Tag: court

Categories
Writers Solution

U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

Research Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses unethical police decisions or immoral practices by the police. Provide a brief synopsis of the case and discuss how the Supreme Court views procedural justice and/or police misconduct.
Write a 2-3 page, APA style paper addressing the issues as described above. Please include 2-3 references. Only one reference may be from an internet source (not Wikipedia) the other references must be located in the Grantham University Online Library. Only the body of the paper will count toward the page requirement. Include a title sheet.                   References

U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

……………………………………………………………………………………………………

SEE SOLUTION BELOW

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

NO PLAGIARISM

Ethics: U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

(Course Instructor)

(University Affiliation)

(Student’s Name)

Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case

Introduction

            America is the most sensitive society to any form of totalitarianism and government that employs coercive power (Munster, 1992). The government can express power in many forms and one most notable way is the use of police to restrain law and order among its citizens. Although the exercise of political power through the police is generally a morally right obligation by any government, if it is not managed well, it can constitute an abuse of power. The Tennessee vs. Garner case was a landmark case rule by the Supreme Court that greatly impacted on the circumstances under which police officers may use deadly force in arrested fleeing felons.

Synopsis

            Garner was a 15-year old boy who was shot by Hymon, while scaling a fence in order to escape a burglary arrest from two Memphis officers on the night of October 3, 1974 (Tennenbaum, 1994).  Hymon was convinced that if Garner made it over the fence, he would escape and he shot him at the back of the head. The police officer shot at Garner despite having a clear sight that he neither posed threat to him nor others.

The state of Tennessee had statute laws, which governed the fleeing felons, just like many other U.S states at the time. However, owing to the death of his son, the deceased father filed a petition in the Federal District Court, seeking compensation for what he termed as the violation of the constitutional rights of his son. Although the Federal District Court ruled that the officers acted within the states laws, the Supreme Court ruling held that a fleeing-felon rule was unconstitutional under the fourth amendment.

How the Supreme Court Views Procedural Justice and/or Police Misco……………………………..

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

NO PLAGIARISM

Categories
Writers Solution

U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

Research Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses unethical police decisions or immoral practices by the police. Provide a brief synopsis of the case and discuss how the Supreme Court views procedural justice and/or police misconduct.
Write a 2-3 page, APA style paper addressing the issues as described above. Please include 2-3 references. Only one reference may be from an internet source (not Wikipedia) the other references must be located in the Grantham University Online Library. Only the body of the paper will count toward the page requirement. Include a title sheet.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………

SEE SOLUTION BELOW

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

NO PLAGIARISM

Ethics: U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

(Course Instructor)

(University Affiliation)

Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case

Introduction

            America is the most sensitive society to any form of totalitarianism and government that employs coercive power (Munster, 1992). The government can express power in many forms and one most notable way is the use of police to restrain law and order among its citizens. Although the exercise of political power through the police is generally a morally right obligation by any government, if it is not managed well, it can constitute an abuse of power. The Tennessee vs. Garner case was a landmark case rule by the Supreme Court that greatly impacted on the circumstances under which police officers may use deadly force in arrested fleeing felons.

Synopsis

            Garner was a 15-year old boy who was shot by Hymon, while scaling a fence in order to escape a burglary arrest from two Memphis officers on the night of October 3, 1974 (Tennenbaum, 1994).  Hymon was convinced that if Garner made it over the fence, he would escape and he shot him at the back of the head. The police officer shot at Garner despite having a clear sight that he neither posed threat to him nor others.

The state of Tennessee had statute laws, which governed the fleeing felons, just like many other U.S states at the time. However, owing to the death of his son, the deceased father filed a petition in the Federal District Court, seeking compensation for what he termed as the violation of the constitutional rights of his son. Although the Federal District Court ruled that the officers acted within the states laws, the Supreme Court ruling held that a fleeing-felon rule was unconstitutional under the fourth amendment.

How the Supreme Court Views Procedural Justice and/or Police Misconduct

            The Supreme Court ruling in Tennessee vs. Garner, 1985, severely impacted on the circumstances under which a police officer may use deadly forcing in arresting a suspect (Tennenbaum, 1994). The Fourth Amendment considered that the use of deadly force was a legally considered seizure, which must be considerable. Therefore Supreme Court observed that the use of deadly force would apply only if the suspect posed a threat to the life of the officers and others or caused serious physical injury to the apprehending officers or others. The use of deadly force in the Garner case was unethical and unjust given that Garner was unarmed and possessed no weapon to warrant any shooting. Moreover, the arresting officer had a clear sight on Garner, since he used his spotlight to achieve a clear vision of the hands of the felon.

            The fleeing felon rule demands that deadly force be employed as a last resort on a fleeing felon regardless of the severity of the alleged offence (Crowley, 1989). The court considered that the intrusion of a police officer had to be considered based on the risks that such an intrusion posed on the suspect. Therefore, the Supreme Court determined that the common statute laws that governed fleeing-felon suspects were unconstitutional.

