Based on your readings thus far from the text and your own research, discuss disaster life cycles. Discuss disaster tradition and theory. Finally, discuss the types of disaster research.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals Based on your readings thus far from the text and your own research, discuss disaster life cycles
For the first part of the assigned project, you will create a partial draft of the risk management plan. To do so, follow these steps:
Research risk management plans.
Create an outline for a basic risk management plan with anticipated section headings (as indicated in this numbered list). This plan will include a qualitative risk assessment, which is addressed later in the project.
Write an introduction to the plan by explaining its purpose and importance.
Define the scope and boundaries of the plan.
Research and summarize compliance laws and regulations that pertain to the organization. Keep track of sources you use for citation purposes.
Identify the key roles and responsibilities of individuals and departments within the organization as they pertain to risk management.
Develop a proposed schedule for the risk management planning process.
Create a draft risk management plan detailing the information above. Format the plan similar to a professional business report and cite any sources you used.
Submission Requirements
Format: Microsoft Word (or compatible)
Font: Arial, size 12, double-space
Citation style: Your school’s preferred style guide
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals Research risk management plans.
Assessment type: Structured literature review – Individual. 2,000 words report (+ 10%) Purpose: This assessment is designed to allow students to identify relevant sources for their research and undertake review on theoretical concepts/constructs that has real world business implications. This assessment relates to learning outcomes a, b and d. Value: 25% Due Date: Week 8 – 11:59 pm Saturday of Week 8. Submission: Upload a soft copy to Moodle and Turnitin via Moodle links Topic: Literature review Task Details: Following consultation with the lecturer or tutor, the students research the field to develop literature review relating to the research topic as proposed in Assessment 2. Minimum 8 articles should be used and they must be from 2010 onwards, and all articles must be full papers (not research note or book reviews) sourced from refereed academic journals. The Literature Review should be presented in the following structure: Contents Length (word counts) Project title: descriptive summary of the proposed research topic. Max. 50 words Research Questions and Research Objectives – present the research questions and objectives in bullet points (the same as the ones provided in A2). 100 – 150 words Discussion of major theories, models or streams of influence around this topic – provides evidence that you have gone deeper than your initial search now to find literature that leads you toward answering your research question. The more comprehensive your literature review, the better. 1000 words Gap in the Literature – draw the reader’s attention to any contrasting views expressed in prior research in this area and give your view of how differing opinions can be brought together to help answer the research question and ultimately resolve the research problem. 500 words Discuss how the LR has provided you with theoretical bases an answer to your research question(s). 300 words Marks out of 25 will be awarded based on how well the following criteria is addressed: Criteria % Marks Identification of appropriate body of knowledge 20% Depth of the literature Search 30% Quality of the literature used 10% Structure of the literature review 10% Clarity on discussion on the gap in the literature 20% References list and Referencing (in-text citation) 10% Submission requirements details: Individual Assessment. Word limit: 2000 words (±10%) (excluding reference list). You need to state the word count of the assessment on the cover page. The review should be professionally presented using proper headings and sub-headings, in Arial 10pt or Times New Roman 12pt, single space. Harvard (Anglia) style referencing. Submission deadline Week 8 – Sunday by 11.59pm. Softcopy to be uploaded on Turnitin via Moddle links
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals Identify relevant sources for their research and undertake review on theoretical concepts/constructs that has real world business implications
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals My Resume- (Clinical Research Associate) Previous Job -Clinical Study Coordinator
Describe the value of qualitative research in healthcare and its’ impact on clinical decision making. Provide an example how qualitative research may influence nursing practice or healthcare delivery.
Your initial posting should be at least 400 words in length and utilize at least one scholarly source other than the textbook.
Assignment:
Qualitative Research
Write a fully developed and detailed APA essay addressing each of the following points/questions. There is no required word count; be sure to completely answer all the questions for each question in detail. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least one (1) source using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page are required. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative research study on the topic identified in Module 1. Conduct an initial critical appraisal of the study.
Respond to the overview questions for the critical appraisal of qualitative studies, including:
What type of qualitative research design was utilized to conduct the study?
Are the results valid/trustworthy and credible?
o How were the participants chosen?
o How were accuracy and completeness of data assured?
o How plausible/believable are the results?
Are implications of the research stated?
o May new insights increase sensitivity to others’ needs?
o May understandings enhance situational competence?
