Tag: inefficiencies

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS605 Systems Analysis and Design
Assessment Design Specification
Individual/Group Individual
Length 2500 words +/- 10%
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
b) Formulate, validate and document business requirements for a medium-scale information system development project and effectively communicate these requirements to the stakeholders.
c) Demonstrate the ability to effectively analyse, design and develop information systems using Unified Modelling Language (UML) models.
Submission For 12-week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 4.2 (Week 8)
For 6-week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 4.2 (Week 4)
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 100 marks
Task Summary
Based on your responses to questions in Assessment 1, perform process and data modelling and develop and document a number of design diagrams including context diagram, level 0 and level 1 data flow diagram and entity relationship diagram.
Context
In Assessment 1, you performed a comprehensive requirement analysis for the case study that was given to you. With an in-depth understanding of the functional requirements of the system, you are now required to perform further analysis through process and data modelling.
Process modelling and data modelling can be used to provide deeper understanding of a system thus they are an integral part of system analysis. Process modelling models processes in a system while data modelling helps in identifying the data that flows through the processes.
Instructions

1. Please read case study provided to you by your facilitator. Note that every piece of information provided in this case study has a purpose.
2. The solution that you provided in assessment 1 and the feedback of your Learning Facilitator against assessment 1 would also serve as an input to assessment 2.
3. Please answer the following questions:
   Question 1 (15 mark).
   Create and provide a Context Diagram for the given case study.
   Question 2 (20 mark).
   Create and provide a Level 0 Data Flow Diagram (DFD). The Level 0 DFD should contain all the major high-level processes of the System and should show how these processes are interrelated/interacting.
   Question 3 (24 mark).
   Select three important processes from Level 0 DFD and provide their decomposition (Level 1 DFD).
   Question 4 (20 mark).
   For the given case study, provide an Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD). Provide the logical model only!
   Question 5 (5 mark).
   For the given case study, identify the data stores including the files that are not part of ERD.
   Question 6 (16 mark).
   Translate the ERD you developed in Task 4 into a physical relational database design. Use some database tool such as Microsoft Access to create your database and submit diagram that you made using this tool. Normalise your database design to the Third Normal Form (3NF).
   Word Count and Layout
   • The word count of this assessment is 2500 words +/- 10% but this assessment focuses largely on diagrams. The text in this assessment would largely be the explanation of the diagrams.
   • Please provide all your answers in a MS word document.
   • All diagrams must be drawn using any diagramming tool but the same should be copied to MS Word document.
   • Please note that you are NOT required to copy the questions over to the MS Word document. Use the question number to indicate which question your answer relates to.
   • The recommended font size is 12 with 1.5 line spacing.
   • You can make assumptions where necessary but please outline them very clearly.
   Referencing
   It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
   Submission Instructions
   Please submit the written assessment via the Assessment link within Assessment 2. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
   Academic Integrity
   When submitting their assessment task, students will be asked to declare the academic integrity of their assessment by completing and signing an assignment cover sheet. You can
   find the assignment cover sheet here
   All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are available at https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms.
   Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
   Special Consideration
   To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator. These documents are available at https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms.
   Assessment Rubric
   Assessment Attributes Fail
   (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass
   (Functional)
   50-64% Credit
   (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
   (Advanced)
   75-84% High Distinction
   (Exceptional)
   85-100%
   Question 1: Create and provide a Context Diagram for the given case study.
   15%
   The student has no understanding of what a context diagram is. The student has very limited understanding of what a context diagram is. The student has some understanding of what a context diagram is but the solution is not in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a context diagram is but the representation is mostly incorrect. The solution, however, is in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a context diagram is. Representation is mostly correct and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
   Question 2: Create and provide a Level 0 Data Flow Diagram (DFD). The Level 0 DFD should contain all the major high-level processes of the System and should show how these processes are interrelated.
   20%
   The student has no understanding of what a Level 0 DFD diagramming is. The student has very limited understanding of what a Level 0 DFD is. The student has limited understanding of what a Level 0 DFD is. Representation is partially correct and the solution is not in sync with the given case study completely. The student has clear understanding of what a Level 0 DFD is.
   Representation needs improvement, however the solution is in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a Level 0 DFD is. Representation is mostly correct and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
   Question 3: Select three important processes from Level 0 DFD and provide their decomposition (Level 1 DFD).
   24%
   The student has no understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The student has very limited understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The student has clear understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The solution, however, is not in sync with the given case study completely.
   DFDs are not balanced. The student has clear understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The solution is in sync with the given case study but the
   DFDs are not balanced. The student has clear understanding of how DFD decomposition is done. The solution is in sync with the given case study and the
   DFDs are balanced.
   Assessment Attributes Fail
   (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass
   (Functional)
   50-64% Credit
   (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
   (Advanced)
   75-84% High Distinction
   (Exceptional)
   85-100%
   Question 4: For the given case study, provide an Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD).
   Provide the logical model only!
   20%
   The student has no understanding of what a logical ERD is. The student has very limited understanding of what a logical ERD is. The student has clear understanding of what a logical ERD is but the solution is not in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a logical ERD is and the solution is in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what a logical ERD is. Representation is mostly correct and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
   Question 5: For the given case study, identify the data stores including the files that are not part of ERD.
   5%
   The student has no understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The student has very limited understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The student has clear understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The solution is however not in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The solution is partially in sync with the given case study. The student has clear understanding of what data store/ file system is and how it relates to ERD. The solution is completely in sync with the given case study.
   Assessment Attributes Fail
   (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass
   (Functional)
   50-64% Credit
   (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
   (Advanced)
   75-84% High Distinction
   (Exceptional)
   85-100%
   Question 6: Translate the ERD you developed in Task 4 into a physical relational database design. Use some database tool such as Microsoft Access to create your database and submit diagram that you made using this tool.
   Normalise your database design to the Third Normal Form (3NF).
   16% The student has no understanding of what an ERD (physical relational database design) is. Diagram is not provided using a database tool. The student has very limited understanding of what an ERD
   (physical relational database design) is.
   Diagram is provided using a database tool. The student has clear understanding of what an ERD (physical relational database design) is but the solution is not in sync with the given case study.
   Diagram is provided using a database tool.
   Solution has major normalisation issues. The student has clear understanding of what an ERD (physical relational database design) is and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
   Diagram is provided using a database tool.
   Solution is not fully normalised. The student has clear understanding of what an ERD (physical relational database design) is.
   Representation is mostly correct and the solution is in sync with the given case study.
   Diagram is provided using a database tool.
   Solution is fully normalised.

WE HAVE DONE THIS ASSIGNMENT BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER on critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes

Are You looking for Assignment and Homework Writing help? We Provide High-Quality Academic Papers at Affordable Rates. No Plagiarism.

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS605 Systems Analysis and Design
Assessment Written assessment
Individual/Group Individual
Length words +/ 10%
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
b) Formulate, validate and document business requirements for a medium-scale information system development project and effectively communicate these requirements to the stakeholders.
c) Demonstrate the ability to effectively analyse, design and develop information systems using Unified Modelling Language (UML) models.
Weighting 30%
Total Marks marks
Task Summary
In response to the case study provided, identify the functional and the non-functional requirement for the required information system and then build a Use Case Diagram and document set of use cases.
Context
System analysis methods and skills are of fundamental importance for a Business Analyst. This assessment allows you to enhance your system analysis skills by capturing the business and then functional and non-functional requirement of a system. It helps you in identifying “what” the proposed system will do and “how”?.
Instructions

1. Please read the attached MIS605_ Assessment 1_Case Study. Note that every piece of information provided in the following case serves a purpose.
2. Once you have completed reading the case study. Please answer the following questions:
   Question 1 (10 mark).
   Identify all the human and non-human actors within the system. Provide brief description against every actor.
   Question 2 (30 marks).
   Using the information provided in the case study, build a Use Case Diagram using any diagramming software.
   Note: Please make assumptions where needed.
   Question 3 (60 marks).
   Document all use cases (use case methods). All use cases identified in the Use Case Diagram in Question 2 must be elaborated in detail. Please document each use case using the following template:
   Use Case Number
   Use Case Type Base/Abstract (Extends or Includes)
   Use Case Name
   Priority
   Actor Involved
   Associated Data Sources
   Associated User Interfaces
   Pre-Condition(s)
   Post Condition(s)
   Detailed
   Description
   Normal Course of Events Using a
   Flow Chart
   Diagram
   Alternate
   Course(s)
   Word Count and Layout
   • The total word count for the written assessment should be no more than 2000 words.
   • Please provide all your answers in a MS word document.
   • Please note that you are NOT required to copy the questions over to the MS Word document.
   Use the question number to indicate which question your answer relates to. • The recommended font size is 12 with 1.5 spacing.
   Referencing
   It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing if needed. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
   Submission Instructions
   Please submit the written assessment via the Assessment link within Assessment 1. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
   Marking Criteria F P C D HD
   Question 1: Identify all the human and non-human actors within the system. Provide brief description against every actor.
   10% Actors identified are largely incorrect. Actors identified are partially incorrect. Actors identified are correct but sufficient detail is not provided. Actors identified are correct and sufficient detail is provided. Actors identified are correct and sufficient detail is provided. The student has clear understanding of human and nonhuman actors.
   Question 2: Using the information provided in the case study, build a Use Case Diagram using any diagramming software.
   30% UCD does not include major use cases, many actors in the UCD are missing, association of base and abstract actors is not given with the use cases, extends and includes are not identified where required and not linked to base use case. The use case diagram does not sync in well with the requirements laid down in the case study. UCD misses some important use cases, some actors in the UCD are missing, some associations of base and abstract actors are not given with the use cases, extends and includes are partially identified (where required). Extends and includes and not appropriately linked to the base use cases. The use case diagram does not fully sync with the requirements laid down in the case study. UCD has all the use cases and actors, some associations of base and abstract actors are not given with the use cases, extends and includes are partially identified (where required). Extends and includes are not appropriately linked to the base use cases. The use case diagram largely syncs with the requirements laid down in the case study. UCD has all the use cases and actors, associations of base and abstract actors are given with the use cases, extends and includes are identified (where required). Extends and includes and not appropriately linked to the base use cases. The use case diagram syncs in completely with the requirements laid down in the case study. UCD has all the use cases and actors, associations of base and abstract actors are given with the use cases, extends and includes are identified (where required). Extends and includes and appropriately linked to the base use cases. The use case diagram syncs in completely with the requirements laid down in the case study.
   MIS605_Assessment 1_Brief_written Assessment Page 4 of 5
   Marking Criteria F P C D HD
   Question 3: Document all use cases (use case methods).
   60% Use case descriptions are incomplete and do not sync in with the given case study. Use case descriptions are partially incomplete and do not fully sync in with the given case study. Use case descriptions are complete but do not fully sync in with the given case study. Use case descriptions are complete and are in sync in with the given case study. Use case descriptions are complete, detailed and are in sync in with the given case study.
   MIS605_Assessment 1_Brief_written Assessment Page 5 of 5

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

• Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
• Timely Delivery– capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
• Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
• Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
• Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
• Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Misuse of Department Property

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts