In this assignment, you will document, track and manage the project’s risks and utilization of human resources. The risk management will be accomplished through the use of a Risk Register chart. Using the Risk Register is a way to identify, document, and manage all of the risks associated with a project. The chart details provide an easy way to scan for level of risk, status, potential responses, who is responsible for the risk in addition to the project manager, or other details needed to manage the risk. This is a great way to keep everyone informed when this document is presented at the weekly team meetings and in communication with all stakeholders. Another key tool is called the RACI chart which helps you identify who is responsible, accountable, consulted, or informed for each major project task. The RACI (responsible, accountable, consulted, informed) chart will help manage and track utilization of human resources; this facilitates monitoring and control as well as provides one means of communication. It documents and makes it clear who is responsible for bringing the task to completion, on time, on budget. For this assignment, do the following: Complete the Risk Register and RACI documents for your project. All project risks must be identified and added to your risk register following the example. The RACI chart must provide the responsibility, accountability, consulted, or informed status for each member of the team for all major project tasks following the RACI example.
Assignment status: Track and manage the project’s risks and utilization of human resourcesTrack and manage the project’s risks and utilization of human resources
HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMPANY YOU CAN CHOOSE: SONIC HEALTHCARE
Go to the website of your allocated company. Then, go to the Investor Relations section of the website. This section may be called: “””Investors”””, “”Shareholder Information”,” or similar titles. In this section, find the ‘company’s annual report and other related reports. Download the ‘firm’s latest annual report and other related information and reports and save it to your computer. For example, these reports may be dated 30 June 2021 or 30 June 2022.
Questions
Assume that you have been appointed as the external auditor for your allocated company for the financial year ending June 2021 or 2022. Prepare a report to adequately address the following:
Examine and assess the Revised ASA315 with a focus on identifying risks, including risks associated with information technology and the auditor’s obligation to utilize automated tools and techniques to perform the audit in a professional, effective and efficient manner
Go to the website of your allocated company. Then, go to the Investor Relations section of the website. This section may be called: “””Investors”””, “”Shareholder Information”,” or similar titles. In this section, find the ‘company’s annual report and other related reports. Download the ‘firm’s latest annual report and other related information and reports and save it to your computer. For example, these reports may be dated 30 June 2021 or 30 June 2022.
Questions
Assume that you have been appointed as the external auditor for your allocated company for the financial year ending June 2021 or 2022. Prepare a report to adequately address the following:
Examine and assess the Revised ASA315 with a focus on identifying risks, including risks associated with information technology and the auditor’s obligation to utilize automated tools and techniques to perform the audit in a professional, effective and efficient manner
Each member of an organization is held accountable for managing risks. Therefore, it is essential to establish the context for a risk framework and risk process.
Prior to beginning this assignment, view “Risk Management and Assessment” within the “Video Playlist: Policy Management for Security Solutions,” located in the Class Resources.
Using your company from Topic 1, establish a risk management framework using industry standards for compliance.
Part 1
Refer to the “CYB-535 Risk Management Framework Guide,” and create a Risk Management Framework.
Part 2
Refer to “An Overview of Threat and Risk Assessment,” located in the topic Resources. In 750–1000 words, discuss various risk assessment models, methodologies, and processes that can be used to perform a risk assessment of a particular system. Make sure to:
Describe how risk relates to a system security policy.
Describe various risk analysis methodologies.
Considering your framework from Part 1, explain why it is important to evaluate and categorize risk a) with respect to technology; b) with respect to individuals, and c) in the enterprise.
Compare the advantages and disadvantages of various risk assessment methodologies.
Explain how one would select the optimal methodology based on needs, advantages, and disadvantages.
Then, submit both Parts 1 and 2.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:
MS Information Assurance and Cybersecurity
2.1 Establish a risk management framework using industry standards for compliance
MS Cybersecurity
1.5 Establish a risk management framework using industry standards for compliance.
a) Critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches b) Evaluate procurement requirements to formulate procurement processes in order to initiate contracts Weighting 20% Total Marks 20 marks Assessment Task Critically read the assigned case study, available from either the Subject Learning Resources tab on the course homepage or as sent to you by the Learning Facilitator as an announcement. Read the Module 1-2 learning resources, especially those focused on project risk. Engage with other students by posting a 600-800-word discussion forum post and 300-word critiques detailing your response to the question below. Please refer to the instructions for details on how to complete this task. Context Procurement and contracts are integral to successful project management. Planning for purchases and acquisitions, requests for proposal, vendor selection, contract administration, and contract closure are integral parts of the process. Learning from case studies and benchmarking against better practices, standards and excellence is vital to understand complexity of issues and successful strategies for procurement and contract management. It will also ensure improved responsiveness to key issues, promote supplier client relationships through proactive management of risks and ultimately deliver higher level of focus on performance-based outcomes. Assessment 1 is a discussion with other students of key issues to better understand the principles of project procurement, challenges, and risks, as well as develop key procurement themes and quantify financial exposure. This assessment requires that you critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches. This assessment requires that you answer the following question, evaluating the following risk and procurement concepts: “What are some important procurement risks that typically exist for large or complex projects? What procurement/financial risks exist in the assigned case study, and what strategies do you propose for mitigating these risks?”. To do so, address the following concepts in your post: • Identify 2-3 typical procurement risks required to be managed for complex projects • Identify 2-3 specific financial risks from the case study project • Propose possible procurement/financial risk mitigation actions for the case study project, and explain these relate to better practice guidelines • Identify possible areas for further vendor negotiations and management that you believe are important to achieve a successful contract completion • Identify areas of key accountability that exist for the project manager and procurement manager in facilitating a successful outcome for the case study project To answer this question, you will need to: (a) Post a 600-800-word (+/-10%) response to this question, based on your informed opinion and demonstrated knowledge of project management procurement risks, project lifecycles, and PMBoK, to the Discussion Forum on the Learning Portal. (b) Respond to a minimum of two other students’ posts by critiquing their opinion and comparing it with yours in 300 words (+/-10%). Instructions
Read module 1-2 learning resources, particularly those relevant to procurement risk, to familiarise yourself with fundamental concepts. Critically reflect on your readings to form an opinion. Commence writing your opinion to answer the question and support that opinion by using at least six (6) references from academic or industry literature. Cite these references in your opinion of 600-800 words both in-text and as a reference list at the end of your opinion piece. The word count does not include the reference list. It is expected that you will undertake sufficient research and reading to effectively contribute and share ideas individually. This is important for discussions to achieve sufficient depth of analysis as to provide high quality information to satisfy the requirements for the case study analysis – based on the above guidelines.
Read other students’ posts. Think about their opinion and try to compare and contrast them with yours. This will allow you to “critique” the views of at least two other students. You can do this by highlighting the things you agree with and those you disagree with in their post. You need to justify and explain your critique of their opinion. In your response, you will need to refer to some of the literature. Your responses will need to be a minimum of 300 words. This does not include the reference list Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool Submission Instructions Submit this task via the Assessment 1 link in the main navigation menu in PROJ6004 – Contracts and Procurement. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Understanding of the Project 30% 10% Superficial analysis of the project context and complexities Rudimentary analysis of the project context and complexities Proficient analysis of the project context and complexities Through analysis of the project context and complexities Sophisticated analysis of the project context and key elements 10% The project complexities and nuances have not been understood Basic evaluation of the project complexities and nuances Thoughtful evaluation of the project complexities and nuances Discerning evaluation of the project complexities and nuances Insightful evaluation of the project complexities and nuances 10% Responses to the key questions lack intellectual rigour and resolution Functional responses to the key questions posed Responses to the key questions posed show developing judgement Astute responses to the key questions posed Considered and highly resolved responses to the key questions posed Application of Learned Theories and Frameworks 20% 10% Learned theories and frameworks have not been understood or interpreted incorrectly Demonstrates a basic level of understanding of learned theories and frameworks Demonstrates proficient level of understanding of learned theories and frameworks Demonstrates an advanced level of understanding of learned theories and frameworks Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of learned theories and frameworks 10% Learning theories and frameworks have not been used to support discussion contribution Learning theories and frameworks are applied at a superficial level to somewhat support discussion contribution Effectively synthesises and applies theories and frameworks to support discussion contribution Persuasively synthesises and applies theories and frameworks to support discussion contribution Eloquently synthesises and applies theories and frameworks to support discussion contribution Effective Contribution to Discussion 30% 10% Student’s contribution to the discussion and engagement in the developing conversation is limited or non-existent Student has only engaged in the developing conversation in a minor way Student is engaged in the discussion and responsive to the developing conversations Student initiates some discussions and shows consistent engagement in the developing conversations Student shows leadership in activating community discussions and contributing to developing conversations 10% Original post lacks depth and consideration, with little opportunity for further group discussion Original post considered and offers relevant ideas for group discussion Original post is highly engaging and offers well reasoned arguments for group discussion Original post is conceptually evocative and and offers carefully considered ideas for initiating group discussion Original post is insightful and offers highly stimulating, authentic thought for initiating group discussion 10% No response posts have been made Response posts have been made, but lack depth and consideration Response posts are considered and constructive Response posts are constructive and engaging, supporting further group learning Response posts are encouraging and provocative, supporting further group learning Language and Communication 10% Significant grammar, spelling and punctuation errors resulting in a lack of clarity to ideas communicated. Ideas are understandable, but notable spelling and punctuation errors evident throughout. Ideas are communicated successfully but some minor spelling and punctuation errors are evident. Ideas are clearly communicated with only minor punctuation errors. Ideas are flawlessly communicated with no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Research and Referencing Quality 10% 5% No independent research beyond lecture material Superficial independent research beyond lecture material Substantial research beyond lecture material Extensive independent research beyond lecture material Exhaustive independent research beyond lecture material 5% Citations of sources and references used to inform ideas are not evident Some citations of sources and references used to inform ideas Proficient citations of sources and references used to inform ideas Significant citation of sources and references used to inform ideas Exemplary citation of sources and references used to inform ideas The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment SLO a) Critically evaluate the risks associated with contract and procurement management approaches SLO c) Evaluate procurement requirements to formulate procurement processes in order to initiate contracts
Jackie is the database manager for a large retail company in North America. Recently there have been some error messages generated concerning errors and data inconsistency in the customer databases where the customer contact information and credit card information are kept. Jackie is leaving town for 2 weeks on a business trip. She is trying to decide whether to copy the databases to her laptop and troubleshoot the problems while away from the office
In a 400-word essay, address the following questions.
· What are the risks of copying the database to the laptop and taking it home or on a trip?
· What are the chances that this data will be at risk?
Given that this database contains customer contact information and credit cards, we cannot at any cost put this information in any kind of danger. On the other hand, if the database problems are not fixed, there may be more errors and data inconsistencies.
Include a title page, abstract, proper citations using APA style, and a bibliography.
Include an introduction based on a well-formed thesis statement. The logical order of the content will be derived from the thesis statement. In a quality paper, the conclusion will summarize the previously presented content and will complement the thesis statement from the introduction.
Free of any spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors. Sentences and paragraphs will be clear, concise, and factually correct.
A quality paper will have significant scope and depth of research to support any statements. Strategic implications will be explained and supported. Relevant illustrations or examples are encouraged. A quality paper will employ use of sound reasoning and logic to reinforce conclusions.
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements
– APA format with a title page, 1-2 pages of content, and a References page if necessary.
– Using the 5 step process, assess the risk involved with a specific scenario related to ground transportation.
– Describe the System – 1 Paragraph explaining the scope of your risk assessment (e.g. pedestrian safety on LU campus).- Identify Hazards – List (in paragraph form) at least 10 hazards. (E.g. Cars, scooters, ice on sidewalks, etc.)
– Analyze Risk – Select at least 3 risks derived from some of the hazards and explain the reasonable severity and likelihood of that risk using the Risk Matrix in chapter 2 (e.g. the severity of being run over by a car is severe because this would likely cause severe, potentially life threatening injury. The likelihood of an individual being run over by a car is improbable, however, because it is unlikely to occur to most students).
– Assess the Risk – determine whether the risk is already acceptable using existing mitigations/best practices (e.g. the risk of being run over by a car is mitigated by having a pedestrian breezeway physically separated from road traffic, and by using sidewalks and crosswalks throughout campus. This risk is low enough to be acceptable with existing mitigations).
– Mitigate the Risk – propose at least one additional mitigation for one of the risks assessed in order to lower the severity and/or likelihood of the risk occurring. (E.G. requiring pedestrians to look both ways before using a crosswalk would mitigate the likelihood of a collision by increasing situational awareness).
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals Analyze Risk – Select at least 3 risks derived from some of the hazards and explain the reasonable severity and likelihood of that risk using the Risk Matrix in chapter
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS607 Cybersecurity Assessment Mitigation Plan for Threat Report Individual/Group Individual Length 2500 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: b) Explore and articulate cyber trends, threats and staying safe in cyberspace, plus protecting personal and company data. c) Analyse issues associated with organisational data networks and security to recommend practical solutions towards their resolution. d) Evaluate and communicate relevant technical and ethical considerations related to the design, deployment and/or the uses of secure technologies within various organisational contexts. Weighting 45% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary For this assessment, you are required to write a 2500 words mitigation plan for threat report based on knowledge you gained about threat types and key factors in Assessment 2. You are required to use the Assessment 2 case as context to write a report to address or alleviate problems faced by the business and to protect the customers. In doing so, you are required to demonstrate your ability to mitigate threat/risks identified in Assessment 2 through the strategy you recommend (STRIDE). Context Cybersecurity help organizations to mitigate threats/risks, reduce financial loss and safety violations, decrease unethical behaviour, improve customer satisfaction, and increase efficiency, as well as to maintain these improved results. Threats can be resolved by Risk Acceptance (doing nothing), Risk Transference (pass risk to an externality), Risk Avoidance (removing the feature/component that causes the risk) and Risk Mitigation (decrease the risk). This assessment gives you an opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of cybersecurity and your capability to explain Risk Mitigation strategies for such threats. Mitigations should be chosen according to the appropriate technology and resolution should be decided according to the risk level and cost of mitigation. Task Instructions 1. Read the Assessment 2 Case Scenario again to understand the concepts discussed in the case. 2. Review your subject notes to establish the relevant area of investigation that applies to the case. Reread any relevant readings that have been recommended in the case area in modules. Plan how you will structure your ideas for the mitigation plan for threat report. 3. The mitigation plan for threat report should address the following: • Setting priorities for risks/threats MIS607_Assessment_3_Brief_Mitigation plan for threat report_ Module 6.1 Page 1 of 4 • Analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios • Apply standard mitigations • Discuss specific resolutions for improvement, and justify their significance • Provide recommendations for mitigating risk based on an assessment of risk appetite, risk tolerance and current risk levels (Choose techniques to mitigate the threats) • Make recommendations to the CEO on how to conduct risk management, key issues involving your process improvement model, including a road map, the identification of appropriate technologies for the identified techniques, communicating the strategy, and a suggested timeline. 4. The report should consist of the following structure: A title page with subject code and name, assignment title, student’s name, student number, and lecturer’s name. The introduction that will also serve as your statement of purpose for the report. This means that you will tell the reader what you are going to cover in mitigation plan report. You will need to inform the reader of: a) Your area of research and its context (how to mitigate or manage threats) b) The key concepts you will be addressing c) What the reader can expect to find in the body of the report The body of the report will need to respond to the specific requirements of the case study. It is advised that you use the case study to assist you in structuring the report. Set priorities for identified threats from assessment 2, analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and discuss specific resolutions and recommendations for improvements in the body of the report. The conclusion (will summarise any findings or recommendations that the report puts forward regarding the concepts covered in the report. 5. Format of the report The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading, and have page numbers on the bottom of each page. If diagrams or tables are used, due attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate captioning. 6. Referencing There are requirements for referencing this report using APA referencing style for citing and referencing research. It is expected that you used 10 external references in the relevant subject area based on readings and further research. Please see more information on referencing here: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool 7. You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the assignment—this will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like. Submission Instructions Submit Assessment 3 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS607 Cybersecurity. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that, except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms. I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly. MIS607_Assessment_3_Brief_Mitigation plan for threat report_ Module 6.1 Page 2 of 4 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Visual appeal and presentation of content Title page included. Adheres to the font, spacing, format, word count requirement. Appropriate use of paragraphs, sentence construction, spelling, and grammar. 20% No title page. Incorrect font and size with poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination, tables, or diagrams. Report is written as a block of text with no breaks in between ideas. Separate ideas cannot be clearly discerned. Many errors in spelling or grammar. Does not adhere to the word count requirement. Title page is included. Missing most information. Incorrect font and size is used or poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination. Paragraphs are used but large blocks of text with long sentences make it difficult to understand the ideas being conveyed. Spelling or grammar has errors but meaning remains clear. Does not adhere to the word count requirement. Title page is included but is missing key information. Some errors in font use and line spacing. Some pagination problems. One idea or concept per paragraph. Some paragraphs could be more succinctly written. Minor spelling or grammar errors. Adheres to the word count requirement. Title page is included with most required information. Minor errors in font, spacing and format. One idea or concept per paragraph with 3–4 wellconstructed sentences per paragraph. No errors in spelling or grammar. Adheres to the word count requirement. Title page is included with all required information. Font, spacing, and format are in accordance with the requirements of the assignment brief. Expert use of paragraphs with 3–4 well-constructed sentences per paragraph that follow logically from each other. No errors in spelling or grammar. Adheres to the word count requirement. Knowledge and understanding Understanding of the key concepts, principles of cybersecurity, Analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios and apply standard mitigations. 30% Lack of understanding of the required concepts and knowledge. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Lack of analysis of the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios and no application of standard mitigations. Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge. Some of the key components of the assignment are not addressed. Limited analysis of the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios. Limited application of standard mitigations. Adequate understanding of the required concepts. A reasonable capacity to explain and apply relevant key concepts. Supports opinion and information substantiated by evidence from research to analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios. Adequate application of standard mitigations. Thorough understanding of the key concepts. Welldemonstrated capacity to apply and analyse relevant information to analyse the case in terms of identified risk categories and scenarios and application of standard mitigations. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s and key concepts. Expert analysis of case in terms of identified risk categories and application of standard mitigation. MIS607_Assessment_3_Brief_Mitigation plan for threat report_ Module 6.1 Page 3 of 4 Evaluation and recommendations Discuss specific resolutions for improvement. Evaluation and justification of resolutions to provide recommendations for mitigating risks 30% Lack of discussion on specific resolution for improvement. No evaluation of resolutions for improvement to provide recommendations for mitigating risk. Limited discussion on specific resolutions for improvement. Lack of evaluation of resolutions for improvement to provide recommendations for mitigating risk. Adequate discussion of specific resolutions for improvement. Provide resolutions for improvement and recommendations for mitigating risk. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and discuss specific resolutions for improvement. A comprehensive evaluation and justification of resolutions to provide recommendations for mitigating risk. Expert discussion of specific resolutions for improvement. Comprehensive and high level of evaluation and justification of the significance of resolutions to provide recommendations for mitigating risks. Use of academic and discipline conventions Formal tone. No use of first-party perspective. Meets the assignment brief regarding introduction, body, and conclusion. Appropriate use of credible resources. Correct citation of key resources using APA style of referencing. 20% Does not adhere to the assignment brief requirements. Poorly written with informal tone using first person pronouns. No introduction attempted. Conclusion not attempted. Inconsistent and inadequate use of goodquality, credible resources. No use of intext references, or no reference list at the close of the report. Many mistakes in using the APA style. Written according to academic genre. Minor errors in the use of first-person pronouns. Introduction attempted but very generic. Does not clearly state the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the report. Conclusion attempted but does not include summation of key concepts and/or recommendations. Consistent use of credible sources but these are not always explicit or welldeveloped. Little use of intext referencing. Mistakes in using APA style. Written according to academic genre. Sound use of the introduction but does not clearly state either the purpose of the report or what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report. Sound use of the conclusion and succeeds in either the summation of key concepts discussed or recommendations, but not both. Consistent use of credible sources. Good use of in-text referencing. Minor errors in using the APA style. Well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Good use of the introduction, which clearly states the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report. Good use of the conclusion and succeeds in summation of key concepts discussed and key conclusions or recommendations. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible sources. Very good use of in-text referencing. No mistakes in using the APA style. Expertly written. Adheres to the academic genre. Excellent use of introduction. Secures the attention of the reader, clearly states the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the report. Excellent use of the conclusion. Succeeds in confident summation of key concepts and recommendations. Expert use of credible and relevant sources. Excellent use of in-text referencing. No mistakes in using the APA style. MIS607_Assessment_3_Brief_Mitigation plan for threat report_ Module 6.1 Page 4 of 4
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Cybersecurity help organizations to mitigate threats/risks, reduce financial loss and safety violations
There are certain risk factors that heighten the potential for a family to experience domestic violence. The King family has a number of dynamics that make them particularly susceptible to family violence. Discuss the following:
Identify at least 3 risks factors that contribute to the family violence in the King household.
As a domestic violence counselor, what are some signs or symptoms that would concern you as an advocate for the King family?
Can an argument be made that Ashley and Aaron are experiencing childhood abuse or neglect while living with their parents?
Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. risks factors that contribute to the family violence in the King household
