Freudian theory continued to evolve even as Neo-Freudian theories continued to emerge. Today, Freudian ideas still provide a foundation for modern psychology and research though some appear in a significantly different form. In this assignment, you will address how modern research and empirical study may validate Freudian theory and how Freudian theory continues to influence modern psychology. You will also explore how Freudian and Neo-Freudian theories address the general problems explored in the field of psychology.
General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA 7th style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
· You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Directions:
Write a paper (1,500-1,750 words) in which you address how modern research and empirical study may validate Freudian theory and how Freudian theory continues to influence modern psychology. Include the following in your paper:
1. A discussion of how medical monitoring and empirical research have supported Freud’s drive theory.
2. A discussion of why psychoanalysis is still questioned in scientific circles.
3. A discussion of the general problems explored in the field of psychology.
4. A discussion of how Freudian and Neo-Freudian theories attempt to address these problems.
5. A discussion of what still needs to be explored in the field of psychology in order to more adequately address these problems
Assignment details: Discussion about the Economics of Zimbabwe
This discussion is designed to help you apply the concepts from this chapter in a real world situation.
STEP 1:Read the provided article on Zimbabwe written by your textbook author Dr. Brad Schiller
STEP 2:After reading the article: Post your answer to the following question:
A. Explain in a few sentences what you believe to be the major factor in the economic collapse of Zimbabwe.
B. How does this relate back to your readings in the Global Poverty Chapter or Chapter 2?
STEP 3:
Find some more recent information and elaborate on the current economic conditions and events in Zimbabwe…have things gotten better or worse since Schiller wrote his article?
Do a little digging to expand on the discussion in the World View (Maduro: Bourgeois Parasite” Thwart Growth) in your text. How are these events in these two countries similar (venezuela and Zimbabwe)? How are they different?
MAKE SURE THAT YOU ANSWER ALL PARTS OF THIS ASSIGNMENT IN YOUR DISCUSSION POSTING
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the discussions guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The ebb and flow of a discussion is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction (CO4)
Actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty (CO5)
Requirements:
Post a written response in the discussion forum to EACH threaded discussion topic:
This week we learned about the potential benefits and drawbacks to clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table with a column for “Pro” and a separate column for “Con”. Include at least 3 items for each column. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you included it on the respective list.
The primary goal of a CDSS is to leverage data and the scientific evidence to help guide appropriate decision making. CDSSs directly assist the clinician in making decisions about specific patients. For this discussion thread post, you are to assume your future role as an APN and create a clinical patient and scenario to illustrate an exemplary depiction of how a CDSS might influence your decision. This post is an opportunity for you to be innovative, so have fun!
Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:
For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.
Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Application of Course Knowledge
50
33%
The quality for this category is determined by the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lessons and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations.
Scholarliness and Scholarly Resources
40
27%
This category is evaluated on the quality of the student’s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match, and minimize or appropriately format direct quotations.
Interactive Dialogue
40
27%
The quality for this category is determined by substantive written responses to a peer and faculty member’s questions in the threaded discussion. Substantive posts add importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion. Students must respond to least one peer in the threaded discussion. If no question asked directly from faculty, student must respond to questions posed to the entire class. Post must include at least one scholarly source.
Total CONTENT Points= 130
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format
20
13%
Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.
* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.
**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the discussion
Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. A verdict was rendered against three parent chaperones. How was the third parent included in the case?
Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction
In this Discussion Post you will take a set of flow notes and provide assessment. I’ll always ask for assessment of content and delivery, but we haven’t covered delivery expectations yet. Please provide general feedback about delivery here also.
Assess this speech and listen for the parts of the introduction and conclusion, the internal previews, and transitions statements. The speaker does a good job on some, others could be stronger. Identify each and explain if it was strong or what could be done to improve it.
While watching this speech, take a set of flow notes and post your notes in this Discussion Post along with your assessment below. Take a photo of your notes and upload within the post.
Introduction:
What’s strong?
What can be improved?
Problems:
What’s strong?
What can be improved?
Causes:
What’s strong?
What can be improved?
Solution:
What’s strong?
What can be improved?
Conclusion:
What’s strong?
What can be improved?
please watch the video link this assignment must be do before at 11:30
Assessment Assessment 2 (Part A: Business Report, Part B: Discussion of partnership processes and preparation of Accounting entries) Individual/Group Individual Assignment Length Part A—1500 words Part B— 300 words for requirement 3. Learning Outcomes b) Apply Accounting principles and standards when accounting for non-current assets, revenue and liabilities. c) Prepare statements of cash flows. d) Prepare Accounting entries and processes for partnerships. Submission Week 10 (Detailed information is provided below) Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks (Part A: 75 marks and Part B: 25 marks) Individual Assignment Specifications Assessment Task Description The assignment is to be completed individually. Listed below is the overview, instructions, marking criteria and rubric for Part A and Part B outlining the specific questions to be addressed in your report. 1. Overview The total marks available for this assessment task are 30. The assignment has an allocation of 100 marks, final mark on the assignment will be a weightage of 30% of the marks awarded out of 100. The assignment requires you to: (i) directly address Part A & Part B worth a total of 100 marks, and (ii) “to do so with academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence”, worth 15 marks (see Instructions, Item 4) 2. Instructions 1. Select a company from Table 1 listed under pt.5. 2. Obtain the recent annual report preferably financial year ending 30 June 2020. 3. Students are not allowed to select the same company; therefore, your lecturer must approve the choice of your company. 4. In terms of ‘Academic Quality’ worth 10 marks for Part A and 5 marks for Part B, a combined total of 15 marks out of 100 marks. 5. Selected list of ASX companies is provided below, that need to be selected for your choice of Part A Table 1: Selected list of ASX listed companies ASX Code Company name 1 CSL CSL Ltd 2 STO Santos Ltd 3 RIO RIO Tinto Ltd 4 TCL Transurban Group 5 LLC Lendlease Group 6 ALX Atlas Arteria 7 ORI Orica Ltd 8 OZL OZ Minerals Ltd 9 OSH Oil Search Ltd 10 MIN Mineral Resources Ltd 6. The requirements for Part A of this assignment must be written/structured in the form of a ‘business report’. That is, it must have a/an: (i) Word limit: 1,500 words (ii) A proper report format is expected (title page, executive summary, table of contents, introduction, body of the report with headings and subheadings, conclusion & recommendations, appendices, list of references) (iv) Students are strongly advised to avoid plagiarism or collusion in doing the assessment. General rule: If the similarity, detected and reported by Turnitin report, comes from the original assignment questions, table of contents, table of numbers and data, diagrams and charts, calculations, reference list, appendix…, then it is not an indication of plagiarism. However, if the similarity comes from the discussion or analysis or interpretation or recommendation parts of the assignment then it is an indication that the student has “copied and pasted” from the original source. This is not the student’s own work and therefore it will negatively affect the quality of the student’s answers in the submitted report. (v) A minimum of 3 different academic reference sources are required. Remember that Wikipedia, Investopedia and other similar websites are not academic sources and must not be used as a reference source. (vi) The marking rubrics for the business report is provided under Assignment marking criteria and Rubric. Part A: Discuss and interpret various Accounting Standards covering non-current assets, revenue recognition, liabilities, and cash flow statement. (75 Marks) For your selected/approved Company, comment on the following: 1. Knowledge and understanding of the accounting principles and standards for non-current assets, revenue, and liabilities. a. Discuss why the selected company has prepared the general purpose financial statements. Your discussion should include the reference to the objective of conceptual framework (6 marks) b. State the basis of preparation of these statements. (3 marks) c. Refer to the following items from statement of financial position/ Balance sheet of the selected company: ? Property, Plant& Equipment (PPE) ? Intangible assets ? Right of use of asset ? Deferred tax assets ? Deferred tax liabilities ? Provisions Review the information provided in notes to financial statements about each of the above items. In your written report identify the following for each of the above item: ? accounting standards used for reporting. (6 marks) ? measurement basis used. (6 marks) ? key judgements and estimates applied. (6 marks) d. Identify selected company’s sources of revenue and the accounting standard applied for reporting revenue. (3 marks) e. Explain the revenue recognition criteria applied to each of the revenue source identified in (d) and further assess whether it satisfies the recognition criteria as stated in the Conceptual Framework. (6 marks) 2. Preparation, presentation, and analysis of cash flow statement. a. Outline the two different methods of preparing the statement of cash flows. Examine the selected company’s statement of cash flows and report on its method used. (6 marks) b. Assess how each section in the statement of cash flow of your selected company relates to the statement of financial position. (6 marks) c. Examine the selected company’s statement of cash flows and compare the cash from operating activities with operating profit after tax. Are they similar? If not, suggest why. (6 marks) d. What financing activities were undertaken by the selected company? Compare the borrowings from the previous year and suggest reasons for any major changes. Were there any payments made to shareholders? (3 marks) e. Generate an opinion about the selected company’s cash position and its usefulness to shareholders, lenders, and creditors. (3 marks) 3. Developed recommendations in line with the evidence available in the annual report. Analyse the measurement basis, key judgements and estimates identified in Part A 1 (c), discuss whether this provides relevant, reliable, and faithful representation to stakeholders. For this analysis you may look at qualitative characteristics mentioned in the conceptual framework and look at an annual report of another company in the similar sector and compare the approach adopted with your selected company. (5 marks) 4. Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence. Report Layout and Content (i.e., title page, executive summary, table of contents, introduction, body of the report (this is where you will address the above 3 questions) with headings and subheadings, conclusion & recommendations, appendices, list of references (10 marks) Part B: Partnership processes and accuracy of accounting entries (25 Marks) On 1 July 2019 Patrick and Patricia decided to join forces and form a partnership (P&P Partners). Their contributions to the partnership were: Patrick – Cash: $160,000, Accounts Receivable: $75,000, Equipment: $85,000 Patricia – Cash: $240,000, Inventory: $200,000, Accounts payable: $75,000 Their agreement has the following conditions: • Patricia’s inventory has a market value of $180,000 • Patrick’s equipment has been valued at $80,000 • The partners receive 5% interest on their capital balances • Salaries Patrick – $90,000 and Patricia – $75,000 • The remaining profit is split equally. • Any drawings attract an 10% interest rate for the financial year. Required: 1. Prepare journal entries for the formation of the partnership. (4 marks) 2. During their first year they made a profit of $204,000. Both partners have drawings Patrick $25,000 and Patricia $30,000. Prepare a schedule for the distribution of profit for the year. (6 marks) 3. As the business is growing, partners are curious to know if company structure would be beneficial for the business. Provide a brief advise to the partners stating whether they should consider registering the business as a company. In your advice comment on the aspects of company structure, such as regulatory compliance, taxation, continuity and if these aspects provide any advantage over partnership structure. (10 marks, 300 words) 4. Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence. (5 marks) Assignment Marking Criteria and Rubric The following summarizes the key marking criteria that will be used to assess how you have addressed the assignment requirements of Part A and Part B, academic and discipline conventions, and sources of evidence. Marking Criteria Marking Criteria Marks Allocated Marks Awarded Part A: Discuss and interpret various Accounting standards covering non-current assets, revenue recognition, liabilities, and cash flow statement 1. a. b. c. d. e. Knowledge and understanding of the accounting principles and standards for non-current assets, revenue, and liabilities. Discuss why the selected company has prepared the general purpose financial statements. Your discussion should include the reference to the objective of conceptual framework (6 marks) State the basis of preparation of these statements. (3 marks) Refer to the following items from statement of financial position/ Balance sheet of the selected company: ? Property, Plant& Equipment (PPE) ? Intangible assets ? Right of use of asset ? Deferred tax assets ? Deferred tax liabilities ? Provisions Review the information provided in notes to financial statements about each of the above items. In your written report identify the following for each of the above item: ? accounting standards used for reporting. (6 marks) ? measurement basis used. (6 marks) ? key