Tag: critically

Categories
Writers Solution

Critically evaluate the major disruptive technologies that are changing the hotel industry

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title TII604BM Technology, Innovation and Intrapreneurship
Assessment Individual Infographic
Individual/Group Individual
Length Poster/Infographic (1page)
In Class Elevator Pitch (3-minutes)
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
(a) Critically evaluate the major disruptive technologies that are changing the hotel industry.
(b) Analyse the implications of the disruptions for marketing and operations in the hotel industry.
Submission Infographic Due by Turnitin submission by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Week 3.
Presentations in the Week 4 class.
Weighting 30%
Total Marks 100 marks
Assessment Task
Identify and critically evaluate some of the major disruptive technologies that are changing the hotel industry. Then, analyse the implications of these technologies on the operations of hotels that use them. Present your findings in an Infographic Poster (1 page) with an accompanying in-class Elevator Pitch (3minute.)
Context
Disruptive technologies are impacting the hotel industry on a global scale. An awareness and understanding of these disruptions and their effects are critically important for a modern leader. This assessment will help you to identify and analyse both the challenges and benefits that result from the introduction of these disruptive technologies into hotels, such that there is a seamless customer experience
Infographics are a popular way of presenting information, statistics, data. They are an excellent communication tool, are more memorable and effective than notes or memos and provides decision makers quick information. Moreover, utilising graphics or charts helps visual learners understand patterns, correlations, and trends.
TII604_Assessment_1_Brief_Infographic Page 1 of 4
Instructions

  1. Identify technological disruptions that are changing the way hotels operate by investigating and reviewing various sources of information, including the literature, case studies and online articles. You are required use sources published within the last 5 years.
  2. Critically evaluate three disruptive technologies being used in hotel operations. Address the following aspects for each technology:
    a. What is the nature of the disruptive technology? (i.e. Applications, software, robotics, A.I.)
    b. Where has it been implemented? (Please provide the name of the hotel and its operational use)
    c. What has been the impact of its implementation? (e.g. Improved check-in experience, predictive purchasing, happier staff.). What benefits to the customer has been realised.
    d. Has the hotel highlighted this new technology when marketing to potential customers?
  3. Create an infographic (1-page poster) that visually captures your findings. Please attach the Reference List in the second page following the infographic.
  4. Deliver a 3-minute presentation in the format of an elevator pitch to present your disruptive technologies, using your one-page infographic (with a one-page reference list) as a visual aid. This must be displayed as a one slide PowerPoint presentation on the screen (with a one-page reference list). The presentations will take place during the Week 4 class.
  5. Please note that you are required to submit the infographic poster on the Sunday before 11:55pm, prior to your in-class presentation (i.e. Sunday Week 3).
    Referencing
    It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
    Submission Instructions
    Submit this task via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in TII604 Technology, Innovation and Intrapreneurship. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
    Please submit the infographic poster document in PDF format. This should contain only two pages, your infographic and a reference list.
    Academic Integrity
    All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online. Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
    Special Consideration
    To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.

TII604_Assessment_1_Brief_Infographic Page 2 of 4
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attributes Fail
(Yet to achieve minimum standard)
0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional)
85-100%
Critical evaluation of
disruptive technologies
Identify three disruptive technologies relevant to the hotel industry.
Provides a critical evaluation of each technology by discussing their nature, implementation and impact supported by credible and contemporary sources.
Total Percentage for this
Assessment Attribute = 40 %
The technologies discussed have been common in hotels for more than the last decade. Their introduction is not critically evaluated or well scrutinised.
The discussion does not utilise credible and contemporary sources to support any points made.
The technologies discussed have been common in hotels for more than the last five years. Their introduction is explored but not critically evaluated.
The discussion uses some contemporary sources, but these are not empirical explorations, only opinionbased articles. The technologies discussed have been common in
hotels for less than the last five years. Their introduction is explored without much critical evaluation.
The discussion uses mostly contemporary sources that are not empirical. However, there are some sources that do meet the empirical level.
The technologies discussed are new and emerging in their use in hotels. Their introduction is explored in a competent manner.
However, more critical analysis would have strengthened the discussion.
There is a good blend of contemporary and empirical sources used to support the points that have been made.
The technologies discussed are new and emerging in their use in hotels. Their introduction is explored in an exciting and critical manner, looking at both the associated opportunities and risks, with strong support throughout.
There is a high level of contemporary and current empirical sources utilised to support all aspects of the discussion.
Visual appeal and presentation of content in the infographic poster
Use of colour
Layout
Clarity and neatness
Organisation of content
Flow of information
Total Percentage for this
Assessment Attribute = 25%
The poster requires significant improvement in design, colour choice, layout, neatness, organisation and flow of information.
Few of the required elements are organized and well placed. However, most content requires clarity and improvement in design, layout and neatness.
Most of the required elements are presented and well placed. The poster demonstrates an acceptable level of design and layout that supports the flow of information. All of the required elements are presented and well placed. The poster has a good design and layout that supports the flow of information. The poster has an excellent design and layout which supports the flow of information and all of the required elements are well placed and clearly defined.
Effective Communication
TII604_Assessment_1_Brief_Infographic_Week 3 Page 3 of 4
In-class evaluator pitch
Total Percentage for this
Assessment Attribute = 25% Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.
Stilted, awkward and/or oversimplified delivery. Limited use of engaging presentation techniques. (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice).
Presentation aids are not employed or developed as directed.
Presentation is sometimes difficult to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical.
Correct, but often stilted or awkward delivery. Sometimes uses engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice)
Employs basic, but generally accurate presentation aids as directed.
Presentation is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments.
Correct, but occasionally stilted or awkward delivery.
Uses engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice). Employs clear
and somewhat engaging presentation aids as directed. Engages audience interest. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well-supported by evidence.
Clear and confident delivery.
Confidently and consistently uses a range of engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact, expression; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice;
stance; movement)
Engages and sustains audience interest.
Expertly presented; the
presentation is logical, persuasive, and well- supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
Clear, confident and persuasive delivery.
Dynamic, integrated and professional use of a wide range of engaging presentation techniques
(e.g. posture; eye contact, expression; gestures; volume,
pitch and pace of voice; stance;
movement)
Correct citation of key references and evidence
Total Percentage for this
Assessment Attribute = 10%
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA.
. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Referencing resembles APA, with frequent or repeated errors. Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas.
Referencing resembles APA, with occasional errors. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements.
Show evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors. Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Show evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors.
TII604_Assessment_1_Brief_Infographic_Week 3 Page 4 of 4

WE HAVE DONE THIS ASSIGNMENT BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on Critically evaluate the major disruptive technologies that are changing the hotel industry

Are You looking for Assignment and Homework Writing help? We Provide High-Quality Academic Papers at Affordable Rates. No Plagiarism.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Categories
Writers Solution

critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS605 Systems Analysis and Design
Assessment Design Specification
Individual/Group Individual
Length 2500 words +/- 10%
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
b) Formulate, validate and document business requirements for a medium-scale information system development project and effectively communicate these requirements to the stakeholders.
c) Demonstrate the ability to effectively analyse, design and develop information systems using Unified Modelling Language (UML) models.
Submission For 12-week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 4.2 (Week 8)
For 6-week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 4.2 (Week 4)
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 100 marks
Task Summary
Based on your responses to questions in Assessment 1, perform process and data modelling and develop and document a number of design diagrams including context diagram, level 0 and level 1 data flow diagram and entity relationship diagram.
Context
In Assessment 1, you performed a comprehensive requirement analysis for the case study that was given to you. With an in-depth understanding of the functional requirements of the system, you are now required to perform further analysis through process and data modelling.
Process modelling and data modelling can be used to provide deeper understanding of a system thus they are an integral part of system analysis. Process modelling models processes in a system while data modelling helps in identifying the data that flows through the processes.
Instructions

  1. Please read case study provided to you by your facilitator. Note that every piece of information provided in this case study has a purpose.
  2. The solution that you provided in assessment 1 and the feedback of your Learning Facilitator against assessment 1 would also serve as an input to assessment 2.
  3. Please answer the following questions:
    Question 1 (15 mark).
    Create and provide a Context Diagram for the given case study.
    Question 2 (20 mark).
    Create and provide a Level 0 Data Flow Diagram (DFD). The Level 0 DFD should contain all the major high-level processes of the System and should show how these processes are interrelated/interacting.
    Question 3 (24 mark).
    Select three important processes from Level 0 DFD and provide their decomposition (Level 1 DFD).
    Question 4 (20 mark).
    For the given case study, provide an Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD). Provide the logical model only!
    Question 5 (5 mark).
    For the given case study, identify the data stores including the files that are not part of ERD.
    Question 6 (16 mark).
    Translate the ERD you developed in Task 4 into a physical relational database design. Use some database tool such as Microsoft Access to create your database and submit diagram that you made using this tool. Normalise your database design to the Third Normal Form (3NF).
    Word Count and Layout
    • The word count of this assessment is 2500 words +/- 10% but this assessment focuses largely on diagrams. The text in this assessment would largely be the explanation of the diagrams.
    • Please provide all your answers in a MS word document.
    • All diagrams must be drawn using any diagramming tool but the same should be copied to MS Word document.
    • Please note that you are NOT required to copy the questions over to the MS Word document. Use the question number to indicate which question your answer relates to.
    • The recommended font size is 12 with 1.5 line spacing.
    • You can make assumptions where necessary but please outline them very clearly.
    Referencing
    It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
    Submission Instructions
    Please submit the written assessment via the Assessment link within Assessment 2. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
    Academic Integrity
    When submitting their assessment task, students will be asked to declare the academic integrity of their assessment by completing and signing an assignment cover sheet. You can
    find the assignment cover sheet here
    All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are available at https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms.
    Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
    Special Consideration
    To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator. These documents are available at https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms.
    Assessment Rubric
    Assessment Attributes Fail
    (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass
    (Functional)
    50-64% Credit
    (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
    (Advanced)
    75-84% High Distinction
    (Exceptional)
    85-100%
    Question 1: Create and provide a Context Diagram for the given case study.
    15%
    The student has no understanding of what a context diagram is. The student has very limited understanding of what a context diagram is. The student has some understanding of what a context diagram is but the solution is not in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a context diagram is but the representation is mostly incorrect. The solution, however, is in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a context diagram is. Representation is mostly correct and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
    Question 2: Create and provide a Level 0 Data Flow Diagram (DFD). The Level 0 DFD should contain all the major high-level processes of the System and should show how these processes are interrelated.
    20%
    The student has no understanding of what a Level 0 DFD diagramming is. The student has very limited understanding of what a Level 0 DFD is. The student has limited understanding of what a Level 0 DFD is. Representation is partially correct and the solution is not in sync with the given case study completely. The student has clear understanding of what a Level 0 DFD is.
    Representation needs improvement, however the solution is in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a Level 0 DFD is. Representation is mostly correct and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
    Question 3: Select three important processes from Level 0 DFD and provide their decomposition (Level 1 DFD).
    24%
    The student has no understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The student has very limited understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The student has clear understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The solution, however, is not in sync with the given case study completely.
    DFDs are not balanced. The student has clear understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The solution is in sync with the given case study but the
    DFDs are not balanced. The student has clear understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The solution is in sync with the given case study and the
    DFDs are balanced.
    Assessment Attributes Fail
    (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass
    (Functional)
    50-64% Credit
    (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
    (Advanced)
    75-84% High Distinction
    (Exceptional)
    85-100%
    Question 4: For the given case study, provide an Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD).
    Provide the logical model only!
    20%
    The student has no understanding of what a logical ERD is. The student has very limited understanding of what a logical ERD is. The student has clear understanding of what a logical ERD is but the solution is not in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a logical ERD is and the solution is in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a logical ERD is. Representation is mostly correct and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
    Question 5: For the given case study, identify the data stores including the files that are not part of ERD.
    5%
    The student has no understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The student has very limited understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The student has clear understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The solution is however not in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The solution is partially in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The solution is completely in sync with the given case study.
    Assessment Attributes Fail
    (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass
    (Functional)
    50-64% Credit
    (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
    (Advanced)
    75-84% High Distinction
    (Exceptional)
    85-100%
    Question 6: Translate the ERD you developed in Task 4 into a physical relational database design. Use some database tool such as Microsoft Access to create your database and submit diagram that you made using this tool.
    Normalise your database design to the Third Normal Form (3NF).
    16% The student has no understanding of what an ERD (physical relational database design) is. Diagram is not provided using a database tool. The student has very limited understanding of what an ERD
    (physical relational database design) is.
    Diagram is provided using a database tool. The student has clear understanding of what an ERD (physical relational database design) is but the solution is not in sync with the given case study.
    Diagram is provided using a database tool.
    Solution has major normalisation issues. The student has clear understanding of what an ERD (physical relational database design) is and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
    Diagram is provided using a database tool.
    Solution is not fully normalised. The student has clear understanding of what an ERD (physical relational database design) is.
    Representation is mostly correct and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
    Diagram is provided using a database tool.
    Solution is fully normalised.

WE HAVE DONE THIS ASSIGNMENT BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes

Are You looking for Assignment and Homework Writing help? We Provide High-Quality Academic Papers at Affordable Rates. No Plagiarism.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Categories
Writers Solution

Critically evaluate the major disruptive technologies that are changing the hotel industry

 Technology, Innovation and IntrapreneurshipAssessment Individual Infographic
Individual/Group Individual
Length Poster/Infographic (1page)
In Class Elevator Pitch (3-minutes)
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
(a) Critically evaluate the major disruptive technologies that are changing the hotel industry.
(b) Analyse the implications of the disruptions for marketing and operations in the hotel industry.
Weighting 30%
Total Marks 100 marks
Assessment Task
Identify and critically evaluate some of the major disruptive technologies that are changing the hotel industry. Then, analyse the implications of these technologies on the operations of hotels that use them. Present your findings in an Infographic Poster (1 page) with an accompanying in-class Elevator Pitch (3minute.)
Context
Disruptive technologies are impacting the hotel industry on a global scale. An awareness and understanding of these disruptions and their effects are critically important for a modern leader. This assessment will help you to identify and analyse both the challenges and benefits that result from the introduction of these disruptive technologies into hotels, such that there is a seamless customer experience
Infographics are a popular way of presenting information, statistics, data. They are an excellent communication tool, are more memorable and effective than notes or memos and provides decision makers quick information. Moreover, utilising graphics or charts helps visual learners understand patterns, correlations, and trends.
TII604_Assessment_1_Brief_Infographic Page 1 of 4
Instructions
1. Identify technological disruptions that are changing the way hotels operate by investigating and reviewing various sources of information, including the literature, case studies and online articles. You are required use sources published within the last 5 years.
2. Critically evaluate three disruptive technologies being used in hotel operations. Address the following aspects for each technology:
a. What is the nature of the disruptive technology? (i.e. Applications, software, robotics, A.I.)
b. Where has it been implemented? (Please provide the name of the hotel and its operational use)
c. What has been the impact of its implementation? (e.g. Improved check-in experience, predictive purchasing, happier staff.). What benefits to the customer has been realised.
d. Has the hotel highlighted this new technology when marketing to potential customers?
3. Create an infographic (1-page poster) that visually captures your findings. Please attach the Reference List in the second page following the infographic.
4. Deliver a 3-minute presentation in the format of an elevator pitch to present your disruptive technologies, using your one-page infographic (with a one-page reference list) as a visual aid. This must be displayed as a one slide PowerPoint presentation on the screen (with a one-page reference list). The presentations will take place during the Week 4 class.
5. Please note that you are required to submit the infographic poster on the Sunday before 11:55pm, prior to your in-class presentation (i.e. Sunday Week 3).
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
Submission Instructions
Submit this task via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in TII604 Technology, Innovation and Intrapreneurship. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Please submit the infographic poster document in PDF format. This should contain only two pages, your infographic and a reference list.
Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online. Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.

TII604_Assessment_1_Brief_Infographic Page 2 of 4
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attributes Fail
(Yet to achieve minimum standard)
0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional)
85-100%
Critical evaluation of
disruptive technologies
Identify three disruptive technologies relevant to the hotel industry.
Provides a critical evaluation of each technology by discussing their nature, implementation and impact supported by credible and contemporary sources.
Total Percentage for this
Assessment Attribute = 40 %
The technologies discussed have been common in hotels for more than the last decade. Their introduction is not critically evaluated or well scrutinised.
The discussion does not utilise credible and contemporary sources to support any points made.
The technologies discussed have been common in hotels for more than the last five years. Their introduction is explored but not critically evaluated.
The discussion uses some contemporary sources, but these are not empirical explorations, only opinionbased articles. The technologies discussed have been common in
hotels for less than the last five years. Their introduction is explored without much critical evaluation.
The discussion uses mostly contemporary sources that are not empirical. However, there are some sources that do meet the empirical level.
The technologies discussed are new and emerging in their use in hotels. Their introduction is explored in a competent manner.
However, more critical analysis would have strengthened the discussion.
There is a good blend of contemporary and empirical sources used to support the points that have been made.
The technologies discussed are new and emerging in their use in hotels. Their introduction is explored in an exciting and critical manner, looking at both the associated opportunities and risks, with strong support throughout.
There is a high level of contemporary and current empirical sources utilised to support all aspects of the discussion.
Visual appeal and presentation of content in the infographic poster
Use of colour
Layout
Clarity and neatness
Organisation of content
Flow of information
Total Percentage for this
Assessment Attribute = 25%
The poster requires significant improvement in design, colour choice, layout, neatness, organisation and flow of information.
Few of the required elements are organized and well placed. However, most content requires clarity and improvement in design, layout and neatness.
Most of the required elements are presented and well placed. The poster demonstrates an acceptable level of design and layout that supports the flow of information. All of the required elements are presented and well placed. The poster has a good design and layout that supports the flow of information. The poster has an excellent design and layout which supports the flow of information and all of the required elements are well placed and clearly defined.
Effective Communication
TII604_Assessment_1_Brief_Infographic_Week 3 Page 3 of 4
In-class evaluator pitch
Total Percentage for this
Assessment Attribute = 25% Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.
Stilted, awkward and/or oversimplified delivery. Limited use of engaging presentation techniques. (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice).
Presentation aids are not employed or developed as directed.
Presentation is sometimes difficult to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical.
Correct, but often stilted or awkward delivery. Sometimes uses engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice)
Employs basic, but generally accurate presentation aids as directed.
Presentation is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments.
Correct, but occasionally stilted or awkward delivery.
Uses engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice). Employs clear
and somewhat engaging presentation aids as directed. Engages audience interest. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well-supported by evidence.
Clear and confident delivery.
Confidently and consistently uses a range of engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact, expression; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice;
stance; movement)
Engages and sustains audience interest.
Expertly presented; the
presentation is logical, persuasive, and well- supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
Clear, confident and persuasive delivery.
Dynamic, integrated and professional use of a wide range of engaging presentation techniques
(e.g. posture; eye contact, expression; gestures; volume,
pitch and pace of voice; stance;
movement)
Correct citation of key references and evidence
Total Percentage for this
Assessment Attribute = 10%
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA.
. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Referencing resembles APA, with frequent or repeated errors. Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas.
Referencing resembles APA, with occasional errors. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements.
Show evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors. Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Show evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors.

WE HAVE DONE THIS ASSIGNMENT BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on Critically evaluate the major disruptive technologies that are changing the hotel industry

Are You looking for Assignment and Homework Writing help? We Provide High-Quality Academic Papers at Affordable Rates. No Plagiarism.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Categories
Writers Solution

Critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches

a) Critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches
b) Evaluate procurement requirements to formulate procurement processes in order to initiate contracts
Weighting 20%
Total Marks 20 marks
Assessment Task
Critically read the assigned case study, available from either the Subject Learning Resources tab on the course homepage or as sent to you by the Learning Facilitator as an announcement. Read the Module 1-2 learning resources, especially those focused on project risk. Engage with other students by posting a 600-800-word discussion forum post and 300-word critiques detailing your response to the question below.
Please refer to the instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
Procurement and contracts are integral to successful project management. Planning for purchases and acquisitions, requests for proposal, vendor selection, contract administration, and contract closure are integral parts of the process. Learning from case studies and benchmarking against better practices, standards and excellence is vital to understand complexity of issues and successful strategies for procurement and contract management. It will also ensure improved responsiveness to key issues, promote supplier client relationships through proactive management of risks and ultimately deliver higher level of focus on performance-based outcomes.
Assessment 1 is a discussion with other students of key issues to better understand the principles of project procurement, challenges, and risks, as well as develop key procurement themes and quantify financial exposure.
This assessment requires that you critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches. This assessment requires that you answer the following question, evaluating the following risk and procurement concepts:
“What are some important procurement risks that typically exist for large or complex projects? What procurement/financial risks exist in the assigned case study, and what strategies do you propose for mitigating these risks?”.
To do so, address the following concepts in your post:
• Identify 2-3 typical procurement risks required to be managed for complex projects
• Identify 2-3 specific financial risks from the case study project
• Propose possible procurement/financial risk mitigation actions for the case study project, and explain these relate to better practice guidelines
• Identify possible areas for further vendor negotiations and management that you believe are important to achieve a successful contract completion
• Identify areas of key accountability that exist for the project manager and procurement manager in facilitating a successful outcome for the case study project
To answer this question, you will need to:
(a) Post a 600-800-word (+/-10%) response to this question, based on your informed opinion and demonstrated knowledge of project management procurement risks, project lifecycles, and PMBoK, to the Discussion Forum on the Learning Portal.
(b) Respond to a minimum of two other students’ posts by critiquing their opinion and comparing it with yours in 300 words (+/-10%).
Instructions

  1. Read module 1-2 learning resources, particularly those relevant to procurement risk, to familiarise yourself with fundamental concepts. Critically reflect on your readings to form an opinion. Commence writing your opinion to answer the question and support that opinion by using at least six (6) references from academic or industry literature. Cite these references in your opinion of 600-800 words both in-text and as a reference list at the end of your opinion piece. The word count does not include the reference list. It is expected that you will undertake sufficient research and reading to effectively contribute and share ideas individually. This is important for discussions to achieve sufficient depth of analysis as to provide high quality information to satisfy the requirements for the case study analysis – based on the above guidelines.
  2. Read other students’ posts. Think about their opinion and try to compare and contrast them with yours. This will allow you to “critique” the views of at least two other students. You can do this by highlighting the things you agree with and those you disagree with in their post. You need to justify and explain your critique of their opinion. In your response, you will need to refer to some of the literature. Your responses will need to be a minimum of 300 words. This does not include the reference list
    Referencing
    It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool
    Submission Instructions
    Submit this task via the Assessment 1 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6004 – Contracts and Procurement. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
    Academic Integrity Declaration
    I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
    I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly.
    Assessment Rubric
    Assessment
    Attributes Fail
    (Yet to achieve minimum standard)
    0-49% Pass
    (Functional)
    50-64% Credit
    (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
    (Advanced)
    75-84% High Distinction
    (Exceptional)
    85-100%
    Understanding of the Project
    30%
    10%
    Superficial analysis of the project context and complexities Rudimentary analysis of the project context and complexities Proficient analysis of the project context and complexities Through analysis of the project context and complexities Sophisticated analysis of the project context and key elements
    10%
    The project complexities and nuances have not been understood Basic evaluation of the project complexities and nuances Thoughtful evaluation of the project complexities and nuances Discerning evaluation of the project complexities and nuances Insightful evaluation of the project complexities and nuances
    10%
    Responses to the key questions lack intellectual rigour and resolution Functional responses to the key questions posed Responses to the key questions posed show developing judgement Astute responses to the key questions posed Considered and highly resolved responses to the key questions posed
    Application of Learned Theories and Frameworks
    20%
    10%
    Learned theories and frameworks have not been understood or interpreted incorrectly Demonstrates a basic level of understanding of learned theories and frameworks Demonstrates proficient level of understanding of learned theories and frameworks Demonstrates an advanced level of understanding of learned theories and frameworks Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of learned theories and frameworks
    10%
    Learning theories and frameworks have not been used to support discussion contribution Learning theories and frameworks are applied at a superficial level to somewhat support discussion contribution Effectively synthesises and applies theories and frameworks to support discussion contribution Persuasively synthesises and applies theories and frameworks to support discussion contribution Eloquently synthesises and applies theories and frameworks to support discussion contribution
    Effective
    Contribution to
    Discussion
    30%
    10%
    Student’s contribution to the discussion and engagement in the developing conversation is limited or non-existent Student has only engaged in the developing conversation in a minor way Student is engaged in the discussion and responsive to the developing conversations Student initiates some discussions and shows consistent engagement in the developing conversations Student shows leadership in activating community discussions and contributing to developing conversations
    10%
    Original post lacks depth and consideration, with little opportunity for further group discussion Original post considered and offers relevant ideas for group discussion Original post is highly engaging and offers well reasoned arguments for group discussion Original post is conceptually evocative and and offers carefully considered ideas for initiating group discussion Original post is insightful and offers highly stimulating, authentic thought for initiating group discussion
    10%
    No response posts have been made Response posts have been made, but lack depth and consideration Response posts are considered and constructive Response posts are constructive and engaging, supporting further group learning Response posts are encouraging and provocative, supporting further group learning
    Language and
    Communication
    10%
    Significant grammar, spelling and punctuation errors resulting in a lack of clarity to ideas communicated. Ideas are understandable, but notable spelling and punctuation errors evident throughout. Ideas are communicated successfully but some minor spelling and punctuation errors are evident. Ideas are clearly communicated with only minor punctuation errors. Ideas are flawlessly communicated with no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
    Research and
    Referencing Quality
    10%
    5%
    No independent research beyond lecture material Superficial independent research beyond lecture material Substantial research beyond lecture material Extensive independent research beyond lecture material Exhaustive independent research beyond lecture material
    5%
    Citations of sources and references used to inform ideas are not evident Some citations of sources and references used to inform ideas Proficient citations of sources and references used to inform ideas Significant citation of sources and references used to inform ideas Exemplary citation of sources and references used to inform ideas
    The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
    SLO a) Critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches
    SLO c) Evaluate procurement requirements to formulate procurement processes in order to initiate contracts

WE HAVE DONE THIS ASSIGNMENT BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on Critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches

Are You looking for Assignment and Homework Writing help? We Provide High-Quality Academic Papers at Affordable Rates. No Plagiarism.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Categories
Writers Solution

critically analyse and deconstruct behaviour change theory and its application within mental health contexts

Assessment;

Behaviour Change Report

Assessment type;

Essay addressing behaviour change in a specific population

Word limit/length; 2000 words

Learning Outcomes

1. critically analyse and deconstruct behaviour change theory and its application within mental health contexts

2. evaluate and critique, biological, psychological, social, neurophysiological and systematic factors that impact on behaviour and behaviour change in mental health contexts

3. formulate effective individual and systemic responses to facilitate behaviour change founded on theory, empirical research and recovery principles

4. apply motivational interviewing knowledge and strategies to facilitate coconstructed constructive consumer behaviour change

Task

Select a behaviour that is relevant to a specific population of mental health service users / consumers and propose an evidenced based approach to successful behaviour change. Consider and include in your discussion:-

1. The rationale for focusing the behaviour change intervention with the specific population;

2. A critical review of theoretical perspectives that have been applied to supporting behaviour change in the population;

3. A discussion of potential barriers to behaviour change at the neurophysiological, individual, interpersonal, organisational levels and how these barriers could be overcome.

Specific details of the proposed intervention are not required within this assignment. The focus should be on the justification, the theoretical approach to addressing the behaviour and a sophisticated understanding of obstacles to behaviour change

WE HAVE DONE THIS ASSIGNMENT BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on critically analyse and deconstruct behaviour change theory and its application within mental health contexts

Are You looking for Assignment and Homework Writing help? We Provide High-Quality Academic Papers at Affordable Rates. No Plagiarism.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Categories
Writers Solution

Critically appreciate the origins of oil and gas and the main exploration and exploitation techniques

Contemporary Issues in Oil, Gas and Energy
Assignment
Title The oil and gas industry: business or politics?
Assignment Type Academic Essay
Word Limit 3,500 – 4,000
Weighting 100%
Plagiarism When submitting work for assessment, students should be aware of the LSBF guidance and regulations concerning plagiarism. All submissions should be your own original work.
You must submit an electronic copy of your work. Your submission will be electronically checked.
Harvard
Referencing &
Special
Instructions The Harvard Referencing System must be used. The Wikipedia website must not be referenced in your work.
You are allowed to upload only ONE attachment (e.g. an Excel sheet) in addition to your original assignment, unless there is a requirement for more than one document in the assignment brief.
You must upload your assignment in PDF or Word document format. Your paper will not be graded if it is submitted in any other format.
If you submit your assignment as a PDF version, please include the exact word count of the assignment on the title page.
Learning Outcomes On successful completion of this assignment you will be able to:

  1. Critically appreciate the origins of oil and gas and the main exploration and exploitation techniques.
  2. Critically evaluate the relative value of the oil and gas business.
  3. Critically analyse how oil and gas are delivered to their destinations and the relative costs.
  4. Critically evaluate global energy policies, trends and alternative energy sources.
  5. Have a thorough understanding of the significance and business and politics of various global regions in the global energy industry.
    Grading Criteria Postgraduate Grading Criteria for this assignment is available at the end of this document.
    Your Task
    According to Ustima (2015), energy is a business. Yet it is so heavily politicised, so transnational and globalised, and so necessary for countries’
    economic wellbeing and security that it cannot simply be viewed as a clearcut business, although for the most part that’s how it runs.
    You are required to critically evaluate and examine the relevant literature to explore the above statement with a special focus on the following factors:
  6. The main theories on the origins of oil and gas (20%) (LO1)
  7. The role of International Oil Companies (IOCs) in the global oil and gas industry (20%) (LO2)
  8. The concept of energy security (20%) (LO4)
  9. The importance of large volume tanker trade in LNG for the global energy market (20%) (LO3, LO5)
  10. The importance of unconventional sources of oil and gas and its effect on the global energy market (20%) (LO4, LO5)
    Guidelines Please read all questions and information provided carefully. Answers should be an appropriate length, keeping in mind the question requirements and total word count allowance.
    In addition, your assignment should demonstrate the following qualities:
    A critical appreciation of relevant literature and its use to support your argument, substantiate calculations, and address other aspects of the assignment.
    Taking ownership of the content, being prepared to debate and argue a personal position, and providing evidence of evaluative skills. A submission made up of extracts from published sources which is descriptive or simply theoretical regurgitation is not acceptable. Your submission must have interpretation and consideration of the challenges and issues of applying theory to practice.
    Logical flow of ideas and treatment; appropriate selection of real-world factors related to the companies under scrutiny.
    Evidence of additional personal research, and the ability to analyse material from a variety of appropriate, relevant perspectives.
    Presentation, structure, appropriateness of methodology, breaking into section headings/subheadings, tidiness.
    Marks will be awarded for proper referencing and originality of work. Also note that plagiarism is a serious offence and your submission will be electronically checked.
    Your report must be handed in electronically no later than the given date of submission.
    Grading Criteria
    Grading
    Criteria 70%+ (Distinction) 60-69% (Merit) 50-59% (Pass) 0-49% (Fail)
    Generic skills: communication and presentation. Comprehensive and correctly structured assessment. Style of
    writing is very fluent and develops a coherent and logical argument. Excellent referencing. Well structured report which follows appropriate format but some aspects of layout and referencing could be improved.
    Style of writing is fairly
    fluent. Good referencing. Good report in most aspects but suffers from variations in quality and the layout contains some inadequacies. Style of writing is satisfactory. Referencing needs improving. Very poor report which is incorrectly structured and contains major errors and omissions. Style of writing is descriptive, lacks coherence and fluency.
    Poor referencing.
    Knowledge &
    Understanding Demonstrates excellent knowledge of theory and provides critical theoretical underpinning. Very good interpretations and summarising of main themes. Wide range of knowledge demonstrated and evidence of good understanding of the topic.
    Ability to interpret and summarise succinctly. Good range of knowledge
    demonstrated but with some room for improvement. Some understanding displayed of the topic.
    Summary and
    interpretation are satisfactory. Very poor range of knowledge, research and interpretation of information that is subjective and lacks conceptual coherence. There is no
    clear identification, understanding or interpretation of main themes.
    Analysis Excellent use of theoretical and conceptual models to guide analysis linked with a critical discussion of main themes.
    Has demonstrated an ability to discriminate in the use of more abstract concepts and techniques. Very good use of the theoretical and conceptual models with good critical discussion. Has applied a range of
    analytical skills with greater independence and understanding of more abstract data or concepts.
    Use of theory and concepts limited in scope and depth but relevant. Application could be improved and there is a tendency towards description rather than application of concepts.
    Very poor use of theory
    and very little application of core concepts.
    Very little or limited analysis and evaluation in relation to fundamental principles and concepts.
    Synthesis/ Creativity/ Application Logical presentation of themes with appropriate examples being demonstrated. Very good demonstration of synthesis. Models have been clearly applied to the argument. Very good account of main themes with sound application. Good attempt at applying models to the argument. Fairly good attempt at synthesising the salient points. Good account of main themes with some attempt at application. Limited evidence of synthesis. Very poor account of main themes with little or no application. No links between models and argument.
    Evaluation Shows clear evidence of in-depth critical reflection and evaluation of the argument by providing a robust defence of the opinions presented in the assessment. Shows evidence of
    critical reflection and evaluation and a fairly cohesive defence of the argument Shows some evidence
    of critical reflection but could have been developed. Shows little or no evidence of critical reflection and needs to be much more developed. There is no defence of the opinions presented

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com ON 

  • Critically appreciate the origins of oil and gas and the main exploration and exploitation techniques

    • NO PLAGIARISM, Get impressive Grades in Your Academic Work

    Categories
    Writers Solution

    Globalization: Critically assess the impact of Globalization by using the three Globalization readings in unit 3 and the film El Contrato by Min Sook Lee

     1000 words.GNED 101: INTRODUCTION TO ARTS & SCIENCES
    Essay (15%)
    Instructions: Choose one topic from the writing prompts below. Then, develop a strong thesis, which you will prove with your essay. Your essay should be approximately 1000 words.
    Research: Make sure to provide any definitions where necessary, and use evidence from your readings to make your arguments. Students who do not reference at least one reading (some questions require more than one) in their answer will score very poorly. You are also required to use a minimum of two resources outside your readings. These sources must be credible and appropriate for an academic paper (ie. academic journals, newspaper articles, reputable online sources, etc.). You may also use other readings available on Blackboard that were not assigned. You must cite all sources; any exams with improper or missing citations will receive a zero grade.
    Format: Make sure to create a title page with your full name, student number, and an interesting title. Please use APA style for all aspects of this assignment.
    Due Date: Please see the Critical Path.
    Submissions: All submissions must be uploaded to the assignment dropbox (see Assignments on Blackboard).
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    Choose ONE of the following topics
    • Globalization: Critically assess the impact of Globalization by using the three Globalization readings in unit 3 and the film El Contrato by Min Sook Lee (link to the film in Course Readings – Unit 3 folder) as your example. You will need to read the globalization articles and watch the film in order to complete this question. In addition, find at least two other similar examples of issues raised in the readings and film.
    • Two views of the media: How should we evaluate the effects of media? In your essay, explore the arguments presented in the article “Two Historical Views of the Media” by O’Shaughnessy and Stadler, and apply them to a current example (or set of examples). Your essay should focus on the role the media play in shaping how we see and understand the world around us. You may consider traditional media like newspapers, radio, or television; or new media, such as popular and influential social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, or YouTube.
    • Climate Change: Explore themes raised in the Davidson article in the light of recent media coverage on global warming (severe storms, oil sands, melting arctic ice, etc.). Discuss the causes of climate change, its impact on our lives and on the planet and our power to combat it. Use at least two academic or news articles to supplement the course reading.
    Essay Evaluation Rubric
    Unsatisfactory
    Needs Improvement
    Average
    Excellent
    Content
    40%
    • Misunderstands or ignores critical course concepts, or does not address assigned topic.
    • Does not establish a clear thesis.
    • Understanding of some course concepts is significantly flawed or not clearly. demonstrated.
    • Does not create a strong thesis and/or leaves thesis unproven.
    • Good understanding of most concepts, with minor errors or gaps.
    • Creates clear thesis, but may struggle to support thesis at times.
    • Excellent understanding of concepts.
    • Thoroughly responds to topic with a clear, well-supported thesis statement.
    Analysis
    20%
    • Does not draw upon real-world examples.
    • Draws upon real-world examples but with some confusion/gaps.
    • Connects course themes to examples, but misses some links.
    • Relates themes issues from readings to chosen example(s).
    References*
    15%
    *Please note that an Unsatisfactory grade in this category will result in the overall failure of this assignment.
    • Does not reference assigned readings.
    • Does not refer to outside sources.
    • Makes passing reference to reading.
    • Refers to outside source(s) that are not appropriate for academic writing.
    • Draws upon one or two course readings, as required.
    • Does not make satisfactory use of outside sources.
    • Applies and critically expands upon course readings to support his or her argument.
    • Uses at least two academic-level outside sources to support thesis.
    Structure
    10%
    • Essay lacks clear organization (ie. introduction, body, conclusion).
    • Essay is too brief.
    • Confusing or incomplete essay structure.
    • Slightly below the word count requirement,
    • Makes an effort to form an organized and logical essay structure.
    • Length is appropriate.
    • Organized, logical and polished essay structure.
    • Length is appropriate.
    Mechanics
    10%
    • Frequent major and minor grammar errors impair clarity.
    • Some major and many minor grammar errors.
    • No more than one major, or five minor grammar errors.
    • Virtually error free.
    Format
    5%
    • No APA style.
    • Imperfect APA style.
    • APA style is used with errors.
    • APA style is virtually error free.

    WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

    GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

    CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

    TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

    GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

    CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

    TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

    NO PLAGIARISM

    • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
    • Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
    • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
    • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
    • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
    • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals Globalization: Critically assess the impact of Globalization by using the three Globalization readings in unit 3 and the film El Contrato by Min Sook Lee 

    Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

    Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG
    Categories
    Writers Solution

    Critically evaluate and apply theoretical models and methods of the biological bases of behaviour to propose solutions to current global health challenges

    Assessment task 3 – Case study analysis
    Assignment Content
    Overview
    Type: Case study analysis (Individual task)
    Weighting: 50%
    Length: 1500 words (excluding reference list)
    Material: Covered in weeks 2 to 4
    Aligned subject learning outcomes:
    SLO2. Critically evaluate and apply theoretical models and methods of the biological bases of behaviour to propose solutions to current global health challenges;
    SLO3. Communicate proposed solutions to current global health challenges to a variety of audiences.
    In this task you will be required to critically evaluate research from areas of the biological bases of behavior, and use the research to propose solutions to a global health issue that is directly aligned to a Sustainable Development Goal. Your response will take the form of a population-based case study analysis. The following steps apply:
    Choose a population-based case study from the three categories provided below, and select one of the specific options. You must focus on one of the assignations below, otherwise a grade of zero will be awarded for this assessment.
    Identify the challenge for the particular case study and population option, and formulate a research question to focus on, including the methodological approaches and research inclusions and exclusions for the literature review.
    Conduct a literature review on your question to evaluate the current research in behavioural neuroscience.
    Write up your case study in the following format.
    a. The first section of your submission will provide an overview of the case study, and the overarching aim of your analysis of it. Write this first as you will use this synopsis to formulate a scope of your literature review. Be sure to include concise information to inform the reader about the population and the challenge (recommended word limit: 200).
    b. Detail your research question because the research question will determine the review method, the literature sourced, and the focus. A research question in this context is the stated aim/focus of the review that you have set out to have answered by the review process. At this point, detail the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the literature (this is how you determine what literature to include in the review), and explain the reasoning behind these considerations. Use this as an opportunity to really define your review aim and method and its focus (recommended word limit: 200).
    c. Present your evidence-based literature review, critically evaluating the research as it applies to your case study, your aim, and your research question; and provide discussion on behavioural neuroscience evidence-based solutions to the identified issue. Depending on topic and focus, your critical evaluation might involve, for example, weighing up the balance of the evidence in relation to what has been shown to work or not work) and then providing a clearly stated determination for the reader (recommended word limit: 900).
    d. The final section of your submission will provide a succinct overview of your findings of the literature review, and your recommended behavioural neuroscience evidence-based solution(s) to the challenge as it applies to the target population (recommended word limit: 200).
    Notes relevant to your submission:
    • You must adhere to APA 7 formatting requirements, including in-text citations and referencing
    • You must focus on one of the assignations below, otherwise a grade of zero will be awarded.
    Categories
    Digital Neuropsychology
    The health challenge topics in this section align to the Sustainable Development Goal #3, to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.
    Digital neuropsychology provides new approaches for measuring and monitoring neuropsychological functioning (including computerized neuropsychological assessment devices). In this topic you will recommend the potential uses for digital neuropsychology (including computerised neuropsychological assessment devices) in the diagnosis, or treatment or rehabilitation of a neurological condition aligned to the currently recognised global health challenge of good health and well-being. Choose one of the following topics as your population case study:
    Option 1 Diagnosis OR treatment of Adults with Multiple Sclerosis
    Option 2 Diagnosis OR treatment of people with Acquired Brain Injury
    Option 3 Cognitive rehabilitation of adults with drug addiction/addictive disorders.
    Neurobiology of aggression
    The health challenge topics in this section align with the Sustainable Development Goal #16 to significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere.
    Studies related to the neurobiology of aggression provide us with a more sophisticated understanding of the mechanisms underpinning antisocial behaviour, moral decision making, and violent offending. Research has suggested potential links between brain structures, hormones, biological functioning in the body and aggressive behaviour. This topic is focused on the development of neurobiological evidence-based methodologies that can be employed in the diagnosis or treatment of antisocial behaviour. Your target groups are as follows:
    Option 1 Diagnosis of Violent Offenders to assist with targeted treatment
    Option 2 Treatment for the perpetrators of domestic violence to prevent re-offending.
    Healthy and disordered eating: The obesity epidemic
    The health challenge topic in this section aligns to the Sustainable Development Goal #3 to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages; and #12 to ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
    According to the World Health Organisation (2016), there were around 2 billion adults who were categorised as being overweight, 650 million of which were obese. It has been suggested that the worldwide prevalence of obesity tripled between 1975 and 2016. Calculations indicate, based on current trends, that there will likely be in the order of 2.7 billion overweight adults, in excess of 1 billion adults affected by obesity, and 177 million adults severely affected by obesity by 2025. Your task is to recommend neurobiological evidence-based therapeutic (treatment or management) strategies to address obesity caused by food addiction.
    Choose one of the groups listed below as the basis of your population case study:
    Option 1 Overweight primary school children displaying excessive eating behaviours, and who has parents that are obese
    Option 2 Single, working, middle-aged males who are obese and have been diagnosed with food addiction

    GET SOLUTION BELOW

    CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

    TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

    NO PLAGIARISM

    • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
    • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
    • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
    • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
    • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
    • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. A verdict was rendered against three parent chaperones. How was the third parent included in the case?
    • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services Critically evaluate and apply theoretical models and methods of the biological bases of behaviour to propose solutions to current global health challenges

    Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

    Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
    Categories
    Writers Solution

    evolution of the game depends critically on the outcome of the first roll

    1,)  Craps is an interesting casino game because it is an example of a random experiment that takes place in stages; the evolution of the game depends critically on the outcome of the first roll. In particular, the number of rolls is a random variable.

    The player (known as the shooter) rolls a pair of fair dice

    a. If the sum is 7 or 11 on the first throw, the shooter wins; this event is called a natural.

    b. If the sum is 2, 3, or 12 on the first throw, the shooter loses; this event is called craps.

    c. If the sum is 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, or 10 on the first throw, this number becomes the shooter’s point. The shooter continues rolling the dice until either she rolls the point again (in which case she wins) or rolls a 7 (in which case she loses).

    The sum of the scores  on a given roll has the probability density function in the table. The table of bets (not relevant to this problem) is shown in the image.

    Setup an experiment to simulate the sum of a single roll of two 6-sided dice.

    Run 1000 replications of the experiment.

    Analyze the percentage of time the shooter (1) wins on the first roll or (2) loses on the first roll. (Note: we are ignoring item C above for this problem).

    Summarize the sample of the SUMS in a frequency distribution, probability distribution, cumulative probability distribution.

    Graph the results. 

    What would the theorectical probability of winning or losing on the first roll based on classical assignment of probabilities? Graph?

    2.) Roulette is the oldest casino game still in operation. It’s invention has been variously attributed to Blaise Pascal, the Italian mathematician Don Pasquale, and several others. In any event, the roulette wheel was first introduced into Paris in 1765. Here are the characteristics of the wheel:

    The (American) roulette wheel has 38 slots numbered 00, 0, and 1–36.

    Green slot numbers 0, 00;

    Red slot numbers 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 30, 32, 34, 36;

    Black slot numbers 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 29, 31, 33, 35

    The wheel is spun and then a small ball is rolled in a groove, in the opposite direction as the motion of the wheel. Eventually the ball falls into one of the slots. 

    All 38 possible values for a single spin of the wheel are given in the table. Naturally, we assume mathematically that the wheel is fair, so that the random variable X that gives the slot number of the ball is uniformly distributed over the sample space. An image of the roulette wheel and it’s betting table (not relevant to this problem) is shown in the image.

    Setup an experiment to simulate the outcome for a single spin of the wheel.

    Run 1000 replications of the experiment.

    Analyze the percentage of time the a player wins

    1) who only bets on the same number for every spin of the wheel

    2) who randomly selects a different number every spin

    Describe your findings in the management statement

    GET SOLUTION BELOW

    CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

    TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

    NO PLAGIARISM

    • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
    • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
    • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
    • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
    • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
    • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. A verdict was rendered against three parent chaperones. How was the third parent included in the case?
    • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services evolution of the game depends critically on the outcome of the first roll

    Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

    Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
    Categories
    Writers Solution

    critically analysing a nominated website

    Assessment 2:
    Assessment type: Individual written assessment (1,000 words)
    Purpose: Assessment 1 is a report critically analysing a nominated website. Students must identify all the good interface design principles used in the website design. The report should point out the good and bad practices of interface design. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes a and b.
    Value: 20% Due Date: Week 5
    Assessment topic: Analysis of nominated website
    Task Details: Write an analysis report on one of the following type of websites:
    o Magazine website.
    o News Website.
    o Crowdfunding Website.
    o TV or video streaming Website.
    o Community forum Website.
    The report should include the following points:

    1. Introduction: The introduction about your selected website. All the relevant information and background details should include.
    2. Website Structure: The structure of your chosen website should be covered properly. The report should include how the website is set up, the individual subpages are linked to one another etc.
    3. Interface Design: Identify at least 5-6 good and bad interface design principles used in the website design. Justify the good and bad interface design identified by you.
    4. Screenshots: Provide screenshot samples for all the good and bad interface design principles you have identified in the website and support those with discussion.
    5. Conclusion and Recommendations: After the analysis provide a comprehensive summary of the report. Also, add the limitations you have studied and what will be the future scope to overcome those limitations

    GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

    CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

    TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

    GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

    CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

    TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

    NO PLAGIARISM

    • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
    • Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
    • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
    • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
    • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
    • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. critically analysing a nominated website

    Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

    Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays