Categories
Writers Solution

The scenario-based case study used in this course provides descriptive information and data to help you make decisions as if you were actively participating in a real-life investigation of a warehouse fire

Part 1: Scenario-Based Case Study 

The course project is a scenario-based case study, which will be due in Unit VIII. A scenario-based case study is similar to other case studies you may have experienced. The scenario-based case study used in this course provides descriptive information and data to help you make decisions as if you were actively participating in a real-life investigation of a warehouse fire. There are eight assignments for the scenario-based case study (one per unit). You will complete and submit Part 1, Sections I and II of the course project in this unit. Use APA level one headings for each section. The heading should be indicative of the major section to follow. Here is a tutorial on level headings.For the course project, you will utilize what you learn throughout the course to solve a real-world problem of what fire protection is needed to create plausible actions, concepts, or inventions to solve fire protection deficiencies that resulted in a large-scale fire in a warehouse distribution center.From Unit I through Unit VII, you will complete one part of your recommendation in each unit, and in Unit VIII, you will write an executive summary and conclusion. You will then compile all parts into one document as your final project. You can arrange each part in any order you would like before submitting the final project. For instance, this assignment about fire pumps is covered in Chapter 6 of the textbook; however, you may choose to cover fire protection, detection, and suppression systems (completed in Unit II) as the first part of your final project and to place fire pumps after another topic of your choice. You are able to organize the final report sections in any order that makes logical sense to you.During each part, you will prepare a well-organized narrative consisting of two sections. Only submit the assignment for that unit until the final case study is compiled from all units and submitted as a single document in Unit VIII. However, you should evaluate and revise the recommendations as needed during the process for each previous unit as you learn more during the progression of this course.This scenario-based case study is designed to draw upon your imagination to think creatively on potential concerns with fire and explosive hazards, fire controls, and fire and emergency management. You should look at fire protection technology in a holistic way. This way of design thinking is significantly different from what was previously designed by thinking in isolation. You will evaluate and develop recommendations to resolve potential fires in the future.Please click  here to view the background information of the scenario.Through the scenario-based case study process, you will begin developing a tool that will synchronize suggestions to improve life safety. You will accomplish this by utilizing recommendations to improve fire protection after a warehouse distribution center fire.Section ISection I will address the foreign-made fire pump and your recommendations after reviewing the background information.Your narrative will consist of your evaluation of the foreign-made fire pump and your choice of fire pump that you would recommend for the rebuild of the warehouse. The background information will provide you the needed material to identify the basic components common to fire protection for the City of Washington Distribution Warehouse. As you review the material, make sure you do the following actions: 

  1. examine what contributed to the fire,
  2. analyze building components and existing fire suppression systems, and
  3. prepare and disseminate recommendations.

Fire protection design involves an integrated approach where designers need to analyze the building’s use, occupancy, footprint, and existing fire protection systems or components. This assignment is not looking for compliance with building codes nor expecting you to be a fire protection system designer. However, the purpose of this assignment is for you to apply the concepts and knowledge you learned in this unit as you begin writing your final project covering protection systems that will detect, contain, control, and extinguish a fire. In addition, this assignment provides you with the opportunity to use your skills, expertise, and experience to enrich your response.Section IISection II will address the ethical dilemma of using the foreign-made fire pump, as described in the Points to Ponder Scenario within this unit, as a right versus right action or a right versus wrong action.As we saw in the unit lesson, Kidder (1995) described four basic paradigms that deal with most ethical dilemmas of right versus right choices. He believed ethical decisions often involve choices of the individual versus community, truth versus loyalty, short-term versus long-term, and justice versus mercy. Pick one of the paradigms below, and answer the question.

  • Is it right to use the foreign-made fire pump because others were not available in order to provide fire protection so the warehouse could re-open and the workers could go back to work?  -OR-
  • Do you believe using the fire pump dilemma was a right versus wrong action based on your own values, professional ethics, and institutional values?

For this assignment, you will write a two-page narrative (one page per section) supporting your positions. You must have a title page and references page. An abstract is not required. You may use information from reputable, reliable journal articles, case studies, scholarly papers, and other sources that you feel are pertinent. You should use at least three sources, one of which must be your textbook. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations following proper APA style

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER The scenario-based case study used in this course provides descriptive information and data to help you make decisions as if you were actively participating in a real-life investigation of a warehouse fire

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Categories
Writers Solution

Case Study: A Young Caucasian Girl with ADHD

Not only do children and adults have different presentations for ADHD, but males and females may also have vastly different clinical presentations. Different people may also respond to medication therapies differently. For example, some ADHD medications may cause children to experience stomach pain, while others can be highly addictive for adults. In your role, as a psychiatric nurse practitioner, you must perform careful assessments and weigh the risks and benefits of medication therapies for patients across the life span. For this Assignment, you consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with ADHD.

To prepare for this Assignment:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the Medication      Resources indicated for this week.
  • Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend      for the assessment and treatment of patients with ADHD.

The Assignment: 5 pages

Examine Case Study: A Young Caucasian Girl with ADHD. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.

At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.

Introduction to the case (1 page)

  • Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure      to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision      making when prescribing medication for this patient.

Decision #1 (1 page)

  • Which decision did you select?
  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your      response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources,      including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the      exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant      and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support      your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources      (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan      and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #2 (1 page)

  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your      response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources,      including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the      exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant      and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support      your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources      (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan      and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #3 (1 page)

  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your      response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources,      including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the      exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant      and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support      your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including      the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan      and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Conclusion (1 page)

  • Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you      selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and      support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific      resources, including the primary literature.

Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of five academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. You should be utilizing the primary and secondary literature

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com ON  Case Study: A Young Caucasian Girl with ADHD

NO PLAGIARISM, Get impressive Grades in Your Academic Work

Categories
Writers Solution

Computer Security Technology Planning Study (Volume II)

MXS Cloud SDK

Multi-X Security

Software Development Kit

Multi-Level

Multi-Category

Multi-Nation

Maxus Cloud SDK, the Multi-X Security Software Development Kit Hello, and welcome to the Maxus cloud software development kit briefing. This briefing will cover the basics of the Maxus Cloud SDK. If you’d like to hear more information about what you’ve seen in this brief, please contact Major Kyle Stewart at kyle dot stewart dot 5 @ US dot AF dot mil. MXS, pronounced “maxus”, stands for Multi-X security. The maxus project objectives are to provide secure multi-level, multi-category, and multi-nation environments. Categories are the maxus term for what some might call a compartment, caveat, or program.

1

Historical Context

2

The major problems of the USAF stem from the fact that there is a growing requirement to provide shared use of computer systems containing information of different classification levels and need-to-know requirements in a user population not uniformly cleared or access-approved. …

Users are permitted and encouraged to directly program the system for their applications. It is in this latter kind of use of computers that the weakness of the technical foundation of current systems is most acutely felt.

Computer Security Technology Planning Study (Volume II)

October 1972

https://csrc.nist.rip/publications/history/ande72.pdf

2

Challenges & Solutions

MXS Reference Architecture

MXS Security Model

Challenges

Current commercial cloud infrastructure does not provide a multi-level / multi-category environment out-of-the-box; it must be provided by workload owner

It is difficult for vendors and mission owners to create multi-level / multi-category aware software

Unclear approach to data labeling impedes interoperability and complicates development of software solutions that function across the enterprise

Solution

Execute project that develops a standard security model, data model, reference architecture, and Software Development Kit (SDK)

Conduct prototyping in an unclassified cloud environment to demonstrate feasibility of using the MXS SDK to develop multi-level / multi-category software solutions

When successful, utilize the MXS SDK to address IT requirements related to enterprise software development

3

3

Enterprise View

4

4

System View

5

5

What is MXS Cloud SDK?

Increasing Technical Opinion

Documentation

Security Model

Data Model

Reference Architecture

Reference Implementation

Cost Model

Human-centric terms and definitions with concepts modeled in a well-defined visual language

Machine readable data formats for access control information and metadata aligned to security model

Organization of COTS/GOTS components into solution which supports security and data models

Executable form of reference architecture that runs inside government owned cloud environment

Provide cost predictions for reference implementation including licenses, compute, store, and network

Acquisition and developer centric documentation that covers requirements, use cases, testing, etc.

6

6

Business Processes

Multiple organizations participate and contribute via DI2E DevTools based on Atlassian tools (Confluence, JIRA, BitBucket) + Jenkins Milestones are 4-week planning periods (i.e., sprints) All work is drafted, approved, and tracked via JIRA tickets Clear “definition of done” with deliverable required for ticket approval Documentation (including this briefing) is all tracked and built from version control

7

7

Generic Security Model

8

8

Claims 0.1

{ “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:digitalIdentifier”: “CN=Lastname Firstname Middle personId, OU=PE, OU=DoD, OU=DoD, O=U.S. Government, C=US”, “sub”: “7fbdecb9-7b1c-4663-bf7e-3e70b57f681e”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:aICP”: false, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:dutyOrganization”: “ABMC”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:dutyOrganizationUnit”: “CIO:APPS:EASPO”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:entityType”: “CTR”, “email_verified”: false, “iss”: “http://localhost:8080/auth/realms/hello-world”, “preferred_username”: “Firstname.Lastname”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:clearance”: [“TS”, “S”, “C”, “U”], “aud”: “siteapp”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:countryOfAffiliation”: [“USA”], “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:adminOrganization”: “ABMC”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:entitySecurityMark”: “U”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:auditRoutingOrganization”: “Routing Org”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:authorityCategory”: “ICD503”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:group”: [“my-group”, “my-group-two”, “your-group”], “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:region”: [“EMEA”], “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:role”: [“DoD-MXS-Admin”, “NATO-Liason”], “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:topic”: [“HLTH”], “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:certificateAuthority”: “DoDPKI”, “urn:us:gov:ic:uias:originatingNetwork”: “NET1″, “email”: “Firstname.Lastname@world.com”, “urn:us:gov:dod:contractorOrg”: “ACME Inc.”, “urn:us:gov:dod:contractorOrgId”: “91749”, “urn:us:gov:dod:authorizationSet”: { “XMS”: { “M”: { “CAT1″: [“ABC:1234″] }, “H”: { “CAT1″: [“APPLES”], “CAT2″: [“DEF:9876″], “CAT3″: [“BANANAS”], } } } }

Claims are represented by Open ID Connect JSON Web Token (JWT)

Design is split into “heavy” JWT (backend authorization) and “light” JWT (held by client)

Leverages semantics from IC UIAS standard as well as from OSD SAP CIO

Format depicted here includes explicit, long namespaces to make it clear the origin of the semantic

All labels and markings are notional and for illustrative purposes only.

9

Clearance Owner:->“XMS”: { Level:—>“M”: { Category Type:——->“CAT1″: Categories:—————>[“ABC:1234″]

9

Information Security Marking

Multi-Level Markings (MLM) occur when there is a mixture of classification levels and categories portion marked within a document

Standards like ISM potentially can misrepresent the aggregate precisely, resulting in over classification at the root level

MXS is working with OSD SAP CIO and Common Metadata Standards Tiger Team (CMSTT) on possible implementation strategies and policies

10

All labels and markings are notional and for illustrative purposes only.

10

Label 0.1

Derived from ISM semantics including JSON-LD distributed controlled value enumeration files

Added additional structure in key areas of concern to address challenges with mixed classification level, categories, coalition data, and developer ergonomics

Works together with MXS Claims JWT

Designed to accept, produce compliant ISM labeled data

Stepping-stone to next-generation labeled infrastructure based on OPA/REGO

Moving the label to application-level protocols (like HTTP) that leverage JSON makes the shared data model more easily exchanged and validated

Better aligned with modern development techniques and knowledge base in industry

{ “classification”: { “XMS”: “H” }, “categories”: { “XMS”: { “M”: { “CAT1″: [“ABC:1234″] }, “H”: { “CAT1″: [“APPLES”], “CAT2″: [“DEF:9876″], “CAT3″: [“BANANAS”], } } }, “disseminationControls”: [“REL”, “DISPLAYONLY”], “ownerProducer”: [“XMS”], “geoPolitical”: { “FGIsourceOpen”: [“AUS”, “CAN”, “GBR”], “FGIsourceProtected”: [“FGI”], “releasableTo”: [“USA”, “AUS”, “CAN”, “GBR”], “displayOnlyTo”: [“ABW”], “joint”: true },

“classDeclass”: { “derivativelyClassifiedBy”: “MXS Developer mxs@dod.gov”, “derivedFrom”: “Pursuant to SCG ABC version 1.2 dtd 01/01/2020”, “declassDate”: “2070-02-18”, “declassEvent”: null, “declassException”: [“AEA”], “classifiedBy”: null, “classificationReason”: null }, “metadata”: { “DESVersion”: “201903.201909”, “ISMCATCESVersion”: “201909”, “resourceElement”: null, “compliesWith”: “USGov”, “createDate”: “2021-02-19”, “exemptFrom”: “IC_710_MANDATORY_FDR”, “noAggregation”: “false”, “externalNotice”: null, “noticeType”: “DoD-Dist-X”, “noticeDate”: “2021-02-18”, “noticeReason”: “Contains CUI DCRIT”, “unregisteredNoticeType”: null, “pocType”: “ICD-710”, “hasApproximateMarkings”: null, “compilationReason”: “Language”, “excludeFromRollup”: null } }

11

All labels and markings are notional and for illustrative purposes only.

11

Access Control

MXS implements an attribute-based access control (ABAC) model that in turn needs to support mandatory access control (MAC), discretionary access control (DAC), and role-based access control (RBAC) Data model focuses on modern production environments like the service meshes in a Kubernetes environment, deploying “sidecars” via COTS tools like Grey Matter Leverages open tools like Open Policy Agent, and the REGO policy language to express and enforce access control policies Combines the claims and labeling standardization in JSON to create a zero-trust architecture with rigid enforcement throughout the mesh

package mxs default allow = false allow { # has_necessary_attributes sufficient_clearance all_categories } # Ensure that the user has sufficient clearance to view the marking on # the document. sufficient_clearance { # UIAS data has an array of clearances, not the highest clearance doc_classification_num := input.label._classification._classId clearance_number[user_clearances[_]] >= doc_classification_num } …

https://docs.greymatter.io/use-cases/zero-trust
https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/

12

12

Towards 1.0 – MXS ABAC Data Model

Top-down design after gathering taxonomy of existing data semantics from IC and SAP communities

Core specification that deals with the attributes required for access control to support MAC, DAC, and RBAC

Priorities / Trade-offs

Keep data going over the WAN small

Keep data structures as normalized and regular as possible

Follow principle of least surprise

Interoperability with legacy formats

Leverages JSON based JavaScript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE), JSON Web Tokens (JWT), and SPIFFE for security and certificate management

Future expansion to binary formats like Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR), or other formats like XML

13

13

Three Tier Architecture

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitier_architecture

14

14

Reference Architecture

Government owned architecture with focus on use of commercial products and standards

Example open / commercial products:

Example open / commercial standards:

Initial focus is on single-level, multi-category; aligns with cloud architecture

Hooks to facilitate cloud hosted or on-premise cross domain solution

Compatible with MLS data stores and services

Managed, labeled data management and application hosting environment designed to integrate well with K8s DevSecOps pipelines like Platform One

JSON

Schema

System for Cross-domain

Identity Management

15

15

Reference Implementation

Automation Stack

(*) Will support full DevSecOps lifecycle of hosted applications (via GitOps) and service mesh

Used to automate deployment of packages on K8s

Used for orchestration of executable capability

Used to configure the baseline and deploy K8s

Used to create, manage, and destroy baseline infrastructure

Prototype / Experimentation

Hosted in Cloud One Development (C1D) on top of Amazon Web Services (AWS) Used for COTS evaluation, prototype, experimentation, and scalability testing Leverages full C1D guard-railed environment to support potential future expansion to C1 production

Development

U-FEN is primary development environment Minimizes delta to other *-FEN targets Allows connectivity to unclassified identity store to enable ICAM solution Already aligned with Platform One as DevSecOps environment

16

16

Next Steps

Integration with Platform One Integration with Grey Matter Automated Security Analysis

MITRE Caldera for automated pen testing framework

MITRE SAF (Heimdall) for automated compliance monitoring

Deployment to U-FEN Government Functional Testing Groundwork for Operational Pilots

MITRE Security Automation Framework (https://saf.mitre.org

MITRE Caldera (https://github.com/mitre/caldera)

MITRE Heimdall (https://github.com/mitre/Heimdall)

17

17

MXS Roadmap

MXS Cloud SDK FY21 Deliverables

Security Model / Data Model

Reference Architecture

Unclassified Prototype Cloud Implementation

Legacy Integration Guidance

Cost Model

Fences Integration

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23+

Prototype • GTRI as Prime ⁃ 2371B OTA via AFRL ⁃ 9-month POP • Cloud One Dev / U-Fences + Platform One • Early involvement from AO and test communities • Demo Days June / Oct 2021

Transition & Mature • MXS Data Labeling Standard 1.0 (NIEM / CMSTT) • Upstream to Platform One (Iron Bank / Big Bang) • Enterprise ICAM Pilot • Operational Pilots

Enterprise Software Factory • Sustained Capability Development ⁃ Leverage DevSecOps ⁃ Built on Platform One ⁃ MXS SDK (Cloud / Edge) • Production Cloud Environments ⁃ Cloud One (IL5, IL6) ⁃ *-FEN ⁃ C2S

Impact • Empowers customers with DevSecOps as-a-Service • Lowers bar for third party developers to create multi-level, multi-category, multi-nation aware applications in the cloud or on premise • Government owned architectures supported with COTS products

18

18

MXS SDK Future Architecture

Baked-in resiliency to denied, disrupted, intermittent, and limited environments Takes advantage of strengths of both cloud and on-premise data centers Builds upon the use of commercial and government standards


WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

Multi-X Security Software Development Kit Hello

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

Categories
Writers Solution

Case Study- Community Development principles and practices in action

 Assessment BriefProgram Bachelor of Applied Social Science
Subject Community development
Name of assessment Assessment 3: Written academic case study
Length 2500 words
Learning outcomes addressed
by this assessment: A, B, C, D, E
Submission Date: End of week 10, Sunday 11.55 pm
Assessment brief summary:
Research and choose an example of Community Development today. Use
this example to identify, theoretically articulate & analyse as an Academic
Case Study- Community Development principles and practices in action.
Identify- the community of focus, the principles, power roles & alliances,
networking, leadership/team skills, educational initiatives, “positioning”,
development of communication / research / development skills:- as well as
using public awareness groups and initiatives etc. Identify evidence of the
underpinning social justice ethos in their work, and the range of values,
skills, and insights drawn from social theory, and academic disciplines/ and
models of practice. Demonstrate the efficacy of their sustainability
principles and practices.
Total marks 50
Weighting 50%
Students are advised that any submissions past the due date incur a 10% penalty per day, calculated from the total
mark e.g. a task marked out of 40 will incur a 4 mark penalty per day.
Please note: you must attempt all tasks in a subject to be eligible to pass the subject.
More information, please refer to the Academic Progression Policy on http://www.think.edu.au/about‐think/think‐
quality/our‐policies.
WEL301A – AB3, Case Study Page 2
Assessment Description:
Community development workers draw on values underpinning an ethos of social justice. In their
work, workers employ a range of values, skills, insights drawn from social theories and academic
disciplines, and models of practice. Summarise these core Community Development Characteristics –
and then use examples in your case study ‐ to critically justify and discuss‐ how it is an example of
Community Development core principles and practices.
Include a critical evaluation of the community development project or initiative as theoretical content
from sections 7‐9/10. Provide a clear academic analysis of the case study, study. Some of the topical
points to consider include:
 Principles of social justice, equitability, inclusiveness
 Power and empowerment
 Social, ecological and economic sustainability
 Broader social, political, historical and economic contexts
 Stages of community development used in the project
 Skills employed by community developers
 Project’s effects, outcomes. Project evaluation
 Theories of community development which might help to explain the community development
approach employed by the project/ initiative described in the case study.

Marking Criteria:
Max. in
category Your
points
Answering the question and responding to the topic 30
Links to theories and concepts 10
Number and choice of appropriate references 4
Word count, readability, and structure 3
In-text references and reference list, accuracy and use of
correct referencing style 3
Total: 50
Comments:

WEL301A – AB3, Case Study Page 3
What we want to see:
The work must be fully referenced with in-text citations and a reference list at the end. We
recommend you work with your Academic Writing Guide to ensure that you reference correctly. You
will find a link to this document on the main page of every unit, under the ‘Assessments’ section.
Correct academic writing and referencing are essential tasks that you need to learn. We
recommend a minimum of six references.
Referencing: References are assessed for their quality. You should draw on quality academic
sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. Your textbook can be used as a
reference, but not the Study Guide and lecture notes. We want to see evidence that you are capable
of conducting your own research. Also, in order to help markers determine students’ understanding
of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page
number/s if shown in the original.
Researching: You can search for peer-reviewed journal articles, which you can find in the online
journal databases and which can be accessed from the library homepage. Reputable news sites
such as The Conversation (https://theconversation.com/au/health), online dictionaries and online
encyclopedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic. Government
departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council
(NHMRC), international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) and local not
for profit organisations such as the Cancer Council are also good resources.
Formatting: The assessment MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other
formats may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other
formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in Word.

What we don’t want to see:
Plagiarism: All sources of information need to properly be acknowledged. Please refer to the
plagiarism website on blackboardi. By clicking the ‘Upload this file’ button you acknowledge that you
have read, understood and can confirm that the work you are about to submit complies with the
Flexible and Online plagiarism policy as shown in the JNI Student Handbook. Like other forms of
cheating plagiarism is treated seriously. Plagiarising students will be referred to the Program
Manager.
Word Count: Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count – as a general rule you
may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
Late Submissions: Students are advised that any submissions past the due date incur a 10%
penalty per day, calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 30 will incur 3 marks
penalty per day.
No submission: Students must attempt all tasks to be eligible to pass the unit.

More information can be found in Think Education Assessment Policy document on the Think
Education website.
WEL301A – AB3, Case Study Page 4
Resources Available to YOU:
1. Academic writing guide link
https://laureate-
au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_
1&content_id=_2498847_1&mode=reset

2. Writing & referencing: The link to the Learning and Academic Skills Unit
(LASU) is on the left pulldown menu on the blackboard home page:
https://laureate-
au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_
1&content_id=_2498847_1&mode=reset
LASU also provides a series of academic skills tutorials. Please contact Caroline
Spaans (cspaans@laureate.net.au, 02 949 232 14).

3. Researching: A guide to researching is available on the library page
http://library.think.edu.au/research_skills/.
Please contact the online and Pyrmont librarian for Health, Dawn Vaux
(dvaux@laureate.net.au) if you would like further help or a tutorial on how to do
research this way

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals Case Study- Community Development principles and practices in action

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG
Categories
Writers Solution

Describe the problem that Soma Bay encountered in this case study.

Instructions

The case studies below provide you with an opportunity to critically analyze events that are taking place in real-life businesses. This helps to develop your critical thinking and research skills as you research each of these scenarios.For this assignment, you will review four case studies, one from Chapter 9, one from Chapter 10, one from Chapter 11, and one from Chapter 12. Then, you will evaluate the studies and respond to each of the questions below, using both critical thinking and theory as well as supporting documentation.In Chapter 9, read the case study ”Soma Bay Prospers with ERP in the Cloud” on pages 345–346 of the textbook. Then, address the prompts below.

  • Describe the problem that Soma Bay encountered in this case study.
  • Why was an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system needed to solve the problem?
  • What are some challenges that this ERP system poses?
  • Will this ERP system help the company achieve operational excellence? Why, or why not?

In Chapter 10, read the case study “A Nasty Ending for Nasty Gal” on pages 414–416 of the textbook. Then, answer the questions below.

  • Was it a good idea to use social media as a marketing and social tool for Nasty Gal? Why, or why not?
  • What were the management, organization, and technological issues that contributed to the failure of Nasty Gal?
  • If you were hired as the new chief executive officer (CEO) of Nasty Gal, what would you have done differently to keep the company from filing for bankruptcy?

In Chapter 11, read the case study “Can Cars Drive Themselves–And Should They?” on pages 453–455 of the textbook. Then, address the prompts below.

  • Discuss some benefits and disadvantages of automated automobiles. Be sure to include a discussion of ethical and social issues presented by automated automobiles.
  • If you were the CEO of a major auto manufacturer, would you invest resources in the development and marketing of automated automobiles? Why, or why not?

In Chapter 12, read the case study “Anthem Benefits from More Business Intelligence” on pages 480-481 of the textbook. Then, address the prompts below.

  • Discuss the problem with the old human resources (HR) system at Anthem.
  • Describe the new People Data Central (PDC) portal adopted by Anthem. What does it do, and how does it improve data analytics capabilities at Anthem?
  • How will the new PDC portal help the HR department make better decisions?

When formatting your case analysis, do not use the question-and-answer format; instead, use an essay format with subheadings. Your APA-formatted case study must be at least four pages in length (not counting the title and reference pages). You are required to use a minimum of three peer-reviewed, academic sources that are no more than 5 years old (one may be your textbook). All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; all paraphrased material must have accompanying in-text citations

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers,
  • Describe the problem that Soma Bay encountered in this case study.
  •  

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG
Categories
Writers Solution

What considerations must be given to the selection of a quantitative methodology for a research study?

What considerations must be given to the selection of a quantitative methodology for a research study? Based on what you know now, which of these considerations do you believe are the most important? Why?  

150 word paragraph with reference

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals What considerations must be given to the selection of a quantitative methodology for a research study?

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG
Categories
Writers Solution

Refine the study hypothesis so that it is as specific as possible and contains all elements of a “good” hypothesis

Suppose that you have been hired by university student health services to design a case-control study to assess the following hypothesis among undergraduate students:

Irregular sleep patterns increase the risk of headaches.Be sure that your design addresses the following elements:

  • Refine the study hypothesis so that it is as specific as possible and contains all elements of a “good” hypothesis.
  • How will you identify and define the cases?
    • Are there any exclusion criteria that you would apply?
  • How will you sample from the underlying population for your “controls”?
  • Who will you select as controls?
  • How will you select them?
  • How will you define the exposure of interest?
    • How will you collect the information on exposure?
  • What other information do you want to know about participants that may be related to the exposure of interest and/or the outcome (potential confounders)? Of these, what will you be able to collect and what will you be unable to collect?
  • Which measures of disease frequency and association will you calculate?
  • What are the strengths and limitations of your study?
    • Which limitations could be removed by using a different study design?
  • What other information would you like to know to design this study?

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals.
  • Refine the study hypothesis so that it is as specific as possible and contains all elements of a “good” hypothesis
  •  
  •  

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG
Categories
Writers Solution

Wholesale Operations Manager Case Study


Big Box General Stores is a new retailer that we’re about to start supplying with our Vitamins and Supplements. We’re going to be on the shelves in all 500 stores with our 3 best-selling vitamins and our two, brand new, not yet released, anxiety and heart supplements. The launch date is December 1st and they must have the products delivered in their DC Network by November 2nd.
For their initial order they need to seed all stores with product and would like to hold 2 weeks of supply in their DCs as backup inventory. We have a single facing per item in each store that holds 3 units per facing. The estimated sales by item by store are provided below (Units Per Store Per Week).
Product UPSPW
Biotin Vitamins 0.8
Immunity Vitamins 0.9
Sleep Vitamins 1.1
Anxiety Supplement 0.9
Heart Supplement 0.6
Big Box has three distribution centers that serve all 500 stores – they are located in CA, TX and PA. The pallet height limit for their DCs is 65 inches (including the height of the pallet).
DC Loc Store Per DC
CA 140
TX 180
PA 180
Total 500
Today is October 18th and, due to supply chain issues, we’ve just learned of a delay in receiving the new supplements. The current delivery schedule to our Fulfillment Center in Columbus, OH is below, but things are changing regularly. There are no supply issues with the 3 vitamins.
Delivering to our warehouse by:
Supplement 10/18 10/25 10/29 11/2
Anxiety Supplement 400 400 800 1400
Heart Supplement 500 900 800 800
Questions:

  1. Share your fulfillment plan for the initial shipment to Big Box (please share your working for this solution)?
  2. How many cartons and pallets do you expect to ship to each DC (please share your working)?
  3. What factors did you consider in coming up with this shipment plan?
  4. What other options did you consider in coming up with your fulfillment plan?
    Appendix
    Product dimensions
    Product Qty per Carton Carton Width (in) Carton Depth (in) Carton Height (in) Cartons Per Pallet Layer
    Biotin Vitamins 8 5.63 17.5 6 16
    Immunity Vitamins 8 5.63 17.5 6 16
    Sleep Vitamins 8 5.63 17.5 6 16
    Anxiety Supplement 24 16.5 11.5 11.5 9
    Heart Supplement 24 16.5 11.5 11.5 9

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposalsWholesale Operations Manager Case Study

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG
Categories
Writers Solution

1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure

The journal indicated below describes a national project. Based on the journal, and on your team’s understanding of the project, answer the questions below:

Journal title: “1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure”

#QuestionPoints

1. Was it an internal or external project? Provide rationale.  

2. Identify at least 10 major stakeholders for the project.

3. What were the needs or expectation of each stakeholder?

4. Identify and describe at least 5 most important resources used in the project.

5.What was the alternative approach for the project (i.e. if the stadium had not been built, what else could have been done to ensure the olympics still occurred)?

6. Based on (5) above, was building the stadium at this location and at this time the best approach to have been chosen?  Provide rationale using PV, NPV, IRR, B/C. [1 page]

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. 1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

ase Study Scenario for ‘Holmes Software Engineering

HS2021 Database Design and Use
Assignment 2 Individual Assessment
Assessment Weight: 15%
Due: Weeks 8
Objective(s)
This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to reinforce the lecture material and give students practice at applying Database design techniques, as well as providing a relational schema using DDL statements and relational DML statements to demonstrate access of the Database to be built.
Instructions
Consider the following Case Study Scenario for ‘Holmes Software Engineering’
A relational database is to be designed for a medium sized Company dealing with industrial applications of computers. The Company delivers various products to its customers ranging from a single application program through to complete installation of hardware with customized software. The Company employs various experts, consultants and supporting staff. All personnel are employed on longterm basis, i.e. there is no short- term or temporary staff. Although the Company is somehow structured for administrative purposes (that is, it is divided into departments headed by department managers) all projects are carried out in an inter- disciplinary way. For each project a project team is selected, grouping employees from different departments, and a Project Manager (also an employee of the Company) is appointed who is entirely and exclusively responsible for the control of the project, quite independently of the Company’s hierarchy. The following is a brief statement of some facts and policies adopted by the Company.
• Each employee works in some department.
• An employee may possess a number of skills
• Every manager (including the MD) is an employee
• A department may participate in none/one/many projects.
• At least one department participates in a project.
• An employee may be engaged in none/one/many projects
• Project teams consist of at least one member.
Deliverable Descriptions
For the above mini-case study, you are to analyze the data requirements and develop a set of relational tables to suit the above case study.
• Draw and ER diagram depicting the relational database.
• Make sure the tables are normalized.
• Build the Database in PostgreSQL (storing your DDL statements in a script)
• Add test data to the PostgreSQL database (again store these DML statements in a script), one of the employees you add must have an employee ID the same as your own Student ID. This employee must also be part of a team working on some project
• Develop a set SQL queries to query this database (there should be at least 4 queries)
? at least 2 queries should joint multiple tables (1 should join at least 3 tables)
? at least one query should show the employee with the ID the same as your student ID
For each query, you should show the output from executing the Query in PostgreSQL by cutting and pasting the PostgreSQL output into your assignment just under the Query.
This should be demonstrated to your tutor in class during a tutorial after the due date to be advised by your tutor.
Submission Guidelines
The day and time of the due week that the assessment must be submitted will be announced by your subject coordinator.
Your documents should be a single MS Word or OpenOffice document containing your report. Do not use PDF as a submission format,
All submissions will be submitted through the safeAssign facility in Blackboard. Submission boxes linked to SafeAssign will be set up in the Units Blackboard Shell. Assignments not submitted through these submission links will not be considered.
Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session detailed above) and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after the due date and time will be penalized per day late (including weekend days) according to Holmes Institute policies.
The SafeAssign similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of plagiarism. SafeAssign will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class members submissions for plagiarism. You can see your SafeAssign similarity score (or match) when you submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to change your assignment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed your assignment will be graded as late. Submitted assignments that indicate a high level of plagiarism will be penalized according to the Holmes Academic Misconduct policy, there will be no exceptions. Thus, plan early and submit early to take advantage of the re-submission feature. You can make multiple submissions, but please remember we grade only the last submission, and the date and time you submitted will be taken from that submission.
Academic Integrity
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrity is integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have any questions about Academic Integrity issues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the Study Sills link on Blackboard.
Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.
Table 1: Six categories of Academic Integrity breaches
Plagiarism Reproducing the work of someone else without attribution. When a student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is known as self-plagiarism.
Collusion Working with one or more other individuals to complete an assignment, in a way that is not authorised.
Copying Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent their own original work from being copied, this may also be considered an offence.
Impersonation Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as oneself, in an in-person examination.
Contract cheating Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task, generally in exchange for money or other manner of payment.
Data fabrication and falsification Manipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting false conclusions, including manipulating images.
Source: INQAAHE, 2020

GET SOLUTION BELOW

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. A verdict was rendered against three parent chaperones. How was the third parent included in the case?
  • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services ase Study Scenario for ‘Holmes Software Engineering

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays