Tag: rhetorical

Categories
Writers Solution

Using rhetorical theory as a frame for textual analysis

Below is the source,

https://youtu.be/hLQ-XD3LeH8

Purpose of the Assignment: To practice using rhetorical theory as a frame for textual analysis. To practice using rhetorical theory to find the intent and exigence in sources.

Intended Audience: Classmates. Instructor. Writing Teachers. Individuals interested learning more about writing and rhetorical theory.

Assignment Description: *NOTE: It’s a good idea to print this out and keep it nearby as you work on this assignment. There is a lot of information in here that will be directly helpful to you as you work through the process.

Step 1: Locate a text, and remember that a text is a broad term in this assignment, and identify and analyze the rhetorical situation of that text. A text can be defined broadly, but for this assignment, you’re going to choose from either of these two categories:

a) choose an assignment that you were given by your teacher or professor in a class that you have taken within the past six months. You must have the original document that came with the assignment and supporting materials such as the class description, the class syllabus, and other information about the context within which you received the assignment.

b) choose a written communication that you directly composed for professional or personal reasons in order to solve a problem. This text must be significant. It could be the text you wrote about for the Writing to Solve Problems assignment if that seems like it will provide enough substance and interest for you to analyze. By significant, I mean that you had to go through multiple stages to get this text written and sent; it must have had a strong exigence (reason) and you had an important argument to make, and you went through stages of a process to compose and create it rather than simply writing it in a few minutes and sending it. Think carefully about this option.

c) if you can’t find an example within either of these categories, you must make an appointment with me to discuss an alternative option before beginning your writing process for this assignment.

You have to have an authentic copy of your text for this assignment; this constraint will factor in to your choice of a topic. You’re going to need to attach the text to the end of your assignment so that your reader can refer to it as they read your analysis, so make sure you have a copy of it that is shareable and that you have permission to share. Work e-mails can be sensitive, for example, so if you chose that option, then do what you need to do and consult whom you need to make sure it’s shareable. If it’s too difficult, then it would probably be best to choose a different text. 

Think about the text you intend to use for this assignment and make sure you fully understand how to apply the theory of the rhetorical situation to that text.  Don’t choose a text that is too difficult to analyze or has very little content or substance. Choose a text wisely, and make sure the text you choose has plenty of rhetorical content to address and examine so you can demonstrate your knowledge of rhetorical situations in the paper. Watch this video by Kyle Steadman to help you understand what rhetorical analysis is and how it works:

Step 2: Now create rhetorical data to examine and use to write the paper. This will take some time. Use the following questions to help you generate content for the analysis. The goal is to learn as much as possible about the details of the text before writing the paper. 

  1. What is the exigence and purpose for the text? Why was it made? What is the text reacting to?
  2. What is the main argument the text is trying to make? Where is the argument set up and established in the text?
  3. Who are the intended audience(s) for the text? How do you know these are the audiences?
  4. Who stands to gain something from the arguments and information in the text and who does not stand to gain? Why?
  5. Who are all the rhetors responsible for making the text? The writer, sure, but what about the academic department, the educational institution who created the requirements and learning outcomes for the class? Or if it’s yourself writing an e-mail, for example, did you have anyone else look at it before you sent it? Was it critiqued by anyone else? Try to identify all of the individuals responsible for shaping the text. Those are the rhetors. There can be a main rhetor, but there are always contributors to a text.
  6. Does the text have a picture or image? Who made the image(s)?
  7. What types of constraints existed for the rhetors?
  8. What deadlines and limitations did they face? How did that limit the text?
  9. What advantages did they have? Did they have a strict timeline to work around?
  10. Did they only get to use a certain amount of words, pages, or images? How did these issues constrain the work?

The answers to the questions above will serve as a way to collect rhetorical data. The more complete and comprehensive the answers to those questions are, the more rhetorical data you have to examine and analyze for this assignment.

