Categories
Writers Solution

Dave is a driver for Empire Courier Service

Case Analysis: Dave is a driver for Empire Courier Service. Around the company, Dave is known as sort of a hothead. During his previous employment at another company, Dave had been involved in a workplace fistfight with a fellow employee, resulting in criminal charges.

One day, between deliveries and in a company vehicle, Dave decides to get lunch. While leaving the parking lot at Big Burrito Bistro, the favorite lunch spot for most Empire Courier employees, Dave negligently causes a car accident with another vehicle, resulting in injuries to Victor, the driver of the other car. As Dave and Victor are waiting on the side of the road for the police to arrive, Victor comments to Dave, “Oh, you drive for Empire Courier Service. It doesn’t surprise me that Empire hires bad drivers because their service stinks, and their prices are too high!” Dave is so offended that Victor would insult his employer’s professional reputation that he punches Victor in the face, causing Victor to suffer even more injuries. Empire Courier Service does not, as a matter of policy, do criminal background checks on its employees.

Within your paper, define agency and how an agency relationship is created. Identify the various types of agency relationships, and explain tort liability and how it relates to the agency relationship.

Then, considering the legal principles discussed in Chapter 20, explain who is liable for Dave’s negligence for causing the car accident, and explain who is liable for Dave’s intentional tort for punching Victor.

Provide your answers in a case analysis of at least two pages in length.

One source is required. Include an introduction in your paper. Adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment. APA formatting, however, is not necessary.

SEE SOLUTION BELOW

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

Business Law Paper

An agency is an organisation or an institution that agrees to act on behalf of or instead of its client subject to the control of the client. One common example is the house agent. In a business relationship thus, the principle agent relationship calls for being either the employer/ employee relationship or through and independent contractor(“Relationships which give rise to strict liability for the tort of another,” 2019).  The agency relationship thus looks at the fiduciary relation that is as a result from the manifesto of consent by an individual person to another where the other individual is going act on his behalf which is also subject to control or the consent of the other party.

In the agency relationship like that of Dave and Empire courier services one individual (the agent) will agree to do something for another party that is also subject to the control of the other party. In this relationship also the other party should agree to the agreement(Giliker, n.d.).  This also means that the principle is going to be bound by what the agent does based on the fact that the agent is acting in the manner which the principle would have acted him/self

Agent relationships

In regard to the official stipulation of a particular agent relationship is often specified in the contract. The agent relationship usually consists of any capable and consenting parties with the intent to perform a legal undertaking.  In other words, the principle of the agency relationship will look at the single individual that appoints an agent in performing various duties.  The agency relationships by this descriptions will contain principles that are nonprofit organisations, corporations, government agencies and partnerships(“Relationships which give rise to strict liability for the tort of another,” 2019).  In any case the agent will be an individual that is adept to known the task that they are delegated by the principle and they are going to execute the assignment without issues. For example the principle and agent relations will look at hiring an attorney in doing legal work, commissioning a contractor in doing repairs oremploying an individual in diversification of a stock portfolio.

In the case of Dave and Empire Courier services, the principle is the Empire Courier Services while Dave is the agent since he is performing the skilled work of driving the car and transporting the courier. In most case, principles will consist of business owners that employ or chose other persons to carry out the task on their behalf(Giliker, n.d.). The agency torts has a number of rules related to liability between the principle and the agent.  According to the tort the agent usually works as an extension of the principle as if the principle was present. Based  on this, in regard to Dave and Empire courier services,  the principle which is Empire courier services are going to be held liable for the agent’s torts including wrongful act which called for a civil cause of action(“Relationships which give rise to strict liability for the tort of another,” 2019). The agency tort show that a principle will be held liable when the principle negligently hired the agent, the principle gave faulty instructions or the principle failed to properly supervise the agent. 

In conclusion given the history of Dave with running the agency business including personal conduct, it can thus be affirmed that in the recent instances the principal actednegligently on the way it handled the conduct of Dave, whic,…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………,………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Dave is a driver for Empire Courier Service.

