Categories
Writers Solution

Peer-reviewed journal article published within the past 5 years that focuses on coaching philosophies

ARTICLE REVIEW ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

You will complete 2 Article Review Assignments in this course. For each review, choose 1 peer-reviewed journal article published within the past 5 years that focuses on coaching philosophies, models, concepts, frameworks, etc. Then, compose a 2-page review of it. You may want to choose articles that you might also use for your Coaching Philosophy Paper: Annotated Bibliography Assignment and Coaching Philosophy Paper: Final Assignment. Each review must include 2 sections:

1.   A summary of the article and

2.   A critical analysis of the article.

Your summary must include:

The purpose of the article AND

If applicable, a description of participants/sample, research design, methods, and results OR

If applicable, an overview of the conceptual ideas proffered in the paper (if not an empirical study).

Your analysis must include:

Opportunities for further research not already stated in the article.

Application to your context of coaching, both philosophical and practical.

Other original insight or criticism.

Implications of the findings and/or concepts.

Please review the Article Review Grading Rubric for further information.

  • attachment ArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf
  • attachment SMGT621-CoachingPhilosophyPaperAnnotatedBibliography.docx

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. coaching philosophies
  • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

Why use a learning journal?

 MNG81001 Assessment 4: Learning journalFormat: Learning journal presented in a word document OR a series of PowerPoint slides
Weighting: 20%
Word count: Suggested word count per activity: 200 words (+/-10%)
No. sources: No set number of sources. Any source referred to must be cited using the SCU
Harvard referencing style.
Special note: Post a key learning ‘take away’ to the Discussion Board in each relevant week. This could be a quote, a reading or a video.
What is a learning journal?
A learning journal is simply an ongoing collection of writing for learning – that is, writing done for the purpose of learning rather than the purpose of demonstrating learning. The learning journal requires students to reflect on what they have learnt in a course. Students need to detail how their thinking has changed and what this means for the future. Its purpose is to enhance your learning through the very process of writing and thinking about your leaning experiences. It is an opportunity to communicate your thinking process: how and why you did what you did, and what you now think about what you did.
Your leaning journal is personal to you and will reflect your personality and experiences. The writing can be quite informal.
Why use a learning journal?
• To provide a ‘live picture’ of your growing understanding of a subject or experience.
• To demonstrate how your learning is developing.
• To keep a record of your thoughts and ideas throughout your experiences of learning.
• To help you identify your strengths, weaknesses and preferences in learning.
Structuring a learning reflection
Just like all academic writing, a learning reflection needs a key message that is used to structure the narrative. As a writer, you need to make sure that your reader (or marker) understands the significance of your reflection.
A reflection is a piece of writing, so remember what makes writing such as this effective:
An introduction that includes your key reflection(s).
• Put your key message in the introduction (this is the focus of the discussion for that particular week)
A body, that retells the facts and relates it to your prior knowledge
• Use topic sentences to highlight the main point
• Then follow with the retelling and relating (use evidence if you wish to emphasis a point in your learning).
A conclusion, that gives the significance or implications of your key reflections
• What this will mean for the future? What has changed for you?
Please note: Key activities will be provided in Weeks 3, 6, 9 and 11. These form the basis to your reflection. They include a self-assessment, reading an article and watching a video. You must compete the activity in the nominated week. Submit the completed journal no later than Monday 15th February 2021 9.00am QLD time.
Process of reflective learning
Content of your learning journal
A learning journal should focus on your own personal responses, reactions and reflections to new ideas or new ways of thinking about a subject that have been introduced to you through:
• Lectures and tutorial sessions
• Research and reading including any visual research: e.g. television, film
• Conversations and discussions with other students or tutors
• Significant experiences that have happened in the work place or outside university.
What should you write about?
The most important thing is to make time for your writing – regularly set aside some time in Weeks 3, 6, 9 and 11 to think about the question asked of you and then write down your thoughts.
Try to focus on using the journal to help you to communicate (the following is a list of prompts to help you. You do not need to answer every questions):
• What you think about issues raised in the question
• Any flashes of inspiration you have had
• What you understand so far
• What you find puzzling, difficult or contradictory
• How you can reach a better understanding of the above
• What do you need to know more about, and how can you go about finding out more?
• What resources have helped you to understand and/or been interesting to use?
• How do you feel about the way you have approached the issue/topic so far?
• What new knowledge, skills or understanding have you gained during the process of writing your learning journal?
• Have you changed your opinions or values during the process/experience?
• How can you improve your learning, thinking and working in the future?
• Have you identified the next step(s) for your further development?
Sample
Week 3: Do you focus on what others say?
This activity required me to think about my communication with other people, and to complete a self-assessment: ‘Do you focus on what others say?’ The self-assessment is comprised of two aspects: active listening and asking questions. For listening I scored 4/6 and for asking questions I scored 2/5.
I was quite surprised by my result for asking questions as I thought this was something I did well when communicating with others.
In Week 1 we learned how to communicate effectively is a critical part of a manager’s job. Good managers know which channels of communication to use for different messages and why aspects of communication such as listening and asking questions are so important to the communication process.
We also discovered that managers can spend 30% of their time rewriting emails because the original message was confusing and not properly understood by the reader.
As my score for asking questions I wanted to find out more about the process of asking questions. I found an excellent YouTube video called ‘The Power of Effective Questioning’
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dO0dO__wmE).
It really helped me to appreciate the relationship between active listening and asking questions. It also helped me realise how important it is to speak up and ask questions. Something I am not very good at doing
I also found an excellent quote from Albert Einstein: ‘If I had an hour to solve a problem and my life depended on the solution, I would spend the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I know the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes’ (cited in Mosaic projects n.d).
A key learning for me in Week 3 is: ‘remember, there is no point in asking a question if you do not intend to listen carefully to the answer!’
Introduction includes the all-important key reflection: communication with other people focussing on listening and asking questions
Body that retells the facts and relates it to your prior knowledge.
Reflects on the importance of the communication process
Links to new ideas and new ways of thinking about a subject that have been introduced through a YouTube video
Conclusion that gave the significance or implications of key reflections
References
Limos Heroes 2014, The Power of Effective Questioning, online video, YouTube, viewed 16
November 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dO0dO__wmE
Mosaic projects White Papers n.d., Active Listening, viewed 16 November 2020, https://www.mosaicprojects.com.au/WhitePapers/WP1012_Active_Listening.pdf .
Discussion Board posting
Key takeaway: ‘There is no point in asking a question if you do not intend to listen carefully to the answer!’
Great video: Limos Heroes 2014, The Power of Effective Questioning, online video, YouTube, viewed 16 November 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dO0dO__wmE
The four reflections ?Week 3: Do you focus on what others say?
Think about how you communicate with other people during a typical day at work or university. Answer the statements below based on whether they are mostly TRUE or mostly
1. listening and 2. 2. Asking questions.
For your LISTENING score, add 1 point for each MOSTLY TRUE answer to items 1 to 5, PLUS 1 point for a MOSTLY FALSE answer to Question 6.
Listening score = _________________
For your ASKING questions score, add 1 point for each MOSTLY TRUE answer to items 7 to 11. Asking questions score = ______________
We face many distractions which makes it hard to pay attention when someone is speaking. Listening attentiveness prevents many communication mistakes. In addition, effective communicators learn the habit of inquiry, which means to ask questions to learn more about something or to confirm their understanding.
A score of 4 or more on either scale suggests that you are pretty good on that aspect of communication. A combined score of 8 or higher on the two scales suggest that you have excellent focus on what others are saying.
Now reflect on your score. What does it mean? What are you learned so far in the unit about the communication process? What is a key learning takeaway in Week 3?
Don’t forget to post your key takeaway on the Discussion Board for others to read.
?Week 6: Negotiation and conflict management
This week our focus is on negotiation and conflict management. Assessment 2 explores crosscultural negotiation and conflict.
Everyone will experience conflict at some time. Why manage conflict? Because a capacity to manage conflict is an important skill to possess and conflict handled well can be positive and constructive, while conflict handled poorly can be negative and destructive. Avoidance or denial of conflict in the short term allows us to escalate into deeply-rooted conflict in the long run.
One of the challenges in managing conflict is as individuals we each have our own approaches to the way we handle conflict. Added to our personal views and strategies there is cultural conflict. Overcoming cultural barriers at the negotiation table and learning how to avoid cultural conflict when negotiating across cultures are important elements of living and working in an increasingly global world.
Start by watching the video: ‘Conflict Resolution”
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY5TWVz5ZDU).
Now complete the self-evaluation: ‘Conflict Management Styles Assessment’ (located on the BB under Assessment Tasks and Submission Assessment 4 folder.
Reflect on your own approach to conflict and your personal negotiating style. What does this say about you? How might it affect the way you communicate and handle conflict? Can your personal style help or hinder the negotiation, cause, prevent or resolve conflict?
What is the conflict management style you would like to work on? How can you practice this conflict management style?
?Week 9: Communicating to convey goodwill
Observe a live or recorded speech or oral presentation in which the speaker is attempting to persuade. How credible was the speaker? What did she or he say or do that helped to enhance or to detract from his or her credibility? How effective was the speaker in conveying goodwill or establishing a relationship with his or her audience? Finally, how persuasive was the speaker?
?Week 11 Future communication practices
The world is changing; the business environment is evolving and so to organisations and their relationship with both external and internal stakeholders. The following macro trends will inevitably change the practice of communications in the future: the digitised workplace, generational differences, diversity and inclusion, globalised and multicultural workforces, social conscience and impact, worklife balance, and the radical impact of technology.
As a consequence, what transformation and trends of either external OR internal communication practices do you predict?

Categories
Writers Solution

International Journal of Organizational Analysis

University Unit Profile
CQUNIVERSITY UNIT PROFILE
MGMT20144 Term 3 ¬ 2019 Management and Business Context
Save or Print as PDF
All details in this unit profile for MGMT20144 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information
Class and Assessment Overview
CQUniversity Policies
Previous Student Feedback
Unit Learning Outcomes
Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
Textbooks and Resources
Referencing Style
Teaching Contacts
Schedule
Term Specific Information
Assessment Tasks 1 Written Assessment
Assessment Title Business Case Analysis
Task Description
Assessment Type
Written Assessment
Task Description
This is a business case analysis of 1600 words +/­ 10%
Purpose
This individual written assessment is designed to assist you to develop your knowledge of management and business
contexts. The secondary purpose of this assessment task is to give you the opportunity to enhance skills in research,
professional responsibility, and written communication.
Task details
Your task is to write a business case comparing two companies from the following web site: hhps://www.worldsmostethicalcompanies.com/honorees/
Please make sure that you choose two companies from different countries.
It is suggested that you use articles from the following journals to support your theoretical arguments. You must include the doi for each journal article on your reference list. Please note that this is a suggested list of reference sources, and you may use other journals, but please make
sure that they are of a high academic quality
Journals:
Asia Pacific Business Review
Benchmarking: an international journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Business Strategy Review
Competition and Change: the journal of global business and political economy
Contemporary Pacific
European Business Review
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
European Management Journal
Global Governance
Human Resource Development Quarterly
IIMB Management Review
International Journal of Organizational Analysis
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences
International Studies of Management and Organization
Journal of Business Strategy
Journal of General Management
Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization
Journal of Management and Organization
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance
Leadership
Management Decision
Measuring Business Excellence
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Pacific Affairs: an international review of Asia and the Pacific
Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management
Quality Management Journal
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
The TQM Journal
In terms of analysing the organisation all of the companies listed on this web site have an extensive list of annual and business reports, as well as media reporting. It is suggested that you also use these sources of information when seeking to apply theory to practice. Again, you will need to provide a reference for each source used, as well as the doi, where possible, or the appropriate web address in accordance with APA
referencing conventions. You are required to:
· You must first select TWO companies from the following web site.
hhps://www.worldsmostethicalcompanies.com/honorees/
· Undertake a cross­case comparison, which correspond to week 2¬4 topics, with a focus on
critically analysing the impact of a range of internal and external contextual factors on the performance and decision making of your chosen organization:
(a). How are the business and governance structures of your chosen companies different/similar, and why might this be the case?
(b). What are the environmental factors that influence your chosen companies’ performance and/or decision­making?
(c). What are the top three risks your chosen companies face and how might this influence their decision making?
(d). Make 3 suggestions regarding how the companies might improve their business practices.
· Your business case analysis must include at least five (5) peer reviewed journal articles published after year 2009 from the list of journals provided.
Note: further support on writing, referencing, etc. is given on the Moodle site for this course. Assessment Due Date
Week 5 Friday (20 Dec. 2019) 11:59 am AEST
All submissions must be uploaded through the Assessment Item 1 link on the unit Moodle page. The essay can be
uploaded as a pdf or word document. Penalties for late submission are applied according to the policy.
Return Date to Students
Week 7 Monday (7Jan. 2020)
Every effort will be made to return your assignment by the date indicated. You will find your mark and feedback through
the Feedback Studio portal on Moodle.
Weighting 30%
Submission Instructions
All submissions must be submitted through the Moodle site. No email submissions will be accepted. Please contact
SDesk if you have difficulty accessing the Moodle site.
Learning Outcomes Assessed
Critically analyse the impact of a range of internal and external contextual factors on the performance and
decision making of organisations
Synthesise and utilise key theories, concepts and terms relevant to internal and external contextual factors to
examine organisational environments Graduate Attributes
Knowledge
Cognitive, technical and creative skills
Research
Ethical and Professional Responsibility
Assessment Due Date Week 5 Friday (20 Dec. 2019) 11:59 am AEST
Business Case Analysis submission
Return Date to Students Week 7 Tuesday (7 Jan. 2020)
Business Case Analysis return date ­ Takes into account the university closure over the Christmas period
Weighting 30%
Assessment Criteria Assessment Criteria
· Criteria 1. Introduction * 3 marks Clearly outlines the purpose, scope, structure of the essay.
· Criteria 2 Body—Theoretical knowledge * 8 marks Demonstrated ability to define key terms and utilize the theories and concepts presented in Topics 1¬5.
· Criteria 3. Body—Research efforts and analysis * 12 marks Level of research effort demonstrated regarding the chosen companies and ability to critically analyse the impact of a range of internal and external contextual factors on the performance and decision making of the chosen companies by addressing the four proposed questions.
· Criteria 4. Conclusion *3 marks All aspects drawn together in a brief, concise summary. Consistent with findings, no new material introduced but highlights implications or a comment on the future of the company.
· Criteria 5. Presentation *2 marks High quality of expression, grammar, spelling, punctuation and proofreading.
· Criteria 6. Referencing * 2 marks Inclusion of an accurate reference list on a separate page listing only the sources that actually have been used. The reference list is arranged in alphabetical order according to the authors’ last names. At least 5 academic references post 2009 have been used, together with a numerous number of non¬academic references.
Referencing Style
American Psychological Association (APA)
Referencing Style American Psychological Association (APA)
Submission Online
Submission Instructions
All submissions must be submitted through the Moodle site. No email submissions will be accepted. Please contact SDesk if you have difficulty accessing the Moodle site.
Learning Outcomes Assessed Critically analyse the impact of a range of internal and external contextual factors on the performance and decision making of organisations
Synthesise and utilise key theories, concepts and terms relevant to internal and external contextual factors to examine organisational environments
Graduate Attributes
Knowledge
Cognitive, technical and creative skills Research
Ethical and Professional Responsibility

Categories
Writers Solution

Benchmarking: an international journal Business Strategy and the Environment Business Strategy Review

Task Description
This is a business case analysis of 1600 words +/­ 10%
Purpose
This individual written assessment is designed to assist you to develop your knowledge of management and business
contexts. The secondary purpose of this assessment task is to give you the opportunity to enhance skills in research,
professional responsibility, and written communication.
Task details
Your task is to write a business case comparing two companies from the following web site: hhps://www.worldsmostethicalcompanies.com/honorees/
Please make sure that you choose two companies from different countries.
It is suggested that you use articles from the following journals to support your theoretical arguments. You must include the doi for each journal article on your reference list. Please note that this is a suggested list of reference sources, and you may use other journals, but please make
sure that they are of a high academic quality
Journals:
Asia Pacific Business Review
Benchmarking: an international journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Business Strategy Review
Competition and Change: the journal of global business and political economy
Contemporary Pacific
European Business Review
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
European Management Journal
Global Governance
Human Resource Development Quarterly
IIMB Management Review
International Journal of Organizational Analysis
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences
International Studies of Management and Organization
Journal of Business Strategy
Journal of General Management
Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization
Journal of Management and Organization
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance
Leadership
Management Decision
Measuring Business Excellence
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Pacific Affairs: an international review of Asia and the Pacific
Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management
Quality Management Journal
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
The TQM Journal
In terms of analysing the organisation all of the companies listed on this web site have an extensive list of annual and business reports, as well as media reporting. It is suggested that you also use these sources of information when seeking to apply theory to practice. Again, you will need to provide a reference for each source used, as well as the doi, where possible, or the appropriate web address in accordance with APA
referencing conventions. You are required to:
· You must first select TWO companies from the following web site.
hhps://www.worldsmostethicalcompanies.com/honorees/
· Undertake a cross­case comparison, which correspond to week 2¬4 topics, with a focus on
critically analysing the impact of a range of internal and external contextual factors on the performance and decision making of your chosen organization:
(a). How are the business and governance structures of your chosen companies different/similar, and why might this be the case?
(b). What are the environmental factors that influence your chosen companies’ performance and/or decision­making?
(c). What are the top three risks your chosen companies face and how might this influence their decision making?
(d). Make 3 suggestions regarding how the companies might improve their business practices.
· Your business case analysis must include at least five (5) peer reviewed journal articles published after year 2009 from the list of journals provided.
Note: further support on writing, referencing, etc. is given on the Moodle site for this course. Assessment Due Date
Week 5 Friday (20 Dec. 2019) 11:59 am AEST
All submissions must be uploaded through the Assessment Item 1 link on the unit Moodle page. The essay can be
uploaded as a pdf or word document. Penalties for late submission are applied according to the policy.
Return Date to Students
Week 7 Monday (7Jan. 2020)
Every effort will be made to return your assignment by the date indicated. You will find your mark and feedback through
the Feedback Studio portal on Moodle.
Weighting 30%
Submission Instructions
All submissions must be submitted through the Moodle site. No email submissions will be accepted. Please contact
SDesk if you have difficulty accessing the Moodle site.
Learning Outcomes Assessed
Critically analyse the impact of a range of internal and external contextual factors on the performance and
decision making of organisations
Synthesise and utilise key theories, concepts and terms relevant to internal and external contextual factors to
examine organisational environments Graduate Attributes
Knowledge
Cognitive, technical and creative skills
Research
Ethical and Professional Responsibility
Assessment Due Date Week 5 Friday (20 Dec. 2019) 11:59 am AEST
Business Case Analysis submission
Return Date to Students Week 7 Tuesday (7 Jan. 2020)
Business Case Analysis return date ­ Takes into account the university closure over the Christmas period
Weighting 30%
Assessment Criteria Assessment Criteria
· Criteria 1. Introduction * 3 marks Clearly outlines the purpose, scope, structure of the essay.
· Criteria 2 Body—Theoretical knowledge * 8 marks Demonstrated ability to define key terms and utilize the theories and concepts presented in Topics 1¬5.
· Criteria 3. Body—Research efforts and analysis * 12 marks Level of research effort demonstrated regarding the chosen companies and ability to critically analyse the impact of a range of internal and external contextual factors on the performance and decision making of the chosen companies by addressing the four proposed questions.
· Criteria 4. Conclusion *3 marks All aspects drawn together in a brief, concise summary. Consistent with findings, no new material introduced but highlights implications or a comment on the future of the company.
· Criteria 5. Presentation *2 marks High quality of expression, grammar, spelling, punctuation and proofreading.
· Criteria 6. Referencing * 2 marks Inclusion of an accurate reference list on a separate page listing only the sources that actually have been used. The reference list is arranged in alphabetical order according to the authors’ last names. At least 5 academic references post 2009 have been used, together with a numerous number of non¬academic references.
Referencing Style
American Psychological Association (APA)
Referencing Style American Psychological Association (APA)
Submission Online
Submission Instructions
All submissions must be submitted through the Moodle site. No email submissions will be accepted. Please contact SDesk if you have difficulty accessing the Moodle site.
Learning Outcomes Assessed Critically analyse the impact of a range of internal and external contextual factors on the performance and decision making of organisations
Synthesise and utilise key theories, concepts and terms relevant to internal and external contextual factors to examine organisational environments
Graduate Attributes
Knowledge
Cognitive, technical and creative skills Research
Ethical and Professional Responsibility

GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Image result for order now

NO PLAGIARISM