Provide an overview of your two most promising articles.
· Restate the Goal of your Proposed Program for the readers, then
· Using APA style manual, provide a correct citation for each article.
· In your own words (I will be watching and checking), provide an overview or summary of the major points and conclusions as demonstrated in the article.
· Specifically, why was this article helpful to you? What strategies do you plan to use from it in the design of your own program? What makes you think your program will show similar success to the article you read about?
· If there are differences in the two situations (problem, people, location, etc.) in your program to the ones addressed in the article, either what will you do to overcome those differences or why do you believe the strategy should still work?
Anide
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry
2018, Voi. 15(2) 243-261 © The Author(s) 2018
Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
Christian Education as Discipleship Formation
DOI: 10.1 177/0739891318778859 journals.sagepub.com/home/cej
®SAGE William F. Cox Jr Regent University, VA, USA
Robert A. Peck The Samuel School, Harrisburg, PA, USA
Abstract To be true to its name-sake, the academic focus of Christian education should be in service to discipleship, not vice versa. Only discipleship formation equips for the eternal transcendent issue of life. Christian discipleship expectations for home, church, and school settings are elaborated under seven biblical mandates: Dominion Mandate, populate the earth, self-governance, the First Greatest Commandment, the two parts of the Second Greatest Commandment (love self and love others), and the Great Commission.
Keywords discipleship, Christian, education, Bible
Introduction Christian discipleship is a major, all-encompassing theme of the Bible – Old and New Testaments alike. Pivotally articulated in the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18- 20 ), it addresses all dimensions of life, is deeply grounded in teaching and mentor- ing, and applies to practically all age levels. Its content includes but is not limited to expectations such as comprehensive Bible knowledge, witnessing strategies, inter- personal relationships, apologetic skills, logical reasoning, world/life-view integra- tion, parenting, teaching, personal integrity, spiritual warfare, faith-learning integration, stewardship of creation, sustained allegiance, miracles, and so on. In effect, the formation of Christian disciples is essentially about equipping for the
Corresponding author: William F. Cox Jr., Regent University, 1000 Regent University Dr, Virginia Beach, VA 23464, USA. Email: wallcox@regent.edu
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry 15(2)244
highest order citizenship both on earth and in heaven, namely the kingdom of God (Matt. 13:11; Eph. 2:19; 1 Pet. 2:9). To compartmentalize discipleship as a subset of academics and/or minimize it is to short-change preparation for and thus participa- tion in this singular citizenship of inestimable value.
Equipping for discipleship’s 360 degree, 24/7 biblically-based lifestyle fully applies across the generations within the major formative institutions of home, church, and school (Graustein & Schultz, 1995). Regarding the home, the Bible calls parents to raise their children as unto the Lord (e.g., Deut. 6; Eph. 6:4; Ps. 78) and to disciple one another (Eph. 5:22-32). The church, whether in group venues (cf. Jn 7:15; Lk. 2:46) or individual mentoring (1 Tim. 1:18), carries its share of discipleship responsibilities. Christian education institutions, the third of what has been called the three-legged stool of Christian education, carry their responsibilities as part of the Church even if in non-ecclesiastical settings. Christian teacher and lexicographer Noah Webster captured the weightiness of discipleship equipping with his analogous observation that “The Education of youth, an employment of more consequence than making laws and preaching the gospel, because it lays the foundation on which both law and gospel rest for success” (Webster, 1828, cited in Slater, 1967, p. 12). Undoubtedly, Webster was claiming that education which lays such a foundation is more about forming the person than about teaching for only temporal competence.
Discipleship Minimized Comprehensive discipleship expectations notwithstanding, Christians in the United States are apparently rather deficient exemplars of discipleship fidelity. For exam- pie, a high percentage of youth leave the church once away from home (Ham & Beemer, 2009), sharing the Gospel is typically an intimidating effort for most Christians (Reid, 2017), two-thirds of the U.S. Christians surveyed by the Pew Research Center say many religions can lead to eternal life, and most of them say some non-Christian religions can lead to life everlasting (2015), pornography has a significant grip on pastors (CBN News, 2016), and biblical literacy among Chris- tians is low (Mohler, 2016).
Discipleship scholar Dallas Willard (1998) pointedly addressed this plight with the observation that few Christians have intentionally made the decision to live like Jesus (p. 297). Most, he claims, think no further about their Christianity than that it is “fire insurance” against going to hell (p. 37). And of the contemporary Christian, he says, “he or she has no compelling sense that understanding of and conformity with the clear teachings of Christ is of any vital importance to [their] life and certainly not in any way essential… Such obedience is regarded as out of the question or impossible” (1998, front cover). Similarly, Willard (2006) claims, “I know of no current denomination or local congregation that has a concrete plan and practice for teaching people to do ‘all things whatsoever I have commanded you’” (pp. 72-73).
245Cox and Peck
The prevalence of this orientation by Christians is referenced by Hull’s (2006) synonymous terms “two-tier Christianity” and “non-discipleship Christianity” (p. 41).
Quite possibly, a causative factor for the low discipleship status of Christians relates to the fact that approximately 80 percent of children from U.S. Christian homes attend public schools (Newman, 2017) where biblically based discipleship equipping is forbidden yet where discipleship in the oppositional life-view of humanism reigns (Cox, 2013; Cox, 2014a). Even when Christian schools are con- sidered as potentially valuable, administrators report that the predominant question of parents is whether their children will be equipped by that school to enter a reputable college. In other words, Christian discipleship is apparently low on the list of parental aspirations for their children (which doesn’t speak well of parents’ own discipleship maturity!). In turn, out of financial necessity, academically related priorities in Christian schools tend to prevail over discipleship related priorities.
Encouragement regarding the contribution of Christian schools toward disciple- ship comes from Simmons (2012/2013), former president of the Association of Christian Schools International. He believes that “everything that the school does should be within the context of discipleship to Jesus Christ” (p. 1). Even so, there is a lack of published research on the practice of and outcomes from discipleship in Christian schools (Alarid, 2015; Allotta, 2013) and likewise regarding the interest of school leadership in that activity (Frye, 2017).
