Categories
Writers Solution

Michigan’s state statute that defines what is considered to be a public record that must be made available to the public upon request.

Using library or Internet resources provide a full citation for each of the following items:
(The state is MI and the city is Grand Rapids for all “local” questions)

  1. Michigan’s state statute that defines what is considered to be a public  record that must be made available to the public upon request.
  2. The pre-World War I opinion by the U.S. Supreme Court holding, on re-argument, that a federal income tax was unconstitutional.
  3. The federal statute authorizing the U.S. Secretary of Transportation  to make payments to states for the value of materials stockpiled near  federal highway construction projects in conformity with the project  specifications.
  4. The federal joint regulation of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife  Service, Department of the Interior, National Oceanic and Atmospheric  Administration, and Department of Commerce, identifying the factors for  listing, delisting, or reclassifying endangered species.
  5. Michigan’s state administrative regulations specifying the licensure process for real estate agents.
  6. The local ordinance in your municipality governing noise.
  7. The most recent opinion of your Michigan’s state highest appeals court  describing the extent to which the state constitution requires that the  power of eminent domain be exercised only for a public use.
  8. A recent federal trial court decision in your federal district describing the standard for summary judgment in federal court.
  9. A law-review article published within the past five (5) years about libel law and political campaign advertisements.

Your assignment must:

Categories
Writers Solution

Economic crisis in the state of Arizona, home values decreased dramatically and homeowners began walking away from their homes in large numbers

During the most recent economic crisis in the state of Arizona, home values decreased dramatically and homeowners began walking away from their homes in large numbers.  This was largely due to the fact that they owned more on the home than it was worth and in many cases they could no longer afford to make the payments.  Financial institutions foreclosed on large numbers of homes and forced the owners to leave.  As they left their real property homeowners ofter stripped the home of anything valuable they could remove.  Homeowners took appliances, window coverings, light fixtures, ceiling fans, water heaters, rugs and carpets,plumbing fixtures (toilets, sinks, showers, bathtubs etc.) electrical wiring, doors, cabinets and sometimes even windows and outdoor plants from property they no longer owned.

Given the understanding that many of these things qualify as “fixtures” that are attached and should remain with real property (the home), discuss in an original post whether or not you think their decision to remove these items is ethical (or even legal?)  How do you think some of these people justified taking these items?  Do you agree or disagree with that reasoning?  Should the financial institutions have pursued legal action against these people?

Write an original 200+ word post. Always discuss any ethical issues that are involved. Cite any other sources you use when writing your post

Assignment statusSolved by our Writing Team at CapitalEssayWriting.com