NOTE THAT WHAT YOU HAVE JUST READ IS A SAMPLE PAPER ABOUT THE TOPIC. CLICK THE ORDER BUTTON TO ORDER YOUR OWN PAPER

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays  

Categories
Writers Solution

Dave is a driver for Empire Courier Service

Case Analysis
Dave is a driver for Empire Courier Service. Around the company, Dave is known as sort of a hothead. During his previous employment at another company, Dave had been involved in a workplace fistfight with a fellow employee, resulting in criminal charges.

One day, between deliveries and in a company vehicle, Dave decides to get lunch. While leaving the parking lot at Big Burrito Bistro, the favorite lunch spot for most Empire Courier employees, Dave negligently causes a car accident with another vehicle, resulting in injuries to Victor, the driver of the other car. As Dave and Victor are waiting on the side of the road for the police to arrive, Victor comments to Dave, “Oh, you drive for Empire Courier Service. It doesn’t surprise me that Empire hires bad drivers because their service stinks, and their prices are too high!” Dave is so offended that Victor would insult his employer’s professional reputation that he punches Victor in the face, causing Victor to suffer even more injuries. Empire Courier Service does not, as a matter of policy, do criminal background checks on its employees.

Within your paper, define agency and how an agency relationship is created. Identify the various types of agency relationships, and explain tort liability and how it relates to the agency relationship.

Then, considering the legal principles discussed in Chapter 20, explain who is liable for Dave’s negligence for causing the car accident, and explain who is liable for Dave’s intentional tort for punching Victor.

Provide your answers in a case analysis of at least two pages in length.

One source is required. Include an introduction in your paper. Adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment. APA formatting, however, is not necessary.


GET SOLUTION BELOWAssignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at CapitalEssayWriting.com ORDER YOUR COPY AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

Business Law paper: Driver for Empire Courier Service

Name

Institution

Supervisor

Date

Business Law Paper

An agency is an organisation or an institution that agrees to act on behalf of or instead of its client subject to the control of the client. One common example is the house agent. In a business relationship thus, the principle agent relationship calls for being either the employer/ employee relationship or through and independent contractor(“Relationships which give rise to strict liability for the tort of another,” 2019).  The agency relationship thus looks at the fiduciary relation that is as a result from the manifesto of consent by an individual person to another where the other individual is going act on his behalf which is also subject to control or the consent of the other party.

In the agency relationship like that of Dave and Empire courier services one individual (the agent) will agree to do something for another party that is also subject to the control of the other party. In this relationship also the other party should agree to the agreement(Giliker, n.d.).  This also means that the principle is going to be bound by what the agent does based on the fact that the agent is acting in the manner which the principle would have acted him/self

Agent relationships In regard to the official stipulation of a particular agent relationship is often specified in the contract. The agent relationship usually consists of any capable and consenting parties with the intent to perform a legal undertaking.  In other words, the principle of the agency relationship will look at the single individual that appoints an agent in performing various duties.  The agency relationships by this descriptions will contain principles that are nonprofit organisations, corporations, government agencies and partnerships(“Relationships which give rise to strict liability for the tort of another,” 2019).  In any case the agent will be an individual that is adept to known the task that they are delegated…………………………………………………………………………………………………

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

NO PLAGIARISM

Categories
Writers Solution

Dave is a driver for Empire Courier Service.

 Case AnalysisDave is a driver for Empire Courier Service. Around the company, Dave is known as sort of a hothead. During his previous employment at another company, Dave had been involved in a workplace fistfight with a fellow employee, resulting in criminal charges.

One day, between deliveries and in a company vehicle, Dave decides to get lunch. While leaving the parking lot at Big Burrito Bistro, the favorite lunch spot for most Empire Courier employees, Dave negligently causes a car accident with another vehicle, resulting in injuries to Victor, the driver of the other car. As Dave and Victor are waiting on the side of the road for the police to arrive, Victor comments to Dave, “Oh, you drive for Empire Courier Service. It doesn’t surprise me that Empire hires bad drivers because their service stinks, and their prices are too high!” Dave is so offended that Victor would insult his employer’s professional reputation that he punches Victor in the face, causing Victor to suffer even more injuries. Empire Courier Service does not, as a matter of policy, do criminal background checks on its employees.

Within your paper, define agency and how an agency relationship is created. Identify the various types of agency relationships, and explain tort liability and how it relates to the agency relationship.

Then, considering the legal principles discussed in Chapter 20, explain who is liable for Dave’s negligence for causing the car accident, and explain who is liable for Dave’s intentional tort for punching Victor.

Provide your answers in a case analysis of at least two pages in length.

One source is required. Include an introduction in your paper. Adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment. APA formatting, however, is not necessary.

Categories
Writers Solution

The Ottoman Empire in the Great War/WWI

For this paper, I want you to choose two scholarly papers of between 10 and 25 pages apiece which examine some aspect of the First World War from different perspectives. The two essays do not need to be entirely in opposition to each other, nor do they have to be on exactly the same specific subject. However, they should treat the same general subject from different perspectives.

Please cite these papers as sources when first mentioned in the body of your paper, and also in a Bibliography at the end. See the Purdue Owl Writing Center handout on Chicago citation method.  (Links to an external site.)

Here is a link to a sample student paper

Actions that, while not 100% perfect, does a great job of performing a side-by-side comparison of the two papers the student chooses.  Note that the paper is about the Montgomery bus boycott, and thus is not about “World War I,” so this topic would not work for this particular assignment.

For example, if you were to choose as your World War I subtopic, “The Ottoman Empire in the Great War/WWI” you should find two essays which have as their main subject the Ottoman Empire which in some way relate to the First World War.

One paper (and I’m just imagining imaginary papers here) may examine the political intrigue surrounding the rise of the Young Turks to power, while another might examine the experience of Ottoman soldiers on the front.  As long as you choose two academic papers about the same broad subtopic, read them, summarize them, and compare their approaches, you have fulfilled the goal of the paper. 

All I am asking is for you to locate two reputable academic papers about a single subject, and then write a unified three to four page essay on what the different perspectives are. It need not be an assessment of the articles, but instead a comparison of their topics and the approach of their authors to the subject. The different perspectives must be chosen wisely, however. You cannot choose just any two papers. You must not write a three to four page paper that treats each reading separately and distinctly and doesn’t unify them. You must choose them so that you can write a unified paper that sheds light on the subject as a whole, by using the two essays. Usually the best way to do this is to have a strong introduction and thesis, and a strong conclusion. You may discuss the papers separately inside the essay, but your justification for looking at the two essays together must be clear.

That said, you are not writing a research paper based on two articles — you are comparing two academic articles.  You should mention in the body of your paper the author, title, and typically, the journal where they appeared, and will generally refer to the article in your paper by the last name of the primary author (e.g. “While McMillen discusses the Ottomans prior to 1914, Gandalf is mostly concerned with the collapse of the empire in the 1918-1920 period.” 

Here are some potential topics:

The Schlieffen Plan

Kaiser Wilhelm’s instability

Serbian nationalism

Bulgarian nationalism

The War in Africa

Japan in WWI

The Battle of the Marne (or Somme, or etc.)

Shell Shock (PTSD)

Nurses at the Front

The Flu Pandemic in Europe

Trench Life

The Sinking of the Lusitania

U-Boat Warfare

Women’s Suffrage Movements During the War

German and Austro-Hungarian Military Cooperation

The Versailles Conference

Dogfighting

I mean, there are millions of possible topics.  Just find two academic articles about one of them, read both, take notes, and then compare their approaches to the topic.  

NOTE: The assignment perhaps sounds more difficult than it actually is.  It really is just a compare and contrast piece concerning two different academic papers.  It’s not a review of the two articles, although you will have to summarize them; instead, you should discuss how each of the papers examines a different aspect of the subject you have chosen.  That’s it.

One good way to think about your thesis statement is create one that reads “Whereas Paper A says this about the topic,  Paper B says this.”  You should try to talk about the two papers together though, and not as two separate summaries or reviews.