, problem, or policy of law enforcement, corrections, or the court system. In this assignment, you will revise your Key Assignment Draft based on instructor and peer feedback and you will evaluate an alternative position to your selected topic that was not addressed in your original Key Assignment Draft.Assignment GuidelinesFirst, revise your Week 4 Key Assignment based on instructor feedback and peer responses.  Next, add to your final Key Assignment draft by addressing the following in 4–5 pages:  Select 1 alternative to your position addressed in the Week 4 Key Assignment regarding your selected topic:  What major points are argued by proponents of this alternative position? Explain in detail.  Conduct research on this alternative position and evaluate the arguments.  Do the arguments hold any merit? Why or why not?  What policies currently exist that support these arguments? Explain in detail.  Which position is more significant for improving the current state of the criminal justice system? Explain in detail. Remember to use academic and scholarly sources to support your arguments.  Be sure to reference all sources using APA style. 

Hello all, feel free to simply add the Unit 4 IP to the end of the Unit 5 IP to meet the requisite page numbers.  MAKE SURE AND PUT EDITS IN RED for the Unit 4 IP or make them easily visible.  Have a terrific weekend.

 
 Deliverable Length:  3-5 new pages (10-12 total pages)