Conclusion……………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

NO PLAGIARISM

Categories
Writers Solution

U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

Research Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses unethical police decisions or immoral practices by the police. Provide a brief synopsis of the case and discuss how the Supreme Court views procedural justice and/or police misconduct.
Write a 2-3 page, APA style paper addressing the issues as described above. Please include 2-3 references. Only one reference may be from an internet source (not Wikipedia) the other references must be located in the Grantham University Online Library. Only the body of the paper will count toward the page requirement. Include a title sheet.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………

SEE SOLUTION BELOW

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

NO PLAGIARISM

Ethics: U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

(Course Instructor)

(University Affiliation)

(Student’s Name)

Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case

Introduction

            America is the most sensitive society to any form of totalitarianism and government that employs coercive power (Munster, 1992). The government can express power in many forms and one most notable way is the use of police to restrain law and order among its citizens. Although the exercise of political power through the police is generally a morally right obligation by any government, if it is not managed well, it can constitute an abuse of power. The Tennessee vs. Garner case was a landmark case rule by the Supreme Court that greatly impacted on the circumstances under which police officers may use deadly force in arrested fleeing felons.

Synopsis

            Garner was a 15-year old boy who was shot by Hymon, while scaling a fence in order to escape a burglary arrest from two Memphis officers on the night of October 3, 1974 (Tennenbaum, 1994).  Hymon was convinced that if Garner made it over the fence, he would escape and he shot him at the back of the head. The police officer shot at Garner despite having a clear sight that he neither posed threat to him nor others. The state of Tennessee had statute laws, which governed the fleeing felons, just like many other U.S states at the time. However, owing to the death of his son, the deceased father filed a petition in the Federal District Court, seeking compensation for…………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

NO PLAGIARISM

Categories
Writers Solution

The United States of America and the International Criminal Court (Links to an external

 Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read The United States of America and the International Criminal Court (Links to an external site.),https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1668&context=fac_artchop

 Between cosmopolitan and American democracy: Understanding US opposition to the International Criminal Court, https://journals-sagepub-com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/00471178030172005?

and pages 477-480 and 483 of the Routledge Handbook of Critical Criminology (Links to an external site.). https://books.google.com/books?id=8zOMAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA477&lpg=PA477&dq=scholarly+articles+critical+no+us+in+icc&source=bl&ots=WNE_jP4G4w&sig=5caB3dkM4oEEc6kfuw10BpfiZB8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0a%20hUKEwiLw_PE4dzNAhVO0GMKHX-RBSYQ6AEIOzAD#v=onepage&q=scholarly%20articles%20critical%20no%20us%20in%20icc&f=false

The United States has refused to join the International Criminal Court (ICC) since its inception. The issue of the United States’ reluctance to join the ICC continues to be a matter of international debate. This week’s assignment requires you to take a position on whether or not the United States should formally join, and accept the jurisdiction of, the International Criminal Court. Avoid notions of jingoism, and examine the international community and the responsibilities of the United States as an international actor in both civilian and military affairs. Make sure to explain the consequences of not joining or a decision to join the ICC.

In your paper,

  • Assess the purpose and function of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
  • Explain why the United States has not joined the ICC.
  • Examine the pros and cons for the United States to be a member of the ICC.
  • Construct an argument proposing the United States should join or continue to not be a part of the ICC.
    • Provide sound reasoning for your opinions.
    • Examine not just the United States’ reasons for not joining the ICC, but also various international perspectives about the leading military power in the world’s decision not to join this criminal law court.
  • Explain the ramifications of the opinion that you advance to the United States and the international community.

The International Criminal Law paper:

Categories
Writers Solution

U.S.Supreme Court’s ruling in Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan?

 Do you agree with the U.S.Supreme Court’s ruling in Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan? Do you think the punishment was excessive given that the crime is often called “victimless”? Explain your stance.  

Categories
Writers Solution

Supreme Court of Canada say about the role that an organization’s computer use policy and practices

  1,What does the Supreme Court of Canada say about the role that an organization’s computer use policy and practices may play in the assessment of whether there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in a work laptop computer where employees are permitted to use the laptop computer for personal matters? What do you recommend to an organization should be done to address this situation? 

2,  You are the IT systems security manager of the organization. Your organization in based in Edmonton but does share some employee data with a benefits service provider in Toronto. A breach has occurred affecting both customers and employee information held by your organization. Discuss and contrast your organization’s obligations to report a breach under Alberta’s Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) and under the Personal Information Protection Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). Discuss the circumstances when the company is subject to report a breach under each of these laws and the variables that should be considered in making the assessment. 