This matter of discipleship is especially crucial for children for at least the following three reasons (cf. Matt. 18:3, 19:14). (1) Bible text and the educational receptivity of humans reveal that learners are most impressionable and teachable in the early years of life (cf. Lk. 1:41-44; Moll, 2014; Tough, 2012; Vemy, 1981; 2 Tim. 3:15). (2) From a biblical and Jewish historical perspective, children were prepared beforehand for the teen years’ onset of adulthood (cf. Barclay, 1959; Lk. 2:42-44; Isa. 7:15). (3) The likelihood of becoming a Christian is highest during the school age years, diminishing significantly thereafter (Bama, 2017; Culbertson, 2015).
Discipleship and/or Education At creation, God’s first expectation of Adam and Eve to produce others in their, and thus in His image (Genesis 28b), marked the beginning of Christian discipleship. Subsequently, because of the sin-contamination of human nature and environmental orderliness, intentional academic equipping necessarily became an integral part of discipleship. In New Testament times, the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18-20) in effect links discipleship activities to Dominion Mandate, related competencies (e.g., literacy). For instance, how to teach, read and understand God’s Word are among the methods for and outcomes of discipleship formation.
Historically, a predominant rationale for Christian schools has been that bibli- cally infused academics will lead to developing the qualities of Christ in students. A reasonable assumption: biblical accounts of discipleship equipping essentially occur
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry 15(2)246
within academically related content such as enumeration (e.g., Matt. 15:32-38, 16:9- 10), logical reasoning (e.g., Mk 3:25), construction of buildings (e.g., Jn 6:48), and reading and writing (e.g., Jn 10:26). Exemplifying that perspective, great scientists (e.g., Einstein, Faraday, Galileo, Newton) professed the desire to study creation for the very purpose of understanding the mind of Christ (Dao, 2009). Accordingly, it is rather typical for Christian schools to advertise that they are “Christ-centered”. Paradoxically, the exponential increase in contemporary understandings of the mys- teries of the universe through research, inventions, science, and technology has generally not been accompanied by a connected, public acknowledgment of com- mensúrate understandings of God’s mind. Instead, the contemporary culture is increasingly departing from even believing in the God of creation (Ham & Beemer, 2009; Hetland, 2011 ; McDowell, 2006), at the same time that the scientific potential for “understanding” God’s mind is increasing and thus where his reputation should be spreading. Over time, however, this interdependence of discipleship and equip- ping for temporal dominion-taking has significantly blurred their relative impor- tance. Clarifying this interdependency is what this article is about.
Elaborating further, an Internet search on the phrase “discipleship education” reflects a bifurcation of discipleship and education even though from a biblical perspective they are not separate entities. It is not as if discipleship programs don’t exist. As the search revealed, there are a number of discipleship programs at the university (e.g., Biola University, Liberty University, Regent University) and insti- tute (e.g., C.S. Lewis Institute, Navigators, Youth with a Mission) levels. But it is relatively rare that Christian education for adults organically incorporates disciple- ship within academic and professional programs much less makes discipleship the guiding conceptual framework.
Throughout this article, the case is made that discipleship formation should be the foundational focus of Christian education. In support of that perspective, the article closes with a detailed description of the educational implications of biblically based discipleship expectations, categorized within seven high-order “mandates” from God.
Rationale for Discipleship Education Arguably, intellectually focused activities regarding knowing and understanding the Scriptures (Jn 5:39-40) are not the prime biblically recommended way toward knowing God and being His disciple. Indeed, knowledge about God that results from academic/intellectual attainments is qualitatively different from personally and experientially knowing Him. Biographical accounts such as of the wisest human who ever lived – Solomon (1 Kings 4:13); the person likely first to be filled with the Holy Spirit – Bezalel (Exod. 31:3); more recently the humble slave turned great scientist – George Washington Carver (Federer, 2002); and most recently the famed neurosur- geon – Ben Carson (Carson & Murphy, 1990) suggest that relationship with God may even precede rather than follow intellectual attainments resulting from the
247Cox and Peck
search for God. Augustine’s quote – “believe so that you may understand” (Nash, 1994, p. 88) – nicely captures this orientation.
Relationship with Academics
True, the Dominion Mandate established at creation (Gen. 1:26, 28) “legitimizes” the academic aspects of education for understanding and thus governing creation (i.e., the non-human environment). But that is not the same thing as saying that academics for temporal dominion-taking axiomatically results in a better under- standing of and a personal relationship with God. In fact, there is little evidence from Christian schools, homes or churches to support the belief that intellectually motivated understandings about God’s creation enable, intentionally and eviden- tially, a closer relationship with Him. The general lack of evidence regarding the union of competencies derived from earth-focused schooling (i.e., Dominion Man- date related academics) and student Christ-likeness (i.e., disciple formation) opens the question of what is being done in existing Christian education institutions (i.e., home, school, and church) to develop that fully-orbed interconnectivity.
Obviously, the frequently expressed claim of Christian education institutions that they are “Christ-centered” needs clarification. It might mean, for instance, that Christ taught the same kind of subjects typically taught in such academically oriented institutions. Evidently not the case, perhaps the phrase about being Christ-centered is instead saying that the discipleship teachings Jesus was regularly promoting is exactly what these contemporary educational institutions are likewise doing. This is not likely the case either since there is very little evidence that Christian educational institutions that fly the banner of being Christ-centered even conceptualize their endeavors in a superordinate discipleship paradigm. In either case, the expression “Christ-centered education” is strained since Jesus did not come primarily for, nor promote, nor die for academics, labor saving inventions, scientific/ technological advances, and other similar naturalistic endeavors. The beneficial aspects of Christian education notwithstanding, academics are not promoted in the Bible as the recommended route to discipleship formation as expected by Jesus.
Clarifying further, Christian education institutions err when they biblically justify their academics on words in the New Testament such as mind, understanding, knowledge, and wisdom. In context (context being a prime biblical hermeneutic), these words relate more to moral, relational, and life-style matters rather than to intellectual equipping. For example, interpreting the renewing of the mind passage in Rom. 12:2 as biblical support for the academic aspect of Christian education, as some Christian educators do, is problematic. In context, examples of the renewed mind in subsequent verses 3 through 8 focus on Christian living rather than on essentially intellectual endeavors. Additionally, in this same context, the emphasis on “mind” in the New Testament (NKJV) often refers to intrapersonal matters such as a sound mind (Mk 5:15), inclination and purpose (Rom. 8:17), and deep thought (Matt. 22:37). Similarly, the word “know” often refers to interpersonal matters such
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry 15(2)248
as knowing Jesus (e.g., Eph. 1:17, 18, NKJV), and experiencing His attributes of power and the fellowship of His sufferings (Phil. 3:10). Quite possibly the mis- construal of the meaning of these words is related to the argued misconstrual about discipleship in Christian education. That is, learning about and knowing how to manage the natural, temporal creation of God apparently is rarely if ever taught in the Bible as the essence of Christian discipleship.
Discipleship Priority in Christian Education
The word Christian in the New Testament (Acts 11:26, 26:28; 1 Pet. 4:16) means follower of Christ, i.e. “little Christs.” In effect, these expressions signify that Christians are to demonstrate the nature of their elder brother Jesus who himself demonstrates the nature of Father God (Jn 10:30, 14:9). Accordingly, Christian education is about far more than just academics; it is ultimately about discipleship!
The inherent connection between education and discipleship is made very clear by Jesus’ command to His disciples (Matt. 28:18-20, NKJV): “Go therefore and make disciples, teaching them…” (emphasis added). They were to do what He did (Jn 14:12, 15:16, 17:18). Reiterating the main point of this article, important as academics are in Christian education, the more important focus, both temporally and eternally, has to be discipleship formation. And this age-unlimited expectation is incumbent upon all three formative institutions of home, church, and school.
The following seven biblical orientations address the relative priority valuing of discipleship formation rather than academics as the foundational basis of Christian education. First and foremost, as expressed in the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18), Jesus commanded discipleship. Second, an obvious ultimate source in the Old Tes- tament for understanding the natural and human environment was not primarily humans but God Himself (cf. 2 Chron. 1:12). Third, when Jesus met temporal needs it was, at least in the recorded accounts, most often not by way of the natural but by the supernatural (e.g., catching fish – Jn 21:6, making bread – Mk 6:41-44, produc- ing wine – Jn 2:9, healing physical afflictions – Lk. 17:19, and freeing from demonic torment – Mk 4:16). Fourth, important and as necessary as they are, temporally oriented academic accomplishments are in fact transitory since they will be destroyed, this final time by fire (Gen. 7:21-23; 2 Pet. 3:7, 10-13). Fifth, since the full liberation of creation from the bondage of decay will happen only when the sons of God are revealed (Rom. 8:19-23), the Dominion Mandate, even with all the benefits of academic success, takes a lower place than identity focused discipleship. Sixth, by virtue of carrying His name, Christian education should have His own pre- eminent high order focus regarding “making” disciples for Kingdom living (cf. Matt. 6:10). Seventh, Christian education is misguided without a focus on Christian dis- cipleship qualities such as cooperating with the Holy Spirit, intimacy with Jesus, and unconditionally loving others. In fact, without evidence of these qualities, excellence of academics, since attainable also by non-Christians, does not qualify as the high water mark of Christian discipleship.
249Cox and Peck
One more issue needs to be discussed, however, prior to directly addressing the content of discipleship education. This issue helps contextualize the crucial nature of inter- and intra-relationships. In fact, this issue undergirds the very essence of dis- cipleship formation.
Relationship Basis
The strong emphasis on teaching and educating in the Bible would seemingly be accompanied by some clear how-to-educate type prescriptions. However, while the Bible gives numerous admonitions about the necessity of biblically infused educa- tion (e.g., Deut. 4:9, 6:7; Eph. 6:4; Ps. 78:1-7), it gives no explicit educational methodology regarding how to carry out those highly consequential admonitions. For instance, there are few if any guidelines in the Bible regarding how to differ- entiate the teaching of various kinds of content, age levels of learners, learning and teaching styles, or environmental settings – all of which are posited by educators as necessary elements in educational prescriptions (Murray, 1989). This biblical absence of prescriptive methodology seems to be a serious omission in light of the fact that the nature of education people receive will likely affect their entire lives, if not also their eternal destiny.
Not a God who leaves His people without essential guidance, the reality is that He has very amply provided the understandings for quality educational methods. Point- ing us in that direction are various accounts (e.g., Collins & Tamarkin, 1982; Comer, 2004; Cox, 2014b; Omish, 1998) documenting that the most important understand- ing about education is that it is a relationship-embedded endeavor. As Yale univer- sity professor Comer (2004) repeatedly declared, the reason for his huge success as an educator is captured in three words – “relationship, relationship, relationship” (p. xiii). And as celebrated inner-city educator Collins (Collins & Tamarkin, 1982) similarly explained regarding her success in teaching disadvantaged children: “The one thing all children finally wanted was the chance to be accepted for themselves, to feel some self-worth. Once they felt it, children became addicted to learning, and they had the desire to leam forever” (p. 92). Relationally based authentication is key!
Specifically, relational love is highly efficacious regarding the impact and mean- ingfulness of educational activities (Cox, 2014b). Conversely, the absence or oppo- site of loving relationships is invariably deleterious to all human endeavors including education (cf. Prov. 15:1, 18:21, 25:11, 25:15). Commensurately, the Bible gives very clear directives regarding human relationships. For instance, by virtue of being created in the image and likeness of Him who is love, a highly significant quality of human nature is that humans are created to love, to desire love ( 1 Jn 4:8,16), and to be nurtured by love both administered and received. As a case in point, it wasn’t until the disciples were healed by Jesus of their relationally based hard-heartedness that they could then leam what He was teaching them (cf. Mk 6:52, 7:18, 8:17). Plainly stated, relationship is the central aspect of education. Paraphras- ing Bible text, the gaining of temporal wisdom and learning the secrets of creation
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry 15(2)250
(both obviously connected to education), as well as operating in the power of biblically based faith and speaking in the tongue of angels (connecting uniquely to Christian education) all amount to very little – in fact “nothing” in God’s economy without relational love (1 Cor. 13:1-13).
