Tag: topic

Categories
Writers Solution

Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic?

ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title PUBH6008: Capstone A: Applied Research Project in Public Health
Assessment Assessment 2: Literature review
Individual/Group Individual
Length 4,000 words
Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: 2. Integrate and apply their knowledge and skills in public health 3. Develop research skills and apply these to a public health issue 4. Conduct a small literature review which critically analyses key issues on a public health research topic 5. Define and justify a research question, based on the literature/public health issue, and outline its significance
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 100 marks
PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page 1 of 6
Instructions:
By the end of module 3, student must provide to their learning facilitator a brief review of the literature on their chosen topic. The literature review must contain key references/theorists/researchers for the public health topic chosen. The literature review assignment must be designed to address the following questions:
• Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic?
• What are the key issues?
• What are the gaps in the existing body of knowledge?
The literature review should provide a basis for justifying a clear research question or hypothesis to be explored further.
You must also indicate the search strategy used for your literature review. For example, what were the key words you searched for, and which key databases or other sources did you use to conduct your literature review? (e.g. CINAHL, Proquest Public Health, Informit, Medline, Google Scholar).
Assessment Criteria:
• Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) ? Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) 0 General assessment criteria (20%):
o Provides a lucid introduction
o Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues
o Shows ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to chosen topic
o Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts o Shows evidence of reading beyond the required readings
o Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments and not merely assertions
o Provides a conclusion or summary o Correctly uses academic writing, presentation and grammar:
¦ Complies with academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list)
¦ Writes clearly, with accurate spelling and grammar as well as proper sentence and paragraph construction
¦ Uses appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research
Marking Rubric:
Assessment Attributes 0-34 (Fail 2- 35-49 F2) (Fail 1 – Fl) 50-64 (Pass-P) 65-74 (Credit – CR) 75-84 (Distinction – DN) 85-100 (High Distinction-HD)
Unaccept Poor able Functional Proficient Advanced Exceptional
Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the subject, insufficient understanding of the subject content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of subject learning objectives, the development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the subject or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the subject. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the subject demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills. Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, creativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills.
Knowledge and understanding Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Knowledge/understa nding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often Thorough knowledge/understandi ng of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by
PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2
of
Page 4 8
conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.
Critical reasoning, presentation and defence of an argument and/or position Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Specific position (perspective or argument) fails to take into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Makes assertions that are not justified. Specific position (perspective or argument) begins to take into account the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Others’ points of view are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with wellformed arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) is expertly presented and accurately takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with welldeveloped arguments. Specific position (perspective or argument) is presented expertly, authoritatively and imaginatively, accurately taking into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Limits of position are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with sophisticated arguments.
PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2
Page 5 of 8
Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Limited synthesis and analysis. Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of Thoroughly developed and creative analysis Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with
Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Limited application/recommendatio ns based upon analysis. knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and/or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases.
PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2
Page 6 of 8
Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence Use of academic conventions including appropriate resources and referencing (20%) ^General assessment criteria shown below Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading
well developed. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA style. There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.
*GenerglA^essmenLCntengi
• Provides a lucid introduction
• Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues
• Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to your chosen topic

  • Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts_______________________
    PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2
    Page 7 of 8
    Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading
    Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments not merely assertion
    Provides a conclusion or summary
    Use of academic writing and presentation and grammar:
    Complies with normal academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list).
    Is written clearly with accurate spelling, grammar and sentence and paragraph construction ? Appropriate citation and referencing used (using APA style)

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic?
  • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic?

ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title PUBH6008: Capstone A: Applied Research Project in Public Health
Assessment Assessment 2: Literature review
Individual/Group Individual
Length 4,000 words
Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: 2. Integrate and apply their knowledge and skills in public health 3. Develop research skills and apply these to a public health issue 4. Conduct a small literature review which critically analyses key issues on a public health research topic 5. Define and justify a research question, based on the literature/public health issue, and outline its significance
Submission Due Sunday following the end of Module 4 at 11:55pm AEST/AEDT*
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 100 marks
PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page 1 of 6
Instructions:
By the end of module 3, student must provide to their learning facilitator a brief review of the literature on their chosen topic. The literature review must contain key references/theorists/researchers for the public health topic chosen. The literature review assignment must be designed to address the following questions:
• Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic?
• What are the key issues?
• What are the gaps in the existing body of knowledge?
The literature review should provide a basis for justifying a clear research question or hypothesis to be explored further.
You must also indicate the search strategy used for your literature review. For example, what were the key words you searched for, and which key databases or other sources did you use to conduct your literature review? (e.g. CINAHL, Proquest Public Health, Informit, Medline, Google Scholar).
Assessment Criteria:
• Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) ? Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) 0 General assessment criteria (20%):
o Provides a lucid introduction
o Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues
o Shows ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to chosen topic
o Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts o Shows evidence of reading beyond the required readings
o Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments and not merely assertions
o Provides a conclusion or summary o Correctly uses academic writing, presentation and grammar:
¦ Complies with academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list)
¦ Writes clearly, with accurate spelling and grammar as well as proper sentence and paragraph construction
¦ Uses appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research
Marking Rubric:
Assessment Attributes 0-34 (Fail 2- 35-49 F2) (Fail 1 – Fl) 50-64 (Pass-P) 65-74 (Credit – CR) 75-84 (Distinction – DN) 85-100 (High Distinction-HD)
Unaccept Poor able Functional Proficient Advanced Exceptional
Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the subject, insufficient understanding of the subject content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of subject learning objectives, the development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the subject or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the subject. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the subject demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills. Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, creativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills.
Knowledge and understanding Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Knowledge/understa nding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often Thorough knowledge/understandi ng of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by
PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2
of
Page 4 8
conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.
Critical reasoning, presentation and defence of an argument and/or position Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Specific position (perspective or argument) fails to take into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Makes assertions that are not justified. Specific position (perspective or argument) begins to take into account the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Others’ points of view are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with wellformed arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) is expertly presented and accurately takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with welldeveloped arguments. Specific position (perspective or argument) is presented expertly, authoritatively and imaginatively, accurately taking into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Limits of position are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with sophisticated arguments.
PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2
Page 5 of 8
Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Limited synthesis and analysis. Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of Thoroughly developed and creative analysis Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with
Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Limited application/recommendatio ns based upon analysis. knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and/or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases.
PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2
Page 6 of 8
Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence Use of academic conventions including appropriate resources and referencing (20%) ^General assessment criteria shown below Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading
well developed. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA style. There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.
*GenerglA^essmenLCntengi
• Provides a lucid introduction
• Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues
• Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to your chosen topic

  • Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts_______________________
    PUBH6008 Assessment Brief 2
    Page 7 of 8
    Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading
    Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments not merely assertion
    Provides a conclusion or summary
    Use of academic writing and presentation and grammar:
    Complies with normal academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list).
    Is written clearly with accurate spelling, grammar and sentence and paragraph construction ? Appropriate citation and referencing used (using APA style)

  • GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

    CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

    TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

    NO PLAGIARISM

    • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
    • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
    • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
    • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
    • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
    • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic?
    • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.

    Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

    Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

Identify a current political topic of interest to you that has an impact on health care or nursing.

1. Identify a current political topic of interest to you that has an impact on health care or nursing. The topic  an be one identified in your textbook, a current Assembly bill in Wisconsin legislature, or other      political topic affecting health care or nursing.

2. Research the topic, clarify your point of view, and choose a federal or state legislator to whom you will address your opinions and request for political action.

3. Write a letter to the legislator (example in your textbook) to include:

  • Your name and address 
  • Legislator’s name and address
  • A single topic of concern to you
  • Your request or points of view stated in the first sentence
  • A brief rationale for your point of view or request

  • GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

    CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

    TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

    NO PLAGIARISM

    • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
    • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
    • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
    • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
    • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
    • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. Identify a current political topic of interest to you that has an impact on health care or nursing.
    • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.

    Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

    Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

select a disorder/topic and assess the client provided through BPS and CRSJ. Briefly explore ethical considerations

Using the scenario provided select a disorder/topic and assess the client provided through BPS and CRSJ. Briefly explore ethical considerations.  You may choose the gender, culture, and race of the individual in the scenario.  You may also add or delete sections that would add to the scenario in a more appropriate manner depending upon the disorder you have chosen.

Click here for Scenario.

Please select the disorder/topic from this list only. Please note you must choose one of the following disorders:

  • ADHD
  • Anxiety
  • Bullying, self-harm, suicide prevention
  • Mood disorders (Depression, Post-Partum Depression, Bipolar)
  • Substance abuse/addiction
  • Dementia/Alzheimer’s

Review the late submission policy in the syllabus. 

Content – Criteria:

Each student will introduce and explore BPS and CRSJ as the foundation for examining the selected disorder/topic. Give an understanding, analysis, and critical evaluation of each factor (a minimum of 8 factors are expected for an average grade for the entire paper, a total of 12 factors would be beneficial), building a therapeutic relationship, a brief discussion of ethical considerations or concerns, your personal role as a therapist, and conceptualization (be sure to develop a framework and conceptualize how you would help the client using a BPS/CRSJ approach, and a path toward assessment, (goals and treatment plan are not a part of this assignment). 

The focus of the paper should be on the application of BPS and CRSJ in order to explore the disorder/topic in preparation or progress toward treatment. You do not need to consider a treatment plan for this disorder/topic as this is not expected at this level. The first step is to assess and explore layers that would impact the client and clinical process (i.e., layers outlined in BPS/CRSJ). In future courses, skills and competencies will be added to fully create the treatment plans and intervention. Discuss the importance of developing the therapeutic relationship and your role as a therapist. 

Please use APA 7th edition in writing your paper including headings in your paper. Subheadings should be included. Use the provided rubric to guide the outline of the paper.

Length:

Your Final Paper should be between 10 – 12 double-spaced pages excluding title page and reference pages. A Word Document is required for this paper, not a pdf. The course instructor will not read theoretical content after page 12. This paper does not require an abstract, a table of contents, or an appendix.

Resources:

You are welcome to draw predominantly from the course reading materials to complete this assignment. However, you must have at least five (5) additional current (last ten years), peer-reviewed resources (from outside the course) to ensure adequate coverage of the topic. Remember to cite original sources unless they are not accessible in the Yorkville library.

Quality of Writing:

It is imperative you have a very good writing style and follow APA format as you will be marked on these variables (APA manual, 7th edition).

    • GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

      CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

      TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

      NO PLAGIARISM

      • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
      • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
      • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
      • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
      • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
      • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay. select a disorder/topic and assess the client provided through BPS and CRSJ. Briefly explore ethical considerations
      • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.

      Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

      Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
       
Categories
Writers Solution

Self-report scale focused on the topic of religion

Assignment 1: Research report—Part B

Word limit: 1,250 (+/- 10%)
Weighting: 20%

After you have read this information, head over to the Assignment 1 Q&A discussion board to ask any questions and see what your peers are saying about this assignment.

Assignment overview

This assignment is a mandatory submission, which means that in order to pass this unit of study, you must submit this assignment.

In this first assignment, you will be completing a psychometric assessment of a short, self-report scale focused on the topic of religion. This will require you to assess validity, factorial structure, internal consistency, and reliability. Based on this assessment, you will write a report in the style of an academic article or thesis, which will be submitted in two parts.

This assignment supports unit learning outcomes 1, 3, 4 and 6. 

Assignment details

Part B will be where your analyses of the data will be presented. As well as reporting the results of your analyses, you will include a discussion that identifies limitations and conclusions, highlights any issues, and comments on the previous literature. Relevant tables and/or figures may be incorporated into this discussion, and an abstract that summarises your overall report will also need to be presented. 

Note: the reference list is not included in the word count.

Supporting resources

Submission details overview

This assignment will be submitted through Canvas. When you are ready to submit your assignment, select the ‘Start Assignment’ button at the top of this page. You will be taken to the ‘File Upload’ tab where you can choose your file or submit your URL.

Please note: When you submit your assignment through Canvas, you are also submitting the assignment through Turnitin, which is a text-matching service that compares your work with an international database of information sources. You will need to agree to using it.

Once you have submitted your assignment, select ‘Submission Details’ on the right of your screen to view your originality report if you haven’t already done so. Self-report scale focused on the topic of religion

Please allow a 24-hour turnaround for an originality report to be generated.

Assignment criteria

  1. Abstract.
  2. Results.
  3. Discussion.
  4. APA formatting.

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers. Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Delivery. capitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Privacy and safety. It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts. Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service? 
  • Enjoy our bonus services. You can make a free inquiry before placing and your order and paying this way, you know just how much you will pay.
  • Premium papers. We provide the highest quality papers in the writing industry. Our company only employs specialized professional writers who take pride in satisfying the needs of our huge client base by offering them premium writing services.

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

For the term paper, you are required to pick a current economic topic that relates to the material we have covered or will cover in this course.

  For the term paper, you are required to pick a current economic topic that relates to the material we have covered or will cover in this course. You will research and find an article that covers the topic you have chosen. You can use an article online or offline from any reputable source. You will write up a review of the article and integrate course concepts into your review. Please make sure you both summarize the article and discuss how it relates to the course. 

Apa format 700 words
2Assignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at CapitalEssayWriting.comCLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

Categories
Writers Solution

Write an Annotated Bibliography for your Capstone Topic with a collection of 12 articles following a set structure.

 Assessment item 3 – Annotated BibliographyValue: 30%
Length: 2000 words (10-12 pages)
Group Assessment: No
Submission method options: Alternative submission method
TASK
You are required to prepare for this Assessment Item by:
1. READING the Subject outline,
2. COMPLETING Topic 3, 4 and 5 on sections that discuss how to do an Annoatated Bibliography and a Relective Analysis Paper.
WHAT TO DO: Tasks 1 and 2 below
TASK 1 25%
Annotated Bibliography
1. Write an Annotated Bibliography for your Capstone Topic with a collection of 12 articles following a set structure. The Annotated Bibliography is a critical examination of the most relevant and recent scholarly research on the topic area that is not just a summary of the articles you have read.
2. An Annotated Bibliography is a detailed analysis of sources that can be used later in an expanded Literature Review.
3. Use the latest online search tools (CSU PRIMO, Google Scholar, Online databases) and efficient bibliographic organisers – CSU supports the use of EndNote. (available on iPad). EndNote is a bibliographic citation program, allowing references and footnotes to be translated into a variety of standard formats.
Other tools like Mendeley (https://www.mendeley.com) or Zotero (https://www.zotero.org/)are fine to use as alternatives.
4. As a CSU student you can download and install EndNote X9 for Windows or Mac OS platforms from https://libguides.csu.edu.au/endnote
5. Ensure that the Annotated Bibliography submitted by you is your own work and has not been submitted elsewhere and comply with the University’s requirements for academic integrity.
6. You can get help in Building and Writing an Annotated Bibliography from several Topics in the ITC571 Interact2 site sidebar menu and other study advice and tips from:
1. Study Resources (PDF files to download): http://student.csu.edu.au/study/resources
2. APA styles (6 or 7) Referencing from http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu
Example below shows APA6 style with 2nd and subsequent line indentation and use of DOI link to source if available:

3. The CSU Library website for LibGuides in Information Technology, Computing and Mathematics at http://libguides.csu.edu.au/cat.php?cid=66969
7. Review the emerging technology (use internet for journals, conference papers, magazines, news articles, online databases, eBooks) and submit a 12-article Annotated Bibliography on your topic.
8. A good place to start a collection of articles in your annotated bibliography is via the PRIMO search tool located on the CSU Library website at http://www.csu.edu.au/division/library
9. Self-Evaluation Report on Originality (100-150 words)
1. Select an 1000-word sample of annotations text only (exclude references) from and submit it for testing at Turnitin turnitin.com
2. Save and append a copy of the originality report obtained.
3. Critically evaluate and interpret the originality report, from your context or point of view as your personal Self-Evaluation Report on Originality (100-150 words).
10. NOTE: Tasks 1 and 2 (below) can be appended into the one document and submitted via Turnitin as PDF or other document format
As an example, the Capstone Topic PRIMO search on a research topic like -IoT security in smart cities- returned the following snapshot from a large list of very recent journals related to the Topic, by using the -articles- filter to cut out books, eBooks etc. Next when applying another filter -peer-reviewed- and a sort by -Date-newest-, joined with a show only -Open access- and -Available Online-, then the second screen reveals a 2019 journal paper not readily seen on the first broader search result page 1:

Library Resources
Information Technology Journal Databases: http://www.csu.edu.au/division/library/find-info/databases/subject/infotech
Information Technology & Computing LibGuides : http://libguides.csu.edu.au/itc
The following questions may be useful while reviewing the topic:
1. What is the new technology?
2. What does it do and what are the special features it has?
3. When is it coming out in the market and how much will it cost?
4. What industry will the new technology affect? (Medical, agricultural, computer, business, etc….).
5. In your opinion, will the new technology be beneficial to society? Why or why not.
6. What did you learn from a critical analysis of your sources of information on this new technology?
TASK 2 5 %
Annotated Bibliography Reflection (300 words)
Write a reflective narrative on your experience from doing Task 1 as a short Reflective Analysis Paper.
This task will analyse and evaluate the findings you have made from doing the Annotated Bibliography.
This will be an active start to a working thesis or overall idea that you are going to pursue and write about in detail later.
The purpose of this assessment activity is for you to analyse your own annotated bibliography as a whole.
Use the Five Reflective Analysis Questions below for your 300 word Analysis paper as a guide:
1. Make a list of keywords for later use in your research writing e.g. literature review, concept mapping etc.
2. What patterns or trends does your collection of articles reveal to you about your project topic?
3. Can you reflect holistically on how all of the sources in your Annotated Bibliography relate to any arguments and themes in your project topic?
4. Are you able to -identify a gap in the literature- as an area of research that is missing and may move you to give focus to that gap? Why or Why not? (Either case is fine to explain)
5. What are the next steps to do, in order to expand the current annotated bibliography into a longer literature review on the same topic?
After submission, post a copy to share with your peers on the ITC571 Discussion Forum.
RATIONALE
This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:
• be able to perform literature searches and critically analyse the literature in the chosen topic.
• be able to critically reflect on and synthesize complex information, problems, concepts and theories in the chosen topic.
• be able to apply established research methodologies with autonomy.
• be able to apply project management and information and communication technologies (ICT) tools to plan, execute, record and present their research and project work as a capstone experience.
The rationale of this assessment is to test your ability to review, evaluate, critique and support others opinions as well as existing literature, using a scholarly writing style. You will also demonstrate your ability to carry out independently research and locate information from various sources such as journals, conference proceedings, online databases, eBooks and industry magazines.
The Learning Outcomes being assessed in task include your ability to perform literature searches and critically analyse the literature in the chosen topic and then to critically reflect on and synthesize complex information, problems, concepts and theories in the chosen topic. As the Annotated Bibliography develops, so will also be demonstrating your advanced communication and academic writing skills in transmitting your capstone experiences and ideas to others.
What does a well constructed annotated bibliography contain?
That is a research topic on its own, however I recommend the list of SIX structural elements below
1. Interpretation and evaluation of an overview of recent trends in emerging technologies and innovation;
2. Evidence of literature searches and critical analysis of the literature in the chosen capstone topic;
3. Critical reflection and synthesis of complex information, problems, concepts and theories in the chosen topic;
4. Original opinion on the benefits of your capstone project to others;
5. Reflective comments on what was learnt from a review of the literature;
6. Use of correct citations and referencing conforming to recognised referencing format.
The Checklist for the Annotations elements can be used as a quality check as you write:
Content Elements
• Coverage of topic
• Depth of discussion
• Development of argument and reasoning
• Selection of literature
Writing Style Elements
• Structure of review
• Technical competence
• Use of citations and quotations
• Referencing
Task 2 Reflection paper of 300 words
After studying something quite intensely in task 1 Annotated Bibliography, you are now an expert in that area of research. As such, you need to be able to do an holistic analysis and reflect upon the Annotated Bibliography experience as a whole, as each annotations contains its own individual critique, analysis and evaluation. This relates clsoely to the SIX structural elements from 2 to 5 above.
MARKING CRITERIA AND STANDARDS
Task 1 Annotated Bibliography 25%
Contains 12 articles on the chosen topic, recognition of research methods used in the articles and synthesis of data, findings and ideas)

Criteria HD DI CR PS
Perform a twelve (12) articles search and extractions of information needed to support arguments and decisions with appropriate research, evidence or literature from the discipline and produce an annotated bibliography.
5.00 Information is located, evaluated and managed from multiple, research-based sources using “best practice” online resources.
Evidence of digital literacy and critical analysis of the literature in the chosen capstone topic is apparent;
4.25 to 5.00 Information is located, evaluated and managed from multiple sources using online resources. Evidence of some digital literacy critical analysis of the literature in the chosen capstone topic is provided;
3.75 to 4.24 Information is located, evaluated and managed from a limited number of sources and online services. Limited evidence of digital literacy or critical analysis of the literature in the chosen capstone topic is provided;
3.25 to 3.74 Information is gathered from a very small number of sources or relies heavily upon a single source of information. No critical analysis of the literature in the chosen capstone topic;
2.50 to 3.24
Theme and logical flow arguments and issues in the annotation paragraphs demonstrate familiarity with the sources and a synthesis of ideas available in your topic
5.00 Well organized and demonstrates logical sequencing and structure of arguments. Writing style is narrative and demonstrates active voice, clarity and synthesis of ideas.
4.25 to 5.00 Well organized and demonstrates quite logical sequencing or structure of arguments. Writing style is loosely narrative and demonstrates active voice, clarity and synthesis of ideas.
3.75 to 4.24 Well organized, but demonstrates illogical sequencing or lack of arguments in places. Writing style demonstrates a mix active/passive voice and some synthesis of ideas.
3.25 to 3.74 Organization, sequencing, or structure of the arguments needs refinement. Writing style demonstrates is mixed voice, lack of clarity due to omission or a limited synthesis of ideas.
2.50 to 3.24
Critically analyze, evaluate and synthesize the information and emergent knowledge by commenting on the sources relative strengths and weaknesses, its argument, theory, methodology, contribution and its overall significance.
5.00 All facts and information presented was accurate & opinions informative. Identifies strengths and weaknesses in own thinking: recognizes personal assumptions, values and perspectives, compares to others’, and evaluates them in the context of alternate points of view.
4.25 to 5.00 Most facts and information presented was accurate & opinions informative. Identifies strengths and weaknesses in own thinking: recognizes personal assumptions, values and perspectives, compares to others’, with some comparisons of alternate points of view.
3.75 to 4.24 Some facts and information presented was accurate & some opinions were useful to consider. Identifies some personal assumptions, values, and perspectives;
recognizes some assumptions, values and perspectives of others; shallow comparisons of alternate points of view.
3.25 to 3.74 Few facts and information presented was accurate & very little or no opinions were expressed. Identifies some personal assumptions, values, and perspectives;
does not consider alternate points of view.
2.50 to 3.24
Produce a 12 article, annotated bibliography with full bibliographic details of the source – systematically organised as an APA style reference list in alphabetical order, by the author’s surname.
5.00 Adheres to 12 articles criteria and annotation paragraphs with bibliographic details and the correct APA citation format.
Highly systematic use of tools and techniques (SAGE, EndNote etc.) is evident.
4.25 to 5.00 Adheres to 12 articles criteria and annotation paragraphs with bibliographic details and the correct APA citation format.
Systematic use of tools and techniques (SAGE, EndNote etc.) is evident.
3.75 to 4.24 10 to 12 articles used and annotation paragraphs with most bibliographic details and most entries are in correct APA citation format. Better systematic use of tools and techniques (SAGE, EndNote etc.) could be considered.
3.25 to 3.74 Less than 9 articles used and annotation paragraphs with some bibliographic details missing. Lacking the systematic use of tools and techniques (SAGE, EndNote etc.) and APA citation formats are incorrect or need refinement.
2.50 to 3.24
Self-Evaluation Report on Originality reveals Critical evaluation and interpretation of the report information.
5.0 Critical Analysis
interpretation, insightful of comments and writing style are at the highest level.
4.25 to 5.0 Critical Analysis
interpretation, insightful of comments and writing style are at a high level.
3.75 to 4.24 Critical Analysis
interpretation, insightful of comments and writing style are at mixed variance.
3.25 to 3.74 Critical Analysis
interpretation, insightful of comments and writing style are at the basic level.
2.5 to 3.24
Task 2 Annotated Bibliography Reflection (300 words) based on your Task 1 results 10%
Criteria HD DI CR PS
Bibliographic Reflection and Analysis are evident and relate to the research problem, the aims and to the development of the research questions. The significance of the study is described.
Bibliographic Reflection and Analysis covered the research problem in detail and the significance of the study.
Contains an interpretive insight and high quality analysis of sources and their arguments.
Overall impression:
The reflection paper exhibits excellent interpretive and analytic insight and contains writing of the highest quality. Logical expression and reflective comments included.
Presentation is well structured and exceptionally well written, with a conclusion and APA referencing.
8.50 – 10.00 Bibliographic Reflection and Analysis covered the research problem and other items of significance.
Contains very good insight and quality analysis of sources and their arguments.
Overall impression:
The reflection paper exhibits very good interpretive and analytic insight and contains writing of very good quality. Some logical expression and reflective comments included.
Presentation is well structured and well written, with a conclusion and some APA references.
7.50 – 8.49 Bibliographic Reflection and Analysis covered the research problem and how some source were significant to the study.
Contains some insight and quality analysis of sources and their arguments.
Overall impression:
The reflection paper exhibits some good interpretive and analytic insight and contains writing of good quality. Reflective comments were included.
Presentation is well structured and written with a conclusion and only a few APA references.
6.50 – 7.49 Bibliographic Reflection and Analysis covered the research problem in detail and the significance of the study.
Contains very litte insight, but does included some quality analysis of a few of the sources and their arguments.
Overall impression:
The reflection paper exhibits some interpretive and analytic insight, but the writing quality needed improvment. Very little reflective comments were made.
Presentation had structure but needed a conclusion with APA referencing.
5.00 – 6.49
Analysis of sources & Argumentation
Quality, currency and relevance to the research problem, of an holistic analysis of the collection of articles; logical arguments and suggestions; reflective comments made of the overall implications.

Structure & Writing Expression and sequence of each section; consistent theme or reflective point for coherence and significance.

Presentation & Referencing
Presentation of the reflection paper as appropriate to the aims.
Format, Word length; layout, use of headings; Correct citations and listed APA references, if used.
300 word Journal Synopsis paper based on your Task 1 results
PRESENTATION
The Annotated Bibliography should be presented in form of:
• submit as a PDF file or other document format
• include a References appendix in APA style
TEMPLATE FOR ANNOTED BIBLIOGRAPHY.
ITC571 – Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Instructions: Please remove all text that is between “ ” and “ ”
Add Project Title here
Subject Coordinator:
Put a picture here if you want to
Name: your name here
Student Number: your student number here
You have previously written a short and brief literature review in the proposal. This comprehensive one is the literature review that describes and evaluates the research articles you have read in the specific topic of your interest.
It also includes a critical analysis of the relationship among different works. Therefore, you need to relate them to your work.
Your Annotated Bibliography should be between 1600 – 2500 words and have the following sections:

Abstract

Length: approx. 200 words
Give a brief overview of these document in a paragraph. You need to include the following sections (no citations):
1. Introduction
2. Summary of the findings in the literature review
Research Questions

Length: 100 – 300 words (You need to use enough citations to support your statements)
What are the major research questions that your project will address? (3 – 6)
Please explain each listed question.
They should be consequent to the research topic and as specific as the topic. It is recommended to avoid very general questions about the topic technology, technique, or domain.
FOR LITERAURE REVIEW YOU CAN VIEW A VIDEO.
https://charlessturt.zoom.us/rec/share/HwWookeZ3mTJK8_CHUZ8mheYJqV38jMvsRaDLgsGnvVDt5J8NW43VyVVTDn0U1Dv.zsubYgwLUDGRYLfZ
Literature Review

Length: 200 – 300 words (You need to use enough citations to support your statements). Describe the field of research and show your reader how you will organise your research (in sections with headings). Write your 6blocks, using the following guide: [Please do not discuss paper by paper]
1. Think of this as an extended introduction. Organise the 6 reviewed blocks extracting the important components of your research topic (depending on what is important for you) – you may have noticed categories some research papers fall into.
• By technology
• By results
• etc.
2. Check all papers to see what you can describe together.
3. Describe the research by
• Whatdid they do?
• How did they do it?
• What technology did they use?
4. Evaluate the contribution the work makes to the field
• Why is this work important?
• How does it differ from other work?
5. Show the limitations of the research
• What did the researchers identify as limitations?
6. Reflect
• Whatyou think you know about this topic now
• What you can identify if those articles have not done something
• The gaps and limitations that are justified for this research
• How the research is valuable for your project (link it to your research questions).
7. Identify relationships among studies in the same group/block:
• Note relationships among studies (i.e. this work achieved higher accuracy than other studies using the ROTTO algorithm because …).
• Identify important studies (landmark studies) that led to subsequent studies in the same area.
8. Keep your review focused on your topic: make sure that the articles you have found are relevant and directly related to your topic.
9. If you include tables, diagrams, flowcharts or formulas as part of your review, each of them should be given a figure/ table number and that number must be cited in the main text with a detailed explanation (below the figure).

Conclusion
Length: 100 – 200 words (No Citations)
Summarise the key findings from the literature review
References

Please note that you need to add all 30-35 references you have collected in your weekly submissions and the other additional references you are appending for each block. That means you should have a reference list of more than 30.
Please do the citation of all these papers in the main document (mindful of the comments on referencing above).
• List the resources in APA 7 style
o Do not forget alphabetical order
o Do not forget the naming style
o Any resource should have a publication year
o Do not forget to manage articles with similar last name of the first author
o Check for any wrong duplicated resources in the list
o Check all references in the list are cited in the text and vice versa
o Check the in-text citations to be in proper format and proper place
• It is recommended to use reference management software
• Check the list before submission. A common problem is incorrect or incomplete bibliographical data.

Appendix A

Start each of your appendices on separate pages; number them with capital letters A, B, C …
Pointers for Success
• Make sure there are no orphaned headers (headings by themselves at the bottom of the page).
• Make sure all pictures have captions under them (See Figure 1).
• Ensure pictures are referred to in the text.
• Ensure all Tables have captions (see Table 1) and ensure they are referred to in your text.
• Ensure all images sources from elsewhere are properly referenced.
• Ensure you use APA 7 referencing style.
• Ensure all work is written in your own words and all ideas are referenced back to the original author.
• NOTE: Please use the “Grammar Check” link in the left side bar in Interact2 to check the grammar of your final report before submitting it.
• Critical analysis and writing are very important

Sample review group (see below for codes A – H)
Convolution Neural Networks (CNN)
[A] Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been used to achieve a more fine-grained analysis in a range of research works. They are generally effective for smaller corpora (Hadad et al., 2016; Colton et al., 2015). However, processing a large corpus isstill computationally expensive due to the high processing time. [B] To overcome this, Abasir et al. (2017) used CNN to train a Natural Language Processing (NLP) systemcreating a RoTT1 algorithm to reduce the training time of a large corpus by several seconds.[C] Lowering training time is important since it lowers computational cost [D] and even though the improvement was not of magnitude, no other group of researchers has been able to achieve this. It points to the fact that the RoTT1 algorithm has potential. [E] In addition to the size of the decrease, the researchers identified as limitation that the overall impact of this reduction is minimal as the data preparation time increased significantly, offsetting the time gains from training.[F]Despite these issues which require further research,the RoTT1 algorithm developed by the researchers is still of interest to the proposed work as it has proven to reduce processing timewhich is one of the aims of this research.[G] The RoTT1algorithm has since also been used by other researchers. An algorithm based on similar principles and CNN were also the basis of an object detection system by Compten and Wells (2018). However, although this adaptation of RoTT1 is interesting, it is field-specific, and the concept may not be suitable foradaptation because the development of a new algorithm is not the focus of this work.It is, therefore, of no further interest. [H] However, of considerable value for our work is the research by Blander et al (2019) which focused on [A] compression of corpora by … Blander at a l (2019) used a multi-layer CNN with the aim adding layers that would sort and condense the corpus
Article adapted for educational purposes from Ho et al. (2018) with permission of the authors.
[A]State the special area this paper is based on [get additional references from general research or from the paper you have reviewed but not used].
[B] Introduce the work you want to discuss and what they did.
[C] Tell your reader why their work is important.
[D] Draw a comparison about this work with existing research.
[E] The limitations the researchers identified themselves.
[F] State why this work is of value to your own research
[G] How has research been used in the field?
[H] Create a link to the next valuable piece of research (i.e. one of the 12) in the same category


Assignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at CapitalEssayWriting.comCLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

Categories
Writers Solution

Based on the topic and theoretical lens you have chosen in Unit Four, carry out a review of the literature around the topic selected and generate an annotated bibliography

Instructions

Based on the topic and theoretical lens you have chosen in Unit Four, carry out a review of the literature around the topic selected and generate an annotated bibliography.

  1. Gather and assess five scholarly research articles relevant to your topic, compiling these articles into an annotated bibliography.
    • Annotated bibliographies are comprised of a brief summary of the article and a discussion and assessment of how the article will contribute to the research project.
    • These five sources must be scholarly sources of original research, such as journal articles and books.
    • Although students may use relevant course readings for their research projects, the annotated bibliographies must not include course readings.
    • Each annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 – 200 words per entry (total 750 – 1000 words).
    • Annotated bibliographies must be written according to academic standards of scholarship and referencing using APA.
  2. There are many helpful university-based websites, including the following, to help students prepare their annotated bibliographies: 
  • OWL. (n.d.). Purdue online writing lab. https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/ 
  • Cornell Unversity. (n.d.). How to prepare an annotated bibliography: The annotated bibliography. http://guides.library.cornell.edu/annotatedbibliography


Assignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at CapitalEssayWriting.comCLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

Categories
Writers Solution

Based on the topic and theoretical lens you have chosen in Unit Four, carry out a review of the literature around the topic selected and generate an annotated bibliography.

Instructions

Based on the topic and theoretical lens you have chosen in Unit Four, carry out a review of the literature around the topic selected and generate an annotated bibliography.

  1. Gather and assess five scholarly research articles relevant to your topic, compiling these articles into an annotated bibliography.
    • Annotated bibliographies are comprised of a brief summary of the article and a discussion and assessment of how the article will contribute to the research project.
    • These five sources must be scholarly sources of original research, such as journal articles and books.
    • Although students may use relevant course readings for their research projects, the annotated bibliographies must not include course readings.
    • Each annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 – 200 words per entry (total 750 – 1000 words).
    • Annotated bibliographies must be written according to academic standards of scholarship and referencing using APA.
  2. There are many helpful university-based websites, including the following, to help students prepare their annotated bibliographies: 
  • OWL. (n.d.). Purdue online writing lab. https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/ 
  • Cornell Unversity. (n.d.). How to prepare an annotated bibliography: The annotated bibliography. http://guides.library.cornell.edu/annotatedbibliography
Categories
Writers Solution

Product safety has become a hot topic for businesses around the world.

Assignment in 5 Sentences 

Respond to the following:

  • Product safety has become a hot topic for businesses around the world. The purpose of product safety policies and legislation is to keep consumers safe, with the expectation that product quality is balanced against business profits. How does a company factor these competing expectations and still hold the consumer responsible for safe and effective use of the product?