What is the effect on the reader?
o Are the results plausible and believable?
o Is the reader imaginatively drawn to the experience?
What are the results of the study?
o Does the research approach fit the purpose of the study?
How does the researcher identify the study approach?
o Are the data collection and analysis techniques appropriate?
Is the significance/importance of the study explicit?
o Does the literature support a need for the study?
o What is the study’s potential contribution?
Is the sampling clear and guided by study needs?
o Does the researcher control selection of the sample?
o Do sample size and composition reflect the study needs?
o Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified?
Are data collection procedures clear?
o Are sources and means of verifying data explicit?
o Are researcher roles and activities explained?
Are data analysis procedures described?
o Does analysis guide directions of sampling when it ends?
o Are data management processes described?
o What are the reported results (descriptive or interpretation)?
How are specific findings presented?
o Are the data meanings derived from data described in context?
o Does the writing effectively promote understanding?
Will the results help me care for my patients?
o Are the results relevant to persons in similar situations?
o Are the results relevant to patient values and/or circumstances?
o How may the results be applied to clinical practice?
Please be sure to answer the questions thoroughly using complete sentences and APA format. Explain responses to yes/no questions in detail by presenting information found in the study to support your response.
Provide a reference for the article according to APA format and a copy of the article.
Assignment Expectations:
Length: Clearly and fully answer all questions; attach a copy of the articleStructure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of one (1) scholarly source for the article is required for this assignment.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Describe the value of qualitative research in healthcare and its’ impact on clinical decision making
Assignment 1 Leadership Evaluation and Mentorship Proposal KEY INFORMATION Due date Refer to the UC Unit Outline for the current teaching period Weighting 15% Relevant chapters 1 ? 2 Assessment format Submit in .doc or.docx format Length 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) Specific requirements Include academic journals, papers,and books sourced from the library, course content and webinars, and additional media suggested in the webinars. Use Harvard or APA 7th edition style. Minimum of five academic or research references should be included. LEARNING OUTCOMES On successful completion of this assessment, students will be able to: • Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results • Clearly articulate their own preferred approach to leadership and critically situate that style with reference to the research evidence. GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES • UC graduates are professional -communicate effectively • UC graduates are professional -employ up-to-date and relevant knowledge and skills • UC graduates are professional -use creativity, critical thinking, analysis and research skills to solve theoretical and real- world problems • UC graduates are global citizens -make creative use of technology in their learning and professional lives • UC graduates are lifelong learners -adapt to complexity, ambiguity and change by being flexible and keen to engage with new ideas • UC graduates are lifelong learners -evaluate and adopt new technology. Page 1 of 5 UC9937_0121
9937 APPLIED LEADERSHIP Assignment 1 Leadership Evaluation and Mentorship Proposal BRIEF Construct a mentorship proposal (1,000 words) outlining your intended mentorship goals which consists of three assignments as you observe a leader. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS For this assignment, you will undertake a personality test and draw upon its results to construct a mentorship portfolio outlining your mentorship goals and observations. This assignment is the first part of your mentorship portfolio and includes completing a leadership and personality skills test and analysing the results and outline your plan to interview and observe a leader. Section 1 – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) 1. First you are required to complete the leadership and personality skills survey 16 Personalities Test. Answer the questions as honestly and accurately as possible. Your survey results should also be included in this assignment and your final portfolio assignment. 2. Interpret the survey results and compare them with your own leadership experience and performance in a professional setting. Summarize the results and personal reflections regarding the results. You should connect and support your reflections with research evidence found in the chapters, readings, and academic resources. In essence, you should link your personality findings to the leadership style research. Use the following questions to guide your thinking: • What do you think of the results? Are they accurate? • Are there any results that surprised you? If so, would you agree or disagree with the results? • How accurate do the results reflect your past experience with other leaders? • What type of workplace behaviours and outlook do you consider you conform to the most? • Do you believe your personal traits have influenced your previous work and professional behaviours? If so, in what ways? • Having considered the relevant research, do you consider the combination of traits and skills sets to be relevant to strong leadership behaviours? 3. Next, use your reflections to establish several goals and objectives. The goals and objectives should be guided by the effective leadership style research. Additionally, you will use the goals and objectives to guide your leader observation and interview portion of your portfolio. Use the following questions to develop your goals and objectives: • What personal leadership skills do you wish to improve upon? What is the basis of your thinking? • What are your personal goals you want to achieve from this observation exercise? What is the basis of your goals? • Is there a type of leadership you are curious to observe in practice? Does the research suggest its relevance to current working conditions? • Have you selected a leader for a particular purpose? Do they represent a skill you wish to investigate? Link this as closely as you can to your own personal survey outcomes, personal skills and those advocated in the research. Page 2 of 5 UC9937_0121
9937 APPLIED LEADERSHIP Assignment 1 Leadership Evaluation and Mentorship Proposal Section 2 – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) 1. Identify a leader or manager who will act as a mentor. This maybe someone you have recently met or someone you already know. You will be required (at a minimum) to complete the following activities with your selected mentor: a. (1) initial interview with your mentor b. (1) face-to-face meeting (this maybe completed via video) c. (1) key observation of leadership in practice (Consult with your instructor regarding this requirement. This requirement maybe adjusted to meet COVID safety requirements) 2. Write a proposal outlining your anticipated leadership mentorship observation and interview. Feedback on your proposal will be provided and may require you to adjust the nature of your engagement with your selected mentor for the next assignment. a. Review your goals and objectives and describe how your selected mentor will help you achieve your goals and objectives. You may want to use the questions above to guide your answer. In addition, use the following questions to guide your proposal: • The purpose and scope of the mentorship. • Regarding your own skillsets named by the survey, are you actively responding to these results and seeking particular insights to guide you for the future? • Has the mentor been selected for a particular reason? Do they excel in a skill you seek to investigate? Was this a skill reflected in your survey? • How will activities be structured? When will observations take place and what are some of the practicalities of this mentorship undertaking? SUGGESTED STRUCTURE You may organise your report in any manner that best outlines your analysis plan. Here is a sample structure. 1. Cover Page 2. Introduction a. Summarize what your proposal will review. 3. Proposal Body a. Section One -Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) i. Summary of personality test results ii. Personality test result reflection iii. Goals and objectives for your mentor observation and interview b. Section Two – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) i. Describe briefly your selected mentor ii. Purpose and scope of mentorship iii. Plan for interviews and observation 4. Conclusion 5. List of References 6. Appendix a. Include personality survey results Page 3 of 5 UC9937_0121
9937 APPLIED LEADERSHIP Assignment 1 Leadership Evaluation and Mentorship Proposal ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS • 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) • Minimum of 5 references are required • Use Harvard or APA 7th reference style • Times New Roman or Arial (12 pt) are the recommended fonts • Include page numbers and your name • Include a title page, list of references and any subheadings CONSIDERATIONS • Ensure you complete the personal skills and traits survey first and use these results to form a basis of your mentorship proposal. You can be critical of the survey results: you do not have to agree with them but think about why this is. Explain your rationale for how this has impacted your mentorship goals and leader selection. • The mentor can be someone you know previously, someone you admire, or even someone who is strong in an area you seek to improve upon. Think about personal and formative outcomes of this task! Your mentor cannot be a relative or partner. • Consider your own past leadership experience: what were you good at? What feedback did you receive? Are you seeking to receive some feedback on your own personal style? How does this relate to the research evidence of effective leadership approaches?
