In this assignment, you will complete the final course project focusing on incident response, network investigation, and findings documentation. As a capstone exercise, this will require knowledge that you have acquired throughout the course. Thus, in addition to reviewing the links provided, also be sure to review the resources provided throughout the course, as appropriate.
The following Wikipedia article may be a helpful reference to you for this project:
This project has three parts. In the first part, you will conduct a network investigation for 2 scenarios, and then you will fill out an Acme Incident Response Report. For part two, you will take the information you gathered for your scenarios and combine them into a formal Incident Response Report. Lastly, you will combine your new report with your Acme Incident Response Report into a single file for submission.
Part 1
In the first part, review all of the following bullets, then complete the associated tasks.
Review Acme’s Incident Response Procedures
Download Acme’s Incident Response Procedures
to ensure you are following the company’s protocols. (attached)
Answer the questions associated with all four scenarios by conducting the appropriate network investigations using these
Word count/Time provided: 2000 Words Weighting: 25% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO 1, ULO 2 Assessment 3 Detail For this assignment students will perform a critical analysis of selected e-commerce websites.
https://www.tesco.com/
https://www.johnlewis.com/
https://www.victorianfarmersdirect.com.au
https://www.kijiji.ca
https://www.bestbuy.ca/en-ca
https://www.thebay.com/
https://www.asos.com/
https://www.nykaa.com
https://www.sweetviolets.com.au
https://www.foodlandsa.com.au/ PART A: Scoping Literature Review Perform a scoping literature review of critical factors that make e-commerce sites successful. As part of your research, you should cite at least five reference articles in your review. You may include factors listed in the Australian Post report on e-commerce (link below). For example in your review you may include but not limited to factors such as the web site design, ease of use, information quality, trustworthiness, security, payment options and social network presence. https://auspost.com.au/content/dam/auspost_corp/media/documents/inside-australian-onlineshopping-ecommerce-report.pdf Part B: Evaluation Matrix Create an evaluation matrix based on the factors you uncovered in your literature review. You should group similar attributes in a few key categories. It is important to include a quantitative method for evaluating each attribute such as a score out of 5. Please read the following article on how to setup a scoring matrix: https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/how-to-make-a-decision-matrix Use your evaluation matrix to critically appraise ONLY the e-commerce sites listed in this assignment. After completing the matrix for each of the sites, you need to justify why you gave the scores including examples of best practice, and comparisons between the same attributes on different sites. As part of the discussion, you may refer to additional sources and provide links to appropriate sections of those sites to highlight good or bad design. Part C: E-Commerce Site Improvements For the lowest scoring website in your analysis in Part B, suggest a number of improvements to their e-commerce site. You should address the criteria which have scored the lowest points, for example you could suggest improvements to their home page layout or improve the shopping trolley purchase experience. You must demonstrate in this task a good understanding of the criteria and be able to justify the improvements you have suggested. Academic Skills: The report should be presented professionally, have a cover page, table of contents, introduction include Part A literature review and Part B evaluation of the 10 websites. In the appendix you should place your final evaluation matrix. References should be included using the Harvard method. Academic Integrity: Please be aware that Assignments with a similarity rating above 25% will be investigated and may result into reporting for academic misconduct with a risk of a fail grade for the assignment and/or the subject. Always create your own work and do not use any other work with proper paraphrasing and referencing. Assessments 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric • The assessment will be marked out of 100 marks and will be weighted 25% of the total unit mark. • The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page. Assessment 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric Marking Criteria Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64% of the criterion mark) Good (65-74% of the criterion mark) Very Good (75-84% of the criterion mark) Excellent (85-100% of the criterion mark) Part A: Literature Review (10 marks) Literature review of state of the art in E- Commerce. Limited evidence of reading and/or poor synthesis of information. The attributes identified are poorly linked to E-commerce. A satisfactory attempt is made to synthesise existing research relating to Ecommerce, and to identify attributes for success. Some major gaps in the depth and scope of the literature review. A thorough attempt is made to synthesise existing research relating to Ecommerce, and to identify important attributes for success. Some gaps in the depth and scope of the literature review. The literature review is comprehensive, relevant and demonstrates the ability to synthesise information and to critically reflect on existing research. The identified attributes are well connected to E-commerce and to the synthesis of the literature. The literature review is extremely comprehensive, relevant and demonstrates an outstanding ability to synthesise information and to critically reflect on existing research. The identified attributes are very clearly connected to Ecommerce and to the synthesis of the literature. Part A: Critical Factors (10 marks) Identification and discussion of selected critical factors Critical factors not identified, or they are very poorly related to Ecommerce. A few critical factors identified and connected to E-commerce with some brief discussion. Several critical factors identified with clear connection to E-commerce and includes some reasoning for decisions. Several critical factors identified with clear connection to E-commerce, good reasoning for decisions, and good references to literature. Many critical factors identified with excellent connection to E-commerce, high quality reasoning for decisions and very well referenced to literature. Part B: Evaluation Matrix (30 marks) Construction and completion of evaluation matrix, with categories for selected factors and a scoring system. 10 sites are evaluated. Matrix contains less than 5 general factors that do not give a useful outcome. Scoring system is not present or is ineffective. Matrix is basic with a small number (around 5) of general factors and an adequate scoring system. Matrix contains a good number (5-10) of factors and a mixture of specific and general factors. Scoring system is effective. Matrix contains a good number (around 10) of mostly specific factors and an effective scoring system. Matrix is very well constructed with over 10 logical and specific factors and a very effective scoring system. Part B: Discussion of sites (15 marks) Effective discussion of pros/cons of each site Scores and discussion are poorly aligned or missing. Very little explanation provided for scores. Scores and discussion are somewhat aligned with some discussion of the reasons for scores. Scores and discussion are mostly well aligned with some basic justifications provided for scores. Scores and discussion are very well aligned with good justifications provided for scores. Scores and discussion are perfectly aligned with strong justifications provided for scores. Part C: E-Commerce Site Improvements (25 marks) Suggested improvements/best E-commerce practice Few or no improvements provided. No links made to evaluation or E-commerce practice. Some improvements discussed in relation to the evaluation and basic connections made to Ecommerce practice. Good discussion of the evaluation and improvements; some useful links made between the evaluation and E-commerce practice. Thorough discussion of the evaluation and improvements; clear links made between the evaluation conducted and best practice in E-commerce. Comprehensive discussion of the evaluation and findings; In-depth improvements such as use of storyboards and new design work, where ideas are directly drawn from the evaluation conducted and Ecommerce best practice. Academic skills (10 marks) Quality of writing and referencing Poor ability in report writing, with several gaps in the quality of written expression and presentation. Several major referencing errors or absent referencing. Some major gaps evident in the quality of written expression and presentation. Significant further work needed in report writing technique, improvement needed in the formatting of references and citations. Some gaps evident in the quality of written expression and presentation. Further work needed in report writing technique, including some minor issues formatting of references and citations. Quality of written expression and presentation mostly conforms to academic standards relating to clarity of expression, syntax, grammar, and punctuation. No significant gaps in referencing technique using the Harvard referencing system. Quality of written expression and presentation is excellent and conforms fully to academic standards relating to clarity of expression, syntax, grammar, and punctuation. No gaps in referencing technique using the Harvard referencing system
Write a response of 250-300 words addressing the following three prompts. Address all items for each prompt. This is not a question-and-answer assignment but two or three flowing paragraphs and possibly references.
· Describe the topic or concept and give an example of how and where it is applicable (currently or in the future). If applicable, include a link to the topic or concept.
· What did you know and understand about this concept before studying it in MATH 106?
· Describe what (more) you learned about it.
· What do you find (more) interesting about the topic now? Explain.
· Do you think it will be applicable in more ways now? How and why?
2. Retroactive Applications: Have you learned about a topic or concept that has helped you in the past without realizing it?
· Add any additional competencies you feel have applied in this class or will apply in your current or future career based on the learning in Modules 1-4. Explain how and why.
Details on Modules:
Module1: Review of Real Numbers and Solving Equation
Review the feedback on the change proposal professional presentation and make required adjustments to the presentation. Present your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Be prepared to answer questions and accept feedback.
After presenting your capstone project change proposal, write a 250–350-word summary of the presentation. Include a description of the changes that were suggested by your preceptor before your presentation and how you incorporated that feedback. Describe how this interprofessional collaboration improved the effectiveness of your presentation. Include a description of the feedback and questions from your audience after your presentation, and how this experience will affect your professional practice in the future.
APA style required, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center
Your assignment for this unit involves two parts. In the first part, you will be identifying rhetorical devices used to persuade an audience. In the second part, you will identify premises used to build a logical argument devoid of rhetoric.
Using the Unit VII Assignment Template , review the political speech regarding the construction of the proposed factory. Identify the rhetorical devices, ethos, and pathos in the template. Next, review the additional relevant information that was omitted from the speech. Using this information, identify premises for a logical argument based on relevant information in the template.
View the Unit VII Sample Assignment for an example of how your completed assignment should look. APA Style is not required for this assignment, and no outside resources are required.
Unit VII Assignment Template is here: https://www.mediafire.com/file/kzjn9k8mbvx0cyb/UTF-8%2527%2527UnitVII_AssignmentTemplate.docx/file
Choose 1 country that the organization you’ve been working on in this course could consider expanding into.
(Caterpillar)
Read the selected article from the University Library.
Read
Burkus, D. (2012). Essay: Developing Global Leadership: A review of barriers and adjustments for international expansion. International Management Review, 8(2), 83–84.
Analyze that potential international market by considering the 4 aspects of the Diamond of National Advantage: industry rivalry, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, and factor endowments
Analyze the forces (in the home market and international market) that will help the organization succeed with its expansion, and the forces that may act as barriers to that expansion. Refer to your analysis of strengths and weaknesses completed in Week 1, the Porter’s Five Forces worksheet from Week 3, and your analysis of the Diamond of National Advantage.
Evaluate the 4 adjustments leaders must make when expanding internationally (Burkus, 2012). Recommend 1 specific leadership action for each adjustment, such as developing a global mindset, developing sensitivity to cultural differences, decentralizing, deciding on the level of involvement, etc.
Recommend whether the organization should expand into the chosen country and explain your rationale.
Create a PowerPoint presentation to present your analysis and recommendation. Include the following sections in your presentation:
A cover slide
An agenda
Identification of the country you have chosen (1 slide, with brief speaker’s notes)
1 slide for analysis of each of the elements of the Diamond of National Advantage (4 slides, with speaker’s notes)
A summary of analysis of the forces that will help the organization succeed in the new country (1 slide, with speaker’s notes)
A summary of analysis of the forces that will hinder the organization’s success in the new country (1 slide, with speaker’s notes)
Leadership actions required to make the 4 adjustments identified by Burkus (2012)
A recommendation and rationale (1 slide, with speaker’s notes)
A conclusion
References
Support your Statements: Include citations in the speakers notes.
Format your citations and references according to APA guidelines.
Choose 1 country that the organization you’ve been working on in this course could consider expanding into.
(Caterpillar)
Read the selected article from the University Library.
Read
Burkus, D. (2012). Essay: Developing Global Leadership: A review of barriers and adjustments for international expansion. International Management Review, 8(2), 83–84.
Analyze that potential international market by considering the 4 aspects of the Diamond of National Advantage: industry rivalry, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, and factor endowments
Analyze the forces (in the home market and international market) that will help the organization succeed with its expansion, and the forces that may act as barriers to that expansion. Refer to your analysis of strengths and weaknesses completed in Week 1, the Porter’s Five Forces worksheet from Week 3, and your analysis of the Diamond of National Advantage.
Evaluate the 4 adjustments leaders must make when expanding internationally (Burkus, 2012). Recommend 1 specific leadership action for each adjustment, such as developing a global mindset, developing sensitivity to cultural differences, decentralizing, deciding on the level of involvement, etc.
Recommend whether the organization should expand into the chosen country and explain your rationale.
Create a PowerPoint presentation to present your analysis and recommendation. Include the following sections in your presentation:
A cover slide
An agenda
Identification of the country you have chosen (1 slide, with brief speaker’s notes)
1 slide for analysis of each of the elements of the Diamond of National Advantage (4 slides, with speaker’s notes)
A summary of analysis of the forces that will help the organization succeed in the new country (1 slide, with speaker’s notes)
A summary of analysis of the forces that will hinder the organization’s success in the new country (1 slide, with speaker’s notes)
Leadership actions required to make the 4 adjustments identified by Burkus (2012)
A recommendation and rationale (1 slide, with speaker’s notes)
A conclusion
References
Support your Statements: Include citations in the speakers notes.
Format your citations and references according to APA guidelines.
By the end of the semester, you will produce a systematic review about a biological research topic of your choice. Though the final draft is not due until the last week, you will be working on this project incrementally throughout the semester.
What is a systematic review?
A systematic review is a rigorous evaluation of the existing scientific literature that addresses a clear research question. An extensive search of the primary literature is performed in order to locate and assess research evidence relevant to the research question using a pre-specified protocol. This makes systematic reviews more comprehensive than a literature review.
What are the steps to produce a systematic review?
Through a combination of instructor-led lessons and assignment submissions, students will work through the following steps in order to complete the systematic review process (adapted from Pullin, A., & Gavin B. Stewart. (2006). Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management. Conservation Biology,20(6), 1647-1656.):
Stage 1: Planning the review
TOPIC: Utilization of CRISPR CAS9 in cancer genes
1.) Question formulation
· During the early weeks of the semester, you will choose a paper topic and begin to explore the scientific literature relevant to your topic. From there, a reviewable research question can be articulated.
· A reviewable question is commonly some version of “Does intervention x produce outcome y on subject z?”
· Example A: Does regular coffee consumption decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in humans?
· Example B: Does mercury pollution impact survivorship of freshwater fish populations?
2.) Developing a review protocol
· A review protocol is a document developed beforehand that will guide the review process. It should include enough detail to the methodology that someone else could repeat the same review process; the repeatability of search methods is a key characteristic of systematic reviews.
· The protocol starts by outlining the rationale and objectives of the review.
· From there, it should detail the methods that will be used including
· Eligibility criteria – how will you decide which studies to include or exclude?
· Search strategy – which databases will you use to search for studies? How will you go about your search?
· Data management – how will your data be organized as it’s collected? Which variables will you be tracking?
· Data synthesis – how will your collected data be synthesized qualitatively? How will it be synthesized quantitatively?
Assignment Rubrics
PROTOCOL – DUE BY FEBRUARY 17
Protocol Component
Description
Possible Points
Title
Title identifies the report as a protocol of a systematic review & clearly indicates the research topic
1
Rationale & Objectives
Outlines the utility of this review. Provides and explicit statement of the question(s) the review will address.
3
Eligibility Criteria:
Specify the study characteristics (such as PICO, study design, setting, time frame) and report characteristics (such as years considered, language, publication status) to be used as criteria for eligibility for the review
8
Search Strategy:
Describe the steps to take to search for appropriate articles including databases, search limits, keywords, and study selection.
5
Data Management:
Describe how the data collected will be extracted and organized in a spreadsheet and/or any other management tools. List and define all variables for which data will be sought.
5
Data Synthesis:
Outline the steps that will be taken to compare, synthesize, and analyze data
8
TOTAL
30
YOU CAN USE THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES TO COMPLETE THE ASSIGNMENT
Bibliography
Biagioni, A., Laurenzana, A., Margheri, F., Chillà, A., Fibbi, G., & Del Rosso, M. (2018). Delivery systems of CRISPR/Cas9-based cancer gene therapy.
Journal of Biological Engineering, 12(1), 33–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0127-2
Han, Y., Liu, D., & Li, L. (2020). PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: current researches in cancer. American Journal of Cancer Research, 10(3), 727–742.
Iwai, Y., Ishida, M., Tanaka, Y., Okazaki, T., Honjo, T., & Minato, N. (2002). Khalaf, K., Janowicz, K., Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska, M., Hutchings, G., Dompe,
C., Moncrieff, L., Jankowski, M., Machnik, M., Oleksiewicz, U., Kocherova, I., Petitte, J., Mozdziak, P., Shibli, J. A., Iżycki, D.,
Józkowiak, M., Piotrowska-Kempisty, H., Skowroński, M. T., Antosik, P., & Kempisty, B. (2020). CRISPR/Cas9 in Cancer Immunotherapy: Animal Models and Human Clinical Trials. Genes, 11(8), 1–. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11080921
Liu, Q., Yang, F., Zhang, J., Liu, H., Rahman, S., Islam, S., Ma, W., & She, M. (2021). Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in Crop Quality Improvement.
MDPI AG. 10.3390/ijms22084206
Lu, Xue, J., Deng, T., Zhou, X., Yu, K., Deng, L., Huang, M., Yi, X., Liang, M.,
Wang, Y., Shen, H., Tong, R., Wang, W., Li, L., Song, J., Li, J., Su, X., Ding, Z., Gong, Y., … Mok, T. (2020). Safety and feasibility of CRISPR- edited T cells in patients with refractory non-small-cell lung cancer.
Lu, Y. (2016, June 8). PD-1 knockout engineered T cells for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer . ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved November 7, 2021, from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02793856.
Peyambari, M., Warner, S., Stoler, N., Rainer, D., Roossinck, M. (2019). A 1,000- Year-Old RNA Virus. Journal of Virology, 93(1), 1-11. at https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01188-18
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T2 2021 Unit Code HI6008 Unit Title Business Research Assessment Type SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENT Assessment Title Company-specific mini-literature review and research design proposal Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) The purpose of this assessment is to ensure a student who requires and qualifies for an approved SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENT is able to document a mini-literature review and research design. Matches to Unit Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 Weight 100% Total Marks Note: The SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENT result will be either 50P (a passing grade) or NN (a failing grade). Word limit Approximately 2000 words Due Date Within 10 days of final results being released to students. Note that this deadline cannot be extended for any reason. Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by 12 midnight on the due date, along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. • The assignment must be a single document in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings, paragraphing, and page numbers. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list, all using the Holmes adapted Harvard referencing style. • The Supplementary assessment will be graded PASS/FAIL. To PASS, all requirements must be complied with in full.
SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENT Specifications Purpose: This unit aims to give you an opportunity to combine many facets of your acquired MBA skills into the production of a research project mini-literature review and research design proposal. It is explicitly designed as a SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENT for students who qualify for a Supplementary Assessment and are duly notified thereof. You must complete and submit this INDIVIDUALLY. Task Your task is to prepare a report of 2000 words (the word count does not include your questionnaire and reference list), based on the following scenario: Your CEO has requested you to ascertain whether or not she/he should expand the company beyond the shores of Australia, by opening a new branch in the Fijian city of Suva. Please attend to the following aspects: a. Use the city you are currently based in (i.e. where your Holmes campus is) as being the current base from which your company wishes to expand. b. Choose a business that currently operates in either the retail or manufacturing sector. Ensure that you specify which sector and describe the industry within which the business operates. Explain the company and its brand positioning (this must be an existing brand, not a hypothetical one). Provide details about the current performance of the business, its other current locations, its growth history, etc. [from published secondary data]. Decide on and clearly state the Research Problem facing the company. c. Research relevant politico-socio-economic-enviro-legal facts about Fiji in general and Suva in particular. d. Research relevant facts about the state of the industry. e. Research at least three relevant competitors in Fiji. f. For the above three sections you need at least 9 references, of which at least 4 must be academic journal articles. [In your reference list, ensure that you provide the details of each reference in Holmes-adapted Harvard style, plus the hyperlinked URL of anything you accessed online, and the date on which you accessed it]. g. State the research question(s) that remain(s) to be answered after considering all of the above. h. Decide what primary data will be needed to complete your study and state how you would go about collecting it, i.e. your specific methodology design. In particular, specify your sample frame of participants, the type of interviews you would use, and why. [Note: DO NOT actually collect any primary data] i. Add the complete questionnaire and explain the data analysis plan ([Note: DO NOT actually collect any primary data] Assignment Structure must be as the following: 1. Official Holmes Cover Page 2. Introduce the company (a and b above) [approx. 500 words], culminating in the specific Research Problem. 3. Conduct a research of literature review / secondary data (c, d, e, f, g) [approx. 1000 words, culminating in the specific Research Problem and state the Research Question] 4. Apply your knowledge of research to propose a research design (i.e. specify what primary data is needed; how will it be collected, analysed, interpreted (h) [approx. 500 words] 5. Design your detailed Questionnaire (i) designed specifically for the interviews that would be conducted to elicit primary data directly related to the Research Question (word count not specified). Demonstrate an appropriate range of questioning / answering techniques, based on HI6008 lecture materials. 6. List of references [not part of the word count]
HI6008 SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENT – Marking Rubric Section PASS* FAIL 1. Official Holmes Cover Sheet Must be complete and included as the front page of your submitted word document (i.e. the whole submission must be one single word file). 2. Introduction (a and b) (approx. 500 words) 3. Literature Review (c, d, e, f, g) leading to Research Problem and specific Research Question (approx. 1000 words) 4. Research Design / Methodology (h) incl. sample frame, data collection, analysis, interpretation methods (approx. 500 words) 5. Detailed Questionnaire with appropriate range of questioning / answering techniques (g) 6. List of References in correct Holmes-adapted Harvard format with all detail (including URLs hyperlinked) *All sections must earn a PASS in order to complete the unit. Note: Inclusion of any work that is not entirely your own OR inaccurate referencing all sources consulted constitutes plagiarism and will result in a FAIL and a recording of Academic Misconduct
Timely Delivery- primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals
P1 Conduct a review and critique of the implementation of operations management principles within an organisational context
M1 Review and critique the implementation of operations management in relation to Six Sigma methodology and Lean principles
LO2Apply the concept of continuous improvement in an operational context.
P2 Prepare a continuous improvement plan based on the review and critique of operations management principles within an organisational context
M2 Analyse the effectiveness of a continuous improvement plan using appropriate theories, concepts and/or models.
LO3 Apply the Project Life Cycle (PLC) to a given context.
D2 Critically evaluate the PLC through a practical and theoretical exploration of its effectiveness.
P3 Choose an item.
P4 Choose an item.
M3 Choose an item.
M4 Choose an item.
D2 Choose an item.
P3 Apply each stage of the PLC to a given project, producing necessary supporting documentation for completing the project e.g. a business case, project plan, work breakdown structure.
M3 Analyse the rationale for the project methodologies, tools and leadership within the PLC for the given project.
LO4 Review and critique the application of the PLC used in a given project.
P4 Review and critique the effectiveness of the PLC in application to the chosen project using appropriate theories, concepts and models.
M4 Critically analyse how the use of appropriate theories, concepts and models in the PLC will differentiate between large and small-scale projects.
Overall Feedback Summary
Over All Grade
Choose an item.
Date
Click here to enter a date.
[To Achieve a PASS, all P grade descriptors should be achieved; To achieve a MERIT, all P and M grade descriptors should be achieved; https://paperwriters.xyz/uncategorized/apply-appropriate-theories-concepts-and-or-models-to-justify-strategies-of-a-continuous-improvement-plan-for-achieving-improved-efficiency/ To achieve a DISTINCTION, all P, M and D grade descriptors should be achieved.]
Summative Feedback
Overall feedback on current work with emphasis on how the student can improve and achieve higher grades in future
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Conduct a review and critique of the implementation of operations management principles within an organisational context