Instructions: Response must be at least 310 words written in current APA format with at least two academic references cited. References must be within the last five years. Response must extend, refute/correct, or add additional nuance.
Personhood reflects one’s own consciousness, reasoning, self-reflection, identity, values, intentions, and morality (Butts, & Rich, 2018). It is being your own authentic self. Personhood can be related to consciousness on how pain is perceived. It can include reasoning on how we critically think as nurses. Characteristics that make you a unique individual such as hobbies, personality traits, morals, and values are all included in personhood (Butts, & Rich, 2018). Nurses view personhood as living to care for others. Caring for the health outcomes of our patients is an attribute to personhood.
Nurses exemplify personhood in the roles that we take with patients. Being educators, motivators, confidants and healers are what people view nurses as. Personhood describes caring as an innate trait or acquired trait modeled from another. This behavior could have been acquired from a mentor, parent, sibling, patient, or anyone who has made an impact on your life. Leading a life of value is what makes the field of nursing remarkable (Toomey, 2021). The life we live as nurses impacts others within the community and in our own homes. The care we give to our patients regardless of their aggression, anger, and despair is what we inadvertently hope to receive from others.
Personhood reflects motivating ourselves daily regardless of what we may be personally experiencing. It is putting on our game faces to be an inspiration to others. At the same time, the nurse must have self-awareness into partaking in activities that can destress us. Maintaining a balance is the way we achieve the qualities of personhood. An evolution of caring that may not have been an initial trait is reflective of personhood. For example, there are some people who may go into the field of nursing and do not feel empathetic for patients. These individuals may have suffered unusual circumstances within their own lives that make it difficult to express caring gestures. The ability to acquire caring traits through multiple interactions with patients is growth in personhood (Toomey, 2021).
Living to care is a definition of personhood. This is a challenge for new nurses who must learn to ignore rude and irritable patients. They must continue to have thoughtful gestures through the verbal abuse. Some of these patients will insult you and call you names. As nurses, we learn what our main objective is. With experience, these statements and the abusive nature of patients can be ignored. In mental health, nurses learn that through traumatic experiences patients will lash out on the vulnerable ones. We know that major depressive disorders can cause irritability. Knowledge empowers us to be consistent in our generous nature of providing high-quality, culturally competent care to our patients. We know to forgive and excuse those that may be struggling with obstacles or challenges whether it is financial, physiological, or mental
In this assessment task you will be provided with a scenario and relevant patient information. You will apply clinical reasoning to your knowledge of anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, therapeutic interventions, and pharmacotherapy to answer a variety of questions. You’ll be required to complete an online QUIZ and short answer questions (SAQs) which will need to be submitted via Turnitin. Ensure that all of the answer is your own words. Ensure that you review your Turnitin score before submitting your work. Any part of your answer that is completely or partially text-matched to another source by Turnitin may not be considered as part of your answer, as these are not your words. The questions will require you to: consider the patient situation and identify cues (signs and symptoms, as well as other cues) from the case description and clinical information provided. process this information by analysing the cues, and explaining the relevant physiology and pathophysiology underpinning the patient presentation and progression. apply knowledge of physiology to explain the rationale of suggested therapeutic approaches for that patient. It is expected that you will engage with scholarly literature to substantiate your clinical reasoning in the long answer question. How to research for this task Read BEFORE you write. Read to understand, and learn. Do not write your assignment based on what you already believe you know, and then go looking for references to support what you have said. Use the following textbooks, which you can access as eBooks and/or as hard copies in the UTas library. Textbooks should be no more than 10 years old. Amerman, E. 2019. Human Anatomy & Physiology. 2nd Global ed. Pearson: UK.Bullock, S. & Hales, M. 2019. Principles of Pathophysiology. 2nd Ed. Pearson: Melb Bullock, S. & Manias, E. 2017. Fundamentals of Pharmacology. 8th Ed. Pearson: Melb Burston, A. & Corfee, F. 2020. Nursing care of people with cardiac disorders. In G. Bauldoff et al. Lemone & Burke’s Medical-Surgical Nursing. Pearson: Melb. p1040 – 1084 Norris, T. 2020. Porth’s Essentials of Pathophysiology. 5th Ed. Wolters Kluwer: Phil (not an eBook) Websites – ensure that you are ONLY using information for health professionals. Do NOT use consumer information. Wherever possible, identify an author, and that the work has been peer reviewed. Acceptable sources will have a date of authorship. Is the website a recognised source of information eg the Australian Medicines Handbook ? If in doubt, you can always ask the Unit Coordinator. Journal articles – use these judiciously. Ensure that the article is relevant and that the author is actually supporting what you have written. Have you actually read, and understood the article? Is the article discussing HUMAN physiology? Journal articles should be no more that 5 years old. QUESTIONS 1.)Describe the pathophysiological mechanisms for Rupinder’s presentation of -pink-tinged frothy sputum-. Identify any other data which supports your explanation. Word limit: 200 words excluding in-text