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results
KEY INFORMATION Due date Refer to the UC Unit Outline for the current teaching period Weighting 15% Relevant chapters 1 ? 2 Assessment format Submit in .doc or.docx format Length 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) Specific requirements Include academic journals, papers,and books sourced from the library, course content and webinars, and additional media suggested in the webinars. Use Harvard or APA 7th edition style. Minimum of five academic or research references should be included. LEARNING OUTCOMES On successful completion of this assessment, students will be able to: § Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results § Clearly articulate their own preferred approach to leadership and critically situate that style with reference to the research evidence. GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES § UC graduates are professional – communicate effectively § UC graduates are professional – employ up-to-date and relevant knowledge and skills § UC graduates are professional – use creativity, critical thinking, analysis and research skills to solve theoretical and realworld problems § UC graduates are global citizens – make creative use of technology in their learning and professional lives § UC graduates are lifelong learners – adapt to complexity, ambiguity and change by being flexible and keen to engage with new ideas § UC graduates are lifelong learners – evaluate and adopt new technology. BRIEF Construct a mentorship proposal (1,000 words) outlining your intended mentorship goals which consists of three assignments as you observe a leader. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS For this assignment, you will undertake a personality test and draw upon its results to construct a mentorship portfolio outlining your mentorship goals and observations. This assignment is the first part of your mentorship portfolio and includes completing a leadership and personality skills test and analysing the results and outline your plan to interview and observe a leader. Section 1 – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) 1. First you are required to complete the leadership and personality skills survey 16 Personalities Test. Answer the questions as honestly and accurately as possible. Your survey results should also be included in this assignment and your final portfolio assignment. 2. Interpret the survey results and compare them with your own leadership experience and performance in a professional setting. Summarize the results and personal reflections regarding the results. You should connect and support your reflections with research evidence found in the chapters, readings, and academic resources. In essence, you should link your personality findings to the leadership style research. Use the following questions to guide your thinking: § What do you think of the results? Are they accurate? § Are there any results that surprised you? If so, would you agree or disagree with the results? § How accurate do the results reflect your past experience with other leaders? § What type of workplace behaviours and outlook do you consider you conform to the most? § Do you believe your personal traits have influenced your previous work and professional behaviours? If so, in what ways? § Having considered the relevant research, do you consider the combination of traits and skills sets to be relevant to strong leadership behaviours? 3. Next, use your reflections to establish several goals and objectives. The goals and objectives should be guided by the effective leadership style research. Additionally, you will use the goals and objectives to guide your leader observation and interview portion of your portfolio. Use the following questions to develop your goals and objectives: § What personal leadership skills do you wish to improve upon? What is the basis of your thinking? § What are your personal goals you want to achieve from this observation exercise? What is the basis of your goals? § Is there a type of leadership you are curious to observe in practice? Does the research suggest its relevance to current working conditions? § Have you selected a leader for a particular purpose? Do they represent a skill you wish to investigate? Link this as closely as you can to your own personal survey outcomes, personal skills and those advocated in the research. Section 2 – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) 1. Identify a leader or manager who will act as a mentor. This maybe someone you have recently met or someone you already know. You will be required (at a minimum) to complete the following activities with your selected mentor: a. (1) initial interview with your mentor b. (1) face-to-face meeting (this maybe completed via video) c. (1) key observation of leadership in practice (Consult with your instructor regarding this requirement. This requirement maybe adjusted to meet COVID safety requirements) 2. Write a proposal outlining your anticipated leadership mentorship observation and interview. Feedback on your proposal will be provided and may require you to adjust the nature of your engagement with your selected mentor for the next assignment. a. Review your goals and objectives and describe how your selected mentor will help you achieve your goals and objectives. You may want to use the questions above to guide your answer. In addition, use the following questions to guide your proposal: § The purpose and scope of the mentorship. § Regarding your own skillsets named by the survey, are you actively responding to these results and seeking particular insights to guide you for the future? § Has the mentor been selected for a particular reason? Do they excel in a skill you seek to investigate? Was this a skill reflected in your survey? § How will activities be structured? When will observations take place and what are some of the practicalities of this mentorship undertaking? SUGGESTED STRUCTURE You may organise your report in any manner that best outlines your analysis plan. Here is a sample structure. 1. Cover Page 2. Introduction a. Summarize what your proposal will review. 3. Proposal Body a. Section One – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) i. Summary of personality test results ii. Personality test result reflection iii. Goals and objectives for your mentor observation and interview b. Section Two – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) i. Describe briefly your selected mentor ii. Purpose and scope of mentorship iii. Plan for interviews and observation 4. Conclusion 5. List of References 6. Appendix a. Include personality survey results ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS § 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) § Minimum of 5 references are required ? Use Harvard or APA 7th reference style § Times New Roman or Arial (12 pt) are the recommended fonts § Include page numbers and your name § Include a title page, list of references and any subheadings CONSIDERATIONS § Ensure you complete the personal skills and traits survey first and use these results to form a basis of your mentorship proposal. You can be critical of the survey results: you do not have to agree with them but think about why this is. Explain your rationale for how this has impacted your mentorship goals and leader selection. § The mentor can be someone you know previously, someone you admire, or even someone who is strong in an area you seek to improve upon. Think about personal and formative outcomes of this task! Your mentor cannot be a relative or partner. § Consider your own past leadership experience: what were you good at? What feedback did you receive? Are you seeking to receive some feedback on your own personal style? ?How does this relate to the research evidence of effective leadership approaches? RUBRIC CRITERIA HIGH DISTINCTION: 85%+ DISTINCTION: 75-84% CREDIT: 65-74% PASS: 50-64% FAIL: 50% Consider various personality types and what they mean for contemporary leadership performance and the survey results. Links to research. (25%) Considered interrogation of various personality types and leadership performance analysed closely to survey tasks and underpinned by high level research findings. Thoroughly researched exploration of personality types. Leadership performance analysed and discussed against survey tasks. Some sound research analysis of personality types and leadership performance/survey Well referenced. Develops scholarly links between personality types and leadership performance, however, needs further elaboration and links to survey. Missing or no consideration of various personality types. Unreferenced or unclear links to leadership performance and survey. A clearly articulated reflection of students’ individual approach to leadership situated in relational to learnings from research on contemporary leadership models (25%) Articulate and nuanced reflections on both current and aspired leadership practice. Examples given represent high levels of analysis informed by research. Articulates reflection of both own current and aspired leadership practice. Provides considered examples linked to research evidence. Solid reflection of both current and aspired own leadership practice, with some examples drawn from research. Documents student approach to leadership but needs further exploration and linkage to research. Missing or undeveloped student reflection and aspired approach to leadership as per the research. Considered mentor selection and rationale provided that refers to personal skills and traits as a basis for a particular style of leadership. Link to student survey and the research (25%) Reflections reveal a deep understanding of selected leadership competencies. Profile choice is very well situated in relation to survey and research evidence. A very considered review of leadership competencies assessment, and considered choice of profiles matched to survey and research evidence Solid outline of leadership skills/competencies and linked to profile selection, survey results and research evidence. Some discussion of chosen leaders’ skills/competencies Lacks clarity of links to profile choice with survey data and research evidence. Lacking connection to survey, or research, results and minimal coverage of profile choice. Structured proposal considering mentorship potential outcomes expressed through professional language, sound structure and referencing. (25%) A highly considered submission; regarding both mentorship scope and practicalities. Highly professional language expression, structure and referencing. Thorough consideration of mentorship practicalities. Well structured, professional presentation and referencing. Some mentorship practicalities are considered but require extension. Submission is appropriate in terms of professional language, structure and referencing. Mentorship practicalities require further elaboration and detail. Submission requires refinement of professional language, more structure and referencing. Mentorship practicalities not considered. Lacking in professional tone and structure. Minimal or absent referencing.KEY INFORMATION Due date Refer to the UC Unit Outline for the current teaching period Weighting 15% Relevant chapters 1 ? 2 Assessment format Submit in .doc or.docx format Length 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) Specific requirements Include academic journals, papers,and books sourced from the library, course content and webinars, and additional media suggested in the webinars. Use Harvard or APA 7th edition style. Minimum of five academic or research references should be included. LEARNING OUTCOMES On successful completion of this assessment, students will be able to: § Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results § Clearly articulate their own preferred approach to leadership and critically situate that style with reference to the research evidence. GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES § UC graduates are professional – communicate effectively § UC graduates are professional – employ up-to-date and relevant knowledge and skills § UC graduates are professional – use creativity, critical thinking, analysis and research skills to solve theoretical and realworld problems § UC graduates are global citizens – make creative use of technology in their learning and professional lives § UC graduates are lifelong learners – adapt to complexity, ambiguity and change by being flexible and keen to engage with new ideas § UC graduates are lifelong learners – evaluate and adopt new technology. BRIEF Construct a mentorship proposal (1,000 words) outlining your intended mentorship goals which consists of three assignments as you observe a leader. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS For this assignment, you will undertake a personality test and draw upon its results to construct a mentorship portfolio outlining your mentorship goals and observations. This assignment is the first part of your mentorship portfolio and includes completing a leadership and personality skills test and analysing the results and outline your plan to interview and observe a leader. Section 1 – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) 1. First you are required to complete the leadership and personality skills survey 16 Personalities Test. Answer the questions as honestly and accurately as possible. Your survey results should also be included in this assignment and your final portfolio assignment. 