Categories
Writers Solution

Potential criticisms of CSR from a utilitarian viewpoint

Session Long Project 3 Resources

Text:  A Succinct Theory of Business Ethics  (2023)  Text:  2.4 Utilitarianism: The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number  (2023) Text:  3.2 Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Entrepreneurship  (2023)  Text:  2.5 Trends in Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility  (2023)  Text:  Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics  (2023)  Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Explained With Examples  (2023)  Utilitarianism: Making Ethical Decision in Retail . (2023) 

Scholarly Readings:

A new insight on CEO characteristics and corporate social responsibility (CSR): A meta-analytical review  (2023) The Relationships Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Talent Management: An Analysis Through Human Resources Management  (2023) Download PDF

SLP Assignment

CSR Defined

Define Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (1/2 page). Research Required.

Utilitarian Ethics

Introduce utilitarian ethics and its core principle of maximizing overall happiness or utility (1 page). Research Required.

Arguments in Favor of CSR 

From a utilitarian perspective, discuss how CSR initiatives can lead to an overall increase in societal happiness or well-being. Examine the benefits to companies (1 page). Research Required.

Arguments Against CSR

Examine possible utilitarian objections to corporate social responsibility. Think about the ramifications if CSR efforts cause companies to experience short-term losses or if they favor some groups disproportionately at the expense of others (1 page). Investigation Necessitated.

Investigate the arguments for and against CSR using ChatGPT or another AI tool. You have to give credit to ChatGPT and cite it if you use one of its ideas.

The use of AI for generating content in Trident classrooms is not permitted unless it is specifically required by assignments in classes. Certain classes may allow AI to be used for brainstorming or to kickstart research. Turnitin detects AI-generated content. 

All research for this SLP should have been published within the last two years. 

No quotations are permitted in this paper. Since you are engaging in research, be sure to  cite  and  reference the sources in APA format . NOTE: Failure to use research with accompanying  citations  to support content will result in reduced scoring “Level 2-Developing” across the grading rubric. This is a professional paper, not a personal one based on feelings concerning Potential criticisms of CSR from a utilitarian viewpoint. 

SLP Assignment Expectations

Use the APA-formatted  ETH501 SLP 3 template  to create your submission.

· The template is set up in APA 7: double-spacing, font, margins, headings, page breaks, APA help links.

Your submission will include:

· A paper with APA citations (2- to 3-sentence overview, 3 ½ page body, 2- to 3-sentence conclusion)

· The reference list page in APA format WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.

Assignment status: Potential criticisms of CSR from a utilitarian viewpoint

Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)

CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

Order from Academic Writers Bay

Categories
Writers Solution

Please argue from a utilitarian and an ecofeminist perspective, what the right thing to do is in this case.

each question around 100-200 words would do –

1.Please argue from a utilitarian and an ecofeminist perspective, what the right thing to do is in this case. Specifically, should DDT be banned worldwide because of its long- range ecological damage or should economically challenged (poor) countries racked by malaria where people die from the disease everyday be allowed to continue to use this toxic chemical?

2.Describe the difference between the way an ecofeminist might climb a mountain vs how one with a patriarchal view might climb the same mountain. Next, explain how Leopold might answer this question of how to climb a mountain and explain the significance of Leopold’s perspective in terms of how we should make ethical decisions.

3.Please review the case of the Great Ape Declaration that we looked at and apply Martin Schonfeld’s (“The Green Kant” reading) interpretation of Immanuel Kant’s Categorial Imperative to determine what the right thing is to do.

4. describes the “boundary conditions” of Karen Warren’s ethics. Next, apply these to the case regarding the Delhi Sand Fly so that you argue first for and then against the protection of the fly.

5. describes the central components of Utilitarianism. Next, articulate some strengths and weaknesses of the theory. Finally, discuss how this system of ethics was expanded by Peter Singer to support the case against eating animals. 

6. Describe in detail Richard Watson’s critique of Deep Ecology. Next, offer Watson’s alternative approach. Finally, apply Watson’s approach to the practice of testing on animals to insure the safety of makeup products on humans and drugs that might one day be used to cure people (You can look these two examples up on the web if you’d like to see more information on animal testing.) Finally, explain how Albert Schweitzer’s ideas might apply here.

7.Explain the significance of the phrase: “You don’t live on the Earth, you are the Earth.” Next, discuss what ethical theory we have looked at that most closely aligns with this and why. Lastly, explain how this phrase and theory help us better understand the content of the short video you watched called “The History of Stuff”.

8.If one is going to eat other animals, (9,000,000,000 chickens alone per year in the US) does it matter how we’ve treated them before we kill and eat them? Discuss the ethical implications bringing Singer, Leopold or Albert Schweitzer into the conversation.

9.Climate change is happening. Discuss how we know this and discuss the ways that this is connected to any two of the ethical systems/theories that we have looked at. The end product should offer us a guide on how to act.

10. write about which draws an ethical line from the actions of the folks at the original Boston Tea Party, to Leopold stealing the traps of trappers trapping out of season, to the work of the Reykjavík Raiders, to the actions of ELF, to the warning offered to us by Greta Thunburg regarding climate change, and to environmental justice. From what ethical theory can one argue that each of the above actors is acting ethically. Now do the reverse. From what ethical theory can one argue that they are each acting unethically.

