In What Is Art? Leo Tolstoy wrote that one of the chief criteria in judging art is how powerfully the art transmits the feelings of the author to us. If art is “infectious,” if it gets under our skin and moves us to think or act differently or perhaps to create our own art, then that art has proven successful. In Tolstoy’s own words, “The stronger the infection the better is the art, as art.”
When watching a play live, this infection can be extremely powerful. The performers are physically near us and appeal or repel us in immediate ways. We respond to the story and to the voices and to the grandeur of the stage. And we respond in deeply felt ways to the truth presented and what it suggests about our life in this fallen world longing for grace.
Have you ever had this type of powerful experience watching a play? What about the play got under your skin, and how were you changed by the experience? Read Philippians 4:8-9. Given the unique power of dramatic art, do we have a special challenge as Christians both performing in theater and watching it?
If Theater has not had this effect on you, what form of art has? Talk about how you have been infected by that art in specific ways, and why you have been so affected, and what the result has been. Then tie that to the passage from the letter to the Philippians.
Assignment 1 Leadership Evaluation and Mentorship Proposal KEY INFORMATION Due date Refer to the UC Unit Outline for the current teaching period Weighting 15% Relevant chapters 1 ? 2 Assessment format Submit in .doc or.docx format Length 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) Specific requirements Include academic journals, papers,and books sourced from the library, course content and webinars, and additional media suggested in the webinars. Use Harvard or APA 7th edition style. Minimum of five academic or research references should be included. LEARNING OUTCOMES On successful completion of this assessment, students will be able to: • Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results • Clearly articulate their own preferred approach to leadership and critically situate that style with reference to the research evidence. GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES • UC graduates are professional -communicate effectively • UC graduates are professional -employ up-to-date and relevant knowledge and skills • UC graduates are professional -use creativity, critical thinking, analysis and research skills to solve theoretical and real- world problems • UC graduates are global citizens -make creative use of technology in their learning and professional lives • UC graduates are lifelong learners -adapt to complexity, ambiguity and change by being flexible and keen to engage with new ideas • UC graduates are lifelong learners -evaluate and adopt new technology. Page 1 of 5 UC9937_0121
9937 APPLIED LEADERSHIP Assignment 1 Leadership Evaluation and Mentorship Proposal BRIEF Construct a mentorship proposal (1,000 words) outlining your intended mentorship goals which consists of three assignments as you observe a leader. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS For this assignment, you will undertake a personality test and draw upon its results to construct a mentorship portfolio outlining your mentorship goals and observations. This assignment is the first part of your mentorship portfolio and includes completing a leadership and personality skills test and analysing the results and outline your plan to interview and observe a leader. Section 1 – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) 1. First you are required to complete the leadership and personality skills survey 16 Personalities Test. Answer the questions as honestly and accurately as possible. Your survey results should also be included in this assignment and your final portfolio assignment. 2. Interpret the survey results and compare them with your own leadership experience and performance in a professional setting. Summarize the results and personal reflections regarding the results. You should connect and support your reflections with research evidence found in the chapters, readings, and academic resources. In essence, you should link your personality findings to the leadership style research. Use the following questions to guide your thinking: • What do you think of the results? Are they accurate? • Are there any results that surprised you? If so, would you agree or disagree with the results? • How accurate do the results reflect your past experience with other leaders? • What type of workplace behaviours and outlook do you consider you conform to the most? • Do you believe your personal traits have influenced your previous work and professional behaviours? If so, in what ways? • Having considered the relevant research, do you consider the combination of traits and skills sets to be relevant to strong leadership behaviours? 