2. Interpret the survey results and compare them with your own leadership experience and performance in a professional setting. Summarize the results and personal reflections regarding the results. You should connect and support your reflections with research evidence found in the chapters, readings, and academic resources. In essence, you should link your personality findings to the leadership style research. Use the following questions to guide your thinking: § What do you think of the results? Are they accurate? § Are there any results that surprised you? If so, would you agree or disagree with the results? § How accurate do the results reflect your past experience with other leaders? § What type of workplace behaviours and outlook do you consider you conform to the most? § Do you believe your personal traits have influenced your previous work and professional behaviours? If so, in what ways? § Having considered the relevant research, do you consider the combination of traits and skills sets to be relevant to strong leadership behaviours? 3. Next, use your reflections to establish several goals and objectives. The goals and objectives should be guided by the effective leadership style research. Additionally, you will use the goals and objectives to guide your leader observation and interview portion of your portfolio. Use the following questions to develop your goals and objectives: § What personal leadership skills do you wish to improve upon? What is the basis of your thinking? § What are your personal goals you want to achieve from this observation exercise? What is the basis of your goals? § Is there a type of leadership you are curious to observe in practice? Does the research suggest its relevance to current working conditions? § Have you selected a leader for a particular purpose? Do they represent a skill you wish to investigate? Link this as closely as you can to your own personal survey outcomes, personal skills and those advocated in the research. Section 2 – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) 1. Identify a leader or manager who will act as a mentor. This maybe someone you have recently met or someone you already know. You will be required (at a minimum) to complete the following activities with your selected mentor: a. (1) initial interview with your mentor b. (1) face-to-face meeting (this maybe completed via video) c. (1) key observation of leadership in practice (Consult with your instructor regarding this requirement. This requirement maybe adjusted to meet COVID safety requirements) 2. Write a proposal outlining your anticipated leadership mentorship observation and interview. Feedback on your proposal will be provided and may require you to adjust the nature of your engagement with your selected mentor for the next assignment. a. Review your goals and objectives and describe how your selected mentor will help you achieve your goals and objectives. You may want to use the questions above to guide your answer. In addition, use the following questions to guide your proposal: § The purpose and scope of the mentorship. § Regarding your own skillsets named by the survey, are you actively responding to these results and seeking particular insights to guide you for the future? § Has the mentor been selected for a particular reason? Do they excel in a skill you seek to investigate? Was this a skill reflected in your survey? § How will activities be structured? When will observations take place and what are some of the practicalities of this mentorship undertaking? SUGGESTED STRUCTURE You may organise your report in any manner that best outlines your analysis plan. Here is a sample structure. 1. Cover Page 2. Introduction a. Summarize what your proposal will review. 3. Proposal Body a. Section One – Personality Reflection and Goals (500 words) i. Summary of personality test results ii. Personality test result reflection iii. Goals and objectives for your mentor observation and interview b. Section Two – Leadership Mentorship Activity Proposal (500 words) i. Describe briefly your selected mentor ii. Purpose and scope of mentorship iii. Plan for interviews and observation 4. Conclusion 5. List of References 6. Appendix a. Include personality survey results ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS § 1,000 words (10% allowable either way, does not include title page, table of contents, appendix and references) § Minimum of 5 references are required ? Use Harvard or APA 7th reference style § Times New Roman or Arial (12 pt) are the recommended fonts § Include page numbers and your name § Include a title page, list of references and any subheadings CONSIDERATIONS § Ensure you complete the personal skills and traits survey first and use these results to form a basis of your mentorship proposal. You can be critical of the survey results: you do not have to agree with them but think about why this is. Explain your rationale for how this has impacted your mentorship goals and leader selection. § The mentor can be someone you know previously, someone you admire, or even someone who is strong in an area you seek to improve upon. Think about personal and formative outcomes of this task! Your mentor cannot be a relative or partner. § Consider your own past leadership experience: what were you good at? What feedback did you receive? Are you seeking to receive some feedback on your own personal style? ?How does this relate to the research evidence of effective leadership approaches? RUBRIC CRITERIA HIGH DISTINCTION: 85%+ DISTINCTION: 75-84% CREDIT: 65-74% PASS: 50-64% FAIL: 50% Consider various personality types and what they mean for contemporary leadership performance and the survey results. Links to research. (25%) Considered interrogation of various personality types and leadership performance analysed closely to survey tasks and underpinned by high level research findings. Thoroughly researched exploration of personality types. Leadership performance analysed and discussed against survey tasks. Some sound research analysis of personality types and leadership performance/survey Well referenced. Develops scholarly links between personality types and leadership performance, however, needs further elaboration and links to survey. Missing or no consideration of various personality types. Unreferenced or unclear links to leadership performance and survey. A clearly articulated reflection of students’ individual approach to leadership situated in relational to learnings from research on contemporary leadership models (25%) Articulate and nuanced reflections on both current and aspired leadership practice. Examples