Tag: solutions

Categories
Writers Solution

Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS605 Systems Analysis and Design
Assessment Written assessment
Individual/Group Individual
Length words +/ 10%
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
b) Formulate, validate and document business requirements for a medium-scale information system development project and effectively communicate these requirements to the stakeholders.
c) Demonstrate the ability to effectively analyse, design and develop information systems using Unified Modelling Language (UML) models.
Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 3.1
Weighting 30%
Total Marks marks
Task Summary
In response to the case study provided, identify the functional and the non-functional requirement for the required information system and then build a Use Case Diagram and document set of use cases.
Context
System analysis methods and skills are of fundamental importance for a Business Analyst. This assessment allows you to enhance your system analysis skills by capturing the business and then functional and non-functional requirement of a system. It helps you in identifying “what” the proposed system will do and “how”?.
Instructions

  1. Please read the attached MIS605_ Assessment 1_Case Study. Note that every piece of information provided in the following case serves a purpose.
  2. Once you have completed reading the case study. Please answer the following questions:
    Question 1 (10 mark).
    Identify all the human and non-human actors within the system. Provide brief description against every actor.
    Question 2 (30 marks).
    Using the information provided in the case study, build a Use Case Diagram using any diagramming software.
    Note: Please make assumptions where needed.
    Question 3 (60 marks).
    Document all use cases (use case methods). All use cases identified in the Use Case Diagram in Question 2 must be elaborated in detail. Please document each use case using the following template:
    Use Case Number
    Use Case Type Base/Abstract (Extends or Includes)
    Use Case Name
    Priority
    Actor Involved
    Associated Data Sources
    Associated User Interfaces
    Pre-Condition(s)
    Post Condition(s)
    Detailed
    Description
    Normal Course of Events Using a
    Flow Chart
    Diagram
    Alternate
    Course(s)
    Word Count and Layout
    • The total word count for the written assessment should be no more than 2000 words.
    • Please provide all your answers in a MS word document.
    • Please note that you are NOT required to copy the questions over to the MS Word document.
    Use the question number to indicate which question your answer relates to. • The recommended font size is 12 with 1.5 spacing.
    Referencing
    It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing if needed. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
    Submission Instructions
    Please submit the written assessment via the Assessment link within Assessment 1. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
    Marking Criteria F P C D HD
    Question 1: Identify all the human and non-human actors within the system. Provide brief description against every actor.
    10% Actors identified are largely incorrect. Actors identified are partially incorrect. Actors identified are correct but sufficient detail is not provided. Actors identified are correct and sufficient detail is provided. Actors identified are correct and sufficient detail is provided. The student has clear understanding of human and nonhuman actors.
    Question 2: Using the information provided in the case study, build a Use Case Diagram using any diagramming software.
    30% UCD does not include major use cases, many actors in the UCD are missing, association of base and abstract actors is not given with the use cases, extends and includes are not identified where required and not linked to base use case. The use case diagram does not sync in well with the requirements laid down in the case study. UCD misses some important use cases, some actors in the UCD are missing, some associations of base and abstract actors are not given with the use cases, extends and includes are partially identified (where required). Extends and includes and not appropriately linked to the base use cases. The use case diagram does not fully sync with the requirements laid down in the case study. UCD has all the use cases and actors, some associations of base and abstract actors are not given with the use cases, extends and includes are partially identified (where required). Extends and includes are not appropriately linked to the base use cases. The use case diagram largely syncs with the requirements laid down in the case study. UCD has all the use cases and actors, associations of base and abstract actors are given with the use cases, extends and includes are identified (where required). Extends and includes and not appropriately linked to the base use cases. The use case diagram syncs in completely with the requirements laid down in the case study. UCD has all the use cases and actors, associations of base and abstract actors are given with the use cases, extends and includes are identified (where required). Extends and includes and appropriately linked to the base use cases. The use case diagram syncs in completely with the requirements laid down in the case study.
    MIS605_Assessment 1_Brief_written Assessment Page 4 of 5
    Marking Criteria F P C D HD
    Question 3: Document all use cases (use case methods).
    60% Use case descriptions are incomplete and do not sync in with the given case study. Use case descriptions are partially incomplete and do not fully sync in with the given case study. Use case descriptions are complete but do not fully sync in with the given case study. Use case descriptions are complete and are in sync in with the given case study. Use case descriptions are complete, detailed and are in sync in with the given case study.

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery– capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Misuse of Department Property

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

solutions in relation to the management problem you are exploring

Instructions: Read the material at the sites listed, Content Section to help guide you in identifying solutions to the management problem you have identified. Complete a 2-4 page paper discussing solutions in relation to the management problem you are exploring during this course. Here are some tips to help you create your solutions:

· Solutions should focus on the problem, be accepted by the team and be achievable.

· Find opportunities to allow the individuals to meet to work out the differences, respectfully. Focus on strategies that can build trust in the relationship.

· Look at the tasks that the individuals are responsible for and explore whether or not they have had adequate training or resources to be successful in performing their tasks (so the solution is to provide additional training and/or mentoring to help your folks be successful).

· Evaluate the conditions under which these two work (are they sitting right next to the community coffee pot or the photocopy machine or with poor ventilation or no natural light? Is the environment affecting their behavior?) The solution may be to fix the problem by moving them or making some other change.

· Is it financially feasible? Can it be completed in a reasonable time? Can it be done within financial cost structures? What is the return on investment?

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. solutions in relation to the management problem you are exploring
  • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

Role of data in an organisation, and develop solutions related to the creation, storage and management of organisational data.

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS602 Data Modelling and Database Design
Assessment Modelling Report
Individual/Group Individual
Length N/A
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
a) Examine the role of data in an organisation, and develop solutions related to the creation, storage and management of organisational data.
c) Apply contemporary database modelling to identify and address anomalies in data and recommend solutions.
Weighting 30%
Total Marks 100 Marks
Task Summary
This assessment requires you to prepare a modelling report that demonstrates your ability to assess business requirements along with a logical design that could be implemented in a relational database management system.
Context
When preparing to implement a new information system, it is essential that the initial design is well thought out from the outset. Modifying the database after implementation can often be an expensive process in terms of time, effort and cost. Often the first engagement step is to conduct interviews and workshops with end users and business subject matter experts to get a better understand of how the business runs. The output of these workshops becomes the foundation for the database design.
Task Instructions

  1. Please read the attached MIS602_Assessment 1_Case Study.
  2. Based on the information provided in the case study, prepare a modelling report to answer the following questions:
    • An entity relationship diagram including significant attributes against each entity.
    • A relational model showing all fields, primary keys, foreign keys and concatenated keys. Your relational model should be in third normal form. List any assumptions/business rules you have made.
    • A sample screen of what you think your online order form might look like. You may use any tool you like to create this sample screen. Write a brief paragraph discussing the following:
    o Does your database design allow the storage of all the required information?
    o What changes, if any, did you make to your initial ER diagram and relational model after you created the sample input screen?
    MIS602_Assessment 1_Brief_Modelling Report_Module 2.2 Page 1 of 3
    Referencing
    It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
    Submission Instructions
    Submit Assessment 1 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS602 Database Modelling and Database Design. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
    Academic Integrity Declaration
    I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
    I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly.
    MIS602_Assessment 1_Brief_Modelling Report_Module 2.2 Page 2 of 3
    Assessment Rubric
    Assessment Attributes Fail
    (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass
    (Functional)
    50-64% Credit
    (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
    (Advanced)
    75 -84% High Distinction
    (Exceptional)
    85-100%
    Entity relationship diagram
    The ER diagram does not have to be in 3NF. i.e. it can contain many
    to many relationships
    40%
    Only a few entities identified and labelled. No relationships identified. Most entities identified and labelled. Most relationships identified. All entities identified and labelled.
    All relationships identified.
    Most cardinality is correct. Most Participation is correct. All Relationships meaningfully labelled. Primary key labelled for entities.
    All cardinality is correct.
    All participation is correct. Primary keys labelled for
    many-to-many relationships. Some non-key fields labelled.
    Overall, a well-presented entity relationship diagram.
    Relational model
    The relational model needs to be in
    3NF and free from anomalies
    40%
    Only a few entities converted to tables. Design is not in third normal form.
    No list of assumptions/ business rules. Most entities converted to tables. Most fields listed. Design is in third normal form. List of assumptions/business rules provided.
    All entities converted to tables. All fields listed.
    Most many-to-many relationships deconstructed into new tables. Primary keys correctly underlined. All many-to-many relationships deconstructed into new tables. Foreign key correctly underlined. Any multi-valued attributes deconstructed into new tables. Any selfjoins identified. A wellpresented relational model.
    Sample screen
    Sample screen of the online order form.
    Discuss how the database design allow the storage of all the required information and the changes made to the initial ER
    diagram and relational model
    20% Sample screen does not capture the requirements of the order.
    No discussion paragraph provided. Screen captures most of the requirements for the order.
    Discussion paragraph does not address the key points. Screen captures all of the requirements for the order. Discussion paragraph is provided. All screen fields correctly mapped to a field in the relational model. Discussion paragraph is well written and addresses the key points.
    All screen fields correctly and accurately map to a field in the relational model.
    Well-presented sample screen along with a discussion paragraph that addresses the key points with clarity and detail.
    MIS602_Assessment 1_ Brief_Modelling Report_Module 2.2 Page 3 of 3

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service? 
  • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. storage and management of organisational data
  • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

Information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS605 Systems Analysis and Design
Assessment Written assessment
Individual/Group Individual
Length 2000 words
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
b) Formulate, validate and document business requirements for a medium-scale information system development project and effectively communicate these requirements to the stakeholders.
c) Demonstrate the ability to effectively analyse, design and develop information systems using Unified Modelling Language (UML) models.
Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 3.1
Weighting 30%
Total Marks 100 marks
Task Summary
In response to the issues raised in the ‘online university enrolment system’ case study provided, identify the functional and non-functional requirement for an online enrolment system and build and document a set of use cases for that system.
Context
Requirement analysis techniques and skills are of fundamental importance to a Business Analyst, who is often required to help business users in terms of identifying what they really need in their new systems. This assessment allows you to enhance your requirement analysis techniques and skills by capturing the business requirement of a system, identify “what” the proposed system will do, “how” the system will perform those tasks, and communicate the identified requirement through a set of use case diagrams and their associated documentations.
Instructions
1. Please read the attached MIS605_ Assessment 1_Case Study. Note that every piece of information provided in the following case serves a purpose.
2. Once you have completed reading the case study. Please answer the following questions:
Question 1.
(a) Who are the stakeholders in this project? Please list at least four stakeholders. (2 marks)
(b) Who are the Actors in this System? Please list at least four actors (4 mark)
Question 2.
Identify and list at least TEN (10) major functional requirements for the System. (20 marks)
Question 3.
Using your own experience with similar online student enrolment systems and the information provided in the case study, identify and list at least FIVE (5) non-functional requirements for the
System. Explain and justify each non-functional requirement. (20 marks)
Question 4.
Using your own experience with similar online student enrolment systems and the information provided in the case study, build a comprehensive set of use case diagrams for the System using MS Visio. (30 marks)
Please note that the case study has not and does not intend to provide a comprehensive description of requirements for the System. This means that you are required to use your own experience with information systems in general and online student enrolment systems in particular to develop this set of use case diagrams. For example, would Student Enrolment Officers be required to log into the System before performing any tasks?
Question 5.
Based on the use case diagrams you built in Question 4, develop and document two elaborated use cases. For each of the two use cases, please document the following:
• Use Case Name (1 mark each)
• ID (1 mark each)
• Priority (1 mark each)
• Actor (1 mark each)
• Description (1 mark each)
• Trigger (1 mark each)
• Precondition (1 mark each)
• Normal Course (2 marks each)
• Alternative courses (1 mark each)
• Postconditions (1 mark each)
• Exceptions (1 mark each)
(24 marks)
3. Please note that your answers must relate to the case study provided.
Word Count and Layout
• The total word count for the written assessment should be no more than 2000 words.
• Please provide all your answers in a MS word document.
• Please note that you are NOT required to copy the questions over to the MS Word document.
Use the question number to indicate which question your answer relates to. • The recommended font size is 12 with 1.5 spacing.
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Submission Instructions
Please submit the written assessment via the Assessment link within Assessment 1. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Marking Criteria F P C D HD
Subject Learning Outcome:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
? Identify at least four stakeholders.
? Identify at least four actors including both human and non-human.
6%
Subject Learning Outcome:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
b) Formulate, validate and document business requirements for a medium-scale information system development project and effectively communicate these requirements to the stakeholders.
Identify and list at least ten major functional requirements which demonstrate the following qualities:
? The requirements are functional requirements.
? The requirements are major functional requirements.
? Relevant to the case.
?
20%
Satisfy the good requirement criteria.
Subject Learning Outcome:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
b) Formulate, validate and document business requirements for a medium-scale information system development project and effectively communicate these requirements to the stakeholders.
Identify at least five non-functional requirements for the System which demonstrate the following qualities:
? The requirements are non-fictional requirements.
? Relevant to the case.
? Satisfy the good requirement criteria.
?
20%
Clearly justified.
Subject Learning Outcome:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
b) Formulate, validate and document business requirements for a medium-scale information system development project and effectively communicate these requirements to the stakeholders.
c) Demonstrate the ability to effectively analyse, design and develop information systems using Unified Modelling Language (UML) models.
Build a comprehensive set of use case diagrams for the System using MS Visio. The use case diagram has the following features:
? Drawn using a professional diagramming tool.
? The diagram is complete.
? No mistakes in the use case diagram notations.
? Relevant to the case.
? Include all the important actors.
30%
Subject Learning Outcome:
a) Identify, critically evaluate and recommend information systems solutions for inefficiencies in business processes, procedures and work practices using data and process modelling techniques.
b) Formulate, validate and document business requirements for a medium-scale information system development project and effectively communicate these requirements to the stakeholders.
c) Demonstrate the ability to effectively analyse, design and develop information systems using Unified Modelling Language (UML) models.
Develop and document two elaborated use cases.
? Each element of the use case has been clearly and correctly documented.
24%
Fail (Unacceptable)
0-49% Fail grade will be awarded if a student is unable to demonstrate satisfactory academic performance in the subject or has failed to complete required assessment points in accordance with the subject’s required assessment points.
Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Pass is awarded for work showing a satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and an adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged.
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74% Credit is awarded for work showing a more than satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and a more than adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged.
Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84%
Distinction is awarded for work of superior quality in achieving all learning outcomes and a superior integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis and evaluation is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged.
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100% High Distinction is awarded for work of outstanding quality in achieving all learning outcomes together with outstanding integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis, original and creative thought is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged

Categories
Writers Solution

Data Mining Solutions for Direct Marketing Campaign

Submission Deadline

Marks and Feedback

Before 10am on:

Tue 17/12/2019 Fri 20/12/2019 (if required an extension could be granted by Student Mitigation Team)

20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7)

15 working days after deadline (L6)

10 working days after deadline (block delivery)

Unit title & code

CIS111-6: Intelligent Systems and Data Mining

Assignment number and title

Assignment 1: Data Mining Solutions for Direct Marketing Campaign

Assessment type

WR

Weighting of assessment

50%

Unit learning outcomes

Analyse a Data Mining technique capable of supporting practitioners to make reliable decisions which require predictive modelling, for example, in a Business scenario

Demonstrate results of using an efficient technique which is capable of finding a solution to a given predictive problem represented by a data set

Evaluate the accuracy of the technique in terms of differences between the predicted values and the given data

What am I required to do in this assignment?

1. Task

Students will develop a DM solution for saving cost of a direct marketing campaign by reducing false positive (wasted call) and false negative (missed customer) decisions. Working on this assignment, students can consider the following scenario.

A Bank has decided to save the cost of a direct marketing campaign based on phone calls offering a product to a client. A cost efficient solution is expected to support the campaign with predictions for a given client profile whether the client subscribes to the product or not. A startup company wants to develop an innovative DM technology which will be competitive on the market. The Manager will interview and hire Data Analysts. The team will analyse the existing technologies to design a DM solution winning the competition. A team Manager will choose the best solution for the market competition in terms of cost efficiency. The evaluation of the developed solutions will be made on the test data. The costs will be defined for both the false positive and false negative predictions.

Examples of cost-efficient DM solutions for direct marketing are provided on the UCI Machine Learning repository describing a Bank Marketing problem.

Students will apply for one of roles: (i) group manager, (ii) group member, or will work  individually. The group manager will arrange comparison and ranking of solutions designed in a group, and will have additional 5 points. Each student will run individual experiments to find an efficient solution and  describe differences in experimental results.

2. Method and Technology

To design a solution, students will use Data Mining techniques such as Decision Trees and Artificial Neural Networks. Examples of solutions will be provided in R Scripting using (i) a Cloud technology CoCalc or (ii) an advanced development suit RStudio free for students.

3. Data        

The Assignment 1 Bank Marketing data set is available as a csv file.

4. Report submission and report template

Each solution will be evaluated in terms of the costs of false decisions made on the validation data. Reports will be submitted via BREO.  Reports can be prepared with a template. BREO similarity level of reports must be < 20%.

Is there a size limit?

2000 words on average

What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)

Apply Decision Tree technique to solve the Bank Marketing task presented by a set of customer profiles

Analyse problems which are required to be resolved in order to develop a solution providing a high prediction accuracy on a given data set.

How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?

Identify a set of parameters which are required to be adjusted within DM techniques in order to optimise the solution in terms of prediction accuracy

Explain how the parameters of a DM technique influence the prediction accuracy

Run experiments in order to verify the solution designed on the given data set

Analyse and compare the results of the experiments in a group and with the known from the literature.

How does assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?

Data Mining techniques and use cases developed in R will be considered during  lectures and tutorials.

How will my assignment be marked?

Your assignment be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page.

You can use them to evaluate your own work and estimate your grade before you submit.

#

Weight, %

Lower 2nd – 50-59%

Upper 2nd – 60-69%

1st Class – 70%+

1

Analysis

(20)

Fair analysis of the basic approaches

Relatively good analysis of the relevant literature, mainly covering the state-of-art

Excellent analysis of the relevant literature, fully covering the state-of-art

2

Design

(50)

Fair design of a basic solution providing a reasonable performance within a single set of parameters

Design of a solution providing a fair performance in a series of experiments with different sets of parameters

Design of a solution providing a performance, competitive to known from the literature, in a series of experiments with different sets of parameters

3

Conclusion (30)

Fair conclusion on the experimental results obtained within a single set of parameters

Conclusion on and comparison of the experimental results obtained within two different sets of parameters

Conclusion on and comparison of the experimental results obtained within multiple sets of parameters, demonstrating a solution which provides a competitive performance