Categories
Writers Solution

legal reasoning (FIRAC)

Please use legal reasoning (FIRAC) to respond to this assignment   Sequent Products makes washing machines. Over the phone, Sequent offers to sell Treadwater Appliance Outlet one hundred model fx2013 washers at a price of $150 per unit. Sequent says that it will keep the offer open for thirty days. Treadwater responds that within two or three weeks it will decide whether to accept. One week later, Sequent e-mails, and Treadwater receives, notice that the offer is withdrawn. Treadwater immediately phones Sequent to accept the $150-per-unit offer. When Sequent refuses to deliver at that price, Treadwater files a suit. Sequent asserts, first, that there is no contract and, second, that if there is a contract, it is unenforceable.
  Facts 1. 2. 3.   Issue: Whether Sequent’s telephone offer was a Merchant’s Firm Offer when it promised to keep the offer open for 30 days.   Rule: Merchant’s Firm Offer 1. Merchant 2. Makes an offer 3. Available for a specified period of time 4. In writing 5. Is irrevocable   Analysis: 1. Merchant Sequent manufactures washing machines so is a merchant 2. Makes an offer Sequent made an offer to Treadwater of $150 per unit 3. Available for a specified period of time Sequent committed to keeping the offer open for 30 days 3. In writing Sequent made the offer by telephone 4. Is irrevocable As there was no writing this offer was not a “Merchant’s Firm Offer.”   Conclusion: Whether Sequent’s telephone offer was NOT a Merchant’s Firm Offer when it promised to keep the offer open for 30 days

SEE SOLUTION BELOW

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Facts

The case study indicated that there were three facts: (1) Sequent make an offer to Treadwater over the telephone. (2) Treadwater responded that it will make decision within two to three weeks. (3) Sequent withdrew the offer before the time elapses. These are the facts surrounding the case.

Issue

            The issue in this case is determine whether when Sequent’s offer was merchant’s firm because they promise to offer washing machine at $150 per unit and the offer would last for 30 days. In order to come up with good legal reason, it will be prudent to evaluate the condition under which Sequent made the offer.

Rule

            For an offer to be valid, there are conditions that must be met. For instance in this case study the first rule is that the offer was merchant, the second rule is that an offer was made, the third rule is that the offer was open for a specific……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….legal reasoning (FIRAC)…

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays