This assignment aims at applying the various topic areas on project leadership to a case study in order to develop their analytical abilities.
Submission Instructions
You are required to submit a midterm paper on the analysis of the “Ajax Project” case study.
The intent of this paper is for students to delve deeper into the various concepts of the project chapters/topic areas covered in this course – sourcing additional material and synthesizing that additional information in a concise summary of the case study and demonstrating critical thinking.
The paper must have a separate title page and a separate page for references at the end. It is expected that the introduction comprises no more than 10% of the paper, the research body is to be roughly 70% of the paper, and the remaining 20% to be a conclusion with application/reflection.
Answer the questions at the end of the case
The paper is to follow APA rules and guidelines.
You must have at least 2 academic sources.
The paper is to be 1200 (+/- 120) words in length.
All submissions MUST be done through Turnitin with a similarity level not greater than 15%.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
Project rollout begins after a project has been implemented, tested, and judged stable and functional enough to be moved into production. The project rollout process comprises specific steps that must be scheduled carefully to enable the project to hit production deadlines and meet business expectations.
For this assignment, you will create an implementation project plan, which outlines the steps involved in implementing your project. This document is sometimes called a work-back schedule because you begin with the date that your project needs to go live, and then work back from there to determine what needs to be done when.
You will also conduct a post-mortem on the work you have submitted to date. Post-mortem (from the Latin for “after death,” but referring to it in the context of business) is the analysis of a project’s process and results conducted by key project stakeholders after the project has been moved into production, which means it’s functionally complete. The goal of a post-mortem is to identify what went right and what went wrong post-implementation so that project managers can apply these lessons learned to future projects.
For this three-part assignment, you will:
Construct a work-back schedule that presents the steps involved in implementing your project.
Construct a post-mortem using the template on the work you have submitted to date in this course.
Create updated project documents based on the results of your post-mortem.
Create a project implementation plan for your project based on the example document. You may use Microsoft Word or other software to create your project implementation plan.
Complete the Post-Mortem template based on your experiences with completing the course project over the last five weeks.
Update the project documents you have submitted thus far in the course based on your completed post-mortem.
Submit your project implementation plan, post-mortem, and updated project documents
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Construct a work-back schedule that presents the steps involved in implementing your project
Assessment 2: Project Execution Plan Group/individual: Individual Word count/Time provided: 2000 words Weighting: 30% Unit Learning Outcomes: UL01, UL03 Assessment 2 Detail This assessment requires student to develop PEP (Project execution plan) for a chosen project focusing on project delivery, project contract and project procurement. The PEP should include the followings: 1. Introduction: Describe and give background of the selected project. Give rationale why the project is selected. 2. Project delivery method: Discuss the project delivery method based on the criteria you think most appropriate for the project you have selected. Your discussion of the project delivery method should be based on Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build and Construction Management at Risk (CMAR) You must document all your assumptions and rationale for the selection of the project delivery system. All yours suggested ®APIC ASIA PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE grading (the criteria, weights, and scores) should come with justifications and explain why you gaves such grade to each element of the selection matrix. 3. Project contract: Evaluate and recommend the best financial contract type for the selected project based on the criteria that are crucial to the project. The types of contract that need to be evaluated are Lump sumcontract, Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract and Cost- Plus Fixed Fee Contract. All grading must be justified and explained. 4. Project procurement: Evaluate and recommend the best procurement method for the selected project based on the criteria that are crucial to the project. The types of procurement that need to be evaluated are Competitive, Negotiated and Best Value. All grading must be justified and explained. 5. Project risk: Develop Risk Management Plan including Risk Register, Risk Quadrant Analysis, and risk mitigation plan. Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page. Dashboard ??? ??? Calendar To Do Notifications Inbox
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. An Introduction to Organisation Development
You are a structural engineer working in a housing project that is building three storey bungalow units. A typical main frame ABCDEFGH that the architect is proposing is provided in FIGURE Q1. The architect would like to keep the structural elements to a minimum and hence has proposed that it must consist of six columns (AB, BC, CD, EF, FG and GH) of equal length and three beams (BG, CF and DE), also of equal length. The height of the columns, LCC = 3.05 m, the length of the beams, LBB = 5.4m, factored imposed load of FBG kN/m = 3.25 on beam BG, factored imposed load of FCF,DE kN/m = 4.3 on beams CF and DE and a point load of X kN = -55.0 due to wind at beam column junctions B, C and D. As it is easiest to transport to the site, the architect decided to construct the frame from steel and want to fabricate all connections as fixed connections.
1. Your technical director, who believes in optimisation of structures for weight (least material), has asked you to size all of the members of the frame such that no members exceed their yield stress while minimizing the weight of the whole structure. She asked you to use the simple finite element program that you use in the office. Use necessary simplifications backed by solid reasoning and choose only standard steel cross-sections.
2. While you are working on this project at home, your father, who is a retired earthquake specialist, is concerned that you are not considering any dynamic loading. To allay these fears, you have decided to perform a dynamic analysis, the first step of which you have decided will be the computation of mode shapes and their associated frequencies. Compute the frequencies of the first 5 mode shapes and their associated mode shapes by modifying the simple program from QUESTION 1.
3. Once you presented your initial design of the frame, a senior engineer has raised some concerns about the simple beam column finite element solution that you have used. With justification, evaluate the validity of the solution adopted with respect to the structural stability, material behaviour and magnitude of the final deflections
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. structural engineer working in a housing project that is building three storey bungalow units
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Explain why the rule does not make sense to your style of project management
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6000: Principles of Project Management Assessment Assessment 3 – Project Charter Report Individual/Group Individual Length 2,000 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle. d) Evaluate and apply tools and techniques used in the project initiation phase. e) Critically reflect on the leadership competencies necessary to succeed in global project management environments. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 6.1 Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary After reading the project case study, use it to develop a 2,000-word Project Charter, describing the entire project in a short, succinct, and professional document. Context Project leadership is about inspiring the project team to do their best from the outset. This requires a combination of verbal and written communication skills and a range of applied leadership skills. One of the foundational documents that helps “kick off” a project is the Project Charter. The Project Charter describes the entire project in a short, succinct, and presentable document that can be shared with project staff or other stakeholders and aims to commence the project in earnest. The Project Charter helps to clarify the project context, the project team roles, and the goals of the project. Instructions You will be given a project case study to use in order to develop your Project Charter. Though all students will receive the same case study, it is expected that each student will think about the project from their own perspective as an up-and-coming project manager in order to formulate a unique Project Charter. Use your own style based on your critical thinking of what it means for you PROJ6000_Assessment_3_Brief_Report_Module6.1 Page 1 of 6 to lead a project. You may use one of the templates provided in the learning resources or develop your own format. Please follow the instructions below: 1. Read the case study provided by your lecturer. This will form the basis for your Project Charter, because you will assume that you are the project manager for this project. 2. After reading the case study, begin to develop your project charter. This needs to be a 2,000word report (+/- 10%) and must use a minimum of six (6) references (academic literature and industry publications—please consider the case study as a 7th reference). Please ensure all references are cited in-text. 3. The Project Charter must include the following headings and should be written as if you are presenting it to the project team that will build this project. You are the project manager. The contents of your Charter should include: a. Background of the project b. Reasons for the project c. Project objectives d. Proposed project management approach or methodology/methodologies e. Constraints, limitations, and risks f. Leadership structure (project manager and his or her senior aides: list their roles and explain what each does in the project. You need to cite four (4) roles) g. Project risks and their mitigation h. Project stakeholders and how to interact with them i. The vision of the project and the type of project team culture you wish to promote in your team j. Reference list Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool Submission Instructions Submit this task via the Assessment 3 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6000 – Principles of Project Management. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that, except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at: http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. PROJ6000_Assessment_3_Brief_Report_Module6.1 Page 2 of 6 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Knowledge and understanding of project management concepts and how to apply them within an organisational context Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the role of project management in the initiation of new projects Percentage for this criterion = 30% Demonstrates a limited understanding of project management concepts within an organisational context. Key components of the assignment are not addressed, including little to no application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project or strategies to lead project success. Demonstrates a functional or partially developed understanding of project management concepts within an organisational context. Demonstrates a limited application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project or strategies to lead project success. Demonstrates a proficient understanding of project management concepts within an organisational context. Demonstrates a proficient application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project or strategies to lead project success. Demonstrates an advanced understanding of project management concepts within an organisational context. Demonstrates an advanced application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project and strategies to lead project success. Demonstrates exceptional knowledge of management concepts within an organisational context. Demonstrates an exceptional application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project and strategies to lead project success. Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Limited analysis and synthesis of subject Demonstrates basic analysis and synthesis of subject Well-developed analysis and synthesis of subject Thoroughly developed analysis and synthesis of Highly sophisticated analysis and synthesis of Synthesises knowledge of the project management initiation phase and details of the assigned case study with an understanding of project management tools and techniques to develop an effective project charter Percentage for this criterion = 30% concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates limited or no understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, and/or demonstrates limited applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study. concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates a basic understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, with some applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study. concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates a welldeveloped understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, with wellestablished applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study. subject concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates a thoroughly developed understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, with significant applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study. subject concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates a highly sophisticated understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, with substantial applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study that includes thoughtful recommendations and proposals. Effective communication (written) Effectively presents the circumstances of the case study and the required elements of a project charter Limited presentation of information related to the assigned case study, which is difficult to follow. Presents in a basic manner information related to the assigned case study. Occasionally employs specialised language and Presents in a readable and coherent manner information related to the assigned case study. Accurately employs some specialised language and Communicates coherently and concisely information related to the assigned case study in a manner that adheres to the given format. Accurately employs a wide range of specialised Communicates eloquently information related to the assigned case study. Expresses meaning coherently, concisely, and creatively within the given format. Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide Percentage for this criterion = 30% Specialised language and terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle is rarely or inaccurately employed. Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or the acknowledgment of sources. terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle with accuracy. Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical. Some errors are evident in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle. Meaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical. Occasional minor errors present in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. language and terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle. Engages audience interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and persuasive. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are mostly free from errors. range of specialised language and terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle. Engages and sustains audience’s interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are insightful, persuasive, and expertly presented. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are free from errors. Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion = 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Referencing resembles APA with frequent or repeated errors. Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing resembles APA with occasional errors. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Show evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors. Demonstrates use of highquality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Show evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors. The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment SLO a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. SLO b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. SLO c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle. SLO d) Evaluate and apply tools and techniques used in the project initiation phase. SLO e) Critically reflect on the leadership competencies necessary to succeed in global project management environments.ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6000: Principles of Project Management Assessment Assessment 3 – Project Charter Report Individual/Group Individual Length 2,000 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle. d) Evaluate and apply tools and techniques used in the project initiation phase. e) Critically reflect on the leadership competencies necessary to succeed in global project management environments. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 6.1 Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary After reading the project case study, use it to develop a 2,000-word Project Charter, describing the entire project in a short, succinct, and professional document. Context Project leadership is about inspiring the project team to do their best from the outset. This requires a combination of verbal and written communication skills and a range of applied leadership skills. One of the foundational documents that helps “kick off” a project is the Project Charter. The Project Charter describes the entire project in a short, succinct, and presentable document that can be shared with project staff or other stakeholders and aims to commence the project in earnest. The Project Charter helps to clarify the project context, the project team roles, and the goals of the project. Instructions You will be given a project case study to use in order to develop your Project Charter. Though all students will receive the same case study, it is expected that each student will think about the project from their own perspective as an up-and-coming project manager in order to formulate a unique Project Charter. Use your own style based on your critical thinking of what it means for you PROJ6000_Assessment_3_Brief_Report_Module6.1 Page 1 of 6 to lead a project. You may use one of the templates provided in the learning resources or develop your own format. Please follow the instructions below: 1. Read the case study provided by your lecturer. This will form the basis for your Project Charter, because you will assume that you are the project manager for this project. 2. After reading the case study, begin to develop your project charter. This needs to be a 2,000word report (+/- 10%) and must use a minimum of six (6) references (academic literature and industry publications—please consider the case study as a 7th reference). Please ensure all references are cited in-text. 3. The Project Charter must include the following headings and should be written as if you are presenting it to the project team that will build this project. You are the project manager. The contents of your Charter should include: a. Background of the project b. Reasons for the project c. Project objectives d. Proposed project management approach or methodology/methodologies e. Constraints, limitations, and risks f. Leadership structure (project manager and his or her senior aides: list their roles and explain what each does in the project. You need to cite four (4) roles) g. Project risks and their mitigation h. Project stakeholders and how to interact with them i. The vision of the project and the type of project team culture you wish to promote in your team j. Reference list Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool Submission Instructions Submit this task via the Assessment 3 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6000 – Principles of Project Management. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that, except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at: http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. PROJ6000_Assessment_3_Brief_Report_Module6.1 Page 2 of 6 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Knowledge and understanding of project management concepts and how to apply them within an organisational context Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the role of project management in the initiation of new projects Percentage for this criterion = 30% Demonstrates a limited understanding of project management concepts within an organisational context. Key components of the assignment are not addressed, including little to no application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project or strategies to lead project success. Demonstrates a functional or partially developed understanding of project management concepts within an organisational context. Demonstrates a limited application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project or strategies to lead project success. Demonstrates a proficient understanding of project management concepts within an organisational context. Demonstrates a proficient application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project or strategies to lead project success. Demonstrates an advanced understanding of project management concepts within an organisational context. Demonstrates an advanced application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project and strategies to lead project success. Demonstrates exceptional knowledge of management concepts within an organisational context. Demonstrates an exceptional application of project management concepts to the initiation of a new project and strategies to lead project success. Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Limited analysis and synthesis of subject Demonstrates basic analysis and synthesis of subject Well-developed analysis and synthesis of subject Thoroughly developed analysis and synthesis of Highly sophisticated analysis and synthesis of Synthesises knowledge of the project management initiation phase and details of the assigned case study with an understanding of project management tools and techniques to develop an effective project charter Percentage for this criterion = 30% concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates limited or no understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, and/or demonstrates limited applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study. concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates a basic understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, with some applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study. concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates a welldeveloped understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, with wellestablished applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study. subject concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates a thoroughly developed understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, with significant applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study. subject concepts to a project initiation phase. Project charter demonstrates a highly sophisticated understanding of project management knowledge, methodologies, and techniques, with substantial applicability to the circumstances of the assigned case study that includes thoughtful recommendations and proposals. Effective communication (written) Effectively presents the circumstances of the case study and the required elements of a project charter Limited presentation of information related to the assigned case study, which is difficult to follow. Presents in a basic manner information related to the assigned case study. Occasionally employs specialised language and Presents in a readable and coherent manner information related to the assigned case study. Accurately employs some specialised language and Communicates coherently and concisely information related to the assigned case study in a manner that adheres to the given format. Accurately employs a wide range of specialised Communicates eloquently information related to the assigned case study. Expresses meaning coherently, concisely, and creatively within the given format. Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide Percentage for this criterion = 30% Specialised language and terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle is rarely or inaccurately employed. Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or the acknowledgment of sources. terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle with accuracy. Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical. Some errors are evident in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle. Meaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical. Occasional minor errors present in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. language and terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle. Engages audience interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and persuasive. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are mostly free from errors. range of specialised language and terminology related to project management and the initiation phase of the project management lifecycle. Engages and sustains audience’s interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are insightful, persuasive, and expertly presented. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are free from errors. Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion = 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Referencing resembles APA with frequent or repeated errors. Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing resembles APA with occasional errors. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Show evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors. Demonstrates use of highquality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Show evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free from errors. The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment SLO a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. SLO b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. SLO c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle. SLO d) Evaluate and apply tools and techniques used in the project initiation phase. SLO e) Critically reflect on the leadership competencies necessary to succeed in global project management environments.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context
Group/individual: Group Word count/Time provided: 2000 words Weighting: 15% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO4 Assessment 2 Detail This assessment is a staged submissions assessment, and it should be conducted in two parts. The first part deals with Engineering Economy Evaluation of each alternative and recommending a preferred option to meet the project requirements. The second part of assessment deals with Sustainability and Optimisation APIC Project Development & Optimisation Pty Ltd is considering and evaluating the various alternatives to purchase 10 small vehicles ( SUV) for upcoming projects. You are part of project managers to investigate engineering economy of this procurement process. You are required to make recommendation which alternative would be a sound capital investment. This would be the base scenario(alternative) for the next part of assessment. Project details (Part A): The project requires purchase of 10 small SUV vehicles. To reduce greenhouse gases and pollutant emissions, you are required to consider Electric, Hybrid and Petrol vehicles. This project is selected to be evaluated due to it sustainability aspect as well. It is in line with Australian government’s policy to focus on addressing environmental impact of climate change. The first part should focus on cost consideration, estimate cash-flow items both inflows and outflow for each alternative. The bases of estimations for estimates should be given. It is required to decide about interest rate, project life, and other parameters that can affect economic analysis in this activity and apply one of the evaluation techniques to evaluate each alternative and select the best one. Guidelines for writing project report Part A: 1) Develop the total project cost as well as providing clear work breakdown structures (WBS). 2) Provide details of any assumptions made if needed. 3) Estimation Techniques used. 4) Provide Cash flow diagrams. 5) Economy analysis and evaluation of the project by Present Worth (PW), or Internal rate of return (IRR). 6) Conclusions, findings, reasons for recommendation. Assessments 2 (Part A) Marking Criteria and Rubric The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 15% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page. Assessment 2 (Part A) Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking Criteria Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64% of the criterion mark) Good (65-74% of the criterion mark) Very Good (75-84% of the criterion mark) Excellent (85-100% of the criterion mark) Cost structure description (20 marks) Inadequate Cost structure description Basic Cost structure description Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills for Cost structure description Exhibits accurate, Detailed breadth and depth for Cost structure description Displays Excellent cost structure description Provide Cash flow diagrams (10 marks) Inadequate Cash flow diagrams Basic Cash flow diagrams Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills to provide Cash flow diagrams Exhibits accurate, Detailed breadth and depth to provide cash flow diagrams Displays Excellent Cash flow diagrams understanding Estimation Techniques used (10 marks) Inadequate Estimation Techniques Basic Estimation Techniques Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills to provide Estimation Techniques Exhibits accurate, detailed breadth and depth to provide Estimation Techniques Displays Excellent Estimation Techniques understanding Economy analysis and evaluation of the project (20 marks) Inadequate Economy analysis and evaluation of the case project Basic Economy analysis and evaluation of the case project Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills to provide Economy analysis and evaluation Exhibits accurate, Detailed breadth and depth to provide Economy analysis and evaluation Displays Excellent Economy analysis and evaluation of the case project Conclusions, findings, recommendation (10 marks) Inadequate Conclusions, findings, recommendation Basic Conclusions, findings, recommendation Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills of Conclusions, findings, recommendation Exhibits accurate, detailed breadth and depth to provide Conclusions, findings, recommendation Displays Excellent Conclusions, findings, recommendation Academic Writing Skills (20 marks) – Free of any grammatical errors; using correct sentence structure; applying an extensive range of vocabulary; – Proper introduction and conclusion. Inadequate Academic Writing skills Basic Academic Writing skills Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills of Academic Writing. Exhibits accurate, detailed breadth and depth of Writing skills. Displays Excellent Writing skills Report Structure and Presentation (10 marks) – Consistent formatting with suitable headings and sub- headings – Consistent use of labels, highlights, font weight and underline, Reference list – Appropriate Referencing using HARVARD guidelines Inadequate Report Structure and Presentation skills Basic Report Structure and Presentation Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills of Structure and Presentation skills Exhibits accurate, detailed breadth and depth of Structure and Presentation skills Displays Excellent Structure and Presentation skills
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. APIC Project Development & Optimisation Pty Ltd
Assignment Three: Project Report Weighting: 70% Purpose To report your findings and lesson learned from your project. Learning outcomes being assessed The ability to prepare and report findings from the project including the ability to establish a clear link between research aim, objectives, questions, methodology and results, discussion and conclusions. Format Project report supplemented with appropriate appendices. It is difficult to give general guidelines for the headings in the final report. See the reading included in the unit 8 on how to report your project. You should aim for a report of around 5000 – 6000 words in the body text, but the length depends on the project. Task Report the findings from your project in the form of a report supplemented with appropriate appendices. One of the appendices should include what you yourself find you have learned from conducting this project and how it contributes to your continuous professional development. Example of Report structure: • Front page (with title, names and student numbers, year, paper number and title) • Abstract/Executive summary (optional) • Content page • Introduction (why is this important, what do we already know and what do we not know). • Literature review (if not included in the introduction) • Project question and Aim • Project design and method (be specific) • Findings (what did you find. Do not just discuss what you found but present what you found) • Discussion (what do your findings mean in relation to answering your question and in relation to what others have found?) • Conclusion (answer your question) • Recommendations (if you have any) • References • Appendices (including one page on each person’s learning from conducting the project) NB: Please submit this assignment in a Microsoft Word format. Readable when printed on A4 paper. If you have tables that needs to be printed on A3 paper to be readable please insert them in the report and in addition submit them as a separate file (remember to have name(s) and Student number(s) on all submissions)
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. The ability to prepare and report findings from the project including the ability to establish a clear link between research aim, objectives, questions, methodology and results, discussion and conclusion
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6000: Principles of Project Management Assessment Assessment 2 – Individual Report: PMBoK versus PRINCE2 or Agile in contemporary projects Individual/Group Individual Length 1,200 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle. Weighting 35% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary Following group discussions, individually write a 1,200-word report that discusses the strengths, weaknesses, similarities, and contrasts of PMBoK and PRINCE2 or Agile in contemporary projects. Context There are several project management methodologies and approaches that are used in contemporary project management. Among these are PMBoK, PRINCE2, Waterfall, Agile, Extreme Programming (XP), and Adaptive Project Framework (APF). Each of them has certain specific elements that proponents say make it easier to use, more applicable, more robust, or otherwise more appropriate for particular environments or circumstances. Whilst these methodologies are all valid and reliable tools for a project manager to use, it is important to be able to contrast them and to form a view of how they may best be used in a project. This analysis includes their usefulness, application in various types of projects, and how they view project risk. Such context can help project managers identify which methodologies/approaches may be best for specific projects. Instructions In this Assessment, you will write a 1,200-word (+/- 10%) report that considers the application of a project management methodology to a project as described in an assigned case study. In particular, you will review the assigned case study, then compare and contrast the application of the PMBoK project management approach to the highlighted project with your choice of one of the following methodologies/approaches: a) PRINCE2, or b) Agile The report must use the following headings:
INTRODUCTION: Develop an introduction to PMBoK and the other methodology/approach you have selected (PRINCE2 or Agile) that includes their background and historical context (approximately 200 words)
SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES: List 2–3 similarities and 2–3 differences between them and why these similarities and differences are relevant to the assigned case study (approximately 200 words combined)
RISK: How each method treats project risk and how these approaches to risk are relevant to the assigned case study (approximately 200 words)
PROJECT CONTEXT: The types of projects in which each is used (approximately 200 words)
LIFECYCLE IMPLICATIONS: How each differs across different phases of a project’s lifecycle (approximately 200 words)
APPLICATION: Explain which methodology you would choose to apply for the project in the assigned case study, and why (approximately 200 words) Be sure to cite any source material, including learning resources or other academic or industry literature you research, used to inform your analysis. You will need to consult the literature and use at least 6 references (and not more than 12 references) from academic and industry sources. The word count does not include the reference list. Each reference must be cited in-text in your report. The assessment requires that you submit your report via Blackboard. You do not need to upload anything relating to your group discussions in Weeks 4 and 5. Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool Submission Instructions Submit this task via the Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6000 – Principles of Project Management. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that, except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at: http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Knowledge and understanding of project management methodologies and approaches Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of PMBoK and either PRINCE2, and/or Agile methodologies/approac hes Percentage for this criterion = 30% Demonstrates a limited understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Demonstrates a functional understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a thorough knowledge or understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Demonstrates a highly developed knowledge or understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Demonstrates a capacity to explain in significant detail and thoughtfully apply relevant concepts. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of project management methodologies and approaches. Demonstrates an exceptional capacity to explain in substantial and relevant detail critical concepts and apply these concepts in a manner that makes strong connections. Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Compares and evaluates two project management methodologies/approac hes Percentage for this criterion = 30% Limited or no comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approache s. Limited application/recommendat ions based upon analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Demonstrated basic comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches. Demonstrated basic application/recommendation s based upon analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Well-developed comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches. Well-developed application/recommendatio ns based upon proficient analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Thoroughly developed and creative comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches. Thoroughly developed application/recommendatio ns based upon to analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Highly sophisticated and creative comparison and evaluation of project management methodologies/approaches . Highly developed application/recommendati ons based upon to analysis of methodology similarities and differences. Effective communication (written) Effectively presents two selected project management methodologies/approac hes and their distinguishing/differing elements Limited ability to present information related to two selected project management methodologies/approache s and their distinguishing elements. Specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approache s is rarely or inaccurately employed. Presents in a basic manner information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Occasionally employs specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches with accuracy, with some inaccuracies. Presents in a coherent and readable manner information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Accurately employs some specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches. Presents coherently and concisely information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Accurately employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches. Communicates eloquently, coherently, concisely, and creatively information related to two selected project management methodologies/approaches and their distinguishing elements. Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology related to project management methodologies/approaches . Percentage for this criterion = 30% Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or the acknowledgment of sources. Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow. Information; arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical. Some errors are evident in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. Meaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical. Occasional minor errors present in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation. Engages audience interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and persuasive. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are mostly free from errors. Engages and sustains audience’s interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are insightful, persuasive, and expertly presented. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are free from errors. Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion = 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Less than six references employed. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Referencing resembles APA with frequent or repeated errors. Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing resembles APA with occasional errors. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. APA referencing is free from errors. Demonstrates use of highquality, credible, and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. APA referencing is free from errors. The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment SLO a) Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context. SLO b) Compare and contrast project management methodologies and their application within global project contexts. SLO c) Identify and analyse the key processes of a project lifecycle
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Assess the importance of project management concepts within an organisational context
For this assignment, you will take on the role of a Project Management Institute (PMI) Project Management Certification exam instructor and complete a PowerPoint presentation. It is your responsibility to educate individuals who anticipate taking the PMI Project Management Certification exam. The tone of the presentation should be informational and cover the main project management concepts learned in this course. Utilization of the textbook (end of each chapter) might provide additional assistance. As you compile the presentation, minimally discuss the points below.
Describe general topics covered in the PMI Project Management Certification exam.
Explain the roles and responsibilities of a project manager.
Describe project risk strategies and how they create opportunities for project managers.
Examine the tasks associated with the project manager role through closure of the project.
Your PowerPoint presentation should be a minimum of 10 slides in length, not counting the title and reference slides. All sources used must be referenced and paraphrased. Directly quoted material must have accompanying citations and be cited per APA guidelines.Use of speaker notes is required as well. In the speaker notes, you will provide what you would say if you were actually giving the presentation to an audience. Please write your notes in complete sentences, and adhere to typical grammar and/or punctuation rules.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Role of a Project Management Institute (PMI) Project Management Certification exam instructor