Step 3: Once you’ve answered some of these questions, start to shape a central statement about what you’ve learned. Use the “Backpacks and Briefcases” article to set up terms and ideas and to support and elaborate on your rhetorical analysis. Collect quotes from “Backpacks vs. Briefcases” that connect to your own ideas in your paper and that you can use as support for your ideas in your paper, like you are having a conversation with the author Laura Bolin Carroll in your paper.

To craft your thesis statement, think about this questions:

What did the rhetorical information you collected about the text teach you?

What did you learn about the text after examining its rhetorical data? You looked at the text rhetorically. How did that frame for examining a text provide you a different perspective of the text?

What did you learn about the text from studying is rhetorical components? How did rhetorical theory help you see below the surface of the text?

Step 4: Draft your paper. In your own words, tell us how the text is rhetorically situated using your data and the articles from the course about rhetorical situations. The final assignment must be 750-1000 words and follow a citation format like MLA or APA carefully and accurately. Please use a handbook or Purdue Owl (Links to an external site.) to guide you. 

Here is a general guide for organizing your paper:

Introduction: Give us some background about your text. What is it, why did you choose it for this assignment as an example of a rhetorical situation? End the introduction with a thesis statement that synthesizes all of the elements of the rhetorical situation into a clear analysis. The thesis statement should be the answer to a question, or a combination of the questions above–in general, how did you come to see this text differently by using the concepts of rhetorical situations to analyze it? Your thesis statement must be a single sentence.

Body: Write several paragraphs. You can write one paragraph about each of the elements of the rhetorical situation, starting with the exigence and argument, audience, rhetors, constraints. Use the questions above to help you fill in the details. Each body paragraph should start with a topic sentence that states the main idea of the paragraph, which includes the topic of the paragraph and what you’re going to teach us about that topic in the paragraph. The topic sentence has a direct relationship to the thesis. You can think of it as a leg that the thesis is standing on. The body of the essay breaks up the big idea/central statement/thesis statement into smaller, digestible parts that each get their own paragraph. Each paragraph speaks for one part of the thesis. That should be very clear in the paragraph. It takes multiple revisions to get it as clear as possible, so expect to keep reading and re-reading your drafts as you work on this assignment to try and make this connection as clear and obvious as possible for your reader.

Then, after the topic sentence, introduce your idea in your own words; bring in an example from your text that illustrates this idea; explain what this example means and how it connects to your idea, in your own words. Then bring in a quotation or paraphrase from “Backpacks vs. Briefcases” that is in conversation with your idea. Introduce that quote or paraphrase in your own words, with a signal phrase like “Carroll states in “Backpacks vs. Briefcases” that [insert quote or paraphrase here] (page # from the article where the quote appears). Then explain in your own words how that quote relates to your idea.

Finish the paragraph with a sentence that reminds us what you wanted us to learn in this paragraph! That’s a sentence like the topic sentence, only it’s even clearer and uses different words.

Conclusion: Summarize your main points from the paper again in new words. Restate your thesis in new words. What should we take away from this paper and keep thinking about? This can be a recommendation, a prediction, or an opinion about the big idea of your text.

Works Cited: You’ll need to include MLA or APA* citations for Laura Bolin Carroll’s article as well as your own text. I don’t think you’ll be needing any other citations for this paper, but if anything comes up, I’ll be sure to announce ti.

Your text: copy and paste the text into the last pages of your paper.

* If you have a good working knowledge of how to use MLA or APA or a strong preference for either one, you may use it. If you are new to these style formats and citation, please use MLA for this paper, which I am providing examples of. I’m happy to help with citation and formatting, and you should also make an appointment at the TCC Writing & Tutoring Center to go over your paper and get additional help if you think you need it.

Look over some of these examples for the assignment: 

  • Links to an external site.
  • Example Paper #2
Order from Academic Writers Bay
https://youtu.be/hLQ-XD3LeH8
Categories
Writers Solution

Brainstorm different texts for the rhetorical analysis

To brainstorm different texts for the rhetorical analysis assignment. You should choose an assignment that you received in the last six months, a personal written communication, or a social media post (this wasn’t written in the Rhetorical Situation Assignment, but I’m offering it as an alternative) from your own account of a post you made.To figure out how to start the rhetorical situation assignment.To outline the rhetorical situation for your text (exigence, audience, rhetors, constraints).Intended Audience: Classmates. Instructor. Writing Teachers. Individuals interested in learning more about rhetorical situations. Description:ETA: Reminder: You must choose a text within one of the categories listed in the Rhetorical Situation Assignment. Please read the assignment first before you choose your text for the assignment.Post a screenshot (you can use the insert media button, or you can attach it to your post) of one page of the assignment, written communication, or social media post that you made from your own account) you would like to analyze for this assignment, and then provide a brief summary of the text with detail. The summary should start to identify why the text exists (what was the reason for its creation, what problem was it created to solve, what point was it trying to make, what was its purpose) and who the text is targeting (the audience).The summary should be at least 250 words. Consider it to be preparation for your essay. You’ll be using this summary for your essay before you get into the analysis of your text, so put some effort into this summary and provide as many details about the text as necessary.Within 24 hours: Make sure you come back to this discussion and look over your classmates’ outlines. You must provide insights on at least two of your classmates outlines:Help them outline the rhetorical situation. Make a comment or ask a question about the exigence, audience, rhetor, and/or constraints for the text’s rhetorical situation. Did it make sense to you? Did it leave any questions in your mind? What questions could you ask your classmate that would help them to dig up more details about any aspects of the rhetorical situation?I will grade your assignment once I have approved your topic.To start this activity, consider that rhetoric is everywhere. Here is an example of a sign (although you will not be analyzing images for this paper, it provides an example of a rhetorical situation and how I would start thinking about the different aspects of its rhetorical situation). The street sign in the slide below is a rhetorical text that is part of a rhetorical situation. These types of signs started showing up in the Twin Cities after several incidents of police brutality. These are texts commenting on a rhetorical situation about police violence and human rights. They are intended to be seen by everyone in the city, since everyone in the city could potentially be a victim of police violence and travel public streets and highways. I’m not sure who made this sign, so I would try to locate the rhetor. There are several constraints that impact how, where, and when this sign gets bolted to the pole. It’s illegal to put unauthorized street signs up. This is kind of textual interrogation is how you start working on the rhetorical analysis assignment.

Order from Academic Writers Bay
Categories
Writers Solution

Backpacks vs. briefcases: steps toward rhetorical analysis

Assignment Description: 1) Read “Backpacks vs. briefcases: steps toward rhetorical analysis” (Links to an external site.) by Laura Bolin Carroll2) Write down at least two critical questions you had about the reading. Make sure the questions are introspective and can’t be answered directly in the reading. Ask questions that demonstrate some critical consideration of the reading. Ask your instructor for examples of critical discussion questions if needed. Put Critical Questions above the questions.3) Then answer the following discussion question below using 250-350 words.4) Make sure to come back and answer at least two of your classmates’ discussion questions within 48 hours of the initial post deadline.For the Response Part of Your Assignment:Define what a “rhetorical situation” is, including all of its parts (exigence, intended audience, rhetors, and constraints) in your own words, using quotes or paraphrases from Laura Bolin Carroll’s article with MLA in-text citations (send me an e-mail if you need help with this!) and then use an example of a text to explain how each part of the rhetorical situation functions. So, in your post you can have two sections. In the first section, either use bullet points or paragraphs to divide your post into exigence, intended audience, rhetors, and constraints. In each paragraph or bullet-pointed section, a) define the term in your own words, b) include a quote or paraphrase from “Backpacks vs. Briefcases” that supports the definition. Then, in the second section, write about your text example and explain what the exigence, intended audience, rhetors, and constraints for that text were.For your topic for this post, choose a text from either of these two categories: 1) an assignment that you still have in your possession–given to you in a class that you took within the last 6 months or are taking now, or 2) a social media, blog or vlog post that you published for an audience. A third option, if you have the original document in your possession and are able to share it ethically, could be a letter or e-mail that you had to write in order to solve a problem at work or in your personal life, such as to a company.Use MLA format carefully and accurately for your citations from Carroll. Please use the resources for MLA in our modules to guide you. This activity will help you generate content and ideas for your 3-4 page rhetorical situation assignment.

Order from Academic Writers Bay

Categories
Writers Solution

Rhetorical Analysis and Discipline Awareness

The Discipline Project: Rhetorical Analysis and Discipline Awareness

This assignment is designed to help you understand the purpose of writing in your chosen field. Who is an acceptable source of authority in your field? What counts as evidence? What key concepts or specialized terminology is used? How are scholars in the field “in conversation” with one another?

For this assignment, please choose one current scholarly text relating to an issue or controversy in your field. It may be useful to choose a text relating to an issue you plan to investigate for a research project or an area of research you are currently interested in. You must USE THE scholarly source PROVIDED.

Scholarly sources have a very specific purpose and are written by experts in the specific field. The purpose is usually to share original research findings or to analyze and reflect on others’ findings. Scholarly sources are also peer reviewed, which means that, prior to publication, scholars leading the conversation review the research within the publication and offer additional feedback and insight. As a result, scholarly publications are often filled with jargon, statistics, visual data, and the reader of these publications typically will have a similar scholarly background.

Popular sources, such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, Sports Illustrated, The New Yorker, TIME Magazine, National Geographic, The Huffington Post, etc. are designed to inform and to entertain. The readability of these popular sources are meant to appeal to a wider audience base, making the scholarly findings more reader-friendly. The word choice tends to be less academic, and research is conveyed in a more entertaining manner. These are credible sources, but for this assignment, we are focusing only on scholarly source material.

For this assignment, you will apply critical thinking skills to revise a scholarly article of your choice to a popular source. Translating research can be a complicated process. You will need to identify your audience and apply an appropriate rhetoric as you effectively communicate the scholarly research for the general public. What kind of language will you need to use, and what information will you select to include/leave out? You will probably not use the traditional citation methods either (no need for footnotes, for instance), but you will need to give some guidance on where your source material stems from. Organization and formatting will be an important modification, and your translation should follow both the written and visual conventions for a popular source.

It will be necessary to select a specific popular source as your model. Thus, you will need to identify what popular source model you are going to follow. Examples of models would be similar to the examples I provided above for popular sources.

Assignment Requirements:

  1. Select and identify a scholarly source for your translation.
  2. The translation should be the approximate length of your model (NOT your scholarly source). Thus, if you select the Washington Post as your model, what is the typical length of an article found here? If you select The New Yorker as a model, what is the typical length of an article here?
  3. Your use of rhetoric (tone, word choice, organization, style, etc.) must be targeted for the appropriate audience.
  4. Your translated paper will not necessarily adhere to MLA or APA formatting. You will likely include images, fun fonts, and a variety of font sizing, and colors.
  5. Usually, you will adhere to a third-person voice, but please use the appropriate voice for your translated piece.

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com on Rhetorical Analysis and Discipline Awareness

NO PLAGIARISM, Get impressive Grades in Your Academic Work

Categories
Writers Solution

Focus your analysis on demonstrating how the filmmaker use film-specific rhetorical strategies in their attempt to advance their argument

Food, Inc.
  1. Your paper should be based on Food Inc.
  2. Focus your analysis on demonstrating how the filmmaker use film-specific rhetorical strategies in their attempt to advance their argument
  3. Don’t overlook an thorough discussion of the appeals
  4. Note the broad nature of these audiences because it will be important as you make a case for rhetorical effectiveness
  6. Assignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at CapitalEssayWriting.com
  8. CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com