Categories
Writers Solution

Ensure regaining deteriorating market share of SweetBite in Energy Drinks category: Practical ways of reviving an ailing Company.

 Assignment Details

Practical ways of reviving an ailing Company.

SweetBite
SweetBite is the largest player in Food & Beverages Industry in India. The Indian Food & Beverage Industry is marked by number of small players and a few large players controlling a market share of approximately 52%. This large chunk of Market share is controlled by three major players, SweetBite (15%), Ronald Beverages Ltd. (25%) and Khana Khazana Pvt. Ltd. (12%). The Green revolution and booming economy changed the fortunes of even the Regional Players who saw an unprecedented upsurge in revenues leading to Business expansion. This booming economy also led to changing Life Styles, especially in Metros and Tier II cities. Lured by this expanding Indian Food & Beverages Industry, a lot of MNCs started making their foray into Indian market. Even the Regional Players started focusing on Processed Food and Branded Beverages in these Metros and Tier II cities.
SweetBite has been a trusted name in Industry for almost four decades. Most of the brands owned by SweetBite were household names and commanded a leadership position in their category. However, this leadership was taken over by Ronald Beverages Ltd. In the last five years. In the recent years, all the top five companies made their foray into emerging category like Energy Drinks (in the last five years). The category is poised for a 30% annual growth given the fact that Energy Drink is a new concept in India. A comparative Analysis of Revenue figures is given in the table below (Figures in Rs. Crores):
Company Brand Name 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
SweetBite Thirst 69 77 83 88 91
Ronald
Beverages Ltd. TipsyTop 65 72 84 105 153
Khana Khazana
Pvt. Ltd. High Up 15 16 18 20 27
Though SweetBite started the first with a bang and was the biggest player in this category, over the last three years Ronald Beverages Ltd. Took over the Leadership position. This leadership position in the first two years was on account of SweetBite’s takeover of the sole and significant Brand in the market in 2010 called Thirst, owned by an Indian Company named Indian Breweries Ltd.
However, the recent growth in Energy Drinks market was married with some controversies as well. Thirst was often targeted by other companies (though indirectly in their ad campaigns) as a Drink meant for uneducated followers because of high Caffeine content and its ill effects.
Ronald Beverages, on the other hand engaged in educating consumers about the alertness and energy associated with Energy Drinks. Simultaneously Ronald Beverages understood the Indian Market well and started to get associated with various sporting events ranging from Cricket to Hockey to Tennis etc. This added to TipsyTop’s popularity and revenue.
This shrinking margin (for Thirst) also led the Management to put a lid on Marketing efforts followed by a slash on R&D. This in turn resulted in attrition of key people in these departments. Employees at SweetBite (Thirst Division) started feeling ‘Chocked’ by restricted span of control.
Meanwhile, the take over of Thirst (owned by Indian Breweries) by SweetBite brought people from inside the organization together, yet the cultural issues prevailed. Since, the take over, the Management has been struggling with issues on Technological as well as Cultural front. Indian Breweries used improved technology and fostered a culture of achievement and performance. On the other hand, SweetBite was characterized by monopolistic and laid back attitude in every category that it was involved. It has been able to command wide market share only on account of First mover advantage. The decline of SweetBite got reflected in the last three years as evident from the figures. A recent internal and a market survey indicated the following:
Findings from Internal survey:
a. Clash of interest among Boss and Reportee; most of the Top Management designations held by SweetBite employees followed by employees in Middle and Junior Management from Indian Breweries.
b. Lack of appropriate skills needed for business expansion across levels – SweetBite Managers were living the Legacy of ‘Pioneer’ in the Industy. It was the ‘Pull’ Strategy, that worked in their favour in initial years, rather than aggressive ‘Market Driven’ strategy.
c. Low motivation among employees and a sense of insecurity post takeover.
Findings from Market Survey (including the consumer and supply chain):
a. Poor commission being given to Retailers. 58% of Retailers that were surveyed indicated lower commission being offered as compared to other companies. This was true in relative percentage terms as well, when compared with other categories like; soft drinks, Flavoured Milk, Butter Milk etc.
b. Irregular supply of the stock- A significant number of Retailers (56% of the sample population surveyed) were not happy with the stock availability at their stores. Most commonly found reason was – ‘SweetBite Area Managers have to be called and reminded for the stock’. Stock Out was a common phenomenon among Retailers.
c. Low Brand Visibility – Only 28% of the respondents could recollect having seen ‘Thirst’ in ads (both in Print and Broadcast Media) or at POP (Point of Purchase), as compared to 68% for TipsyTop. Ronald Beverage focused all its campaigns on Gen Y and was promoting TipsyTop on Music Channels (TVs and FM), Coffee Joints and Pubs.
d. Unavailability at the store – next-door- Most of the Respondents (62% of the sample population surveyed) expressed disappointment on account of rare availability of Thirst. Most of the times consumer would switch over instantly on the available Brand.
e. Lack of variety – 59% of the sample population surveyed expressed bad ‘After Taste Experience’ and rated TipsyTop higher in terms of taste and variety of flavours available.
You have to assume you are Rohit Kumar. The big question before you is to ensure regaining deteriorating market share of SweetBite in Energy Drinks category, considering the issues faced.
What will you do if you were Rohit Kumar?

Categories
Writers Solution

Connections between stakeholder claims and the product market

Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on critically discuss the connections between stakeholder claims and the product market. Another group of stakeholders beyond these three categories form the secondary stakeholders which include the government, communities, etc.., The capital market stakeholders such as the investors, debt suppliers and banks would want to have a right to decide what the organization has to do in order to maximise the shareholder wealth. However, the organizational stakeholders such as the employees and the unions have a claim on how the company operates to achieve the objectives. On the contrary, the product market stakeholders are concerned with the way they will be affected by the firm (Haslam, Neale and Johal, 2000).

The product market stakeholders include the suppliers and the customers. These stakeholders have an important role to play in the organization and its value, and in turn, have a major effect on the other stakeholders of the firm. The customers of a firm expect high value from the firm in all their encounters. However, they will also have a lot of choices in the market for the product or service, and hence the prices have to be attractive to them. The customers choose a product or service, not only based on the quality but also on the costs involved. Hence their primary expectation or demand from the firm is a reliable and high quality product at the lowest cost (Sloman, Sutcliffe, 2004).

The suppliers on the other hand have a considerable power over the firm, as they control the basic products or services required by the firm in its value chain. The power of the suppliers and their claims in the firm differ based on the availability and the level of competition in their products and services. In case of a supplier having a monopoly in the market, the supplier will have a high level of claims in the firm’s activities and will not be affected profoundly due to other stakeholders (Sloman and Sutcliffe, 2004).


Assignment status
Solved by our Writing Team at 
CapitalEssayWriting.comCLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

Categories
Writers Solution

Using segmentation strategies, what are the target market(s) for The Ritz-Carlton?

Case studies are an important learning strategy in business classes as they provide an opportunity for you to critically analyze events that have taken place in real-life businesses. This develops your critical thinking and research skills as you research the competition and industry in which your business resides with an end goal of formulating a recommendation for the challenges faced by the company.

Option 3: The Ritz-Carlton (pp. 424–425)

  1. Using segmentation strategies, what are the target market(s) for The Ritz-Carlton? How does this relate to their brand management strategies?
  2. Who are the top three competitors of The Ritz-Carlton, and what are their advantages/disadvantages with respect to their competitive product/service strategies.
  3. How does The Ritz-Carlton match up to competing hotels? What are its key differences?
  4. Discuss the importance of the “wow stories” in maintaining top quality customer service for a luxury hotel like The Ritz-Carlton.

In formatting your case analysis, do not use the question-and-answer format; instead, use an essay format with subheadings. Your APA-formatted case study should be a minimum of 500 words in length (not counting the title and reference pages). You are required to use a minimum of three peer-reviewed, academic sources that are no more than 5 years old (one may be your textbook). All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased material must have accompanying in-text citations.

Assignment statusSolved by our Writing Team at EssayCabinet.comCLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT EssayCabinet.com

Categories
Writers Solution

Case study Question New YorkCity Market Case

Short-Essay Question 6: NYC Case study
Question New YorkCity Market Case Study.pdf
Hotel Investment Recommendation Report. (300 words)
Based on the -New York City Market Case Study- provided (see attachment).
What would be your recommendations for a hotel investment in New York City? and Why? Please address the following two (2) criteria. Which locations in New York City would you recommend for a hotel investment? ( East River | Financial District | JFK/Jamaica | La Guardia/Queens North | Midtown South | Midtown West/Time Square | New York City Area | Uptown | Village/Soho/Tribeca)
1. Which locations in New York City would you recommend for a hotel investment? ( East River | Financial District | JFK/Jamaica | La Guardia/Queens North | Midtown South | Midtown West/Time Square | New York City Area | Uptown | Village/Soho/Tribeca)
2. Which segment (hotel class) would you recommend for a hotel investment in New York City? ( Luxury | Upper Upscale I Upscale | Upper Midscale | Midscale | Economy)

Assignment statusSolved by our Writing Team at EssayCabinet.com
CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT EssayCabinet.com

  1. GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS
  2. NO PLAGIARISM