Topic Reflection – What Is Art?

PLEASE USE SCHOOL TEXTBOOK AS ONE OF THE REFERENCES. Martin, F. D. Humanities through the Arts. [VitalSource Bookshelf]. Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781260154238/ Textbook: Chapter 14 Lesson Minimum of 1 primary sources (artist statement) Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook – from critic) Instructions Although controversial art is not a topic exclusive to the 20th and 21st centuries, the distribution of information regarding controversial art has increased with the proliferation of media. Choose an example of a controversial work of art from the 20th or 21st centuries from any discipline of the humanities (music, literature, sculpture, film, television, etc.). Then, address the following: Identify the work and the medium. Based on your example, to what extent does this work of controversial art make a social contribution? What aesthetic value does the work have? How does it reflect the human condition? How does it relate to your life? Has this work ever been censored? If so, explain the circumstances. Are governments ever justified in censoring art? Why or why not? Examine some of the influences of this work of art. Argue whether or not this work should be considered art. Explain why using terms learned in this course. Include an accompanying statement from the artist(s) and a statement from a critic to support your points. Writing Requirements (APA format) Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page References page (minimum of 1 scholarly source and 1 primary source) Grading This activity will be graded based on the W7 Essay Grading Rubric. Course Outcomes (CO): 2, 4, 6 Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday Rubric W7 Essay Grading Rubric W7 Essay Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength 5.0 pts Meets length requirement 0.0 pts Does not meet length requirement 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 10.0 pts Submission addresses all aspects of the assignment. 8.5 pts Submission addresses most aspects of the assignment. 7.5 pts Submission addresses some aspects of the assignment. 6.0 pts Submission addresses few aspects of the assignment. 0.0 pts No effort 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis 35.0 pts Paper provides an in-depth analysis of the artwork showing a clear understanding of the work, the controversy surrounding it, and how if it fits into a definition of art. 29.75 pts Paper provides an strong analysis of the play(s) showing a good understanding of the work, the controversy surrounding it, and how if it fits into a definition of art, but it could include additional details for support of points or to make analysis clearer. 26.25 pts Paper provides an in-depth analysis of the play(s) showing a good understanding of the work, the controversy surrounding it, and how if it fits into a definition of art, but examination could be refined and more in depth. 21.0 pts Analysis of the artwork is limited or unclear, lacking details and support. 0.0 pts No effort 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Integration 5.0 pts Paper includes reference to scholarly sources within the essay and properly integrates the source. 3.75 pts Paper includes reference to scholarly sources within the essay but does not properly integrate the source. 0.0 pts Paper does not make reference to scholarly sources. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity & Flow 10.0 pts The writing contains strong word choice that clarifies ideas and masterful sentence variety that aids with the flow of ideas. 8.5 pts The writing contains varied word choice and sentence structures that clarify ideas and aid with the flow of ideas. 7.5 pts The writing contains word choice and sentence structures that can be revised for better clarification of ideas and flow of ideas. 6.0 pts The writing contains wording and sentence structures that are awkward and/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas. 0.0 pts No effort 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Mechanics & Usage 10.0 pts The writing is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper. 8.5 pts The writing contains a few errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text. 7.5 pts The writing contains some errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper. 6.0 pts The writing contains several errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper. 0.0 pts No effort 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Paper Format 5.0 pts Paper is formatted to include all 7 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers. 4.25 pts Paper is formatted to include 6 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers. 3.75 pts Paper is formatted to include 5 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers. 3.0 pts Paper is formatted to include 4 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers. 0.0 pts Paper is formatted to include 3 or fewer of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and Reference Formatting 5.0 pts All references include complete bibliographic information for sources and are properly formatted using APA style. 4.25 pts Most references include complete bibliographic information for sources are properly formatted using APA style. 3.75 pts Some of the references include complete bibliographic information for sources are properly formatted using APA style. 3.0 pts Few of the references include complete bibliographic information for sources are properly formatted using APA style. 0.0 pts There is no reference page. 5.0 pts Total Points: 85.0

GET SOLUTION BELOWAssignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at CapitalEssayWriting.com ORDER YOUR COPY AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

TO BE WRITTEN AFRESH FROM THE SCRATCH

Controversial Art

Name of Student

University Affiliation

Date

Controversial Art

Pissi Christ

Figure 1: Piss Christ (1987), Andres Serrano. Source: Jones, 2001.

Consisting of a 60 by 40-inch Cibachrome print of plastic and wood crucifix floating in bubbly bright yellow liquid, the Pissi Christ was the first work of immersions series (Jones, 2001). Serrano developed artistic impressions using fluids as pigments. The controversial art provides criticism of the cheapening of the Christian belief of the Holy crucifix and the people who use the words of Christ to suit their bad ways.

