The selection process for law enforcement officers includes an interview, situational tests, and psychological tests. As in most professions, officers also participate in annual continuing education programs. While there is a need for updated training for officers, researchers have also recognized the need to study police behaviors. Recently, researchers have created a mobile electroencephalogram (EEG) to monitor brain activity of officers when put into stressful situations. Read about the study here. Now locate a news article that discusses how police officers are trained to handle stressful situations. Given the information you found, how does your article interpret the research study? Your paper should be no more than two (2) pages and should include an APA citation for the article analyzed
CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDERon Recently, researchers have created a mobile electroencephalogram (EEG) to monitor brain activity of officers when put into stressful situations
Write at least a one-to-two-page paper, using APA format. Reference all resources used. Use the EGCC library to find your article or other research databases. Make sure you cite and reference all of your resources to avoid plagiarism.
Find an evidence-based peer-review research article on a social work topic where the researchers used a quantitative research method. Read the article and then write a summary identifying the type of research conducted, how you know the researchers used a quantitative method, the process they used to conduct the research, and the outcomes of the study. Attach the article to the assignment.
For each DQ elaborate within 260-300 words. Use in text citations accordingly. Use scholarly reference(s) along with the one(s) attached as well. Use and cite references accordingly.
DQ 1) What is your perception of researchers and the role you believe they serve in the academic community? What kinds of mental and behavioral changes do you think you will need to make in order to become a successful researcher?
DQ 2) Many learners approach a doctoral program with great enthusiasm. However, enthusiasm and passion alone do not guarantee success. Often, learners want to begin the research process immediately without the proper skills in place to be successful. Although, passion is necessary, it is important that all learners develop a plan of action to be successful. All learners must make a transition from being a student completing assignments to being a self-directed researcher. This requires students to be self-motivated, to engage in reflective scholarly practice, and to be receptive to feedback and critique from peers and faculty.
How might these three practices support your development of a doctoral identity and help you meet the academic expectations for doctoral learners? What potential challenges to do you foresee with incorporating these practices into your routine? What adjustments will you need to make to overcome these challenges? *(This response does not require research support.)
References:
GCU Doctoral Research: The Purposeful Path to a Successful Dissertation
Ames, C., Berman, R., & Casteel, A. (2018). A preliminary examination of doctoral student retention factors in private online workspaces. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 79-106. doi:10.28945/3958
Grit, Growth Mindset, and Deliberate Practice in Online Learning
Read:
McClendon, C., Neugebauer, R. M., & King, A. (2017). Grit, growth mindset, and deliberate practice in online learning. Journal of Instructional Research, 6, 8-17. doi:10.9743/jir.2017.2
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1153307.pdf
A Preliminary Examination of Doctoral Student Retention Factors in Private Online Workspaces
Read:
Ames, C., Berman, R., & Casteel, A. (2018). A preliminary examination of doctoral student retention factors in private online workspaces. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 79-106. doi:10.28945/3958
Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. A verdict was rendered against three parent chaperones. How was the third parent included in the case?
Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services What is your perception of researchers and the role you believe they serve in the academic community?
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Researchers wanted to explore self-esteem in adolescent boys and adolescent girls. Each respondent completed a 10-item self-esteem scale (they chose one rating for each item from a Likert-type scale, 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). The sum of the 10 ratings was each respondent’s self-esteem score. Their results were: t = 2.01, d = .90 (40 girls, 40 boys).
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Use APA style for the writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least four additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
Directions:
In an essay (500 words), use the scenario presented above to thoroughly answer the following questions:
What statistical test did the researchers use to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in levels of self-esteem between the boys and the girls?
What was the purpose of calculating a Cohen’s d? When is a Cohen’s d calculated? Interpret d=.90. What does it mean in this example?
What if the researcher compared the adolescent boys before treatment and again after treating them for depression? What type of t-test would be most appropriate in this case, and why?
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals
Researchers wanted to explore self-esteem in adolescent boys and adolescent girls
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6008: Capstone A: Applied Research Project in Public Health Assessment Assessment 2: Literature review Individual/Group Individual Length 4,000 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: 2. Integrate and apply their knowledge and skills in public health 3. Develop research skills and apply these to a public health issue 4. Conduct a small literature review which critically analyses key issues on a public health research topic 5. Define and justify a research question, based on the literature/public health issue, and outline its significance Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page 1 of 6 Instructions: By the end of module 3, student must provide to their learning facilitator a brief review of the literature on their chosen topic. The literature review must contain key references/theorists/researchers for the public health topic chosen. The literature review assignment must be designed to address the following questions: • Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic? • What are the key issues? • What are the gaps in the existing body of knowledge? The literature review should provide a basis for justifying a clear research question or hypothesis to be explored further. You must also indicate the search strategy used for your literature review. For example, what were the key words you searched for, and which key databases or other sources did you use to conduct your literature review? (e.g. CINAHL, Proquest Public Health, Informit, Medline, Google Scholar). Assessment Criteria: • Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) ? Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) 0 General assessment criteria (20%): o Provides a lucid introduction o Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues o Shows ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to chosen topic o Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts o Shows evidence of reading beyond the required readings o Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments and not merely assertions o Provides a conclusion or summary o Correctly uses academic writing, presentation and grammar: ¦ Complies with academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list) ¦ Writes clearly, with accurate spelling and grammar as well as proper sentence and paragraph construction ¦ Uses appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research Marking Rubric: Assessment Attributes 0-34 (Fail 2- 35-49 F2) (Fail 1 – Fl) 50-64 (Pass-P) 65-74 (Credit – CR) 75-84 (Distinction – DN) 85-100 (High Distinction-HD) Unaccept Poor able Functional Proficient Advanced Exceptional Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the subject, insufficient understanding of the subject content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of subject learning objectives, the development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the subject or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the subject. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the subject demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills. Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, creativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills. Knowledge and understanding Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Knowledge/understa nding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often Thorough knowledge/understandi ng of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2 of Page 4 8 conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. Critical reasoning, presentation and defence of an argument and/or position Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Specific position (perspective or argument) fails to take into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Makes assertions that are not justified. Specific position (perspective or argument) begins to take into account the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Others’ points of view are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with wellformed arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) is expertly presented and accurately takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with welldeveloped arguments. Specific position (perspective or argument) is presented expertly, authoritatively and imaginatively, accurately taking into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Limits of position are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with sophisticated arguments. PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2 Page 5 of 8 Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Limited synthesis and analysis. Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of Thoroughly developed and creative analysis Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Limited application/recommendatio ns based upon analysis. knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and/or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases. PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2 Page 6 of 8 Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence Use of academic conventions including appropriate resources and referencing (20%) ^General assessment criteria shown below Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading well developed. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA style. There are no mistakes in using the APA Style. *GenerglA^essmenLCntengi • Provides a lucid introduction • Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues • Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to your chosen topic
Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts_______________________ PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2 Page 7 of 8 Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments not merely assertion Provides a conclusion or summary Use of academic writing and presentation and grammar: Complies with normal academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list). Is written clearly with accurate spelling, grammar and sentence and paragraph construction ? Appropriate citation and referencing used (using APA style)
Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic?
Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6008: Capstone A: Applied Research Project in Public Health Assessment Assessment 2: Literature review Individual/Group Individual Length 4,000 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: 2. Integrate and apply their knowledge and skills in public health 3. Develop research skills and apply these to a public health issue 4. Conduct a small literature review which critically analyses key issues on a public health research topic 5. Define and justify a research question, based on the literature/public health issue, and outline its significance Submission Due Sunday following the end of Module 4 at 11:55pm AEST/AEDT* Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page 1 of 6 Instructions: By the end of module 3, student must provide to their learning facilitator a brief review of the literature on their chosen topic. The literature review must contain key references/theorists/researchers for the public health topic chosen. The literature review assignment must be designed to address the following questions: • Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic? • What are the key issues? • What are the gaps in the existing body of knowledge? The literature review should provide a basis for justifying a clear research question or hypothesis to be explored further. You must also indicate the search strategy used for your literature review. For example, what were the key words you searched for, and which key databases or other sources did you use to conduct your literature review? (e.g. CINAHL, Proquest Public Health, Informit, Medline, Google Scholar). Assessment Criteria: • Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) ? Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) 0 General assessment criteria (20%): o Provides a lucid introduction o Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues o Shows ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to chosen topic o Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts o Shows evidence of reading beyond the required readings o Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments and not merely assertions o Provides a conclusion or summary o Correctly uses academic writing, presentation and grammar: ¦ Complies with academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list) ¦ Writes clearly, with accurate spelling and grammar as well as proper sentence and paragraph construction ¦ Uses appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research Marking Rubric: Assessment Attributes 0-34 (Fail 2- 35-49 F2) (Fail 1 – Fl) 50-64 (Pass-P) 65-74 (Credit – CR) 75-84 (Distinction – DN) 85-100 (High Distinction-HD) Unaccept Poor able Functional Proficient Advanced Exceptional Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the subject, insufficient understanding of the subject content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of subject learning objectives, the development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the subject or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the subject. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the subject demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills. Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, creativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills. Knowledge and understanding Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Knowledge/understa nding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often Thorough knowledge/understandi ng of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2 of Page 4 8 conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. Critical reasoning, presentation and defence of an argument and/or position Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Specific position (perspective or argument) fails to take into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Makes assertions that are not justified. Specific position (perspective or argument) begins to take into account the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Others’ points of view are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with wellformed arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) is expertly presented and accurately takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with welldeveloped arguments. Specific position (perspective or argument) is presented expertly, authoritatively and imaginatively, accurately taking into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Limits of position are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with sophisticated arguments. PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2 Page 5 of 8 Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Limited synthesis and analysis. Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of Thoroughly developed and creative analysis Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Limited application/recommendatio ns based upon analysis. knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and/or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases. PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2 Page 6 of 8 Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence Use of academic conventions including appropriate resources and referencing (20%) ^General assessment criteria shown below Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading well developed. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA style. There are no mistakes in using the APA Style. *GenerglA^essmenLCntengi • Provides a lucid introduction • Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues • Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to your chosen topic
Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts_______________________ PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2 Page 7 of 8 Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments not merely assertion Provides a conclusion or summary Use of academic writing and presentation and grammar: Complies with normal academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list). Is written clearly with accurate spelling, grammar and sentence and paragraph construction ? Appropriate citation and referencing used (using APA style)
Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic?
Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.
Assignment details: Researchers often identify the research problem and then go in search of a theory. Discuss the disadvantages of doing this. What does the textbook recommend that researchers do to assure a true fit between theory and designing the study?
The research that is theory driven and supports theory building as the main objectives in the research is normally refers to deductive. The disadvantages of this kind of research design is that it starts with a fully developed framework. This means that the information that does not fit within the framework of the research is thrown out as irrelevant(Pannucci, & Wilkins, 2010). Therefore, the results obtained from this kind of research design can be myopically, thus considered as the science that resists model change. This type of research design follows specific procedures and assumptions described in the theory.
In the text book, sampling procedure was randomized in order to minimize sampling bias. This was achieved through randomization of the treatment conditions. The study also focuses on the issues concerning data collection which is nuance to many researchers. Generally, quantitative data collection does not capture this problem. The study addressed these issues by conducting survey of the patient’s perceptions, thus making the theory to fit the research design. If the research uses an open-ended questions as opposed to closed-end question, the method could be a mixed resign design(Pannucci, & Wilkins, 2010). However, it is important to note that research objectives should be tied with the creation of quantitative data which allows for the comparisons that relates with time-based metrics.
During data collection from patients, it is important to…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….