So far, three major issues have been discussed. One, even though directly com- manded by Jesus, discipleship development (in the United States) seems to be minimally valued. Next, the two formal Christian institutions of Church and Chris- tian education, separately or jointly, give little evidence of intentional discipleship formation. Three, love-based, interpersonal relationship seems to be the unacknow- ledged but powerful key element for discipleship integrity. Mindful of the discipleship-relevant principle (cf. Prov. 18:21) regarding the power of the tongue (and quill and keyboard), the remainder of this article is devoted to speaking posi- tivity into the matter of Christian discipleship.
Focus Points for Re-conceptualizing Discipleship Education
Context and Task
Before the fall of mankind, Adam and Eve lived within the context of right relation- ships (i.e., with God, self, others, and nature – Gen. 1:31). Within that context, a major task given to them by God was to steward the non-human environment – often called the Dominion Mandate (Gen. 1:26, 28). The word “task” is appropriate since work (“till” – Strong’s OT 5647, i.e. to work or dress – Gen. 2:5 KJV) needed to be done to the ground (and metaphorically to all of life) and needed the assistance of a helper (“help meet” – Strong’s OT 5828, i.e. help – Gen. 2:18 KJV). It can be argued that doing the Dominion Mandate task of naming the animals was effectually in service to the larger relationship issue of aloneness (Gen. 2:18-24). Important as it was to manage the earth for God, being created in His image by Him suggests a higher-dimensioned, interpersonal relationship purpose for humanity. Specifically, the first command (Gen. 1:28) given to Adam and Eve was supremely relational. (The hermeneutical principle of “first mention” tells us this first ordering is very important – Hartill, 1960.) Regarding the importance of relationship, this first man- date originated out of relationship, promoted conjugal/familial relationship, and multiplied relationship via population expansion. Far more important than managing the non-human environment, God wanted that all the earth would increasingly be populated by humans who live in a “very good” (cf. Gen 1:31, NKJV; 2 Pet. 3:9) relationship with Him and secondarily with all image bearers.
However, after the Fall, the context and the task were severely altered – in a sense reversed. Adam and Eve’s (and humanity’s) primary task was no longer dominion- taking but instead restoration of the various dimensions of relationship that were lost at the Fall, particularly with God but also with self and others (cf. the three parts of the Two Greatest Commandments). And the context was no longer the enjoyment of intra- and interpersonal relationships but instead engagement in Dominion Mandate
251Cox and Peck
activities over a deteriorating natural environment. Given the first-order purpose of effecting the still relevant pre-Fail priority of a family-of-God populous, adminis- tration of the Dominion Mandate thus became the medium or occupying activity within which God-family enhancements occur (cf. Lk. 19:13). This “reversal” per- spective is signaled by the fact that Jesus came for relationship restoration – not primarily for easing the sometimes extremely arduous task (both practically and metaphorically) of “tilling” the cursed soil. Figuratively expressed, Dominion Man- date related activities are akin to being the occupying activity or “transportation” that carries individuals to the larger valued purpose or “destination” of family of God restoration. This re-ordered context and task continues until Jesus returns.
Doing and Being
No matter how excellently accomplished, doing the Dominion Mandate of softening the hard ground of earth does not guarantee a softening of the hard heart of sin- riddled mankind. Likewise, doing the far more important interpersonal relationship focused expectations in the Bible (e.g., Ten Commandments, Beatitudes) misses the point if they are not addressed as a function of being in relationship with God. Humanity’s ongoing inherent inability to be in right relationship with God indicates that, as Job lamented (Job 9:33,16:20-21, 19:25-26), a divine Redeemer-Mediator is needed.
Moreover, Jesus came primarily to reveal the nature of the Father (Jn 14:9). Being singularly self-validating (“I AM WHO I AM” – Exod. 3:14, NKJV), all others created in His image are absolutely needful of having their veritable beings valí- dated/authenticated by Him. Christian living is therefore more about being with Jesus than about doing for Jesus. Yes, Jesus came to do the will of the Father (Matt. 6:10, 26:39) but that doing was centered in the more important matter of being interconnected with the Father through the Holy Spirit. In fact, the destruction of the works of Satan (1 Jn 3:8) was not God’s primary “assignment” for Jesus; it was instead that all humanity have the opportunity of being in right relationship with the Holy Trinity (Jn 3:16).
The doing that pleases God is being intimate with Him – that is after all the heart of the Father. Doing then is embedded within being in that right relationship. Jesus, in fact, enabled the possibility of that relationship status for all people – no exception! The ultimate purpose of God for all people is that they be like His Son (Rom. 13), in whose image humanity was originally created. Life is ultimately all about son-ship development – both personally and relationally. This is to say that interpersonal relationships that authenticate the fullness of one’s divinely intended identity and destiny (Cooke, 2016) are the context, the means, and the essence of life. The phrase, “I am becoming who I am” succinctly captures this perspective. Thus, Christian/discipleship education should be about the business of reinforcing the God-created, Jesus-validated identity of each student and equipping them for their temporal and eternal destiny.
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry 15(2)252
Doing from being. Consider Paul. Initially living from a works oriented religiousness, Paul was the most fervent Pharisee of his time (Phil. 3:4-6). At that point in time, his doing was not motivated from being in relationship with Jesus but from a legalistic, rule-keeping, obligatory duty-to-God belief system. Thus, his perfectionistic attainments within that rigid system counted as nothing regarding his relationship with God.
The implication for Christian discipleship education is that it should focus the student’s affections on God (as enraptured lovers reciprocally do) rather than pri- marily on lifeless academics. The ongoing temptation, however, is to direct the minds of students (and parents, pastors, and teachers) into doing supposed God- validated, intellectual accomplishments. Paul, after conversion, sets the example for Christian education by aligning his zealousness with the Holy Spirit. From his changed “being”, his doing likewise positively changed regarding how he lived his life (Phil. 3:7-9).
All of this is to say that doing, as often interpreted in Christian education as accomplishing the Dominion Mandate and living by biblical rules, does not neces- sarily equate to discipleship formation. This is crucial since intimacy with God is His prime desire for all humans (Jn 15:4). And by virtue of being in an intimate rela- tionship with God, the Holy Spirit can align the heart of a person to desire to accomplish (i.e., do) based on a sincere love for God. As seen initially with Peter’s initial, legalistically based resistance to God (Acts 10:9-16), external assistance may be necessary to motivate Christians to release strongholds and to be free of bon- dages. As also with Peter, being a Christian does not always mean that what one does results from a loving heart for God but can be the result of a legalistic duty-bound motivation even after being Spirit-filled (cf. Gal. 2:11-14).
Whereas “being” fully in God authenticates the very nature of a person, both concepts of being and doing are necessary for understanding Christian/discipleship education. Doing as unto the Lord can feasibly become internalized thereby result- ing in being progressively transformed into God’s image (cf. Phil. 2:12). Ultimately, all that is done for God should flow out of love for Him as opposed to legalistic duty, compulsion, or obligation. To love someone means wanting to accompany or always be with that person. And accompaniment with God naturally happens when doing His will His way because His expectations literally reflect His own character and nature. This is especially important in the equipping process in Christian education for becoming more and more like Jesus.
Being requires doing. There is a cautionary caveat in all of this. That is, while doing does not guarantee righteousness, being – even in relationship with God – is incom- píete without doing. As James noted, faith without works is dead (Jas 2:14-26). This is to say that while doing academics for God-ordained, Dominion Mandate excel- lence does not guarantee God’s favor, being in right relationship with Him inher- ently results in doing. For instance, Abraham, Moses, and Peter were called to do something because of being in personal relationship with God. But even further,
253Cox and Peck
doing even in right relationship with God that does not come from the power of His presence (i.e., incamational being) is likely a religious activity rather than relation- ship based activity. Paraphrasing Johnson (2006), lovers of God are more fruitful and fulfilled than workers for God (p. 26).
Son-ship
There is yet another aspect of Christian discipleship formation worthy of discussion. Generally speaking, God had only one Son – He wanted many, many more (cf. Heb. 12:5-9; Rom. 8:15)! Elaborating, the Genesis pre-Fail creation and post-flood accounts (Gen. 1:28a and 9:1) speak about a world populated with sons and daugh- ters of God who naturally and intimately communed with Him. Clearly an impos- sible task in the natural order of life, Jesus restores the broken Father-son/daughter relationship, calling again for all people to come into that relationship. In fact, the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18-20) and Jesus’ last words to His disciples (e.g., Jn 17:21) reiterate the son-ship expectations of the pre-Fail Genesis account. Just as young earthly children want to imitate their parents, Jesus modeled that orientation by saying (Jn 12:49) and doing (Jn 5:19) only what the Father respectively said and did. That is, the son-ship expectation that God has on all humans and as Jesus personalized with His words of invitation is “follow me” (Matt. 19:21, NKJV).
This concept of son-ship is laden with implications for discipleship. In fact, discipleship thinking means understanding the term “son-ship” as a generic identity for all children of God (cf. Rom. 8:15-18). As His offspring, they carry qualities of highest order nobility. They are, for instance, saints (Eph. 1:18), accepted in the Beloved (Eph. 1:6), blameless before God (Eph. 1:4), chosen (Jn 15:19), heirs to the throne (Rev. 3:21), royalty (1 Pet. 2:9), citizens of a holy nation (1 Pet. 2:9), and official representatives of Him (2 Cor. 5:20). All this likely being unfamiliar terri- tory, students need to be taught and infused with this identity. At the same time they also need to be prepared for suffering (Phil. 3:10), to accept persecution joyfully (Jas 1:2; Jn21:18-19; Matt. 5:10-12; 1 Pet. 4:12; 1 Thess. 5:16-18) and to be ready to die ungrudgingly for their King (Rev. 12:11c).
Biblical Mandates for Discipleship Education In answer to the logical question “What kind of education would warrant calling it by Christ’s name,” this section of the article develops a conceptual structure of biblical mandates for fully identifying the biblical expectations and thus educational implications of Christian discipleship.
The best way to determine what education should be like to warrant calling it by Christ’s name is to ask “What did Jesus teach and do?” The essential answer: He brought God’s Kingdom to earth by, for instance: healing (Matt. 4:23-24), delivering from the demonic (Matt. 17:14-18), practicing justice (Lk. 4:18-19), teaching about the Kingdom (Matt. 5-7; Acts 1:3), inviting membership into God’s Kingdom
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry 15(2)254
family (Jn 3:3-7), mentoring disciples (Jn 5:19-20), accessing the spiritual realm (Jn 13:21), demonstrating love (Jn 11:5, 36, 44), feeding the poor (Matt.l4:19), and promoting the Beatitudes, the Two Greatest Commandments and the Great Com- mission (Matt. 5:3-12, 22:37-40, 28:18-20). Perhaps most important, He came to reveal the Father (Jn 14:9)! It seems reasonable then that education named after Him (i.e., Christian education) should substantially replicate what He did and what He equipped His disciples to know and to do while on earth. This then would reasonably constitute education for discipleship; i.e. equipping His disciples for what He expressly modeled and then commissioned them to likewise do (Acts 1:8). The documented lack of emphasis on Christian discipleship formation indicates re- conceptualization is needed across the three venues of home, church, and school.
Re<onceptualizing
A recommended initial step toward re-conceptualizing the nature of discipleship equipping involves identifying the major biblically-based expectations incumbent upon all believers. Overall, it seems reasonable that all such mandates invariably fit under the epitome expectation “Be Holy.” This mandate, found in both the Old (Lev. 19:2) and New Testament (1 Pet. 1:15), relates to being in close relationship with God and demonstrating the “fruit” of that relationship. More specifically, in both the Old and New Testaments, to “Be Holy” meant to be set apart, unique, and distinct from the non-believers’ lifestyle. To “Be Holy” connotes imitating and being in service to God. In the Old Testament, “Holiness is to effect every area of Israelite life” (ESV footnote to Lev. 18:1-22:33). The New Testament reflects the heart orientation of Jesus by enriching that term “holy” to include righteous, not just ritual, significance. “Its fundamental ideas are separation, consecration, devotion to God and sharing in God’s purity and abstaining from earth’s defilement” (Zodhi- ates, 1992; 1 Pet. 1:15, Strong’s NT #40). Clearly, holiness addresses both inner qualities and outward behaviors. Equally clear, the concept of holiness is the highest label for comprehensively incorporating all other discipleship qualities. The wonder of it all, Christ died to present us holy to the Father (Col. 1:22).
Subsumed under that “Be Holy” superordinate category are the following seven prescriptive mandates: Dominion Mandate (Gen. 1:28b), populate the earth (Gen. 1:28a), self-governance (Gen. 2:17), love God (Matt. 22:37), love self (Matt. 22:39), love your neighbor (Matt. 22:39), and the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18-20). Each of these mandates carry discipleship expectations that are deeply foundational and highly amenable to the education of Christian disciples. In effect, these biblical charges are discipleship fulfillment pathways. They are presented in a somewhat biblical chronological order – not necessarily by priority order. Each mandate is then subdivided into subsections of discipleship that can be specifically and intentionally customized for home, church, and school settings. Given the wide range of venues wherein discipleship can occur, the products of customization are likely to vary widely even within the following touchstone expectations.
255Cox and Peck
Aspects of Holiness (Being and Doing) Seven major charges or mandates follow from being in righteous relationship with God.
Rule over God’s Creation (Dominion Mandate – Genesis 1:22, 28)
This mandate (initially and subsequently) focuses on stewardship over the material, that is, the non-human environment. Thus, Christian education should emphasize these essential discipleship qualities:
1. Gaining competence in temporal dominion-taking (Gen. 1:27-28; 3:17-19) 2. Providing opportunities to continue His work (Jn 14:12) of supematurally
governing the material world as, for instance, in meeting material needs through earning a livelihood (Lk. 5:4-6 – through divine revelation), multi- plying food to feed the hungry (Mk 6:37 – other than agriculturally), and calming storms to prevent loss of life (Mk 4:39-40 – other than meteorolo- gically) (cf. Otis, 1999 & 2001).
Be Fruitful, Multiply and Fill the Earth (Genesis 1:26, 28; 9:1, 7)
God intends that the human procreative act embedded within His divinely inspired marriage covenant will lead to filling the earth with His image bearing children. That this was the very first mandate to humanity suggests that all else is affected by it (e.g., children flourish in a healthy marital atmosphere; humanity thrives on popu- lation growth – cf. Girgis, Anderson, & George, 2012). Thus, Christian education should emphasize these essential discipleship qualities:
1. Equipping men as future husbands to start a new line of authority separate from their respective parents (Gen. 2:24).
2. Equipping women for switching from being under parental to being under husband headship (Gen. 2:24).
3. Encouraging future husbands and wives (and their existing parents) in their responsibility for birthing and raising their children according to God’s ways and standards (Deut. 6:4-7).
4. Teaching children to be fully obedient to their parents (Eph. 6:1-3). 5. Training humans in certain social and cultural responsibilities in the post-Fail
era which typically is addressed by the term cultural mandate (cf. 2 Chron. 1:10).
6. Intentionally developing spiritual sons and daughters as part of populating the earth in the post-Fail era (i.e., disciple or personhood development as addressed in the Great Commission – Matt. 28:18-20).
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry 15(2)256
Exercise Self-Governance under God (Genesis 2:17)
This dual-focused mandate relates both to moral/relational governance (Gen. 2:17), and environmental stewardship (Gen. 2:20). Self-governance under Godly submis- sion is the center point of biblical obedience.
Essential Discipleship Qualities (Moral Relationship Focus)
Thus Christian education should emphasize:
1. Cultivating desire and action toward inner healing to be rid of all self- originating hindrances (e.g., un-forgiveness) to self-governance (1 Thess. 5:23).
2. Promoting awareness of the possibility of having acquired/received hin- drances to self-governance (Matt. 23:32).
3. Fostering self-governance under the Holy Spirit rather than exclusive self- directedness – the meekness Beatitude (Matt. 5:5; Gal. 5:25).
4. Having a knowledge of and commitment to the Word of God (Matt. 28:20). 5. Developing the belief that supernatural dominion over the spiritual realm is
possible and expected of Christians (Mk 6:13, 9:19-23). 6. Acquiring awareness of sin-related weaknesses (Heb. 12:1). 7. Growing resistance to temptations (1 Pet. 2:11). 8. Modeling a servanthood attitude and lifestyle (Matt. 5:41). 9. Equipping for obedience to authority (1 Pet. 2:13).
10. Training for submission to authority (Rom. 13:1) even if disobedience is biblically appropriate (Acts 4:19, 20; 5:29).
11. Providing an experiential understanding of liberty of choice with conse- quences (Deut. 28; Gal. 5:1).
12. Encouraging humility so that it replaces pride (Jas 4:6). 13. Developing thinking like Jesus morally & relationally (Rom. 12:2).
Essential Discipleship Qualities (Material Focus)
Thus Christian education should emphasize:
1. Encouraging perseverance at learning and discovering (Prov. 4:5). 2. Intentionally aligning students’ aptitudes with their calling trajectories (Isa.
11:2; Jer. 29:11). 3. Cultivating thinking that addresses environmental issues (1 Kgs 4:29). 4. Developing and practicing skills of environmental mastery (Prov. 14:23). 5. Nurturing faith in God regarding personal calling to specific environmental
masteries (cf. 1 Sam. 17:39). 6. Teaching belief that supernatural dominion over the natural realm is pos-
sible and expected of Christians (Mk 6:52, 8:17-21).
257Cox and Peck
7. Instructing toward competence (2 Cor. 3:5). 8. Developing initiative (cf. 1 Sam. 6:6-8). 9. Seeking wisdom (Eph. 1:17).
10. Providing guidance toward being teachable (2 Tim. 1:13). 11. Teaching literacy (cf. Acts 1:20). 12. Developing resource stewardship (Matt. 25:14-27).
Love God (First Great Commandment – Matthew 22:31)
This biblical mandate regarding loving God is His highest priority for all human activity. It places loving obedience to God higher than all personally initiated motives and actions. Even higher, it places relational love – being in fellowship with Him – higher than duty-driven, religious perfectionism. Thus, Christian edu- cation should emphasize these essential discipleship qualities:
1. Teaching adoration of God (Song of Sol. 1:4). 2. Modeling gratefulness to God (Col. 3:17). 3. Fostering absolute trust in God (Prov. 3:5). 4. Nurturing personal intimacy with God (Phil. 3:10). 5. Demonstrating rejoicing, praying and giving thanks in all things (1 Thess.
5:16-18). 6. Training to live, move, and be in Him (Acts 17:28). 7. Providing opportunities for worship (Jn 4:24). 8. Cultivating openness to the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:15-17). 9. Equipping to know Him, the fellowship of His sufferings, and to become
like Him in His death (Phil. 3:10; Rev. 12:11). 10. Interpreting every dilemma as an opportunity to get closer to God (Rom. 18:28).
Love Self (First Part of Second Greatest Commandment – Matthew 22:39)
While this may seem to some an inappropriate attitude for Christians to possess, the Bible supports it. For instance, the message in Rom. 12:3 is that when envisioned in the correct biblical perspective, love of self – if not too high – is good and which by implication also means not too low. The same balanced perspective on love of self is conveyed in the admonition to the husband to love his wife as he loves himself (Eph. 5:28). Thus, Christian education should emphasize these essential discipleship qualities:
1. Envisioning self and others as made in God’s image and as highly cherished by Him (Jn 3:16).
2. Training how to relate to self as God instructs us to relate to others (Matt. 7:12). 3. Guiding toward living true to the various names the Bible gives believers
(e.g., temple of the Holy Spirit, bride of Christ, saint, holy nation citizen).
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry 15(2)258
Love Neighbor (second part of Second Greatest Commandment – John 13:34; Matthew 22:39)
The Second Greatest Commandment actually goes beyond the imperfect standard of loving neighbor as self to the perfect standard of loving neighbor honorably and sacrificially just as God did and does (Jn 13:34, 15:12). Thus, Christian education should emphasize these essential discipleship qualities:
1. Practicing service (Gal. 5:13). 2. Displaying honor (1 Pet. 2:17). 3. Preferring others over self (Rom. 12:10). 4. Cultivating community (Jn 17:21). 5. Exercising forgiveness (Matt. 18:22).
Make Disciples (The Great Commission – Matthew 28:18-20)
This mandate gives highest meaning to the Two Greatest Commandments and the Dominion Mandate. It promotes the highest purpose of life since it most directly impacts eternity. Its focus is on son-ship development in God’s eternal family. Thus, Christian education should emphasize these essential discipleship qualities:
1. Equipping skillfulness in apologetics, logical thinking, hermeneutics, and biblical integration (1 Pet. 3:15).
2. Teaching Biblical literacy (2 Tim. 2:15). 3. Operating in Kingdom power (1 Cor. 4:20). 4. Developing a Biblical world view (1 Chron. 12:32). 5. Developing a renewed mind (Rom. 12:2). 6. Honoring Jewish roots (Rom. 11). 7. Embracing the Christian heritage (Heb. 12:1). 8. Developing a Christian legacy (Gal. 3:29; Heb. 12:1). 9. Living true to Holy Nation citizenship (1 Pet. 2:9).
10. Acknowledging unconditional acceptance in the Beloved (Eph. 1:6). 11. Submitted to authority (1 Pet. 2:13). 12. Banishing generational sins/curses (Matt. 23:32; Lk. 11:50). 13. Engaging in spiritual warfare (Eph. 6:11-18; Rev. 12:11). 14. Interceding (1 Tim. 2:1). 15. Accepting suffering (1 Thess. 5:18). 16. Employing spiritual gifts (1 Cor. 12-14). 17. Preparing for cosmic battle (2 Cor. 10:3-5). 18. Living in correct identity (Gal. 3:26-29). 19. Aligning with personal destiny (Eph. 1:4-2:10). 20. Exhibiting grace (Col. 4:6). 21. Living as royal son-ship (Heb. 12:6-9; 1 Pet. 2:9). 22. Teaching children to “make” disciples (Matt. 28:18-20).
259Cox and Peck
Conclusion An ultimate expectation Jesus had of His disciples was to “… deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me” (Mk 8:34, NKJV). Since “follow me” translates to doing what He did and wants to do through each and every Christian, the above discipleship qualities help equip for just that. Academics are a necessary aspect of Christian/discipleship education but from a biblical perspective they constitute the occupying context (or transportation vehicle) within which the more important dis- cipleship mandate (destination) occurs. Relational son-ship via intra- and inter- personal development is both the outcome and the method of equipping for Christian discipleship. Given that relationships which authenticate one’s God-given identity and destiny are key to discipleship, it is no accident that the chronologically first (Gen. 1:28) and the last (Jn 17:21; Matt. 28:18-20) biblical charge is that Christians mentor others in His image.
Helpful resources for accomplishing these charges for Christian discipleship in the K-12 educational setting include Discipleship in Education (Allotta, 2018), Kingdom Tools for Teaching (Mason et al., 2015) and Kingdom Education (Woods, 2014). Resources of a more general nature include The Love Languages of God (Chapman, 2002), The Nature of Freedom (Cooke, 2016), Teaching with Love & Logic (Fay & Funk, 1995), Absolute Surrender (Murray, 1982), and Keep Your Love On (Silk, 2013).
Two personal questions for the reader: Since we cannot give what we do not possess – How is your personal discipleship/son-ship development progressing and are you generously discipling others?
References Alarid, Μ. N. (2015). Discipleship of faculty at Christian schools (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA. Allotta, J. A. (2013). Discipleship in education: A plan for creating true followers of Christ in
Christian schools (Doctoral project). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1835&context=doctoral
Allotta, J. A. (2018). Discipleship in education. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. Barclay, W. (1959). Educational ideals in the ancient world. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book
House. Bama, G. (2017). Survey: Christians are not spreading the gospel. Retrieved from http://www.
georgebarna. com/research-flow/2017/11/30/survey-christians-are-not-spreading-the- gospel.