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT, Get Impressive Scores in Your Class

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliveryprimewritersbay.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at primewritersbay.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals. Please argue from a utilitarian and an ecofeminist perspective, what the right thing to do is in this case.

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNG Our Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays
Categories
Writers Solution

Deontological or utilitarian theory

Overview
In the Week One Assignment, you formulated a concrete ethical question, took a position on that topic, and identified a reason supporting and a reason opposing that position. In the Week Three Assignment, you discussed either deontological or utilitarian theory, applied that theory to the question, and raised a relevant objection.

By engaging with the course material, you now have had a chance to refine your thinking and broaden your understanding of the problem by approaching it from the perspective of multiple ethical theories.

In this paper, you will demonstrate what you have learned by writing an essay in which you

Present a revised formulation of the ethical question and introduction to the topic.
Explain the kind of reasoning you think is the best way to approach this question, and how that reasoning supports the position you think is strongest.
Raise an objection, and be able to respond to it.

Instructions
Write an essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper must be 1500 to 2000 words in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

The paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:

Introduction
Your first paragraph should begin with the topic question, suitably revised. It should be focused, concrete, and on a relevant moral problem. You should then introduce the topic in the way described by the Week One instructions, but reflecting the developed understanding and information you have gained about the topic and any necessary refinement of the scope.

Follow this with a thesis statement that states your position, and a brief description of the primary reason(s) supporting your position. (See the handout on thesis statements provided). Finally, provide a brief preview of the overall aim and procedure of your paper.


Explanation and Demonstration of Moral Reasoning
This section of the Final Paper will explain and demonstrate what you believe to be the best way of reasoning about the question you have chosen, and showing how that reasoning supports the position you have taken on the question. You might explain the principles, rules, values, virtues, conceptions of purposes and ends, and other general ideas that you find persuasive, and show how they support concrete judgments.

In the course of doing so, you must make reference to at least two of the approaches that we have examined in the course (such as deontological, utilitarian, or virtue-based), and utilize at least one resource off the provided list for each of the two approaches. One of these theories may be the theory you discussed in your Week Three Assignment, but your discussion here should be more refined.

For example, you might find the reasoning associated with Aristotelian virtue ethics to be the most compelling, and reference Aristotle in the process of showing how that reasoning supports a certain conclusion. In the course of this, you could contrast that with a utilitarian approach, referencing Mill for instance.


Objection and Response
After explaining the ethical reasoning that supports your position, you should raise an objection and respond to it. An objection articulates a plausible reason why someone might find the argument weak or problematic. You should explain how it brings out this weakness, and do so in a way that would be acceptable to someone who disagrees with your own argument. Then, provide the best response you can to the objection, showing how it does not undermine your position. Your response should not simply restate your original position or argument, but should say something new in support of it.


Conclusion
Provide a conclusion that sums up what you presented in the paper and offers some final reflections.

Resource Requirement
You must use at least four scholarly resources. Two of the resources must be drawn from the list of acceptable primary resources on each of the two theories you discuss. For example, if you discuss deontology and virtue ethics, you would need at least one resource under the “Deontology” list and at least one resource under the “Virtue Ethics” list. The other two may be from either the Required or Recommended Resources, or scholarly resources found in the Ashford University Library.

The textbook may be cited, but it does not count toward the resource requirement. If you cite the textbook, you will still need to cite at least four more sources that fulfill the requirements stated above.
If you need help with finding additional resources, or are unsure about whether a particular resource will count toward the requirement, please contact your instructor.
For sources to count toward the resources requirement, they must be cited within the text of your paper and on the reference page. 

……………………………………………………………………………………………………

SEE SOLUTION BELOW

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT https://capitalessaywriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

NO PLAGIARISM

Philosophy: Physician Assisted Suicide

(Course Instructor)

(University Affiliation)

(Student’s Name)

(Date)

Introduction

Should voluntary euthanasia be allowed among the terminally ill patients? There is still a huge disagreement and heated debates between the experts, political class and the general public regarding the issue of voluntary euthanasia. The practice of active voluntary euthanasia is legal in Belgium and the Netherlands, while the practice is legal in Oregon and Washington, in the United States of America (Lo, 2013). The proponents of voluntary euthanasia have often cited the need to help the patients to die peacefully, while those opposed to the issue cite sanctity of life (humans being different from other animals) among other moral grounds. Patients who suffer from terminal illnesses such as cancer, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, face a lot of pain and their families undergo a lot of psychological turmoil and financial stresses. Allowing voluntary euthanasia among terminally ill patients will help them to die peacefully, alleviating them of pain and their families of the psychological agony.

The proposition that the paper undertakes regarding the use of voluntary euthanasia must be done in consideration of the perspectives of the patient and those close to them. The paper therefore seeks to sufficiently provide the arguments for voluntary euthanasia, while relating the same to the perspective of the utilitarian and deontological theories to provide an explanation and moral reasoning. Moreover, the paper will also seek to evaluate an objection to the position taken, providing an explanation and response to the objection.

Explanation and Demonstration of Moral Reasoning             One of the principal moral reasons that


Assignment status
Solved by our Writing Team at 
CapitalEssayWriting.comCLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com