judgements and estimates applied. (6 marks) Identify selected company’s sources of revenue and the accounting standard applied for reporting revenue. (3 marks) Explain the revenue recognition criteria applied to each of the revenue source identified in (d) and further assess whether it satisfies the recognition criteria as stated in the Conceptual Framework. (6 marks) 36 2. Preparation, presentation, and analysis of cash flow statement. a. Outline the two different methods of preparing the statement of cash flows. Examine the selected company’s statement of cash flows and report on its method used. (6 marks) 24 b. Assess how each section in the statement of cash flow of your selected company relates to the statement of Financial position. (6 marks) c. Examine the selected company’s statement of cash flows and compare the cash from operating activities with operating profit after tax. Are they similar? If not, suggest why. (6 marks) d. What financing activities were undertaken by the selected company? Compare the borrowings from the previous year and suggest reasons for any major changes. Were there any payments made to shareholders? (3 marks) e. Generate an opinion about the selected company’s cash position. (3 marks) 3. Developed recommendations in line with the evidence available in the annual report. Analyse the measurement basis, key judgements and estimates identified in Part A 1 (c), discuss whether this provides relevant, reliable, and faithful representation to stakeholders. For this analysis you may look at qualitative characteristics mentioned in the conceptual framework and look at an annual report of another company in the similar sector and compare the approach adopted with your selected company. (5 marks) 5 4. Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence. 10 Part B: Partnership processes and accuracy of accounting entries 1. Prepare journal entries for the formation of the partnership. (4 marks) 2. During their first year they made a profit of $204,000. Both partners have drawings Patrick $25,000 and Patricia $30,000 drawings. Prepare a schedule for the distribution of profit for the year. (6 marks) 3. As the business is growing, partners are curious to know if company structure would be beneficial for the business. Provide a brief advise to the partners stating whether they should consider registering the business as a company. In your advice comment on the aspects of company structure, such as regulatory compliance, taxation, continuity and if these aspects provide any advantage over partnership structure. (10 marks, 300 words) 20 4. Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence. (5 marks) 5 TOTAL Marks 100 TOTAL Weight 30% Final Mark Marking Rubric (Business report: 75 marks (Part A) and Partnership processes and Accounting entries: 25 marks (Part B)). Assessment Attributes for Part A and Part B have been clearly labeled in the table below. Please note that the last Attribute of Academic and discipline conventions apply to both parts, where Part A has been allocated 10 marks and Part B allocation is 5 marks. Assessment Attributes Fail (0-49%) Pass (50-64%) Credit (65-74%) Distinctions (75-84%) High Distinction (85-100%) Knowledge and understanding of the Accounting principles and standards for non-current assets, revenue, and liabilities. (36 marks) Part A • • • • Shows very little to no understanding of the Accounting principles and standards required to be discussed from the annual report of selected company. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Demonstrates little to no capacity to explain and apply relevant Accounting principles and standards. Has answered most parts incorrectly. • • Shows limited understanding of the Accounting principles and standards required to be discussed from the annual report of selected company. Has answered some parts incorrectly. • Thorough knowledge or understanding of the Accounting principles and standards required to be discussed from the annual report of selected company. • Highly developed understanding of the Accounting principles and standards required to be discussed from the annual report of selected company. • A sophisticated understanding of the Accounting principles and standards required to be discussed from the annual report of selected company. Preparation, presentation, and analysis of cash flow statement. (24 marks) Part A • • Shows no understanding of direct and indirect methods of presenting cash flows from operating activities. Demonstrates little to no capacity to explain the importance of cash flow from operating activities. • • Shows limited understanding of direct and indirect methods of presenting cash flows from operating activities. Demonstrates limited capacity to • • Shows good understanding of direct and indirect methods of presenting cash flows from operating activities. Demonstrates a good • • Shows highly developed understanding of direct and indirect methods of presenting