Categories
Writers Solution

Judges of the State Supreme Court and Court of Appeals serve a six year term while judges of the Superior Court, Probate Court, and State Court serve four year terms

1. The two major ways that judges are selected are popular elections and appointment. The electorate chooses the judge in a popular election while the executive or legislative branch decides the matter in appointment. Popular elections allow for accountability to the people but also require the judge to be a political candidate which can erode trust in the judiciary due to campaign financing. Appointment can produce distrust in the judicial system due to the potential for loyalty to a particular party or person who is instrumental in the appointment.

The state of Georgia elects judges based on a nonpartisan election and does not utilize retention elections. Judges of the State Supreme Court and Court of Appeals serve a six year term while judges of the Superior Court, Probate Court, and State Court serve four year terms. It has been my experience that the local judiciary elections are most contentious and partisan with large fundraising efforts that easily show the electorate the party the candidate is affiliated with. I am ashamed to admit that I couldn’t name a single member of the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals for the state of Georgia and I have lived here my entire life. I do believe this system works with the opportunity to elect judges and hold them accountable to the job.  

(Please respond with 200 words or more)

2. Having lived in the south for most of my life, but having worked for an electric company based out of New England for the past three years, and having in Iowa for two years a decade ago, I feel that I have gathered a feel for the catch 22 in the major variables in local government structures.In South Carolina, there are many large areas with no city or township incorporation, thus, even in high population density areas, much of South Carolina leans on the County governments as the primary local government agency. While the cities have a fair amount of automy, they often border on redundancy. For instance, in Aiken County, where I live, there are ten municipal governments within it. However, only North Augusta’s Public Saftey takes responsibility for police patrol. All other city police departments only suppliment the Aiken County Sheriff’s Department’s patrol division.My biggest grievance with this structure is that the uniformity often comes at the price of property taxes that do not render their worth to the tax payer.In New England, the exact opposite happens. Their elimination or minimization of county goverments is modeled after the townships in the United Kingdom. In both cases, the benefit of minimizing the local tax burden subsequently adds the burden to the state. This is not entirely negative; every one of these states have a more developed state police force, as well as other state level services that many southern states are prone to delegating to the counties. Midwestern state seem to strike a balance with these two polar opposites. The municipal goverments are developed comprehensively to meet the needs of the community, while county governments never fully abandon the responsibilities of supporting the larger geographic area. The further west you move, the more intensive both get, and once you get to the west coast, you have the outlandishly high cost of living because of egregiously redundant government facilities on the state, county, and city levels.  (Please respond with 200 words or more)

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com ON Judges of the State Supreme Court and Court of Appeals serve a six year term while judges of the Superior Court

NO PLAGIARISM, Get impressive Grades in Your Academic Work

Categories
Writers Solution

Supreme Court decisions: Pick a landmark case and explain the outcome

Essay: Supreme Court decisions

Instructions

 Pick a landmark case and explain the outcome

 Summarize your answer in a 350-word essay that responds to these questions:

· Why did you pick this case?

· What were the facts – parties and issues?  Be specific about who sued who and for what reason.

· What was the legal ruling in the case?

· Was the decision unanimous or split?  Appointees by which president had the most influence (in other words, identify who was in the majority and which president appointed those justices.

· In your view, is this an example of the Court following public opinion or would this case better be described as the Court trying to shape or lead public opinion?  You can use this section to comment more broadly on the impacts of or public reaction to the case if you have that information.

If you know the name of the case (e,g. “Brown v. Board of Education”), a useful resource to understand the decision is oyez.org.  Enter the case name in the search tool on the homepage.

Need help picking case? These are just some ideas in many categories – you can choose any case you like.  There are other cases described in chapters on civil rights and civil liberties, but these are some of the big ones…

 Civil rights – USE THIS ONE BELOW

Loving v. Virginia (interracial marriage)

WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery– primewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals Supreme Court decisions: Pick a landmark case and explain the outcome

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG
Categories
Writers Solution

United States Supreme Court held that detectives interrogating Thompkins did not violate Thompkins’ Miranda rights in obtaining his confession.

Business Law 1

Unit 3 DB: Berghuis v. Thompkins

In this case, after agreeing to hear the case (known as granting certiorari) the United States Supreme Court held that detectives interrogating Thompkins did not violate Thompkins’ Miranda rights in obtaining his confession.

  • Read the case of Berghuis v. Thompkins. You may also find it helpful to listen to the oral arguments the lawyers made before the United States Supreme Court.

Prepare an argument for:

  • If your last name begins with A through M you must argue in favor of the majority’s decision in the case. (Finding that the detectives did not violate Thompkins’ Miranda rights).
  • If your last name begins with N through Z you must argue against the majority’s decision and in favor of the dissent. The dissent argued that Thompkins’ confession was illegally obtained in violation of his Miranda rights.

Remember to support your required position with what you have learned from this week’s assigned reading about constitutional safeguards.

If your opinion varies from the position you are being required to take, you may include such a statement in your discussion post.

Regardless of whether you are an attorney arguing in court or a business stakeholder pitching to shareholders or a potential client, adding support for your argument from appropriate resources strengthens your content. For this discussion board, be sure to include a citation to an appropriate source that supports the point you are making. (HINT: Your textbook is a great source!)

GET SOLUTION BELOW

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. A verdict was rendered against three parent chaperones. How was the third parent included in the case?
  • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services United States Supreme Court held that detectives interrogating Thompkins did not violate Thompkins’ Miranda rights in obtaining his confession.

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

The United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari

On April 18, 2016, The United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (refused to review the lower court’s ruling) in the case of Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2015.

Tell me what you would do if you were the Supreme Court.

That case let stand the ruling of the Court of Appeals which can be found at the following website:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2220742578695593916&q=Authors+Guild+v.+Google+Inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4000006  last accessed February 9, 2019.

Please write a 500-word summary of fair use as this court decision says it.

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliverycapitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Misuse of Department Property

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

Research Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses unethical police decisions or immoral practices by the police. Provide a brief synopsis of the case and discuss how the Supreme Court views procedural justice and/or police misconduct.
Write a 2-3 page, APA style paper addressing the issues as described above. Please include 2-3 references. Only one reference may be from an internet source (not Wikipedia) the other references must be located in the Grantham University Online Library. Only the body of the paper will count toward the page requirement. Include a title sheet.                   References

U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

……………………………………………………………………………………………………

SEE SOLUTION BELOW

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

NO PLAGIARISM

Ethics: U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

(Course Instructor)

(University Affiliation)

(Student’s Name)

Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case

Introduction

            America is the most sensitive society to any form of totalitarianism and government that employs coercive power (Munster, 1992). The government can express power in many forms and one most notable way is the use of police to restrain law and order among its citizens. Although the exercise of political power through the police is generally a morally right obligation by any government, if it is not managed well, it can constitute an abuse of power. The Tennessee vs. Garner case was a landmark case rule by the Supreme Court that greatly impacted on the circumstances under which police officers may use deadly force in arrested fleeing felons.

Synopsis

            Garner was a 15-year old boy who was shot by Hymon, while scaling a fence in order to escape a burglary arrest from two Memphis officers on the night of October 3, 1974 (Tennenbaum, 1994).  Hymon was convinced that if Garner made it over the fence, he would escape and he shot him at the back of the head. The police officer shot at Garner despite having a clear sight that he neither posed threat to him nor others.

The state of Tennessee had statute laws, which governed the fleeing felons, just like many other U.S states at the time. However, owing to the death of his son, the deceased father filed a petition in the Federal District Court, seeking compensation for what he termed as the violation of the constitutional rights of his son. Although the Federal District Court ruled that the officers acted within the states laws, the Supreme Court ruling held that a fleeing-felon rule was unconstitutional under the fourth amendment.

How the Supreme Court Views Procedural Justice and/or Police Misco……………………………..

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

NO PLAGIARISM

Categories
Writers Solution

U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

Research Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses unethical police decisions or immoral practices by the police. Provide a brief synopsis of the case and discuss how the Supreme Court views procedural justice and/or police misconduct.
Write a 2-3 page, APA style paper addressing the issues as described above. Please include 2-3 references. Only one reference may be from an internet source (not Wikipedia) the other references must be located in the Grantham University Online Library. Only the body of the paper will count toward the page requirement. Include a title sheet.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………

SEE SOLUTION BELOW

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

NO PLAGIARISM

Ethics: U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

(Course Instructor)

(University Affiliation)

Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case

Introduction

            America is the most sensitive society to any form of totalitarianism and government that employs coercive power (Munster, 1992). The government can express power in many forms and one most notable way is the use of police to restrain law and order among its citizens. Although the exercise of political power through the police is generally a morally right obligation by any government, if it is not managed well, it can constitute an abuse of power. The Tennessee vs. Garner case was a landmark case rule by the Supreme Court that greatly impacted on the circumstances under which police officers may use deadly force in arrested fleeing felons.

Synopsis

            Garner was a 15-year old boy who was shot by Hymon, while scaling a fence in order to escape a burglary arrest from two Memphis officers on the night of October 3, 1974 (Tennenbaum, 1994).  Hymon was convinced that if Garner made it over the fence, he would escape and he shot him at the back of the head. The police officer shot at Garner despite having a clear sight that he neither posed threat to him nor others.

The state of Tennessee had statute laws, which governed the fleeing felons, just like many other U.S states at the time. However, owing to the death of his son, the deceased father filed a petition in the Federal District Court, seeking compensation for what he termed as the violation of the constitutional rights of his son. Although the Federal District Court ruled that the officers acted within the states laws, the Supreme Court ruling held that a fleeing-felon rule was unconstitutional under the fourth amendment.

How the Supreme Court Views Procedural Justice and/or Police Misconduct

            The Supreme Court ruling in Tennessee vs. Garner, 1985, severely impacted on the circumstances under which a police officer may use deadly forcing in arresting a suspect (Tennenbaum, 1994). The Fourth Amendment considered that the use of deadly force was a legally considered seizure, which must be considerable. Therefore Supreme Court observed that the use of deadly force would apply only if the suspect posed a threat to the life of the officers and others or caused serious physical injury to the apprehending officers or others. The use of deadly force in the Garner case was unethical and unjust given that Garner was unarmed and possessed no weapon to warrant any shooting. Moreover, the arresting officer had a clear sight on Garner, since he used his spotlight to achieve a clear vision of the hands of the felon.

            The fleeing felon rule demands that deadly force be employed as a last resort on a fleeing felon regardless of the severity of the alleged offence (Crowley, 1989). The court considered that the intrusion of a police officer had to be considered based on the risks that such an intrusion posed on the suspect. Therefore, the Supreme Court determined that the common statute laws that governed fleeing-felon suspects were unconstitutional.

Conclusion……………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

NO PLAGIARISM

Categories
Writers Solution

U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

Research Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses unethical police decisions or immoral practices by the police. Provide a brief synopsis of the case and discuss how the Supreme Court views procedural justice and/or police misconduct.
Write a 2-3 page, APA style paper addressing the issues as described above. Please include 2-3 references. Only one reference may be from an internet source (not Wikipedia) the other references must be located in the Grantham University Online Library. Only the body of the paper will count toward the page requirement. Include a title sheet.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………

SEE SOLUTION BELOW

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

NO PLAGIARISM

Ethics: U.S Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

(Course Instructor)

(University Affiliation)

(Student’s Name)

Tennessee v. Garner U.S. Supreme Court case

Introduction

            America is the most sensitive society to any form of totalitarianism and government that employs coercive power (Munster, 1992). The government can express power in many forms and one most notable way is the use of police to restrain law and order among its citizens. Although the exercise of political power through the police is generally a morally right obligation by any government, if it is not managed well, it can constitute an abuse of power. The Tennessee vs. Garner case was a landmark case rule by the Supreme Court that greatly impacted on the circumstances under which police officers may use deadly force in arrested fleeing felons.

Synopsis

            Garner was a 15-year old boy who was shot by Hymon, while scaling a fence in order to escape a burglary arrest from two Memphis officers on the night of October 3, 1974 (Tennenbaum, 1994).  Hymon was convinced that if Garner made it over the fence, he would escape and he shot him at the back of the head. The police officer shot at Garner despite having a clear sight that he neither posed threat to him nor others. The state of Tennessee had statute laws, which governed the fleeing felons, just like many other U.S states at the time. However, owing to the death of his son, the deceased father filed a petition in the Federal District Court, seeking compensation for…………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

NO PLAGIARISM

Categories
Writers Solution

U.S.Supreme Court’s ruling in Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan?

 Do you agree with the U.S.Supreme Court’s ruling in Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan? Do you think the punishment was excessive given that the crime is often called “victimless”? Explain your stance.  

Categories
Writers Solution

Supreme Court of Canada say about the role that an organization’s computer use policy and practices

  1,What does the Supreme Court of Canada say about the role that an organization’s computer use policy and practices may play in the assessment of whether there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in a work laptop computer where employees are permitted to use the laptop computer for personal matters? What do you recommend to an organization should be done to address this situation? 

2,  You are the IT systems security manager of the organization. Your organization in based in Edmonton but does share some employee data with a benefits service provider in Toronto. A breach has occurred affecting both customers and employee information held by your organization. Discuss and contrast your organization’s obligations to report a breach under Alberta’s Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) and under the Personal Information Protection Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). Discuss the circumstances when the company is subject to report a breach under each of these laws and the variables that should be considered in making the assessment. 

 REGULAR FORMAT WITH CITATIONS 

NO PLAGARISM 

EACH QUESTION 5 PAGES 

INCLUDE REFERENCES IN APA FORMAT

Categories
Writers Solution

United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (refused to review the lower court’s ruling) in the case of Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2015.

The United States Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari (refused to review the lower court’s ruling) in the case of Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F. 3d 202 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2015.

Tell me what you would do if you were the Supreme Court.

That case let stand the ruling of the Court of Appeals which can be found at the following website:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2220742578695593916&q=Authors+Guild+v.+Google+Inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4000006  last accessed February 9, 2019.