testimony Archives - NO GPT CHAT OR ANY AI

Topic: The Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony

The Term Paper Assignment will consist of at least 10 double-spaced pages (excluding title page, references, figures, illustrations, or other extraneous elements outside the main body of the paper). Students will format their paper using 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. Students will use at least 10 scholarly and trade references (Wikipedia, non-legitimate peer-reviewed websites, or blogs CANNOT be used as a reference). APA 7th Edition guidelines are to be followed. The structure of the assignment must include the following sections and mandatory headings:

Title Page
Introduction
Description of the Problem or Issue
Literature Review
Analysis and Discussion
Policy and/or Practice Recommendations
Conclusion
References

The following are minimum requirements and general guidelines for the Term Paper Assignment:

Title Page. The title page should include the title of the term paper, course name and number, student name, and date.
Introduction. This section describes the purpose and scope of the topic and provides a brief overview of the term paper.
1. Thesis Statement. You will also include a thesis statement and the end of your introduction. The thesis statement clearly identifies the topic being discussed, includes the points discussed in the paper. Start this off by, “The purpose of this paper is…”
Description of the Problem or Issue. This section presents the core problem or issue related to the topic of the term paper and why it is important.
Literature Review. This section presents a review of the literature related to the overall topic of the term paper. Both consensus and disagreements in the literature should be addressed.
Analysis and Discussion. This section explores the entire topic of the term paper while considering the problem or issue, literature review, and analysis.
Policy and/or Practice Recommendations. This section provides practical suggestions on how to apply the information in the paper to areas of policy and practice.
Conclusion. This section summarizes the paper with conclusions drawn from the discussion and policy and practice sections of the paper.
References. This section contains all source materials used in the preparation of the term paper in proper APA format.

The reliability of eyewitness testimony has long been a subject of debate in legal and psychological circles. While it is often considered a powerful form of evidence, research has shown that human memory is fallible, and eyewitness accounts can be influenced by numerous factors, leading to inaccuracies. Several issues affect the reliability of eyewitness testimony:

Distortion of Memory

The recording of events in memory is not flawless. Rather, it is a reconstructive process that is susceptible to time, different cognitive biases, and outside information. Testimony may get distorted as a result of fading recollections and inadvertently changing or forgetting specifics over time.

Anxiety and Stress

Excessive levels of tension or worry, such those felt during a crime, might make it difficult for an eyewitness to remember specific details. The “weapon focus effect” is a well-known phenomena in which a witness may lose focus on other elements, such as the perpetrator’s appearance, in order to concentrate on a weapon or other potentially dangerous part of the scene……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.

Assignment status: About The Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony

Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

Complete 5 pages APA formatted article: Stephen Colbert’s 2010 Testimony. Rhetoric is contemporarily a formalized study and a civic practice. Westerners most commonly apply this practice in numerous situations, in their daily lives.

Aristotle defines it as a counterpart of both politics and logic. He also refers to it as the faculty of looking into the case at hand and finding available persuasions. Just as Aristotle’s appeals – ethos, pathos, and logos, rhetoric also provides heuristics available for conferring, discovering, and making arguments for given situations.

This practice aims at making speakers adept to engage an audience when delivering a speech, hence a potent tool in discourse (Richards 176). Classical Romans devised the first of the canons of designing rhetoric that moves the audience. These codes encompass aspects of innovation, arrangement, fashion, recollection, and delivery. Rhetoric is among the first of the three arts of communication of the earliest times.

This is alongside grammar and logic. In the ancient western civilizations, there was a dire need to educate speakers from the precise basic levels of education delivery in schools, to make them competent enough to move audiences and deliver plausible arguments. Westerners employ the use of rhetoric in courtrooms, public, political meetings,s, and other assemblies. Believers of rhetoric confer it to bring order or shape communities and considerably influence civic life.

Isocrates confers that rhetoric is an essential practice, not taught just to anyone. that can shape a man’s character and is a part of civic life. Aristotle further reinforces Isocrates’ ideas regarding rhetoric as a civic art that devises any means of persuasion, which various people could utilize in public places or settings in three diverse ways.

He gives an instance of an assembly personality deciding on future events, a member of the jury establishing past events, and orators who are able to persuade others with a command. He, therefore, divides the oratory practice into political inducement, forensic concerns, and ceremonial speechifying or mere flaunt. The nature of rhetoric, being a civic and public art, is, thus, capable of performing opinion-shaping (Aristotle et al. 15). Therefore, Plato considerably criticizes sophism’s use of rhetoric to falsely articulate ideas.