cash flows from operating activities. Demonstrates a highly developed • • Shows sophisticated understanding of direct and indirect methods of presenting cash flows from operating activities. Demonstrates a • Has answered most parts incorrectly. • explain the importance of cash flow from operating activities. Has answered some parts incorrectly. understanding in explaining the importance of cash flow from operating activities. understanding in explaining the importance of cash flow from operating activities. sophisticated understanding in explaining the importance of cash flow from operating activities. Developed recommendations in line with the evidence available in the annual report. (5 marks) Part A • No recommendations developed. • Recommendations developed but not broadly consistent with the evidence presented and generated in the case. • Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. • Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. • Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Knowledge and understanding of partnership processes and accuracy of Accounting entries (20 marks) Part B • • • Shows very little to no understanding of the partnership processes Demonstrates little to no accuracy in recording Accounting entries. Has answered most parts incorrectly. • • • Shows very limited understanding of the partnership processes Demonstrates limited accuracy in recording Accounting entries. Has answered some parts incorrectly. • • Thorough knowledge or understanding of the partnership processes Demonstrates good accuracy in recording Accounting entries • • Highly developed understanding of the partnership processes Demonstrates high accuracy in recording accounting entries • • A sophisticated understanding of the partnership processes. Demonstrates perfect accuracy in recording Accounting entries Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence. (15 marks) 10 marks for Part A and 5 marks for Part B • • • Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. • • • Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. • • • Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. • • • Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. • • • Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. ACCT 2000 Financial Accounting |Page 9 of 9
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Discussion of partnership processes and preparation of Accounting entries
Participation in the Gallery Walk discussion is required. This is the Discussion Topic where you will post your written essays about art work that you have seen while in your Gallery Walks for this course. For the Gallery Walk assignment, you must visit, in-person, at least, two different art venues, which may include: art museums, art galleries, art festivals, outdoor sculpture, and architectural sites. You will write one original post for each of the venues and/or sites that you visit. High-quality, substantial posts will describe your experience visiting an art gallery, the experience of viewing and interpreting public art, or a comparable visit to see a genuine work of art. These two experiences must include a quality written analysis of the art work and artists that you\’ve reviewed. You are encouraged to contact artists and ask them about their works, too. For full points in the \”Gallery Walk\” discussion, you will compose, at least, two substantive original posts and reply with substantive responses to, at least, four other posts. Refer to specific works of art whenever possible by including titles, artist names, media, and dimensions. Note: I hope you can insert two paintings of two different Denver\’s museums, because I suppose to visit two museums and write this essay.
The Denver Art Museum (DAM) is the largest museum of art, located between the Kansas City and West Coast. A visit into the museum is met by amazing architectural design of the building, which was designed by Daniel Libeskind and finished in 2006. The museum houses a number of art collections, ranging from those of world-famous American Indian art collection, as well as art from around the world. For instance, there were classic arts by Monet, Matisse and Picasso. Moreover, modern artwork was observed in the museum, which included the works of Warhol. The artwork from the ancient and contemporary artists offered a chance to compare the aspects of color employed in the artwork by the artists. The museum has a rich collection of paintings…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Please go to page 35 in the textbook. Please read Case Incident 2.1 very carefully. Then answer the four questions that are provided for assignment for this discussion board.
1) Do you agree with Richard? Why or why not?
2)Are the principels of scientific managent applicable in Today\’s organization? Explain your asnwer.
3) What are James Jr\’s reason for keeping things the way they are?
4) What kind of change do you think Richard would like to make?