3. Next, use your reflections to establish several goals and objectives. The goals and objectives should be guided by the effective leadership style research. Additionally, you will use the goals and objectives to guide your leader observation and interview portion of your portfolio. Use the following questions to develop your goals and objectives: • What personal leadership skills do you wish to improve upon? What is the basis of your thinking? • What are your personal goals you want to achieve from this observation exercise? What is the basis of your goals? • Is there a type of leadership you are curious to observe in practice? Does the research suggest its relevance to current working conditions? • Have you selected a leader for a particular purpose? Do they represent a skill you wish to investigate? Link this as closely as you can to your own personal survey outcomes, personal skills and those advocated in the research. Page 2 of 5 UC9937_0121
9937 APPLIED LEADERSHIP Assignment 1 Leadership Evaluation and Mentorship Proposal Section 2 – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) 1. Identify a leader or manager who will act as a mentor. This maybe someone you have recently met or someone you already know. You will be required (at a minimum) to complete the following activities with your selected mentor: a. (1) initial interview with your mentor b. (1) face-to-face meeting (this maybe completed via video) c. (1) key observation of leadership in practice (Consult with your instructor regarding this requirement. This requirement maybe adjusted to meet COVID safety requirements) 2. Write a proposal outlining your anticipated leadership mentorship observation and interview. Feedback on your proposal will be provided and may require you to adjust the nature of your engagement with your selected mentor for the next assignment. a. Review your goals and objectives and describe how your selected mentor will help you achieve your goals and objectives. You may want to use the questions above to guide your answer. In addition, use the following questions to guide your proposal: • The purpose and scope of the mentorship. • Regarding your own skillsets named by the survey, are you actively responding to these results and seeking particular insights to guide you for the future? • Has the mentor been selected for a particular reason? Do they excel in a skill you seek to investigate? Was this a skill reflected in your survey? • How will activities be structured? When will observations take place and what are some of the practicalities of this mentorship undertaking? SUGGESTED STRUCTURE You may organise your report in any manner that best outlines your analysis plan. Here is a sample structure. 1. Cover Page 2. Introduction a. Summarize what your proposal will review. 3. Proposal Body a. Section One -Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) i. Summary of personality test results ii. Personality test result reflection iii. Goals and objectives for your mentor observation and interview b. Section Two – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) i. Describe briefly your selected mentor ii. Purpose and scope of mentorship iii. Plan for interviews and observation 4. Conclusion 5. List of References 6. Appendix a. Include personality survey results Page 3 of 5 UC9937_0121
9937 APPLIED LEADERSHIP Assignment 1 Leadership Evaluation and Mentorship Proposal ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS • 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) • Minimum of 5 references are required • Use Harvard or APA 7th reference style • Times New Roman or Arial (12 pt) are the recommended fonts • Include page numbers and your name • Include a title page, list of references and any subheadings CONSIDERATIONS • Ensure you complete the personal skills and traits survey first and use these results to form a basis of your mentorship proposal. You can be critical of the survey results: you do not have to agree with them but think about why this is. Explain your rationale for how this has impacted your mentorship goals and leader selection. • The mentor can be someone you know previously, someone you admire, or even someone who is strong in an area you seek to improve upon. Think about personal and formative outcomes of this task! Your mentor cannot be a relative or partner. • Consider your own past leadership experience: what were you good at? What feedback did you receive? Are you seeking to receive some feedback on your own personal style? How does this relate to the research evidence of effective leadership approaches?
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results
KEY INFORMATION Due date Refer to the UC Unit Outline for the current teaching period Weighting 15% Relevant chapters 1 ? 2 Assessment format Submit in .doc or.docx format Length 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) Specific requirements Include academic journals, papers,and books sourced from the library, course content and webinars, and additional media suggested in the webinars. Use Harvard or APA 7th edition style. Minimum of five academic or research references should be included. LEARNING OUTCOMES On successful completion of this assessment, students will be able to: § Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results § Clearly articulate their own preferred approach to leadership and critically situate that style with reference to the research evidence. GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES § UC graduates are professional – communicate effectively § UC graduates are professional – employ up-to-date and relevant knowledge and skills § UC graduates are professional – use creativity, critical thinking, analysis and research skills to solve theoretical and realworld problems § UC graduates are global citizens – make creative use of technology in their learning and professional lives § UC graduates are lifelong learners – adapt to complexity, ambiguity and change by being flexible and keen to engage with new ideas § UC graduates are lifelong learners – evaluate and adopt new technology. BRIEF Construct a mentorship proposal (1,000 words) outlining your intended mentorship goals which consists of three assignments as you observe a leader. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS For this assignment, you will undertake a personality test and draw upon its results to construct a mentorship portfolio outlining your mentorship goals and observations. This assignment is the first part of your mentorship portfolio and includes completing a leadership and personality skills test and analysing the results and outline your plan to interview and observe a leader. Section 1 – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) 1. First you are required to complete the leadership and personality skills survey 16 Personalities Test. Answer the questions as honestly and accurately as possible. Your survey results should also be included in this assignment and your final portfolio assignment. 2. Interpret the survey results and compare them with your own leadership experience and performance in a professional setting. Summarize the results and personal reflections regarding the results. You should connect and support your reflections with research evidence found in the chapters, readings, and academic resources. In essence, you should link your personality findings to the leadership style research. Use the following questions to guide your thinking: § What do you think of the results? Are they accurate? § Are there any results that surprised you? If so, would you agree or disagree with the results? § How accurate do the results reflect your past experience with other leaders? § What type of workplace behaviours and outlook do you consider you conform to the most? § Do you believe your personal traits have influenced your previous work and professional behaviours? If so, in what ways? § Having considered the relevant research, do you consider the combination of traits and skills sets to be relevant to strong leadership behaviours? 3. Next, use your reflections to establish several goals and objectives. The goals and objectives should be guided by the effective leadership style research. Additionally, you will use the goals and objectives to guide your leader observation and interview portion of your portfolio. Use the following questions to develop your goals and objectives: § What personal leadership skills do you wish to improve upon? What is the basis of your thinking? § What are your personal goals you want to achieve from this observation exercise? What is the basis of your goals? § Is there a type of leadership you are curious to observe in practice? Does the research suggest its relevance to current working conditions? § Have you selected a leader for a particular purpose? Do they represent a skill you wish to investigate? Link this as closely as you can to your own personal survey outcomes, personal skills and those advocated in the research. Section 2 – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) 1. Identify a leader or manager who will act as a mentor. This maybe someone you have recently met or someone you already know. You will be required (at a minimum) to complete the following activities with your selected mentor: a. (1) initial interview with your mentor b. (1) face-to-face meeting (this maybe completed via video) c. (1) key observation of leadership in practice (Consult with your instructor regarding this requirement. This requirement maybe adjusted to meet COVID safety requirements) 2. Write a proposal outlining your anticipated leadership mentorship observation and interview. Feedback on your proposal will be provided and may require you to adjust the nature of your engagement with your selected mentor for the next assignment. a. Review your goals and objectives and describe how your selected mentor will help you achieve your goals and objectives. You may want to use the questions above to guide your answer. In addition, use the following questions to guide your proposal: § The purpose and scope of the mentorship. § Regarding your own skillsets named by the survey, are you actively responding to these results and seeking particular insights to guide you for the future? § Has the mentor been selected for a particular reason? Do they excel in a skill you seek to investigate? Was this a skill reflected in your survey? § How will activities be structured? When will observations take place and what are some of the practicalities of this mentorship undertaking? SUGGESTED STRUCTURE You may organise your report in any manner that best outlines your analysis plan. Here is a sample structure. 1. Cover Page 2. Introduction a. Summarize what your proposal will review. 