Categories
Writers Solution

thought-provoking, intellectual, and engaging discourse amongst students and the professor

Online class discussion provides a forum for thought-provoking, intellectual, and engaging discourse amongst students and the professor.

The ENG102 Discussion Forum is a student-centered and student-driven framework in which students post a one-paragraph “mini essay” and then provide/receive feedback to/from a community of fellow learners.

FIRST, students post an initial response within the first 6 days of the module start, thus allowing ample time for classmates to respond and engage.

Mini essays should include an opening, thesis statement, three “points” (including details and examples as support) and a conclusion.

Mini essays are to consist of your own thoughts, words, and ideas.

SECOND, students respond to at least two peer mini essays.

When responding to other students’ writing (and in order to earn full point values), students are encouraged to provide specific detail and example related to the mini essay in question. When providing feedback, students should consider the following:

· Does the essay include the required parts? If not, what’s missing?

· Is there a thesis statement and is it clear? If not, what is unclear? Does the thesis relate to the supporting points?

· Are there three specific points in the paragraph? Is each point introduced with a topic sentence?

· Is there enough detail/example in the paragraph to accurately support the thesis? If not, what could be added?

· Is the closing effective? Does it summarize the content of the mini essay? If not, how might it be more effective?

· Is the mini essay free of sentence skill errors? If not, what are the specific grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors? Is the diction (word choice) appropriate for an academic audience? If not, which words should be avoided?

Please note that a peer review writing workshop is an opportunity to provide (and receive) constructive feedback from an academic community in order to improve one’s writing. It is not a venue for chitchat or a place to discuss how one relates (or does not relate) to the writers’ points of view.

Topic: Write a persuasive post—clear, concise, focused, and structured—including two or more citations from one online source, in which you persuade your reader to do something. Be sure to include a References entry for the source (in APA Style) in your post

WE HAVE DONE THIS ASSIGNMENT BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on thought-provoking, intellectual, and engaging discourse amongst students and the professor

Are You looking for Assignment and Homework Writing help? We Provide High-Quality Academic Papers at Affordable Rates. No Plagiarism.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Categories
Writers Solution

Discourse Community Analysis

Project 2: Discourse Community Analysis

, at the start of class ~~Submit in print and on Canvas~~ Length: 1250-1500 words Overview: A discourse community, according to Chuck Bazerman (2009), is “a grouping of people who share common language norms, characteristics, patterns, or practices as a consequence of their ongoing communications and identification with each other.” Examples of discourse communities include professional groups and organizations, academic disciplines and sub-disciplines, interest groups, social media groups, faith-based groups, and so on. In this assignment you will select and conduct an analysis of one specific discourse community. Purpose: As writers, we all participate in discourse communities. As professionals in both academic and industry settings, we are often faced with new situations and new discourse communities for whom we must write. The best writers understand the communities in which they find themselves: their shared histories and vocabularies, what modes and genres they employ, how persuasion generally operates, what kind of rhetorical appeals are most affective, and so on. Thus, the purpose of this assignment is twofold. First, you will learn to conduct primary research through inquiry as you investigate a specific discourse community. Second, you will develop broadly applicable critical skills in determining what effective writing looks like in a given community. The Task: You will select a discourse community to analyze (Please note: you will be working with this discourse community in Project 2 and Project 3). You will identify three primary-source texts, or manifestations of discourse, in/from that community. Then, with reference to these sources, you will write an essay in which you analyze how communication works in that community. We will use Swales’ (1990) six-part framework for conceptualizing discourse communities in class. You are free to use other analytical frames instead of or in addition to his. What McElroy is looking for:

• A concisely written essay in which you analyze a specific discourse community of your choice

• Evidence of intentionality regarding organization and structure • Deductive reference to three primary-source texts from the community

under investigation • Consistency of tone, style, and voice • MLA formatting • Grammatical, syntactical, and spelling accuracy and appropriateness