 REGULAR FORMAT WITH CITATIONS 

NO PLAGARISM 

EACH QUESTION 5 PAGES 

INCLUDE REFERENCES IN APA FORMAT

Categories
Writers Solution

United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (refused to review the lower court’s ruling) in the case of Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2015.

The United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (refused to review the lower court’s ruling) in the case of Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2015.

Tell me what you would do if you were the Supreme Court.

That case let stand the ruling of the Court of Appeals which can be found at the following website:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2220742578695593916&q=Authors+Guild+v.+Google+Inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4000006  last accessed February 9, 2019.

Categories
Writers Solution

The United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari

On April 18, 2016, The United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (refused to review the lower court’s ruling) in the case of Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2015.

Tell me what you would do if you were the Supreme Court.

That case let stand the ruling of the Court of Appeals which can be found at the following website:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2220742578695593916&q=Authors+Guild+v.+Google+Inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4000006

Please write a 500-word summary of fair use as this court decision says it. In APA format with citations and references must.

Categories
Writers Solution

Trace the historical development of law, the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Court system, legal terminology, and legal procedures.

Final Project – Civic Engagement Through the Political Process

This portion of the final project is a written paper that focuses on the processes involved in making the laws that we study as part of the GBS 205 course.  It meets the following course competency:

• Trace the historical development of law, the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Court system, legal terminology, and legal procedures.

The written paper should be divided into three distinct sections.  It should be written as a paper and not a question and answer worksheet.  

SECTION 1 – Civic Engagement Through Contact with Representatives

This section should include the following:

1. A list of the names of the people that represent the area you live in each of the following offices:

• Two U.S. Senators – (These are the people that represent Arizona in Washington DC.)• 

One U.S. Congressman – (Also serves in Washington D.C., determined by your Congressional district)• 

 The governor of Arizona• 

Two state representatives – (represent the district where you live; they meet in Phoenix Arizona.)• 

One state senator – (represent the district where you live; they meet in Phoenix Arizona.)• 

The mayor of the city where you live.• 

A city council member that represents the area of the city where you live.

2. A copy of a letter (or an email) written to one of the above representatives discussing an issue that is important to you and suggesting to them an appropriate way of dealing with it.  You should actually send this letter (or email) to the person to whom it is addressed.

3. A discussion of why you chose this issue, why you chose this representative for dealing with this issue and the importance of communicating with representatives in this manner.  Do you think they read communications such as this and respond to them or are they simply ignored?

SECTION 2 – Understanding the State Legislative Process

For this section of the paper you will need to watch a video archive of a meeting of the state legislature.  To find a meeting go to the Arizona State Legislature webpage.  Select either the Senate or House drop down menu.  Select “Archived Meetings” and you will get a list of previously held meetings that you can watch online.  Choose a meeting that is at least 30 minutes long on a topic that interests you and watch it in its entirety. (Hint: The most interesting topics are discussed early in the year so go back to a meeting in February or March). Write about it in this section and include the following:

1. The name of the group holding the meeting (“Joint Legislative Budget Committee” or “Senate Judiciary” etc.), the date and the length of the meeting.

2. A detailed summary of what happened in the meeting including an identification of any bills that were discussed.

3. Your own evaluation of the importance of the topics discussed in the meeting to both Arizona residents and the Arizona business community.

4. Your understanding and evaluation of the state legislative process.  Are the needs and effects on business adequately presented and discussed at these meetings?  How can businesses influence policy and legislation in the state?  Can you think of anything that might be done to improve this process from a businessperson’s perspective?  

SECTION 3 – Understanding Local Government

For this section of the paper you need to watch a video archive of both a city council meeting and a city council study session.  (If you can demonstrate with pictures or video that you actually attended these meetings you can receive up to 50 extra credit points.). Go to the city’s website and find a link to archived meetings (all cities sites are different – you should be able to navigate through this fairly simply) and watch both meetings in their entirety.

Write about the following in this section of your paper:

1. The city, date and time of both meetings.

2. A detailed description of what happened in each meeting – including prayers, awards, pledge of allegiance, contracts and ordinances discussed, contents of consent agendas etc. 

3. Your evaluation of the importance and relevance of the what happened in the meetings to the residents of the city or town.

 4. Your opinion on the city council process overall.  Is it accessible, valuable, important for residents to attend these meetings?  Do citizens have an adequate say in what takes place in a meeting such as this?  

5. Do the mayor and councilmembers seem to have a good understanding of the issues?  Are they considering the interests of local businesses and citizens when they make their decisions?  Are local businesses represented at the meetings?  Do businesses have good opportunity to express their positions on the issues?  Do you have any suggestions for improving the process?

The length of the paper is not as important as its completeness.  You will be graded on having included a thoughtful discussion on all of the topics presented in this prompt.  Simple “yes” or “no” type answers will not receive credit without further explanation of the reasoning behind the answer.