3. Proposal Body a. Section One – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) i. Summary of personality test results ii. Personality test result reflection iii. Goals and objectives for your mentor observation and interview b. Section Two – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) i. Describe briefly your selected mentor ii. Purpose and scope of mentorship iii. Plan for interviews and observation 4. Conclusion 5. List of References 6. Appendix a. Include personality survey results ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS § 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) § Minimum of 5 references are required ? Use Harvard or APA 7th reference style § Times New Roman or Arial (12 pt) are the recommended fonts § Include page numbers and your name § Include a title page, list of references and any subheadings CONSIDERATIONS § Ensure you complete the personal skills and traits survey first and use these results to form a basis of your mentorship proposal. You can be critical of the survey results: you do not have to agree with them but think about why this is. Explain your rationale for how this has impacted your mentorship goals and leader selection. § The mentor can be someone you know previously, someone you admire, or even someone who is strong in an area you seek to improve upon. Think about personal and formative outcomes of this task! Your mentor cannot be a relative or partner. § Consider your own past leadership experience: what were you good at? What feedback did you receive? Are you seeking to receive some feedback on your own personal style? ?How does this relate to the research evidence of effective leadership approaches? RUBRIC CRITERIA HIGH DISTINCTION: 85%+ DISTINCTION: 75-84% CREDIT: 65-74% PASS: 50-64% FAIL: 50% Consider various personality types and what they mean for contemporary leadership performance and the survey results. Links to research. (25%) Considered interrogation of various personality types and leadership performance analysed closely to survey tasks and underpinned by high level research findings. Thoroughly researched exploration of personality types. Leadership performance analysed and discussed against survey tasks. Some sound research analysis of personality types and leadership performance/survey Well referenced. Develops scholarly links between personality types and leadership performance, however, needs further elaboration and links to survey. Missing or no consideration of various personality types. Unreferenced or unclear links to leadership performance and survey. A clearly articulated reflection of students’ individual approach to leadership situated in relational to learnings from research on contemporary leadership models (25%) Articulate and nuanced reflections on both current and aspired leadership practice. Examples given represent high levels of analysis informed by research. Articulates reflection of both own current and aspired leadership practice. Provides considered examples linked to research evidence. Solid reflection of both current and aspired own leadership practice, with some examples drawn from research. Documents student approach to leadership but needs further exploration and linkage to research. Missing or undeveloped student reflection and aspired approach to leadership as per the research. Considered mentor selection and rationale provided that refers to personal skills and traits as a basis for a particular style of leadership. Link to student survey and the research (25%) Reflections reveal a deep understanding of selected leadership competencies. Profile choice is very well situated in relation to survey and research evidence. A very considered review of leadership competencies assessment, and considered choice of profiles matched to survey and research evidence Solid outline of leadership skills/competencies and linked to profile selection, survey results and research evidence. Some discussion of chosen leaders’ skills/competencies Lacks clarity of links to profile choice with survey data and research evidence. Lacking connection to survey, or research, results and minimal coverage of profile choice. Structured proposal considering mentorship potential outcomes expressed through professional language, sound structure and referencing. (25%) A highly considered submission; regarding both mentorship scope and practicalities. Highly professional language expression, structure and referencing. Thorough consideration of mentorship practicalities. Well structured, professional presentation and referencing. Some mentorship practicalities are considered but require extension. Submission is appropriate in terms of professional language, structure and referencing. Mentorship practicalities require further elaboration and detail. Submission requires refinement of professional language, more structure and referencing. Mentorship practicalities not considered. Lacking in professional tone and structure. Minimal or absent referencing.KEY INFORMATION Due date Refer to the UC Unit Outline for the current teaching period Weighting 15% Relevant chapters 1 ? 2 Assessment format Submit in .doc or.docx format Length 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) Specific requirements Include academic journals, papers,and books sourced from the library, course content and webinars, and additional media suggested in the webinars. Use Harvard or APA 7th edition style. Minimum of five academic or research references should be included. LEARNING OUTCOMES On successful completion of this assessment, students will be able to: § Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results § Clearly articulate their own preferred approach to leadership and critically situate that style with reference to the research evidence. GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES § UC graduates are professional – communicate effectively § UC graduates are professional – employ up-to-date and relevant knowledge and skills § UC graduates are professional – use creativity, critical thinking, analysis and research skills to solve theoretical and realworld problems § UC graduates are global citizens – make creative use of technology in their learning and professional lives § UC graduates are lifelong learners – adapt to complexity, ambiguity and change by being flexible and keen to engage with new ideas § UC graduates are lifelong learners – evaluate and adopt new technology. BRIEF Construct a mentorship proposal (1,000 words) outlining your intended mentorship goals which consists of three assignments as you observe a leader. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS For this assignment, you will undertake a personality test and draw upon its results to construct a mentorship portfolio outlining your mentorship goals and observations. This assignment is the first part of your mentorship portfolio and includes completing a leadership and personality skills test and analysing the results and outline your plan to interview and observe a leader. Section 1 – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) 1. First you are required to complete the leadership and personality skills survey 16 Personalities Test. Answer the questions as honestly and accurately as possible. Your survey results should also be included in this assignment and your final portfolio assignment. 2. Interpret the survey results and compare them with your own leadership experience and performance in a professional setting. Summarize the results and personal reflections regarding the results. You should connect and support your reflections with research evidence found in the chapters, readings, and academic resources. In essence, you should link your personality findings to the leadership style research. Use the following questions to guide your thinking: § What do you think of the results? Are they accurate? § Are there any results that surprised you? If so, would you agree or disagree with the results? § How accurate do the results reflect your past experience with other leaders? § What type of workplace behaviours and outlook do you consider you conform to the most? § Do you believe your personal traits have influenced your previous work and professional behaviours? If so, in what ways? § Having considered the relevant research, do you consider the combination of traits and skills sets to be relevant to strong leadership behaviours? 3. Next, use your reflections to establish several goals and objectives. The goals and objectives should be guided by the effective leadership style research. Additionally, you will use the goals and objectives to guide your leader observation and interview portion of your portfolio. Use the following questions to develop your goals and objectives: § What personal leadership skills do you wish to improve upon? What is the basis of your thinking? § What are your personal goals you want to achieve from this observation exercise? What is the basis of your goals? § Is there a type of leadership you are curious to observe in practice? Does the research suggest its relevance to current working conditions? § Have you selected a leader for a particular purpose? Do they represent a skill you wish to investigate? Link this as closely as you can to your own personal survey outcomes, personal skills and those advocated in the research. Section 2 – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) 1. Identify a leader or manager who will act as a mentor. This maybe someone you have recently met or someone you already know. You will be required (at a minimum) to complete the following activities with your selected mentor: a. (1) initial interview with your mentor b. (1) face-to-face meeting (this maybe completed via video) c. (1) key observation of leadership in practice (Consult with your instructor regarding this requirement. This requirement maybe adjusted to meet COVID safety requirements) 2. Write a proposal outlining your anticipated leadership mentorship observation and interview. Feedback on your proposal will be provided and may require you to adjust the nature of your engagement with your selected mentor for the next assignment. a. Review your goals and objectives and describe how your selected mentor will help you achieve your goals and objectives. You may want to use the questions above to guide your answer. In addition, use the following questions to guide your proposal: § The purpose and scope of the mentorship. § Regarding your own skillsets named by the survey, are you actively responding to these results and seeking particular insights to guide you for the future? § Has the mentor been selected for a particular reason? Do they excel in a skill you seek to investigate? Was this a skill reflected in your survey? § How will activities be structured? When will observations take place and what are some of the practicalities of this mentorship undertaking? SUGGESTED STRUCTURE You may organise your report in any manner that best outlines your analysis plan. Here is a sample structure. 1. Cover Page 2. Introduction a. Summarize what your proposal will review. 3. Proposal Body a. Section One – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) i. Summary of personality test results ii. Personality test result reflection iii. Goals and objectives for your mentor observation and interview b. Section Two – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) i. Describe briefly your selected mentor ii. Purpose and scope of mentorship iii. Plan for interviews and observation 4. Conclusion 5. List of References 6. Appendix a. Include personality survey results ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS § 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) § Minimum of 5 references are required ? Use Harvard or APA 7th reference style § Times New Roman or Arial (12 pt) are the recommended fonts § Include page numbers and your name § Include a title page, list of references and any subheadings CONSIDERATIONS § Ensure you complete the personal skills and traits survey first and use these results to form a basis of your mentorship proposal. You can be critical of the survey results: you do not have to agree with them but think about why this is. Explain your rationale for how this has impacted your mentorship goals and leader selection. § The mentor can be someone you know previously, someone you admire, or even someone who is strong in an area you seek to improve upon. Think about personal and formative outcomes of this task! Your mentor cannot be a relative or partner. § Consider your own past leadership experience: what were you good at? What feedback did you receive? Are you seeking to receive some feedback on your own personal style? ?How does this relate to the research evidence of effective leadership approaches? RUBRIC CRITERIA HIGH DISTINCTION: 85%+ DISTINCTION: 75-84% CREDIT: 65-74% PASS: 50-64% FAIL: 50% Consider various personality types and what they mean for contemporary leadership performance and the survey results. Links to research. (25%) Considered interrogation of various personality types and leadership performance analysed closely to survey tasks and underpinned by high level research findings. Thoroughly researched exploration of personality types. Leadership performance analysed and discussed against survey tasks. Some sound research analysis of personality types and leadership performance/survey Well referenced. Develops scholarly links between personality types and leadership performance, however, needs further elaboration and links to survey. Missing or no consideration of various personality types. Unreferenced or unclear links to leadership performance and survey. A clearly articulated reflection of students’ individual approach to leadership situated in relational to learnings from research on contemporary leadership models (25%) Articulate and nuanced reflections on both current and aspired leadership practice. Examples given represent high levels of analysis informed by research. Articulates reflection of both own current and aspired leadership practice. Provides considered examples linked to research evidence. Solid reflection of both current and aspired own leadership practice, with some examples drawn from research. Documents student approach to leadership but needs further exploration and linkage to research. Missing or undeveloped student reflection and aspired approach to leadership as per the research. Considered mentor selection and rationale provided that refers to personal skills and traits as a basis for a particular style of leadership. Link to student survey and the research (25%) Reflections reveal a deep understanding of selected leadership competencies. Profile choice is very well situated in relation to survey and research evidence. A very considered review of leadership competencies assessment, and considered choice of profiles matched to survey and research evidence Solid outline of leadership skills/competencies and linked to profile selection, survey results and research evidence. Some discussion of chosen leaders’ skills/competencies Lacks clarity of links to profile choice with survey data and research evidence. Lacking connection to survey, or research, results and minimal coverage of profile choice. Structured proposal considering mentorship potential outcomes expressed through professional language, sound structure and referencing. (25%) A highly considered submission; regarding both mentorship scope and practicalities. Highly professional language expression, structure and referencing. Thorough consideration of mentorship practicalities. Well structured, professional presentation and referencing. Some mentorship practicalities are considered but require extension. Submission is appropriate in terms of professional language, structure and referencing. Mentorship practicalities require further elaboration and detail. Submission requires refinement of professional language, more structure and referencing. Mentorship practicalities not considered. Lacking in professional tone and structure. Minimal or absent referencing.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results
What are the processes and the criteria you will use to select your target audience? What is your personal and/or professional connection to your target audience?
Your initial posting should be 400 words in length and utilize at least one scholarly source other than the textbook.
Assignment:
Practice Hours: each module has a minimum required practice hours related to your work on the main education project. Practice hours relate to time spent on project work (Discussion Board work does not apply). Document your hours for Module 3 in Project Concert. Access Project Concert. You should have an estimated 10-15 hours for this module. Minimum required hours must be entered into Project Concert for Module 3. Some states/entities require hour logs for certification or employment. It is the student’s professional responsibility to ensure all hours are entered correctly in order to meet these requirements. Please see the Project Concert directions document in the Learning Materials on how to enter hours.
Create a PowerPoint presentation to illustrate and explain how the core determinants of health are impacting the health of your target population utilizing the picture below. Note that you should briefly review all of the determinants and then choose the ones that impact your target group to talk about in the assignment. Be sure to review the link information in the classroom on Core Determinants of Health. You will then use the power point you created as a visual and record your voice, narrating your power point.
3. The presentation should be between 5 and 7 minutes in length. Use a recording platform of your choice (note that screencast-o-matic is the easiest) and either upload as an mp4 or share the link directly to the video in the drop box.
If you do not know how to create a screencast, note that there are tutorials on the www.screencast-o-matic.com website and also here is a short webinar link to click with information on how to use screencast-o-matic:https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/cqnZ030QTI
You will be using this sort of recording many times, so be sure that you understand how to use it.
***Please do not record as voice-over on the PowerPoint platform, because this cannot be saved in mp4 format or a link.*** If you submit your assignment as a PowerPoint with voice over recording you will not receive credit for your assignment (or partial credit as you did not meet the full requirements of the assignment.)
Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service? film dealing with the march on Washington on August 28, 1963
Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. What are the processes and the criteria you will use to select your target audience?
Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.