given represent high levels of analysis informed by research. Articulates reflection of both own current and aspired leadership practice. Provides considered examples linked to research evidence. Solid reflection of both current and aspired own leadership practice, with some examples drawn from research. Documents student approach to leadership but needs further exploration and linkage to research. Missing or undeveloped student reflection and aspired approach to leadership as per the research. Considered mentor selection and rationale provided that refers to personal skills and traits as a basis for a particular style of leadership. Link to student survey and the research (25%) Reflections reveal a deep understanding of selected leadership competencies. Profile choice is very well situated in relation to survey and research evidence. A very considered review of leadership competencies assessment, and considered choice of profiles matched to survey and research evidence Solid outline of leadership skills/competencies and linked to profile selection, survey results and research evidence. Some discussion of chosen leaders’ skills/competencies Lacks clarity of links to profile choice with survey data and research evidence. Lacking connection to survey, or research, results and minimal coverage of profile choice. Structured proposal considering mentorship potential outcomes expressed through professional language, sound structure and referencing. (25%) A highly considered submission; regarding both mentorship scope and practicalities. Highly professional language expression, structure and referencing. Thorough consideration of mentorship practicalities. Well structured, professional presentation and referencing. Some mentorship practicalities are considered but require extension. Submission is appropriate in terms of professional language, structure and referencing. Mentorship practicalities require further elaboration and detail. Submission requires refinement of professional language, more structure and referencing. Mentorship practicalities not considered. Lacking in professional tone and structure. Minimal or absent referencing.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Explain various personality types and link criteria to research evidence on leadership application results
Write a 1250-1500 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. There should be three main sections, one for each bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least two (2) sources using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page in correct APA do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Part 1: Describe why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible or appropriate for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects.
Part 2: Review the sectioned headed, Two Ethical Exemplars in Chapter 22 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015, pages 518-519). Discuss three main ethical controversies related to implementing Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) Initiatives. Describe how these controversies relate to the four core ethical principles.
Part 3: Identify which ethical principles may be in conflict with the concept of “patients having an ethical responsibility in improving healthcare.” Discuss how these conflicts may be resolved.
Assignment Expectations:
Length: 1250 – 1500 wordsStructure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Describe why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible or appropriate for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects.
Write a 1250-1500 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. There should be three main sections, one for each bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least two (2) sources using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page in correct APA do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.
Part 1: Describe why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible or appropriate for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects.
Part 2: Review the sectioned headed, Two Ethical Exemplars in Chapter 22 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015, pages 518-519). Discuss three main ethical controversies related to implementing Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) Initiatives. Describe how these controversies relate to the four core ethical principles.
Part 3: Identify which ethical principles may be in conflict with the concept of “patients having an ethical responsibility in improving healthcare.” Discuss how these conflicts may be resolved.
Assignment Expectations:
Length: 1250 – 1500 wordsStructure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Describe why ethical safeguards designed for clinical research may not be feasible or appropriate for evidence-based practice or evidence-based practice implementation projects
Biotechnology is a rapidly growing field that uses research tools from biology and chemistry to find solutions to current scientific problems. Some biotechnology professionals look for the genetic basis of disease or factors that affect lifespan. Others focus on solving food shortages, the climate crisis, or criminal investigations.
Case Assignment
To complete your essay for this assignment, select one of the biotechnology/genetic engineering topics below and answer the following questions in essay format:
Therapeutic Uses of Stem Cells
Animal Cloning
Designer Babies
DNA and Criminal Forensics
Summarize the technology (How is it done? What is it used for?)
What people or companies are interested in doing research on this topic?
What are they trying to discover or do?
What have they already done with this technology?
Why are they trying to do it/or what is the ultimate goal in the future?
Assignment Expectations
Organize this essay assignment using subtitles that summarize the topic from each question above. For example, to answer Question 1, use a descriptive subtitle like the following: Introduction to Animal Cloning.
Your essay should be approximately 1.5-2 pages in length. Answer each question under the subtitle using complete sentences that relate back to the question. Be sure to use APA formatting throughout your essay with 1-inch margins, 12-point type and double spacing throughout. Include a title page, introduction, answers to the questions with subtitles and concluding paragraph. Remember to include in-text citations within the body of the essay referencing your resources (i.
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Biotechnology is a rapidly growing field that uses research tools from biology and chemistry to find solutions to current scientific problems.