The print art used color contrast to create a good aesthetic appeal among its viewers. The artwork reflects the changing levels of human perception and beliefs towards Christianity. As a Christian, art relates to my perception of the way people practice the Christian religion. Reading past Christian practices and present experiences show marked differences, which was the intention Serrano wanted to achieve before criticism.

Although Serrano had a different intention when his work was presented for display, it attracted many critics. Jones (2001) points out that Piss Christ and other works of Serrano such as Stigmata were censored. The censorship of the art was considered not artistic but dishonor to the Lord. Responsible criticism of art is to create full understanding and participation (Jacobus & Martin, 2019). However, criticism of Piss Christ became political and did not consider the actual intention to which the art was created. When the criticism reached the floor of the Senate, Senator D’Amato termed it as “a deplorable and despicable vulgarity (p. 2192).” The government can be justified or not to censor art, but this should be based on the artistic impression that was intended from the art. If art is deliberately confrontational and seeks to attack the values and ethics of a society, I think they should………………………………………………………………………………………………

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

NO PLAGIARISM

Business Capstone Assessment 4): Individual Presentation (20%)
Summary of Individual Presentation
The Individual Presentation will be a reflection piece on your personal experience within the Executive Team of your Company. It will revolve around two key areas: 1) Self-Reflection of Learning within the Capstone Business Simulation, and 2) Analysis of the Team Dynamics.
A short and engaging individual presentation of 3-4 minutes (4 minutes maximum) is required.
Students are encouraged to explore various ways of creating a professional online presentation. This may involve using media enhancements in the presentation, if appropriate.
The presentation is expected to be formal in nature, but please note: A formal presentation does not equal a boring presentation! Do not let the word ‘formal’ stifle your creativity when presenting; interaction and creativity in your presentation are encouraged. You are expected to use the skills you have learnt over the course of your degree to keep the audiences interest.
The presentation must be conducted in one of two different ways:
1) Live to your tutor in-class (for those still attending class) or using Blackboard
Collaborate (for those in an online class) during each students scheduled seminar 12 (the last seminar of the semester), or
2) Pre-recorded and uploaded to a free viewing platform (such as YouTube, TikTok etc.) where a login is NOT required and a link to view your presentation can be provided to the tutor.
Whichever presentation method is chosen by students, the due date and time remains as the beginning of each students scheduled seminar 12 (the week of 2-6 November, 2020).
Students who choose the pre-recorded option are expected to have a webcam, therefore it is strongly recommended students use their webcam whilst presenting. A webcam is not compulsory, but a look at the Individual Presentation Rubric will highlight its value.
Refer to the Individual Presentation Rubric (20%).pdf in Blackboard Assessments 4) Individual Presentation (20%) for details of the allocation of marks for the Individual Presentation.
Requirements for Individual Presentation
1) Introduction
• Introduce yourself.
• Specify your Capstone Business Simulation Company.
• Outline the purpose of the presentation.
2) Self-Reflection of learning within the Capstone Business Simulation
These are some SUGGESTED areas that can be covered (do NOT attempt to cover them all):
• Was I confident in my knowledge of running a business before starting the unit?
• What did I know about Finance/Marketing/Production and/or running a business before starting the unit?
• Did I under- or over-estimate the effect that changes in one area of a company has on other areas of a company?
• How did I approach learning new things?
• Did I go in with an open or closed mind? Was it beneficial or detrimental?
• What was my personal approach to the unit?
• Did the changes in structure of the unit (online learning) affect my engagement with the unit?
• What could/should I have done differently?
• Have I learnt anything that I can take with me to the workforce?
• Did I enjoy the unit?
3) Analysis of the Team Dynamics
These are some SUGGESTED areas that can be covered (do NOT attempt to cover them all):
• How many people were in my team?
• Was I aware of any research on group formation processes?
• Was there a leader within my team? Why/why not?
• Did the group become a team or remain a set of individuals?
• How were the roles within the team allocated?
• Were the group meetings effective? Why/why not?
• What was the biggest hurdle the team faced?
• What could/should I have done differently within my team?
• What could/should have been better within the team?
• How could/should I have made my team better?
• Did the group have any fun (at any time throughout the semester)?
4) Conclusion
• Summarise the key points of the presentation.
References are NOT required for the presentation.
Students are expected to be sensitive to other students’ feelings. At all times students should not personally criticise fellow students. Rather the focus should be on the company and team as a whole. The presentation must remain objective. Any personal criticism will not be tolerated, in the (online) classroom nor in the workplace. Refer to the Student Charter for information about Curtin’s Values of Integrity, Respect, Courage, Excellence and Impact.
EVERY student is required to upload an electronic copy (e.g. PowerPoint slides, Prezi link, etc.) of the presentation in Blackboard Assessments 4) Individual Presentation (20%) Company Presentation – Submission before the presentation in Seminar 12.