Carson, B., & Murphy, B. (1990). Gifted hands. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. CBN News. (2016). Pastors and pom: The straggle is real. Retrieved from http://wwwl.cbn.
com/cbnnews/us/2016/January /Pastors-and-Pom-The-struggle-is-Real. Chapman, G. (2002). The love languages of God. Chicago, IL: Northfield Publ. Collins, M., & Tamarkin, C. (1982). Marva Collins’ way. Los Angeles, CA: J.P. Tarcher, Inc. Comer, J. P., Jr. (2004). Leave no child behind. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/
Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry 15(2)260
Cooke, G. (2016). The nature of freedom. Vancouver, WA: Brilliant Book House. Cox, Wm F., Jr. (2013). Tyranny through public education. Maitland, FL: Xulon Press. Cox, Wm F., Jr. (2014a, Summer). Public or not – Education is functionally religious.
New Educational Foundations, 3, 13-28. Cox, Wm F., Jr. (2014b). Inconclusive teacher impact research: A biblical interpretation.
Christian Scholar’s Review, 43(3), 213-231. Culbertson, H. (2015). Age at which Americans become Christian. Retrieved from https://
home.snu.edu/ ~hculbert/ages.htm Dao, C.D. (2009). Thinking God’s thoughts after Him. Dallas, TX: Institute for Creation
Research. Fay, J., & Funk, D. (1995). Teaching with love & logic. Golden, CO: The Love and Logic
Press. Federer, Wm. J. (2002). George Washington Carver: His life & faith in his own words. St.
Louis, MO: Amerisearch, Inc. Frye, M. R. (2017). Discipleship perceptions and practices of K-12 Christian school principals
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation proposal). School of Education, Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA.
Girgis, S., Anderson, R. T., & George, R. P. (2012). What is marriage: Man and woman. A defense. New York: Encounter Books.
Graustein, A. W., & Schultz, G. L. (1995). Christian school education. In P. A. Kienel, Ο. E. Gibbs, & S. R. Berry (Eds.), Philosophy of Christian school education (pp. 457^178). Colorado Springs, CO: Association of Christian Schools.
Ham, K., & Beemer, B. (2009). Already gone. Green Forest, AR: Master Books. Hartill, J. E. (1960). Principles of biblical hermeneutics. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. Hetland, L. (2011). Seeing through heaven’s eyes. Shippensburg, PA: Destiny Image. Hull, B. (2006). The complete book of discipleship. Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress. Johnson, B. (2006). Dreaming with God. Shippensburg, PA: Destiny Image. Mason, J., Brown, L., Novosad, T., & Rust, S. (2015). Kingdom tools for teaching. San
Bernardino, CA: USA. McDowell, J. (2006). The last Christian generation. Holiday, FL: Green Key Books. Mohler, A. (2016). The scandal of biblical literacy: It’s our problem. Retrieved from https://
www.albertmohler.com/2016/01/20/the-scandal/-of-the-biblical-literacy-its-our-prob lem-4/.
Moll, R. (2014). What your body knows about God. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Press. Murray, A. (1982). Absolute surrender. New Kensington, PA: Whitaker House. Murray, F. B. (1989). Explanations in education. In M. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for
the beginning teacher (pp. 1-12). New York: Pergamon Press. Nash, R. H. (1994). Faith and reason. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. Newman, A. (2017). Christians urged to pull children from public schools. New American, 23
March. Retrieved from https://www.Thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/ 256575-christians-urged-to-pull-children-from-public-schools.
Ornish, D. (1998). Love and survival. New York, NY: HarperCollins. Otis, G. (1999). Transformations: A documentary. Lynnwood, WA: Sentinel Group.
http://www.albertmohler.com/2016/01/20/the-scandal/-of-the-biblical-literacy-its-our-prob
261Cox and Peck
Otis, G. (2001). Transformations II: The glory spreads. Lynnwood, WA: Sentinel Group. Pew Research Center. (2015). U.S. public becoming less religious. Retrieved from http://
www.pewforum.org/2015/ll/03/u-s-public-becoming-less-religious/ Reid, A. L. (2017). Sharing Jesus without freaking out. Nashville. TN: B & H Academic. Silk, D. (2013). Keep your love on. Redding, CA: Red Arrow Media. Simmons, B. S. (2012/2013). Heaven or Harvard? Christian School Comment, 44(2), 1-2. Slater, R. J. (1967). Noah Webster, Founding Father of American Scholarship and Education.
Preface in Noah Webster’s first edition An American dictionary of the English language. San Francisco, CA: Foundation for American Christian Education. Facsimile, ed. New York: G. & C. Merriam Co. Originally published in 1828.
Strong, J. (1890). Abingdon’s Strong’s exhaustive concordance of the Bible. Nashville, TN: Abington.
Tough, P. (2012). How children succeed. Boston, MA: Mariner Books. Vemy, T. (1981). The secret life of the unborn child. New York: Dell Publishing. Willard, D. (2006). The great omission. New York: HarperSanFrancisco. Willard, D. (1998). The divine conspiracy. New York: HarperCollins. Woods, D. (2014). Kingdom education. Fort Mill, SC: Momingstar Publ. Zodhiates S. (1992). The complete word study New Testament KJV (2nd ed.). Chattanooga,
TN: AMG Publications.
http://www.pewforum.org/2015/ll/03/u-s-public-becoming-less-religious/
License and Permissible Use Notice
These materials are provided to you by the American Theological Library Association (ATLA) in accordance with the terms of ATLA’s agreements with the copyright holder or authorized distributor of the materials, as applicable. In some cases, ATLA may be the copyright holder of these materials.
You may download, print, and share these materials for your individual use as may be permitted by the applicable agreements among the copyright holder, distributors, licensors, licensees, and users of these materials (including, for example, any agreements entered into by the institution or other organization from which you obtained these materials) and in accordance with the fair use principles of United States and international copyright and other applicable laws. You may not, for example, copy or email these materials to multiple web sites or publicly post, distribute for commercial purposes, modify, or create derivative works of these materials without the copyright holder’s express prior written permission.
Please contact the copyright holder if you would like to request permission to use these materials, or any part of these materials, in any manner or for any use not permitted by the agreements described above or the fair use provisions of United States and international copyright and other applicable laws. For information regarding the identity of the copyright holder, refer to the copyright information in these materials, if available, or contact ATLA at products@atla.com.
Except as otherwise specified, Copyright © 2016 American Theological Library Association
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com
MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER
CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com on Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry