Categories
Writers Solution

1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure

The journal indicated below describes a national project. Based on the journal, and on your team’s understanding of the project, answer the questions below:

Journal title: “1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure”

#QuestionPoints

1. Was it an internal or external project? Provide rationale.  

2. Identify at least 10 major stakeholders for the project.

3. What were the needs or expectation of each stakeholder?

4. Identify and describe at least 5 most important resources used in the project.

5.What was the alternative approach for the project (i.e. if the stadium had not been built, what else could have been done to ensure the olympics still occurred)?

6. Based on (5) above, was building the stadium at this location and at this time the best approach to have been chosen?  Provide rationale using PV, NPV, IRR, B/C. [1 page]

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. 1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure

 The journal indicated below describes a national project. Based on the journal, and on your team’s understanding of the project, answer the questions below:DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000332
Journal title: -1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure-
# Question Points
1 Was it an internal or external project? Provide rationale. 5
2 Identify at least 10 major stakeholders for the project. 5
3 What were the needs or expectation of each stakeholder? 5
4 Identify and describe at least 5 most important resources used in the project. 5
5 What was the alternative approach for the project (i.e. if the stadium had not been built, what else could have been done to ensure the olympics still occurred)? 5
6 Based on (5) above, was building the stadium at this location and at this time the best approach to have been chosen? Provide rationale using PV, NPV, IRR, B/C. [1 page] 20
7 Provide two Level 3 Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) for this project. These two should be the intial (or planned) and final (or actual) WBS. Explain the difference [2 pages] 20
8 Based on (7), was there an evidence of scope creep in the project? Provide rationale. 5
9 Create one network diagram for the project using the final WBS in (7) above [1 page] 30
10 Use the Level 2 tasks in the final WBS to create one GANTT chart for the project. [1 page] 30
11 Use the initial and final WBS to create two high-level budgets for the project. These two should be the initial and final budgets. Explain the difference. [2 pages] 30
12 Using the risk sources, describe three major (broad) categories of risks in the project. 6
13 Using a table, list at least ten individual risks ranked by severity, and also link each of them to one of the categories in (12) above [1 page] 20
14 For each risk in (13) above, describe at least one thing that was done, or could have been done to mitigate that risk. 5
15 Was there adequate quality management processes in place (including quality planning, quality assurance and quality control)? Provide rationale. 4
16 Was there adequate outsourcing in the project? Provide rationale. 5
17 The journal title indicates this project was a failure. Do you agree? Provide rationale. 5
18 If anyone in your group was appointed the project manager for this project, what would you have done differently to make this project successful? 5
19 Describe at least five major lessons that can be learned from this project. 5
20 Other – Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion (one paragraph each) 10
21 Other – Effective APA (Times New Roman, font size 12, double-spaced, in-text citations, grammar, reference list, etc) 10
22 Other Considerations 5
TOTAL 240
Side notes:
• Your response should be between 15 -20 pages only, including all auxilliary pages such as Title page, Reference page and Table of Content.
• This research project requires you to tie together the key components of project management.
• Ensure all responses you provide (including numbers and facts) are supported with information from the journal, or where necessary, provide appropriate assumptions and additional information from external sources. However facts from the journal will trump all external sources. This journal including all other external sources should be correctly referenced.
Use effective APA in-text citation to help the reader know exactly where you are picking your facts from