Overview
According to the principle of determinism, every event that takes place in the world has a cause. Whether or not the event is snow falling, birds chirping or humans thinking, the determinist asserts that each and every event that occurs in the world has a cause, or series of causes, that makes the event, and everything connected to it, inevitable.
Now consider what this means for your thoughts at this present moment and for your forthcoming Module 3 Essay. Presumably, at this present moment, you are thinking very deeply about formulating a thesis that is interesting, compelling, specific and shows good understanding of the material. And, hopefully, these thoughts will lead to a high quality essay. However, if determinism is true (and, of course, there are very good reasons for thinking that it is), EVERY single thing that you are thinking at this present moment is the unavoidable product of your personality (e.g., brain state, genetics and upbringing), the situation that you find yourself in, along with basic laws of nature. The same goes for your forthcoming essay. In this way, the particular thesis that you will end up “choosing,” the quality of your essay and the words that you will employ, all would be inevitable and indeed predictable (in principle) from the moment of your birth. In such a case, would it make sense to say that you deserve the grade that you will get on your essay?
Notice that the same type of question can be posed for ANY human event for which we might be inclined to ascribe praise and blame. Did Mother Teresa deserve to be praised for her charitable acts? Did Hitler deserve to be condemned for his moral atrocities? Ultimately, the answer to these questions depends on one’s view of the complex relationship between determinism, freedom and moral responsibility.
Essay Question: Which theory best explains the true nature of moral responsibility and its relation to human freedom and determinism–libertarianism, hard determinism or compatibilism? In your answer, be sure to demonstrate an understanding of each of the three theories.
Instructions
View the “Essay Writing Guide” attached to this dropbox.
Write and submit a thoughtful, clear and succinct thesis writing assignment of 1000-1500 words, in direct response to the Module 3 assignment above.
Draw directly upon our assigned textbook readings for this Module in carefully crafting your detailed response.
In answering the essay question provided, carefully review, reflect upon, and attempt to integrate the textbook material covered in Chapter 2: Section 2.5-2.8.
Please double-space your submission, include your name at the top of its first page, and be sure to cite all sources quoted or paraphrased from (even if it’s only our textbook). Please take careful note of the above formatting instructions.
Don’t forget to include a bibliography or “works cited” page at the end!
*Note: I am using this book ((THE PHILOSOPHICAL JOURNEY, An Interactive Approach, Sixth Edition, William F. Lawhead))
*(please see the attached file).
*(please write 825 words ((do not count the references as included in the 825))
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com
MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER
Philosophy: Principle of Determinism
(Course Instructor)
(University Affiliation)
(Student’s Name)
(Date)
The Theory that Best Explains the True Nature of Moral Responsibility
In the past, if one would ask similar question regarding the theory that would best explain the idea of moral responsibility, then most definitely one would get a number of theoretical concepts. However, (Henslin, 2011) asserts that theoretical answers provide the basis for getting conceptual framework based on experiences and facts. In philosophy (determinism to be specific), in relation to moral responsibility, then most probably we could get an answer that offers theories based on personal experiences only. When one looks at the positions on hard-determinism, compatibilism or libertarianism, one finds that descriptions of an individual experiences are provided for what they think to be for the cases of morality, freedom and determinism. I find that the explanation for the true nature of moral responsibility and its relation to human freedom is best captured under the theory of determinism. I find the theory to be most comprehensive, with its particular assertions that determined mind, morals and human freedom exist. Determinism is real and this can be explained with the simple example of causes of one’s behavior. If one chose to sit down with one’s mother, father, behavioral therapist and an evolutionary biologist, then definitely one can trace the causes of their behavior. The causes of one’s past behavior can be examined and explained in detail when these individuals examines one’s decisions or why they behave in a particular manner. According to (Lawhead, 2014) the determinist theory posits that every event is casually determined. The author further asserts that human actions, thoughts, decisions and choices constitute events that are casually determined. A denial of this basic principle would amount to denial of the universal principle of causation that has been explained by the physicists, behavioral biologi…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..