PLEASE ENABLE EDITING BEFORE FILLING OUT THIS REPORT!No report will not be accepted for credit after that time.Grade:Lab average to date:Overall average to date:Results: (You may attach a copy of your group data.) (70 pts)1. Qualitative analysis:SourceObservationsFluorescentRoom LightsIncandescentLight Bulb2. Colored Light Bulbs:Incandescent Light BulbColorObservationsBulb #1Bulb #2
3. Discharge Tubes:
Tube Contents
Observed Wavelengths of Discrete Spectral Lines
hydrogen
helium
neon
mercury
4. Wavelength of a Low Power Laser
Observed Wavelength(s) of Discrete Spectral Line(s)
Description of the laser as compared to other line sources
Questions: (30 pts)
1. Identify a light source that is continuous, one that exhibits line spectrums and one that shows both (if any). How many spectral lines were observed for each?
Light Source
# of Spectral Lines
2. Go online and find the spectrums for the four discharge tubes. Did your observations differ from these published data? If so, why do you think it differed? Record the url for the page you visited for each spectrum.
Spectrum
Same? (Yes/No)
Reason
3. Do a little investigation and explain (briefly) why the laser’s spectrum appeared as it did
As a Computer Scientist, you have observed a multitude of reactions when something new and unique has been introduced to accentuate our capabilities. When Google Glasses were released, many business owners refused to allow patrons to wear these devices in their place of business; all Google Glasses had to be checked at the door before entering. The main controversy of Google Glass was its potential to intrude into everyone’s privacy.
The use of brain-computer interfaces could become as controversial as Google Glass. However, this type of interface might not be as visible and should not threaten anyone’s privacy. Just imagine how cool it would be to have a word processor type whatever you were thinking, or search the web using just your thoughts.
Instructions
Conduct some research on brain-computer interfaces to get a better idea of the concept and what recent breakthroughs have occurred. Once you feel comfortable with this new technology you need to develop a feasibility study containing a SWOT with at least three examples of Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats along with Analysis and an impact statement that addresses the following:
· What, if any, employment complications might arise due to the use of brain-computer interfaces.
· The various complications that might develop due to society’s resistance to their use.
· The paradigm shift that the use of brain-computer interfaces will create.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. As a Computer Scientist, you have observed a multitude of reactions when something new and unique has been introduced to accentuate our capabilities.
Assignment 1 SVY3107 Geodetic Surveying B Contents 1. Assignment information 3 1.1. Introduction 3 1.2. Assignment topics 3 1.3. Assignment Value 3 1.4. Due Date 4 1.5. Late penalty 4 1.6. Assignment presentation guidelines 4 1.7. Submission Instructions 5 1.8. Equipment Required 5 1.9. Further questions 5 2. Assignment Body 6 2.1. Introduction 6 2.2. Tasks (200 marks total) 8 2.2.1. Task 1 – AUSGeoid (30 marks) 8 2.2.2. Task 2 – Survey sketch (20 marks) 8 2.2.3. Task 3 – Triangles, triangles and more triangles (60 marks) 8 2.2.4. Task 4 – Arc to Chord to Arc to Chord… (50 marks) 9 2.2.5. Task 5 (40 marks) 9 2.3. Rubric/Marking guide 9 1. Assignment information 1.1. Introduction For this assignment, you’ll be the surveyor in charge of a large survey to establish control for a significant infrastructure plant development. You’ll be tasked with preparing information and resources for your field team, and undertaking a variety of calculations and analysis on their observations. 1.2. Assignment topics This assignment focuses on content in Modules 1 to 3. Additional knowledge from prerequisite subjects will also need to be utilised. For more information on the course topics that this assignment relates to, please see the course specification page. This is linked through the course StudyDesk. Individual courses can be searched here. 1.3. Assignment Value Assignment 1 is a 20% (200 mark) assessment. A summary of mark distribution for the assignment is given in Table 1.3. Task 1 30 marks Task 2 20 marks Task 3 60 marks Task 4 50 marks Task 5 40 marks TOTAL 200 marks Table 1.3: Mark distribution for Assignment 1 1.5. Late penalty Please refer to the University Procedure for Assessment – https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/14749PL If you are in a situation where you believe you are going to need to request an extension for an assignment, it is advisable to get in contact with the lecturer as soon as possible – the day an assignment is due is not appropriate! 1.6. Assignment presentation guidelines It is expected that you will submit a report style submission for this assignment – professional report writing and presentation is a skill that should be developed alongside technical knowledge throughout your university career. The USQ library has many resources about assignment structure and writing for students that can be accessed here. At minimum, your report should contain: • A title page indicating the course code (SVY3107), assignment number, and your name and student number • Clearly labelled answers linking them to the relevant assignment questions • Page numbers Your report should be submitted in PDF file format to ensure formatting issues between different software packages is avoided. Any published material you refer to should be properly referenced and included in a bibliography or list of references at the end of your assignment. You should use the Harvard AGPS style of referencing. See the library website for further details on referencing. All the information required to address the assignment questions needs to be included in your report, however you are required to also submit a copy of your spreadsheet that is used to address task 2. This spreadsheet will be tested with an independent set of data by the marker, so ensure any values that are needed for answering other parts of the assignment are included in the PDF file (i.e. make sure your answers for task 3 are in your PDF not just in the spreadsheet!). Some tips for the presentation of your spreadsheet are: • Make sure all columns have clear headings • Make sure rows have labels where appropriate, particularly when showing a result • Use cell outlines and shading to make your spreadsheet easy for people to understand • Make sure the sheets are labelled appropriately to make it clear which task it is addressing 1.7. Submission Instructions All submissions should be digital, and made through the StudyDesk Assignment submission link. Your assignment submission should include: o 1 PDF file of your assignment o 1 MS Excel compatible spreadsheet/workbook Please ensure your name, student number (the 6001234567 number), and course code (SVY3107) appear at least once in the body of your assignment. Please also ensure that you clearly label each of your solutions with the corresponding question number (e.g. Task 1). Use the following naming convention for your files: o SVY3107_A1_[SurnameInitial]_[StudentNumber].pdf o Where [SurnameInitial] is replaced by your surname and your first initial (eg Chris McAlister would be McAlisterC); and o [StudentNumber] is replaced by your 10 digit student number (e.g. 6001234567) o Please note the size of your files cannot exceed 100MB. 1.8. Equipment Required You will need internet access to access the relevant software packages and assignment resources. You will need to use a spreadsheet program, such as Google Sheets or MS excel to complete this assignment. You have access to Google Sheets through your student account online. 1.9. Further questions If you have any questions about the assignment, please contact the course examiner Chris McAlister via the Course Slack assignments channel. 2. Assignment Body 2.1. Introduction You have been asked by a client to examine some old traverse data between marks on a site where they will be developing significant infrastructure. While most of the original survey data has been lost, there are a number of connections between different marks that have been provided to you as shown below in Table 2.1.1, Table 2.1.2 and Table 2.1.3. All coordinates have been transformed to GDA2020. Station number Latitude Longitude AHD Height AUSGeoid2020 (N) Station 1 -27° 45’ 43.9192” 143° 56’ 0.0080” 137.261m To be determined Station 2 No data available No data available No data available No data available Station 3 -28° 05’ 43.2384” 144° 07’ 55.6608” 141.277m To be determined Station 4 No data available No data available No data available No data available Station 5 To be determined To be determined To be determined To be determined Table 2.1: Point coordinate information From H.I To H.I Azimuth Observed Distance Ellipsoidal distance Station 1 1.541m Station 2 1.769m 103° 24’ 08.49” 24074.998m To be determined Station 2 1.769m Station 3 1.438m 186° 58’ 06.24” No data available To be determined Station 3 1.438m Station 4 1.501m 290° 18’ 17.39” 32261.107m To be determined Station 4 1.501m Station 1 1.567m 22° 41’ 49.01” 27817.578m To be determined Station 2 1.769m Station 5 1.842m 249° 51’ 38.27” No data available 21381.290m Station 3 1.438m Station 5 1.842m 325° 55’ 41.52” No data available 28976.501m Table 2.2: Available traverse information Data Value Scale factor 1.00056 Instrument 1st velocity correction 0.3872 ×???? c=278.96 – × ???? × 10-6 1+0.003661×???? Prism constant (after calibration) -0.030 Temperature 32 °C Pressure 1010 mb Table 2.1.3: Field data provided
2.2. Tasks (200 marks total) Please see below for the tasks you need to complete. You may use excel or similar to undertake the calculations, however you must ensure a copy of the results are pasted into your final report. Reports that direct the reader to refer the spreadsheet will get zero marks for that task. Also ensure all your calculations are clearly labelled and explained for the reader. 2.2.1. Task 1 – AUSGeoid (30 marks) Using the data provided to you; a) determine the AUSGeoid Values for Stations 1 and 3 (10 marks) b) Briefly discuss your choice of AUSGeoid model, explaining what the main components of that model are and why it is best suited to this data (20 marks) 2.2.2. Task 2 – Survey sketch (20 marks) Using the data provided, develop an appropriate sketch (hand drawn is ok) to show the data provided to you clearly. Ensure all the stations are clearly annotated with the data associated with them, and that provided information is clearly distinguished from calculated or determined data (20 marks) 2.2.3. Task 3 – Triangles, triangles and more triangles (60 marks) Before looking at the larger traverse, completing some initial calculations on the closed shapes in the survey is advisable. Using your knowledge of spherical and spheroidal triangles, for the triangle formed by Stations 2, 3 and 5, determine: a) The geodetic internal angles (10 marks) b) The distance between Station 2 and 3 (10 marks) c) The excess in the triangle (10 marks) d) The plane internal angles (10 marks) e) Coordinates of station 2 and station 3 (20 marks) You can assume that the skew normal and deflection of vertical corrections have already been made to the angles. 2.2.4. Task 4 – Arc to Chord to Arc to Chord… (50 marks) You will eventually need to reduce the traverse to determine how reliable the previous survey was. As you’ll want to check the survey by running the traverse from multiple directions, you need to develop a spreadsheet that will allow you to reduce the distance measurements to the ellipsoid. Some tips in making your spreadsheet: • Ensure the input fields are clear and that there are appropriate instructions included so it is easy to use and understand. • Each step should be clearly labelled, and any solutions should be clearly identified • You may select your own input values for any variables not provided in this assignment sheet, but they must be clearly documented. NOTE: Your spreadsheet will be validated with another dataset as part of the marking process. 2.2.5. Task 5 (40 marks) Using the spreadsheet you developed in Task 4, and the additional data provided in the table below calculate the ellipsoid distance of the traverse lines between Stations: a) 1-2 (10 marks) b) 1-4 (10 marks) c) 3-4 (10 marks) d) 2-3 (10 marks) 2.3. Rubric/Marking guide To further understand how you can achieve marks for each task, please refer to the rubric below. Question 100% 85% 75% 50% 25% 0% Marks 1a – AUSGeoid A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 1b – AUSGeoid A discussion was provided that met the following criteria: • A comprehensive understanding of AUSGeoid was demonstrated • A comprehensive understanding of the components was demonstrated • A comprehensive synthesis of AUSGeoid to the project was made A discussion was provided with minor omissions or errors. A discussion as provided that was missing one of the criteria A discussion was provided that was missing two of the criteria A discussion was provided but was missing three of the criteria No attempt was made 20 2 – Survey sketch A sketch is provided with the following criteria: • The stations are clearly identified • The layout is clear and unambiguous allowing a clear understanding of the data • Appropriate labels and symbols are used to provide clarity A sketch is provided with minor errors or omissions in the criteria A sketch is provided with one criteria missing. A sketch is provided with two criteria missing. A sketch is provided with significant omissions or errors in the provided criteria. No attempt was made. 20 3.a A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 3.b A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 3.c A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 3.d A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 3.e A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct results were generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 20 4 – Calculations A spreadsheet is provided with the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid complete and correct A spreadsheet is provided with minor errors or omissions in the calculations, that would have little to no impact on the solution. A spreadsheet is provided with minor errors or omissions in the calculations that would impact the solution. A spreadsheet is provided with significant errors in the calculations, but a solution could be generated. A spreadsheet is provided with significant errors in the calculations that would impact the solution, and no solution could be generated. No attempt was made. 50 5.a The spreadsheet provided with the following criteria: • completed the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid • generated the correct answer The solution had minor input errors that had little to no impact on the solution The solution had minor input errors that had an impact on the solution A solution was provided with one criteria missing A solution was provided with two criteria missing No attempt was made. 10 5.b The spreadsheet provided with the following criteria: • completed the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid • generated the correct answer The solution had minor input errors that had little to no impact on the solution The solution had minor input errors that had an impact on the solution A solution was provided with one criteria missing A solution was provided with two criteria missing No attempt was made. 10 5.c The spreadsheet provided with the following criteria: • completed the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid • generated the correct answer The solution had minor input errors that had little to no impact on the solution The solution had minor input errors that had an impact on the solution A solution was provided with one criteria missing A solution was provided with two criteria missing No attempt was made. 10 5.d The spreadsheet provided with the following criteria: • completed the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid • generated the correct answer The solution had minor input errors that had little to no impact on the solution The solution had minor input errors that had an impact on the solution A solution was provided with one criteria missing A solution was provided with two criteria missing No attempt was made. 10 11 University of Southern Queensland | SVY3107 Assignment 1 2021
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. H.I To H.I Azimuth Observed Distance Ellipsoidal distance
Assignment 1 SVY3107 Geodetic Surveying B Contents 1. Assignment information 3 1.1. Introduction 3 1.2. Assignment topics 3 1.3. Assignment Value 3 1.4. Due Date 4 1.5. Late penalty 4 1.6. Assignment presentation guidelines 4 1.7. Submission Instructions 5 1.8. Equipment Required 5 1.9. Further questions 5 2. Assignment Body 6 2.1. Introduction 6 2.2. Tasks (200 marks total) 8 2.2.1. Task 1 – AUSGeoid (30 marks) 8 2.2.2. Task 2 – Survey sketch (20 marks) 8 2.2.3. Task 3 – Triangles, triangles and more triangles (60 marks) 8 2.2.4. Task 4 – Arc to Chord to Arc to Chord… (50 marks) 9 2.2.5. Task 5 (40 marks) 9 2.3. Rubric/Marking guide 9 1. Assignment information 1.1. Introduction For this assignment, you’ll be the surveyor in charge of a large survey to establish control for a significant infrastructure plant development. You’ll be tasked with preparing information and resources for your field team, and undertaking a variety of calculations and analysis on their observations. 1.2. Assignment topics This assignment focuses on content in Modules 1 to 3. Additional knowledge from prerequisite subjects will also need to be utilised. For more information on the course topics that this assignment relates to, please see the course specification page. This is linked through the course StudyDesk. Individual courses can be searched here. 1.3. Assignment Value Assignment 1 is a 20% (200 mark) assessment. A summary of mark distribution for the assignment is given in Table 1.3. Task 1 30 marks Task 2 20 marks Task 3 60 marks Task 4 50 marks Task 5 40 marks TOTAL 200 marks Table 1.3: Mark distribution for Assignment 1 1.5. Late penalty For each day that an assignment is late, a penalty of 5% of the total assignment marks will be deducted. Please refer to the University Procedure for Assessment – https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/14749PL If you are in a situation where you believe you are going to need to request an extension for an assignment, it is advisable to get in contact with the lecturer as soon as possible – the day an assignment is due is not appropriate! 1.6. Assignment presentation guidelines It is expected that you will submit a report style submission for this assignment – professional report writing and presentation is a skill that should be developed alongside technical knowledge throughout your university career. The USQ library has many resources about assignment structure and writing for students that can be accessed here. At minimum, your report should contain: • A title page indicating the course code (SVY3107), assignment number, and your name and student number • Clearly labelled answers linking them to the relevant assignment questions • Page numbers Your report should be submitted in PDF file format to ensure formatting issues between different software packages is avoided. Any published material you refer to should be properly referenced and included in a bibliography or list of references at the end of your assignment. You should use the Harvard AGPS style of referencing. See the library website for further details on referencing. All the information required to address the assignment questions needs to be included in your report, however you are required to also submit a copy of your spreadsheet that is used to address task 2. This spreadsheet will be tested with an independent set of data by the marker, so ensure any values that are needed for answering other parts of the assignment are included in the PDF file (i.e. make sure your answers for task 3 are in your PDF not just in the spreadsheet!). Some tips for the presentation of your spreadsheet are: • Make sure all columns have clear headings • Make sure rows have labels where appropriate, particularly when showing a result • Use cell outlines and shading to make your spreadsheet easy for people to understand • Make sure the sheets are labelled appropriately to make it clear which task it is addressing 1.7. Submission Instructions All submissions should be digital, and made through the StudyDesk Assignment submission link. Your assignment submission should include: o 1 PDF file of your assignment o 1 MS Excel compatible spreadsheet/workbook Please ensure your name, student number (the 6001234567 number), and course code (SVY3107) appear at least once in the body of your assignment. Please also ensure that you clearly label each of your solutions with the corresponding question number (e.g. Task 1). Use the following naming convention for your files: o SVY3107_A1_[SurnameInitial]_[StudentNumber].pdf o Where [SurnameInitial] is replaced by your surname and your first initial (eg Chris McAlister would be McAlisterC); and o [StudentNumber] is replaced by your 10 digit student number (e.g. 6001234567) o Please note the size of your files cannot exceed 100MB. 1.8. Equipment Required You will need internet access to access the relevant software packages and assignment resources. You will need to use a spreadsheet program, such as Google Sheets or MS excel to complete this assignment. You have access to Google Sheets through your student account online. 1.9. Further questions If you have any questions about the assignment, please contact the course examiner Chris McAlister via the Course Slack assignments channel. 2. Assignment Body 2.1. Introduction You have been asked by a client to examine some old traverse data between marks on a site where they will be developing significant infrastructure. While most of the original survey data has been lost, there are a number of connections between different marks that have been provided to you as shown below in Table 2.1.1, Table 2.1.2 and Table 2.1.3. All coordinates have been transformed to GDA2020. Station number Latitude Longitude AHD Height AUSGeoid2020 (N) Station 1 -27° 45’ 43.9192” 143° 56’ 0.0080” 137.261m To be determined Station 2 No data available No data available No data available No data available Station 3 -28° 05’ 43.2384” 144° 07’ 55.6608” 141.277m To be determined Station 4 No data available No data available No data available No data available Station 5 To be determined To be determined To be determined To be determined Table 2.1: Point coordinate information From H.I To H.I Azimuth Observed Distance Ellipsoidal distance Station 1 1.541m Station 2 1.769m 103° 24’ 08.49” 24074.998m To be determined Station 2 1.769m Station 3 1.438m 186° 58’ 06.24” No data available To be determined Station 3 1.438m Station 4 1.501m 290° 18’ 17.39” 32261.107m To be determined Station 4 1.501m Station 1 1.567m 22° 41’ 49.01” 27817.578m To be determined Station 2 1.769m Station 5 1.842m 249° 51’ 38.27” No data available 21381.290m Station 3 1.438m Station 5 1.842m 325° 55’ 41.52” No data available 28976.501m Table 2.2: Available traverse information Data Value Scale factor 1.00056 Instrument 1st velocity correction 0.3872 ×???? c=278.96 – × ???? × 10-6 1+0.003661×???? Prism constant (after calibration) -0.030 Temperature 32 °C Pressure 1010 mb Table 2.1.3: Field data provided
2.2. Tasks (200 marks total) Please see below for the tasks you need to complete. You may use excel or similar to undertake the calculations, however you must ensure a copy of the results are pasted into your final report. Reports that direct the reader to refer the spreadsheet will get zero marks for that task. Also ensure all your calculations are clearly labelled and explained for the reader. 2.2.1. Task 1 – AUSGeoid (30 marks) Using the data provided to you; a) determine the AUSGeoid Values for Stations 1 and 3 (10 marks) b) Briefly discuss your choice of AUSGeoid model, explaining what the main components of that model are and why it is best suited to this data (20 marks) 2.2.2. Task 2 – Survey sketch (20 marks) Using the data provided, develop an appropriate sketch (hand drawn is ok) to show the data provided to you clearly. Ensure all the stations are clearly annotated with the data associated with them, and that provided information is clearly distinguished from calculated or determined data (20 marks) 2.2.3. Task 3 – Triangles, triangles and more triangles (60 marks) Before looking at the larger traverse, completing some initial calculations on the closed shapes in the survey is advisable. Using your knowledge of spherical and spheroidal triangles, for the triangle formed by Stations 2, 3 and 5, determine: a) The geodetic internal angles (10 marks) b) The distance between Station 2 and 3 (10 marks) c) The excess in the triangle (10 marks) d) The plane internal angles (10 marks) e) Coordinates of station 2 and station 3 (20 marks) You can assume that the skew normal and deflection of vertical corrections have already been made to the angles. 2.2.4. Task 4 – Arc to Chord to Arc to Chord… (50 marks) You will eventually need to reduce the traverse to determine how reliable the previous survey was. As you’ll want to check the survey by running the traverse from multiple directions, you need to develop a spreadsheet that will allow you to reduce the distance measurements to the ellipsoid. Some tips in making your spreadsheet: • Ensure the input fields are clear and that there are appropriate instructions included so it is easy to use and understand. • Each step should be clearly labelled, and any solutions should be clearly identified • You may select your own input values for any variables not provided in this assignment sheet, but they must be clearly documented. NOTE: Your spreadsheet will be validated with another dataset as part of the marking process. 2.2.5. Task 5 (40 marks) Using the spreadsheet you developed in Task 4, and the additional data provided in the table below calculate the ellipsoid distance of the traverse lines between Stations: a) 1-2 (10 marks) b) 1-4 (10 marks) c) 3-4 (10 marks) d) 2-3 (10 marks) 2.3. Rubric/Marking guide To further understand how you can achieve marks for each task, please refer to the rubric below. Question 100% 85% 75% 50% 25% 0% Marks 1a – AUSGeoid A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 1b – AUSGeoid A discussion was provided that met the following criteria: • A comprehensive understanding of AUSGeoid was demonstrated • A comprehensive understanding of the components was demonstrated • A comprehensive synthesis of AUSGeoid to the project was made A discussion was provided with minor omissions or errors. A discussion as provided that was missing one of the criteria A discussion was provided that was missing two of the criteria A discussion was provided but was missing three of the criteria No attempt was made 20 2 – Survey sketch A sketch is provided with the following criteria: • The stations are clearly identified • The layout is clear and unambiguous allowing a clear understanding of the data • Appropriate labels and symbols are used to provide clarity A sketch is provided with minor errors or omissions in the criteria A sketch is provided with one criteria missing. A sketch is provided with two criteria missing. A sketch is provided with significant omissions or errors in the provided criteria. No attempt was made. 20 3.a A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 3.b A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 3.c A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 3.d A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct result was generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 10 3.e A result was provided with the following criteria: • Complete calculations were undertaken • The work was clearly presented in a logical progression • The correct results were generated A result was provided with minor errors or omissions. A result was provided with one of the criteria missing A result was provided with two criteria missing. No attempt was made 20 4 – Calculations A spreadsheet is provided with the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid complete and correct A spreadsheet is provided with minor errors or omissions in the calculations, that would have little to no impact on the solution. A spreadsheet is provided with minor errors or omissions in the calculations that would impact the solution. A spreadsheet is provided with significant errors in the calculations, but a solution could be generated. A spreadsheet is provided with significant errors in the calculations that would impact the solution, and no solution could be generated. No attempt was made. 50 5.a The spreadsheet provided with the following criteria: • completed the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid • generated the correct answer The solution had minor input errors that had little to no impact on the solution The solution had minor input errors that had an impact on the solution A solution was provided with one criteria missing A solution was provided with two criteria missing No attempt was made. 10 5.b The spreadsheet provided with the following criteria: • completed the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid • generated the correct answer The solution had minor input errors that had little to no impact on the solution The solution had minor input errors that had an impact on the solution A solution was provided with one criteria missing A solution was provided with two criteria missing No attempt was made. 10 5.c The spreadsheet provided with the following criteria: • completed the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid • generated the correct answer The solution had minor input errors that had little to no impact on the solution The solution had minor input errors that had an impact on the solution A solution was provided with one criteria missing A solution was provided with two criteria missing No attempt was made. 10 5.d The spreadsheet provided with the following criteria: • completed the calculations to reduced distances to the ellipsoid • generated the correct answer The solution had minor input errors that had little to no impact on the solution The solution had minor input errors that had an impact on the solution A solution was provided with one criteria missing A solution was provided with two criteria missing No attempt was made. 10 11 University of Southern Queensland | SVY3107 Assignment 1 2021
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Azimuth Observed Distance Ellipsoidal distance
SBET 1083 ASSIGNMENT: Trigonometric Heighting Below are data observed from trigonometric heighting survey obtained by using theodolite . Calculate the reduced level of station B and C and the difference in height between the two stations (B and C) . Given: Observation A -B: Height of instrument at station A = 1. 520 metre s Vertical angle between station A and B (incline) = 5 20’ 00” Height of prism at station B = 1. 550 0 metre s Reduced level at station A = 3 0.777 metre s Horiz ontal distance fr om A to B = 245. 45 5 metre s Observation A -C Height of instrument at station A = 1. 520 metre s Vertical angle between station A and C (dec line) = – 3 30’ 00” Height of prism at station C = 1. 325 metre s Reduced level at station A = 3 0.777 metre s Slope distance from A to C = 214 .524 metre s Please include diagrams in your answer. Label them appropriately and define them correctly in your calculations.
Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. Trigonometric Heighting Below are data observed from trigonometric heighting survey obtained by using theodolite
Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.
In this 750-word essay, you will evaluate a real-world scenario from your own experience. Integrate at least two sources from the Waldorf Online Library, along with the Required Reading, to support your rationale.
Identify a bias or stereotype that you have observed either within yourself or within a colleague at your current or past organization. What are the cues that brought this bias or stereotype to your attention, or how is this stereotype reflected in the person’s behaviors? How does this bias or stereotype impact the team or organization? Analyze this situation using Model I of the Socio-Cognitive Systems Learning Model, provided in the unit lesson.
Applying the strategies from this unit, develop a strategy for transformative learning (for overcoming that bias or stereotype). Specifically, how might you gather input for overcoming the bias or stereotype? What are the values, behaviors, and outcomes you hope to achieve through the transformative learning process? Analyze this process using Model II of the Socio-Cognitive Systems Learning Model, provided in the unit lesson.
Use APA formatting and cite all sources. Be sure to abide by Waldorf’s Academic Integrity Policy.