Outline/Describe the strategies/process you use to search for evidence related to best practices (including databases used, search phrases, number of articles located) for suctioning and whether the instillation of saline while suctioning is an acceptable technique.
Search for evidence related to best practices, and provide a summary of all evidence.
Cite at least two scholarly (peer-reviewed) articles to support the data presented in the paper
Develop a PICO question for the instillation of saline during endotracheal suctioning.
Consider/Describe how you could apply PICO to problems in your workplace in order to influence things in clinical practice. Develop a PICO to represent your work setting.
Submit your search strategies, search results, and PICO question and application to clinical practice as an:
o 880-word APA formatted paper(title and reference page are not included in the 880 words count)
IT Business Application Case Study Identify and describe a business problem with an IT solution from your work or personal experience. Are there any specific artificial intelligence (AI) applications that can be considered as part of the solution? If you don’t have specific personal experience, select 1 management enterprise system (MIS) solution with a specific use case. Then, answer the following questions: What have you identified as the existing business problem? What is your expected deliverable of the business process? What specific IT application did you identify to provide an effective solution? What are the specific features and benefits of the new IT application? How does the new application provide long-term support to the business process by maintaining data integrity in cases of disaster recovery and continuity planning? Submitting your assignment in APA format means, at a minimum, you will need the following: Title page: Remember the running head. The title should be in all capitals. Length: 5 pages minimum Abstract: This is a summary of your paper, not an introduction. Begin writing in the third person. Body: This begins on the page following the title page and abstract page and must be double-spaced (be careful not to triple- or quadruple-space between paragraphs). The typeface should be 12-pt. Times Roman or 12-pt. Courier in regular black type. Do not use color, bold type, or italics, except as required for APA-level headings and references. The deliverable length of the body of your paper for this assignment is 5 pages. In-body academic citations to support your decisions and analysis are required. A variety of academic sources is encouraged. Reference page: References that align with your in-body academic sources are listed on the final page of your paper. The references must be in APA format using appropriate spacing, hanging indent, italics, and uppercase and lowercase usage as appropriate for the type of resource used. Remember, the Reference page is not a bibliography but a further listing of the abbreviated in-body citations used in the paper. Every referenced item must have a corresponding in-body citation.
BLAW1002 SEMESTER 2 2020 – ASSESSMENT 3: LEGAL CASE STUDY – SHORT QUESTION AND ANSWER (40 MARKS) For this assessment, students are to apply the concepts taught in the law modules for the unit (modules 9, 10 and 11) to a case study (Commonwealth Bank of Australia: The Unwitting Mule) and answer four short answer questions. To best answer these questions, students may be required to research beyond the principles taught in the lectures and tutorials, and will be required to reference any external material that is used to form the substance of their answers. In breaking down the marks that are available for this assessment, each question is worth 9 marks for a total of 36 marks for the content portion of the assignment. The remaining 4 marks are awarded for the use of referencing and the structure / presentation of assignment submissions. Students are to integrate a completed cover page (a template is provided on blackboard) into their assignment document and submit their assignment file in soft copy format to a turnitin link in blackboard. A hard copy version of your assignment is not required to be submitted to your lecturer or tutor. Assessment Questions Read the Commonwealth Bank of Australia: The Unwitting Mule case study and answer the following questions: 1. What areas of law are pertinent to this case study? Describe what the identified areas of law cover, and explain how they are relevant to the issues raised in the case study. (9 marks) 2. What is the business structure of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)? What does this structure say of the duties that the bank’s directors owe to its stakeholders, and how have the directors breached those duties by allowing the conduct that is detailed in the case study. (9 marks) 3. Describe the regulatory responsibility of AUSTRAC in the context of this case. What changes (if any) to the scope of their responsibility were brought about by the findings of the 2018 Royal Commission into the Banking sector. (9 marks) 4. What business risks were ignored by the CBA executives, and what good governance and compliance practices could have been implemented to alleviate these risks? (9 marks) Below is the marking rubric which will be used to grade your submission: Question 1 – Relevant areas of law 0 – 2 marks Very limited knowledge of topic with significant gaps between what was covered and what answer should have addressed. Answer shows no conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 2 – 4 marks Limited knowledge of topic and will not have discussed relevant points in much detail. Answer shows a general lack of conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 4 – 5 marks Reasonable knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or what was discussed often lacks detail. Demonstrates a reasonable conceptual understanding and a sound ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 5 – 7 marks Good knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or will have discussed all relevant points but will occasionally lack detail. Mostly demonstrates a high level conceptual understanding and a very good ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 7 – 9 marks Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic with discussion of all relevant points in answer. Consistently demonstrates an excellent conceptual understanding and an outstanding ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. / 9 Question 2 – Business Structure of bank 0 – 2 marks Very limited knowledge of topic with significant gaps between what was covered and what answer should have addressed. Answer shows no conceptual understanding, or ability to apply 2 – 4 marks Limited knowledge of topic and will not have discussed relevant points in much detail. Answer shows a general lack of conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in 4 – 5 marks Reasonable knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or what was discussed often lacks detail. Demonstrates a reasonable conceptual understanding and a sound ability to apply 5 – 7 marks Good knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or will have discussed all relevant points but will occasionally lack detail. Mostly demonstrates a high level conceptual understanding and a very good ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 7 – 9 marks Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic with discussion of all relevant points in answer. Consistently demonstrates an excellent conceptual understanding and an outstanding ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. / 9 those concepts in answering the question. answering the question. those concepts in answering the question. Question 3 – Regulatory responsibility of AUSTRAC 0 – 2 marks Very limited knowledge of topic with significant gaps between what was covered and what answer should have addressed. Answer shows no conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 2 – 4 marks Limited knowledge of topic and will not have discussed relevant points in much detail. Answer shows a general lack of conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 4 – 5 marks Reasonable knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or what was discussed often lacks detail. Demonstrates a reasonable conceptual understanding and a sound ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 5 – 7 marks Good knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or will have discussed all relevant points but will occasionally lack detail. Mostly demonstrates a high level conceptual understanding and a very good ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 7 – 9 marks Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic with discussion of all relevant points in answer. Consistently demonstrates an excellent conceptual understanding and an outstanding ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. / 9 Question 4 – Business risks, Good Governance and Compliance 0 – 2 marks Very limited knowledge of topic with significant gaps between what was covered and what answer should have addressed. Answer shows no conceptual understanding, or 2 – 4 marks Limited knowledge of topic and will not have discussed relevant points in much detail. Answer shows a general lack of conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in 4 – 5 marks Reasonable knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or what was discussed often lacks detail. Demonstrates a reasonable conceptual understanding and a 5 – 7 marks Good knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or will have discussed all relevant points but will occasionally lack detail. Mostly demonstrates a high level conceptual understanding and a very good ability to apply those 7 – 9 marks Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic with discussion of all relevant points in answer. Consistently demonstrates an excellent conceptual understanding and an outstanding ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. / 9 ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. answering the question. sound ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. concepts in answering the question. Referencing/Str ucture/ Presentation 0 marks Cover page not included. Incoherent writing style with structure not appropriate to short answer format. Recurrent grammar, formatting and spelling mistakes. No in-text referencing or reference list provided. 1 mark Cover page not included. Largely incoherent writing style with structure not appropriate to short answer format. Recurrent grammar, formatting and spelling mistakes. Either in-text referencing or reference list missing. 2 marks Cover page may / may not have been included. Good writing style with structure appropriate to short answer format. Inconsistent grammar, formatting and spelling applied. In-text referencing and reference list incomplete or contains errors. 3 marks Cover page included. Very good writing style with structure largely appropriate to short answer format. Grammar, formatting and spelling mostly accurate. In- text referencing and reference list provided that accords with Chicago referencing system. 4 marks Cover page included. Fluent writing style with structure appropriate to short answer format. Grammar, formatting and spelling accurate (little to no mistakes). In-text referencing and reference list provided that accords with Chicago referencing system. / 4 Referencing and appropriate acknowledgement of sources Most often errors in referencing are incidental or clearly inadvertent. In the event of a level one incident of plagiarism occurring, a student may be contacted by the University and required to undertake further training or remedial work in relation to referencing. Where the lack of correct referencing appears to contravene the University policy on plagiarism, the student’s paper will be referred to the Unit Coordinator and dealt with according to University policy. This may amount to academic misconduct. An important aspect of the University Plagiarism Policy is recognition that not all plagiarism incidents are intentional or involves cheating. If students are not learning as expected, they will be made aware of their difficulties and helped to improve. Those who deliberately choose to cheat by way of plagiarism, however, will be identified and dealt with accordingly. Students are strongly advised to understand their responsibilities in relation to correct referencing and should consult the unit outline and the referencing information in the Learning Hub section of the Blackboard site. Format of assignments Assignments cannot be handwritten and must comply with the following format requirements. Those assignments, which do not conform to these requirements without prior agreement of the unit coordinator, will either be returned to the student unmarked or will have marks deducted: Document type: Word or pdf (pdf preferred). Font: Arial or similar font – no smaller than 12 point in size. Pages: Numbered in top or bottom margin. Spacing: Appropriate line spacing and paragraph spacing. Margins: At least 2.5 cm top, left, right & bottom. Labelling of assignment file: Should include student’s Curtin ID number, their first and last names, and the title of the assignment (BLAW1002 Assessment 3 – Legal Case Study). Presentation A well-presented assessment will consider and meet the following criteria: • Cover sheet (located on Blackboard under the ‘Assessment’ tab) must be completed and integrated into your assignment document (The system will only allow you to submit one file so you won’t be able to submit your cover page and assignment document separately). • Appropriate sentence structure. • Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. • Paragraph size and breaks appropriate. • Consistent format. • Appropriate use of headings and sub-headings. • Within acceptable word limit. • Appropriate referencing and acknowledgment of sources. Word Limit The total assignment should be a minimum of 2,500 words and not exceed 3,000 words. Please provide a word count on your cover sheet. A penalty of 10% will be imposed on assignments that exceed the word limit. Markers however, have the discretion as to whether to apply the penalty for an additional 100 words, provided the discussion remains relevant. The assignment will not be assessed if it exceeds 3,250 words and will result in a ZERO mark. The word count does not include the following: • cover sheet; • in-text referencing; • referencing list; and • headings or sub-headings. Submission of Assignment Document Please read the submission process carefully. Students should understand that compliance with instructions in relation to an assessment task is critical. Students MUST be aware that non-compliance with submission instructions can result in a mark of ZERO. All assignments must be submitted by Friday, 6 November 2020 by 1PM (WST), unless an extension for legitimate reasons has been granted by the unit cocoordinator prior to the deadline. Students are required to submit their assignment to Blackboard through a link provided in the ‘Assessment’ folder titled ‘Assessment 3 – Legal Case Study’. Submission links will be set up for each mode / location in which this unit is being studied for the relevant study period (e.g. Bentley Internal, Fully Online, Miri etc.), so please ensure that you submit your assignment document to the correct link. The assignment will automatically be submitted to the plagiarism detection program, Turnitin. Please ensure that the version of your assignment submitted to the system is the final version and not an incomplete draft, as the version of your assignment that is in the system at the time the deadline passes will be the version that is marked for assessment purposes (even if it was a draft version that was inadvertently submitted). Feedback on Assignments All of the teaching staff are available to assist you with your learning in this unit. You should contact your lecturer or tutor if you need help understanding the course material or issues arising in the assignment. There is also a staffed Ed forum available for students to ask questions of the teaching team. You can also contact the unit coordinator if you are still unable to get the answer you are seeking. Please allow 48 hours (two working days) for a response to your query. Unfortunately, it is just not possible for the teaching staff to review draft assignments for comment before submission as it is in effect double marking that would give some students an unfair advantage over others. If you require help with your assignment, either narrow the question or section of work to specific questions such as “what is meant by this part of the question?” or “do the areas of law pertain to a particular part of the Module 9 lecture?” Questions such as “have I done this part right?” or “should I include a discussion about this regulator in question 4?” will not be answered as any answer provided by the lecturer or tutor would directly/indirectly impact the mark that the querying student would receive for the assessment, causing the unfairness referred to above. This assignment will be marked using a rubric, which will be provided to students ahead of time. In addition to providing the set feedback to students that is contained in the rubric, markers will also offer individual comments on what a student had done well and what they could have done better to earn a higher mark. Assessments submitted early will not be marked before the due date. Please refer to the unit outline for the full procedure in relation to penalties for late submission and requests for an extension
Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
Note:The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements All papers submitted must use this formatting.
minimum of 3 references
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
The growth, development, and learned behaviors that occur during the first year of infancy have a direct effect on the individual throughout a lifetime. For this assignment, research an environmental factor that poses a threat to the health or safety of infants and develop a health promotion that can be presented to caregivers.
Create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint health promotion, with speaker notes, that outlines a teaching plan. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice over or a video. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning, and an additional slide for references at the end.
In developing your PowerPoint, take into consideration the health care literacy level of your target audience, as well as the demographic of the caregiver/patient (socioeconomic level, language, culture, and any other relevant characteristic of the caregiver) for which the presentation is tailored
Include the following in your presentation:
Describe the selected environmental factor. Explain how the environmental factor you selected can potentially affect the health or safety of infants.
Create a health promotion plan that can be presented to caregivers to address the environmental factor and improve the overall health and well-being of infants.
Offer recommendations on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants.
Offer examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based research. At least three scholarly resources are required. Two of the three resources must be peer-reviewed and no more than 6 years old.
Provide readers with two community resources, a national resource, and a Web-based resource. Include a brief description and contact information for each resource.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
Refer to the resource, “Loom,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on recording your presentation.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Describe at least three reasons for conflict within an institution or organization. How might individual differences and perceptions contribute to the conflict?
Explain the role of functional conflict in institutional change.
Explain the role of dysfunctional conflict in institutional change.
Recommend one conflict resolution strategy organizational leadership could use with functional conflict.
Recommend one conflict resolution strategy organizational leadership could use with dysfunctional conflict.
Format this assessment as a professional report. Use appropriate headings and support your statements with the resources you located. Follow APA guidelines for your in-text citations and references.
Additional Requirements
Submit 3–4 typed, double-spaced pages, not including title and reference pages.
Use 12-point, Times New Roman font.
Include a title page and reference page.
Cite at least 3 current scholarly or professional resources.
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community.
How does emotion affect the way we handle conflict?
Do you think that conflict causes change, or that change causes conflict?
For your third assignment, you are hired as a UX Designer to conduct a Usability Review of an existing web site, desktop application, or mobile app and present your findings and recommendations using PowerPoint or other approved presentation application (e.g. Google Slide, LibreOffice Impress, Prezi)
Project Directions
Select an existing website, desktop, or mobile application and complete the following as the result of your Usability Review.
1. Describe the critical goal of the web site or application. In other words, what is the purpose or what is it designed to accomplish?
2. Describe the top four usability issues you uncovered (sorted by severity). Complete the following information for each issue and present it in column format:
A. Usability Issue – List the issue
B. Severity Rating (High, Medium, or Low) – Rate the severity of the issue into one of three categories:
· High severity – Issues that prevent the user from completing tasks efficiently.
· Medium severity – Issues that impede ease of use and understanding.
· Low severity – Issues that do not prevent users from completing tasks, but inconvenience the user.
C. Rationale – Describe the usability issue. Discuss the severity you assigned to the issue. Why is this an issue? Justify your severity rating.
D. Recommendation – Recommend a path of action to address the usability issue. How can the issue be fixed or corrected?
Note: This is not a complete or extensive usability review, but for purposes of this class, it will provide you an introduction into the usability review process.
Project Findings Presentation
Please follow the steps below:
Create a PowerPoint presentation to present your findings. The PowerPoint template below can be used to complete this project. Simply add your information to the slides.
The slides should be designed as follows:
Slide 1: Cover Slide
Include the following:
· Your name
· Your class
· Year and semeser
· Website or application used in your usability review
Slide 2: The critical goal of the web site or application.
Slide 3: First Usability Issue
Include the following:
· Item A: Usability Issue
· Item B: Severity Rating
· Item C: Rationale
· Item D: Recommendation
Slide 4: Second Usability Issue
Include the following:
· Item A: Usability Issue
· Item B: Severity Rating
· Item C: Rationale
· Item D: Recommendation
Slide 5: Third Usability Issue
Include the following:
· Item A: Usability Issue
· Item B: Severity Rating
· Item C: Rationale
· Item D: Recommendation
Slide 6: Fourth Usability Issue
Include the following:
· Item A: Usability Issue
· Item B: Severity Rating
· Item C: Rationale
· Item D: Recommendation
Slide 7: Summary
Summarize slides 1 through 6.
Slide 8: Questions
Ask your audience if they have any questions.
Slide 9: References
List the references you used to complete this project.
Slide 10: Project Reflection
Answer the following question regarding the assignment:
What issues or challenges did you face completing this project? How did you resolve them? If you did not face any issues or challenges in completing this project, what do you think are some issues or challenges someone new to completing usability studies might face in completing a project like this? Note: Your reflection must be a total of at least 100 words.
Presentation Design Style
Please follow conventional presentation design format and guidelines. In other words, your presentation should look “presentable”.
Submit your presentation to your Project 3 Assignments Folder.
Grading
Listing 4 user design issues and presenting them in presentation format along with a project reflection “in accordance” with the assignment instructions will earn you a 100% (A) on this project.
Refer back to the interview and evaluation you conducted in the Topic 2 Family Health Assessment assignment. Identify the social determinates of health (SDOH) contributing to the family’s health status. In a 750-1,000-word paper, create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family. Include the following:
Describe the SDOH that affect the family health status. What is the impact of these SDOH on the family? Discuss why these factors are prevalent for this family.
Based on the information gathered through the family health assessment, recommend age-appropriate screenings for each family member. Provide support and rationale for your suggestions.
Choose a health model to assist in creating a plan of action. Describe the model selected. Discuss the reasons why this health model is the best choice for this family. Provide rationale for your reasoning.
Using the model, outline the steps for a family-centered health promotion. Include strategies for communication.
Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.
Part 1 attached, please use the paper from part 1 to answer and respond for this paper.