references. Use the School of Nursing guidelines for UTas Harvard referencing. These can be found in the -Assessment help and resources- section on MyLO. 2.)Rupinder experienced two AMIs which led to congestive cardiac failure. As part of his treatment, he was prescribed diuretics. Briefly describe the general mechanism of action for diuretics, and explain in detail how medication that acts on the kidneys improves his cardiac function. Word limit: 200 words excluding in-text references. Use the School of Nursing guidelines for UTas Harvard referencing. These can be found in the -Assessment help and resources- section on MyLO. TASK FORMAT You should preferably write in complete sentences and structured paragraphs. Do not use bullet-point lists or tables to present your response. Flow charts are acceptable (e.g. activation of PSNS – decrease in HR) as long as the relationship between one item and the next is unequivocally clear to the reader. Ensure that you effectively paraphrase by writing in YOUR OWN WORDS. Direct quotes are not accepted for this assignment of short answers. Generally, submissions are expected to be in Microsoft Word or in pdf format (not text scanned into pdf), though Microsoft PowerPoint and Microsoft Excel are also acceptable formats when relevant to the assignment requirements. To see a full list of the file types accepted by Turnitin, view this link: https://help.turnitin.com/feedback-studio/turnitin-website/student/submitting-a-paper/file-requirements.htm UNIT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSED This task evidences progression towards the achievement of the following Unit learning outcomes: ILO1: Apply knowledge of the alterations to anatomy and physiology of the integumentary, cardiovascular, respiratory, immune and renal systems of the body across the lifespan to explain pathophysiological processes. ILO2: Apply clinical reasoning to identify the acute and chronic health needs of a patient and inform the delivery of evidence-informed nursing care in relation to alterations to anatomy and physiology of the integumentary, cardiovascular, respiratory, immune and renal systems. ILO3: Analyse and integrate biological information to explain reasons for: normal and abnormal health states; common diagnostic procedures; and therapeutic interventions, including pharmacotherapy in relation to the integumentary, cardiovascular, respiratory, immune and renal systems. ILO4: Interpret and explain scientific and clinical terminology to facilitate communication of pathophysiological and therapeutic information in relation to alterations to anatomy and physiology of the integumentary, cardiovascular, respiratory, immune and renal systems, appropriate to a health care setting
Timely Delivery- primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals
This week’s discussion question asks you to draw upon the interactive lecture and readings for this week and address two questions regarding concepts of ethical reasoning:
What is the essential basis for ethical reasoning, according to Paul and Elder? Why are ethical principles not a matter of subjective preference?
What are some challenges of moral absolutism and moral relativism?
Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. What is the essential basis for ethical reasoning, according to Paul and Elder?
Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.
Please use legal reasoning (FIRAC) to respond to this assignment Sequent Products makes washing machines. Over the phone, Sequent offers to sell Treadwater Appliance Outlet one hundred model fx2013 washers at a price of $150 per unit. Sequent says that it will keep the offer open for thirty days. Treadwater responds that within two or three weeks it will decide whether to accept. One week later, Sequent e-mails, and Treadwater receives, notice that the offer is withdrawn. Treadwater immediately phones Sequent to accept the $150-per-unit offer. When Sequent refuses to deliver at that price, Treadwater files a suit. Sequent asserts, first, that there is no contract and, second, that if there is a contract, it is unenforceable. Facts 1. 2. 3. Issue: Whether Sequent’s telephone offer was a Merchant’s Firm Offer when it promised to keep the offer open for 30 days. Rule: Merchant’s Firm Offer 1. Merchant 2. Makes an offer 3. Available for a specified period of time 4. In writing 5. Is irrevocable Analysis: 1. Merchant Sequent manufactures washing machines so is a merchant 2. Makes an offer Sequent made an offer to Treadwater of $150 per unit 3. Available for a specified period of time Sequent committed to keeping the offer open for 30 days 3. In writing Sequent made the offer by telephone 4. Is irrevocable As there was no writing this offer was not a “Merchant’s Firm Offer.” Conclusion: Whether Sequent’s telephone offer was NOT a Merchant’s Firm Offer when it promised to keep the offer open for 30 days
The case study indicated that there were three facts: (1) Sequent make an offer to Treadwater over the telephone. (2) Treadwater responded that it will make decision within two to three weeks. (3) Sequent withdrew the offer before the time elapses. These are the facts surrounding the case.
Issue
The issue in this case is determine whether when Sequent’s offer was merchant’s firm because they promise to offer washing machine at $150 per unit and the offer would last for 30 days. In order to come up with good legal reason, it will be prudent to evaluate the condition under which Sequent made the offer.
Rule
For an offer to be valid, there are conditions that must be met. For instance in this case study the first rule is that the offer was merchant, the second rule is that an offer was made, the third rule is that the offer was open for a specific……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….legal reasoning (FIRAC)…
Using the ethical decision-making framework of the Moral-Based Reasoning Model for the case study provided. How does each component of the framework was put into action to resolve the dilemma in the case study. What is the resolution in the case study?
The components of the Moral-Based Reasoning Model is consist of:
1. Recognize the moral issue and determine that action is needed.