Instructions: Students will write a 2500-3000 word (about 10 pages in the main body) properly formatted APA paper (including a title page and references page, but no abstract) that evaluates/assesses the overall effectiveness of the business model used by your organization. This is the third of three assignments that draws from your association with your organization. The previous two “canvas” assignments flow into this one. Identify one or more of the building blocks from the business model canvas where modification should be recommended. Be careful to avoid bias in determining the issue/problem identified by using the canvas. Do not merely critique, but contribute to your organization’s overall success. This paper should be the culmination of the overall work you have done with the business model canvas so that all the pieces go together.
Your final paper should include:
Your business model canvas – Post-It notes discussion/observations (week 2)—summarize this area, but provide the initial canvas.
Identification of theoretical/behavioral trends that you observe in the business model and organization (week 5)—summarize this, do not merely cut and paste.
Discussion of appropriate theory, metaphors, and frames with which to describe your business model in operation, as well as to identify areas needing improvement and how to get there.
Use of the Osterwalder/Pigneur text to evaluate and diagnose your organization’s business model, as well as an integration of the course materials into your writing and consideration.
Recommendations for improvements identified using the canvas, theories, and assessment tools used in this course. What are the expected outcomes.
Use eight scholarly sources besides our textbook (especially case studies) to undergird your assertions from peer-reviewed literature.
Thoroughly familiarize yourself with the assignment specs and ask questions if you are unsure of expectations.
The paper must have at least eight additional scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook. No abstract is necessary, but a title page and references page should be included. Write your paper in third person, even though you are writing about an organization that you are familiar with. To do this, write from the perspective of a scholar who observes and researches about the case. Therefore, first person should be avoided.
All healthcare workers must be culturally sensitive. To that end, they should have some understanding of this county’s history, particularly in its treatment of non-white racial groups, as well as current immigration trends.
How does the racial history of this county contribute to healthcare disparities? What are some other contributing factors?
What challenges are face by immigrants arriving in this country in the past 10 years when it comes to maintaining and/or improving their health.
What are some possible solutions that could help end healthcare inequities?
In correct APA style, list at least 2 sources that you to research these topics.
Based on what you have learned about tools and current trends in the healthcare field, describe a few trends you anticipate seeing in the future of healthcare informatics and explain how this impacts HIM.
·
Finally, explain why HIM professionals are qualified to fill these types of roles.
·
When responding to your peers, discuss how the future trends identified by your peers and EHR use both impact the roles of healthcare professionals.
MRKT20052 Assessment 1B: Portfolio Articles Analysis Weight: 10% Word limit: Maximum of 1,000 words for your selected article Due: Monday Week 6 Due date and time: 23rd December, 5 PM AEST. Note: please adjust this time if you have daylight savings or are not in Queensland. For this assessment, each student will choose any ONE of the two articles provided below and write a reflective analysis. This is an individual assessment with a maximum word count of 1,000 words for the article analysis excluding references. In analysing the chosen article, the emphasis is on identifying the marketing implications of the events or issues described in the selected article. For the selected article, students are to prepare a write-up (in a .doc or .docx format) answering the following question: What are the implications of the events/incidents/issues in the article from a marketing perspective and how will these impact (positively or negatively) relevant stakeholders? The write-up for each article should be presented in the following format using headings as per the three points below: 1. Concise summary of the key issues illustrated in the article. 2. Explanation of why the issues illustrated in the article is important. 3. Discussion of implications of these issues from a marketing perspective. Article Reference #1 Rigby, B. (2019). How brands are capitalising on the ‘Markle Sparkle’ and consumer trends to push sustainable fashion. Retrieved from: https://mumbrella.com.au/how-brands-are-capitalising-on-the-markle-sparkleand-consumer-trends-to-push-sustainable-fashion-575396 #2 Singer, M. (2019). Smaller stores and free booze: Myer’s plan to lure shoppers after dark. Retrieved from: https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/fashion/smaller-stores-and-freebooze-myer-s-plan-to-lure-shoppers-after-dark-20190830-p52mik.html Provide a list of at least 4 references for your reflective analysis. The references should consist of published academic and research papers and textbooks in the write-up to support key points. Ensure that your references are relevant to the issues discussed. You should also reference the chosen articles in the submission document with the correct URL in the reference list section (this is additional to your academic references). Referencing should follow the APA style, which can be found at https://www.cqu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/58413/APA_referencing_guide.pdf All assessments may be checked by the marker and Unit Coordinator for potential plagiarism issues. Therefore, write in your own words, do NOT use Google Translate or Spin, do NOT copy a part or all of a friend’s assessment or pay someone else to do your assessment. It is not just your Turnitin score that counts but whether a staff member feels that this is not your own work that may make us take a long look at your assessment. If your assessment is suspected to be plagiarised, it will be forwarded to an appropriate authority and severe penalties will be applied if you are found guilty of Academic Misconduct. 1 Assessment Criteria: • Summary of key issues (10%) • Explanations of issues’ importance (30%) • Reflective analysis (30%) • Writing style (10%) • Evidence of research (20%) Detailed marking rubric that will be used to mark your assessment can be found in the Assessments folder in Moodle. Penalties apply for late submission (1 mark will be deducted from the total mark for every day late in submission, unless an extension has been granted by the Unit Coordinator). Submission checklist for Assessment 1: • Cover page with student name, student ID, campus, tutor, tutorial class, word count from introduction to reference list (template is provided in Moodle) • 1.5 line spacing and 12 size font in Times New Roman; • Maximum of 1,000 words for the article excluding references; • Submitted in .doc or .docx format 2
MRKT20052 Assessment 1B: Portfolio Articles Analysis Weight: 10% Word limit: Maximum of 1,000 words for your selected article Due: Monday Week 6 Due date and time: 23rd December, 5 PM AEST. Note: please adjust this time if you have daylight savings or are not in Queensland. For this assessment, each student will choose any ONE of the two articles provided below and write a reflective analysis. This is an individual assessment with a maximum word count of 1,000 words for the article analysis excluding references. In analysing the chosen article, the emphasis is on identifying the marketing implications of the events or issues described in the selected article. For the selected article, students are to prepare a write-up (in a .doc or .docx format) answering the following question: What are the implications of the events/incidents/issues in the article from a marketing perspective and how will these impact (positively or negatively) relevant stakeholders? The write-up for each article should be presented in the following format using headings as per the three points below: 1. Concise summary of the key issues illustrated in the article. 2. Explanation of why the issues illustrated in the article is important. 3. Discussion of implications of these issues from a marketing perspective. Article Reference #1 Rigby, B. (2019). How brands are capitalising on the ‘Markle Sparkle’ and consumer trends to push sustainable fashion. Retrieved from: https://mumbrella.com.au/how-brands-are-capitalising-on-the-markle-sparkleand-consumer-trends-to-push-sustainable-fashion-575396 #2 Singer, M. (2019). Smaller stores and free booze: Myer’s plan to lure shoppers after dark. Retrieved from: https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/fashion/smaller-stores-and-freebooze-myer-s-plan-to-lure-shoppers-after-dark-20190830-p52mik.html Provide a list of at least 4 references for your reflective analysis. The references should consist of published academic and research papers and textbooks in the write-up to support key points. Ensure that your references are relevant to the issues discussed. You should also reference the chosen articles in the submission document with the correct URL in the reference list section (this is additional to your academic references). Referencing should follow the APA style, which can be found at https://www.cqu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/58413/APA_referencing_guide.pdf All assessments may be checked by the marker and Unit Coordinator for potential plagiarism issues. Therefore, write in your own words, do NOT use Google Translate or Spin, do NOT copy a part or all of a friend’s assessment or pay someone else to do your assessment. It is not just your Turnitin score that counts but whether a staff member feels that this is not your own work that may make us take a long look at your assessment. If your assessment is suspected to be plagiarised, it will be forwarded to an appropriate authority and severe penalties will be applied if you are found guilty of Academic Misconduct. 1 Assessment Criteria: • Summary of key issues (10%) • Explanations of issues’ importance (30%) • Reflective analysis (30%) • Writing style (10%) • Evidence of research (20%) Detailed marking rubric that will be used to mark your assessment can be found in the Assessments folder in Moodle. Penalties apply for late submission (1 mark will be deducted from the total mark for every day late in submission, unless an extension has been granted by the Unit Coordinator). Submission checklist for Assessment 1: • Cover page with student name, student ID, campus, tutor, tutorial class, word count from introduction to reference list (template is provided in Moodle) • 1.5 line spacing and 12 size font in Times New Roman; • Maximum of 1,000 words for the article excluding references; • Submitted in .doc or .docx format 2
DISCUSSION : Read current technological and policy shifts
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, be certain to have read all the required resources for this week. In recent years, the psychology profession has been greatly influenced by various forms of technology. The prevalence of psychology professionals using technology to market themselves and engage, socialize, and interact with others has created new opportunities and challenges. This is particularly true with regard to potential interactions with clients via these technologies. Given the exponential growth with which these technological advancements are permeating our world, we expect to see the proliferation of new issues, challenges, and opportunities within the realms of psychological research and practice.
In your initial post:
Provide an overview of the relevant issues, ongoing trends, challenges, and future opportunities for psychology professionals and the populations they serve. Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct can be used to guide decisions in the ethical application of these technologies. Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to explain how current technological and policy shifts may influence trends in psychological research and practice. Evaluate potential work settings where the use of technologies promotes ease and convenience for both psychology professionals and the populations they serve. What are the potential responsibilities of the psychology professionals as providers of care with regard to the use of these technologies? Does the increase in ease, convenience, and experience satisfaction for the parties involved outweigh any potential negative outcomes?
WEEK 2 DISCUSSION
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, be certain to have read all the required resources for this week.
The collaborative practice of clinicians across disciplines requires a shared language, appreciation of diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms, and recognition of appropriate roles within the health care team. This collaborative environment is at the heart of a health care system that utilizes the skills and expertise of all its team members in appropriate and extended roles. This model of care delivery is often called integrated care (IC) or collaborative care (CC). Although this model is endorsed by many professional societies and agencies, the CC/IC care delivery model can fail due to multiple factors.
In your initial post, consider the clinical partnerships that result within the CC/IC delivery model. Integrating concepts developed from different content domains in psychology, address the following questions.
How might health care teams achieve therapeutic goals for individual clients? How does this support health literacy? What factors might lead to the failure of the CC/IC delivery model? How might lack of acceptance of the value or viability of the CC/IC model by stakeholders, lack of awareness of the clinical competencies of various members of the team, barriers to financial reimbursement for services, and lack of integration of support services within the practice cause a breakdown in efficacy? What supportive interventions within the CC/IC model address such issues? In addition, consider how successful health care models assume an understanding of each profession’s competencies and responsibilities. For example, primary care providers (PCPs) are sometimes unaware of the abilities and practice scope of psychology professionals.
Identify methods of targeted intervention and education for PCPs that might alleviate potential issues for the CC/IC model. Explain how the APA Ethical Code of Conduct can be used to guide decisions in these complex situations. Evaluate and comment on the potential work settings where you might find the CC/IC model. In what ways might this model provide more job satisfaction?
WEEK 3 DISCUSSION (1) for current technological and policy shifts
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, be certain to have read all the required resources for this week. The use of mandated, or legally coerced, treatment is widespread. Yet research demonstrating the efficacy of this type of treatment is limited, and mandating mental health treatment is one of the most contested issues in the field of psychology. To justify the continued use of mandated treatment, policymakers, practitioners, and researchers are obligated to demonstrate the effectiveness and limitations of such treatment programs.
You have been called in to consult on cases that may require mandated treatment. After reviewing the PSY699 The ethics of mandated treatment scenarios (Links to an external site.), choose two to discuss in your initial post. Begin your research with the required resources for this week. Using the specific situations presented in each of the scenarios you have chosen, conduct further research to help inform your recommendations for each individual. A minimum of one resource per scenario, beyond those already required for the assignment, must be included in your initial post.
In your post, construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to present your recommendations as to whether or not treatment should be mandated for the individuals in each of the scenarios. As you write your recommendations, be certain to provide insights into the following questions.
What are the ethical principles and implications raised by legally mandating clients into treatment? What evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of treatment with and without coercion for this type of situation? What would be the challenges in evaluating the effectiveness of mandated treatment? How might mandated treatment impact your clinical decision making as the mental health professional assigned to these cases? What client factors might limit or augment the potential benefits of treatment if it were mandated? Integrating concepts from your research and the required readings, offer insights across different content domains as to why you have reached these conclusions. Explain how you used the APA Ethical Code of Conduct to guide your decisions. Evaluate the generalizability of your specific research findings to the situations presented and provide a rationale as to why this research supports your recommendations also read current technological and policy shifts
WEEK 3 DISCUSSION (2)
Effective clinical innovations and the dissemination of research findings are key elements in the growth and development of the psychology profession. There are numerous avenues that enable authors to publish and present their work. Poster presentations at conferences are effective methods for communicating research findings and providing opportunities to meet with other researchers and clinicians to discuss the research being presented. Thus, these types of conference presentations play a key role in the proliferation of research.
In this week’s discussion, you will be submitting your proposal for the Week Five Virtual Conference. You may utilize relevant assignments from previous courses in this program or suitable projects from your professional life. See the PSY699 Call for Student Poster (Links to an external site.) Presentations document for specific parameters and instructions on how to create your proposal. Following the guidelines presented in the document, create your proposal and attach it to your initial post in the discussion forum. Evaluate the impact participating in conference presentations may have on potential work settings and/or doctoral programs and comment on the following questions in your initial post.
How are conference presentations professionally relevant? What elements of the proposal process were most difficult for you, and why? What positive outcomes do you anticipate will come from this process, which may be applied to potential work settings and/or doctoral programs?
